CHRONIC COMPLICATIONS OF DIABETES AND QUALITY OF LIFE.

The course of diabetes is marked by the development of chronic complications that, in addition to affecting health, also affect the quality of life of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes based on their chronic complications. The study, which was conducted from March 2019 until March 2020, included 382 diabetic patients, specific data from medical records, and the application of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief questionnaire. There were more men than women included in the study, with the majority of respondents belonging to the age group of 61 to 70 years. In the quality-of-life assessment, the mean value of physical functioning was 57.14 (42.86-71.43), psychological functioning was 66.67 (54.17-79.17), social functioning 66.67 (50.00-75.00), and environmental functioning was 68.75 (50.00-75.00). The domains of social functioning were lowest in patients with diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy, while the physical functioning domains were rated lowest in patients with diabetic nephropathy, diabetic foot ulcer, and multiple chronic complications. All domains were rated lowest by patients with multiple complications and highest by those without any complications. In conclusion, differences in the assessment of quality of life of diabetic patients depend on the type of chronic complication.

Relax, it's just laparoscopy! A prospective randomized trial on heart rate variability of the surgeon in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery might be beneficial for the patient, but it imposes increased physical and mental strain on the surgeon. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery addresses some of the laparoscopic drawbacks and may potentially reduce mental strain. This could reduce the risk of surgeon's fatigue, mishaps and strain-induced illnesses, which may eventually improve the safety of laparoscopic surgical procedures. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, a randomized study was performed, comparing both heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) of the surgeon as a measure of total and mental strain, respectively, during conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Both heart rate and HRV (the low-frequency band/high-frequency band ratio) were significantly decreased when using robotic assistance. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the use of the daVinci® Surgical System leads to less physical and mental strain of the surgeon during surgery. However, assessing mental strain by means of HRV is cumbersome since there is no clear cutoff point or scale for maximum tolerated strain levels and its related effects on surgeon's health.

Epidural analgesia for cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: A combination of general anaesthesia (GA) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) may have a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes by reducing the risk of perioperative complications after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to determine the impact of perioperative epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery on perioperative mortality and cardiac, pulmonary or neurological morbidity. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the risk of adverse events and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia with and without epidural analgesia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 12) in The Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (PubMed) (1966 to November 2012); EMBASE (1989 to November 2012); CINHAL (1982 to November 2012) and the Science Citation Index (1988 to November 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with either GA alone or GA in combination with TEA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All publications found during the search were manually and independently reviewed by the two authors. We identified 5035 titles, of which 4990 studies did not satisfy the selection criteria or were duplicate publications, that were retrieved from the five different databases. We performed a full review on 45 studies, of which 31 publications met all inclusion criteria. These 31 publications reported on a total of 3047 patients, 1578 patients with GA and 1469 patients with GA plus TEA. MAIN RESULTS: Through our search (November 2012) we have identified 5035 titles, of which 31 publications met our inclusion criteria and reported on a total of 3047 patients. Compared with GA alone, the pooled risk ratio (RR) for patients receiving GA with TEA showed an odds ratio (OR) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.33 to 2.13, 31 studies) for mortality; 0.76 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.19, 17 studies) for myocardial infarction; and 0.50 (95% CI 0.21 to 1.18, 10 studies) for stroke. The relative risks (RR) for respiratory complications and supraventricular arrhythmias were 0.68 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.86, 14 studies) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.86, 15 studies) respectively. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of studies, identified to 2010, showed that the use of TEA in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery may reduce the risk of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias and respiratory complications. There were no effects of TEA with GA on the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction or neurological complications compared with GA alone.

Meta-analysis of thoracic epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia for cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: A combination of general anesthesia (GA) with thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) may have a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery. We have performed a meta-analysis to compare mortality and cardiac, respiratory, and neurologic complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with GA alone or a combination of GA with TEA. METHODS: Randomized studies comparing outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with either GA alone or GA in combination with TEA were retrieved from PubMed, Science Citation index, EMBASE, CINHAL, and Central Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 1,390 studies; 28 studies that included 2,731 patients met the selection criteria. Compared with GA alone, the combined risk ratio for patients receiving GA with TEA was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.40-1.64) for mortality, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.52-1.24) for myocardial infarction, and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.24-1.46) for stroke. The risk ratios for the respiratory complications and supraventricular arrhythmias were 0.53 (95% CI: 0.40-0.69) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50-0.93), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that the use of TEA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery reduces the risk of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias and respiratory complications. The sparsity of events precludes conclusions about mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke, but the estimates suggest a reduced risk after TEA. The risk of side effects of TEA, including epidural hematoma, could not be assessed with the current dataset, and therefore TEA should be used with caution until its benefit-harm profile is further elucidated.

Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The addition of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) to general anesthesia (GA) during cardiac surgery may have a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes. TEA in cardiac surgery, however, is controversial because the insertion of an epidural catheter in patients requiring full heparinization for cardiopulmonary bypass may lead to an epidural hematoma. The clinical effects of fast-track GA plus TEA were compared with those of with fast-track GA alone. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 654 elective cardiac surgical patients who were randomly assigned to combined GA and TEA versus GA alone. Follow-up was at 30 days and 1 yr after surgery. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival free from myocardial infarction, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and stroke. RESULTS: Thirty-day survival free from myocardial infarction, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and stroke was 85.2% in the TEA group and 89.7% in the GA group (P = 0.23). At 1 yr follow-up, survival free from myocardial infarction, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and stroke was 84.6% in the TEA group and 87.2% in the GA group (P = 0.42). Postoperative pain scores were low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study was unable to demonstrate a clinically relevant benefit of TEA on the frequency of major complications after elective cardiac surgery, compared with fast-track cardiac anesthesia without epidural anesthesia. Given the potentially devastating complications of an epidural hematoma after insertion of an epidural catheter, it is questionable whether this procedure should be applied routinely in cardiac surgical patients who require full heparinization.

Fast-track anesthesia and cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 7989 patients.

BACKGROUND: Fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) has been widely implemented but its safety has not been evaluated in sufficiently powered studies. METHODS: We compared outcomes of patients undergoing FTCA with a historical control group undergoing conventional high-dose opioid cardiac anesthesia (CCA). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence of in-hospital acute myocardial infarction, renal failure, and stroke. We also compared duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospitalization in the intensive care unit and postoperative ward. RESULTS: The CCA group comprised 4020 patients and the FTCA Group 3969 patients. The patients in the FTCA group were slightly older, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to undergo valve surgery than the CCA group. The incidence of in-hospital mortality was 1.9% in the CCA group and 2.3% in the FTCA group. Compared with the CCA group, the crude odds ratio for mortality in the FTCA group was 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.88-1.64, P = 0.25) and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.32, P = 0.66). The incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke in the CCA and FTCA groups were 5.2% and 5.5% (P = 0.61), and 0.9% and 1.3%, (P = 0.06), respectively, whereas the incidence of acute renal failure was similar in both groups (0.8%, P = 0.84). The duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the FTCA patients compared with the CCA group (6 vs 12 h, P < or = 0.001), but their median intensive care stay was 1 h longer (23 vs 22 h, P < or = 0.001). Although the median duration of hospitalization was 6.0 days in both groups, the 90th percentile of the hospitalization time was 13 days in the CCA group and 18 days in the FTCA group (P < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data from 7989 cardiac surgical patients showed no evidence of an increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing FTCA.