Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 19(6): 718-726, jun. 2017. tab, graf, ilus
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-162829

RESUMEN

Purpose. Biomarkers, such as mutant RAS, predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in only a proportion of patients, and hence, other predictive biomarkers are needed. The aims were to identify candidate genes upregulated in colorectal cancer cell lines resistant to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment, to knockdown (KD) these genes in the resistant cell lines to determine if sensitivity to anti-EGFR antibody was restored, and finally to perform a pilot correlative study of EGR1 expression and outcomes in a cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients given cetuximab therapy. Methods. Comparative expression array analysis of resistant cell lines (SW48, COLO-320DM, and SNU-C1) vs sensitive cell lines (LIM1215, CaCo2, and SW948) was performed. The highest up-regulated gene in each resistant cell line was knocked down (KD) using RNA interference, and effect on proliferation was assessed with and without anti-EGFR treatment. Expression of the candidate genes in patients’ tumours treated with cetuximab was assessed by immunohistochemistry; survival analyses were performed comparing high vs low expression. Results. Genes significantly upregulated in resistant cell lines were EGR1 (early growth response protein 1), HBEGF (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor), and AKT3 (AKT serine/threonine kinase 3). KD of each gene resulted in the respective cells being more sensitive to anti-EGFR treatment, suggesting that the resistant phenotype was reversed. In the pilot study of mCRC patients treated with cetuximab, both median PFS (1.38 months vs 6.79 months; HR 2.77 95% CI 1.2-19.4) and median OS (2.59 months vs 9.82 months; HR 3.0 95% CI 1.3-23.2) were significantly worse for those patients with high EGR1 expression. Conclusion. High EGR1 expression may be a candidate biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy (AU)


No disponible


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Técnicas In Vitro , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Expresión Génica , Biomarcadores , Genes erbB-1 , Proteínas Oncogénicas v-erbB/análisis , ARN/análisis , Inmunohistoquímica , Línea Celular
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 19(6): 718-726, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28005260

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Biomarkers, such as mutant RAS, predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in only a proportion of patients, and hence, other predictive biomarkers are needed. The aims were to identify candidate genes upregulated in colorectal cancer cell lines resistant to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment, to knockdown (KD) these genes in the resistant cell lines to determine if sensitivity to anti-EGFR antibody was restored, and finally to perform a pilot correlative study of EGR1 expression and outcomes in a cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients given cetuximab therapy. METHODS: Comparative expression array analysis of resistant cell lines (SW48, COLO-320DM, and SNU-C1) vs sensitive cell lines (LIM1215, CaCo2, and SW948) was performed. The highest up-regulated gene in each resistant cell line was knocked down (KD) using RNA interference, and effect on proliferation was assessed with and without anti-EGFR treatment. Expression of the candidate genes in patients' tumours treated with cetuximab was assessed by immunohistochemistry; survival analyses were performed comparing high vs low expression. RESULTS: Genes significantly upregulated in resistant cell lines were EGR1 (early growth response protein 1), HBEGF (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor), and AKT3 (AKT serine/threonine kinase 3). KD of each gene resulted in the respective cells being more sensitive to anti-EGFR treatment, suggesting that the resistant phenotype was reversed. In the pilot study of mCRC patients treated with cetuximab, both median PFS (1.38 months vs 6.79 months; HR 2.77 95% CI 1.2-19.4) and median OS (2.59 months vs 9.82 months; HR 3.0 95% CI 1.3-23.2) were significantly worse for those patients with high EGR1 expression. CONCLUSION: High EGR1 expression may be a candidate biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Proteína 1 de la Respuesta de Crecimiento Precoz/biosíntesis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Proyectos Piloto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...