Assessing spirometry competence through certification in community-based healthcare settings in Australia and New Zealand: A position paper of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science.

Spirometry has been established as an essential test for diagnosing and monitoring respiratory disease, particularly asthma and COPD, as well as in occupational health surveillance. In Australia and New Zealand, there is currently no pathway for spirometry operators in community-based healthcare settings to demonstrate spirometry competence. The Australia and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science (ANZSRS) has identified a need for developing a pathway for operators working in community-based practices in Australia and New Zealand to demonstrate spirometry competence and certification. Spirometry certification provides evidence to patients, clients, employers and organizations that an individual has participated in an assessment process that qualifies them to perform spirometry to current international spirometry standards set out by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS). This document describes a competence assessment pathway that incorporates a portfolio and practical assessment. The completion of this pathway and the award of certification confer an individual is competent to perform spirometry for 3 years, after which re-certification is required. The adoption of this competency assessment and certification process by specialist organizations, and the commitment of operators performing spirometry to undergo this process, will enhance spirometry quality and practice in community-based healthcare settings.

A multicentre prospective observational study comparing arterial blood gas values to those obtained by pulse oximeters used in adult patients attending Australian and New Zealand hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry is widely used in the clinical setting. The purpose of this validation study was to investigate the level of agreement between oxygen saturations measured by pulse oximeter (SpO2) and arterial blood gas (SaO2) in a range of oximeters in clinical use in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: Paired SpO2 and SaO2 measurements were collected from 400 patients in one Australian and two New Zealand hospitals. The ages of the patients ranged from 18 to 95 years. Bias and limits of agreement were estimated. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting hypoxaemia, defined as SaO2 < 90%, were also estimated. RESULTS: The majority of participants were recruited from the Outpatient, Ward or High Dependency Unit setting. Bias, oximeter-measured minus arterial blood gas-measured oxygen saturation, was - 1.2%, with limits of agreement - 4.4 to 2.0%. SpO2 was at least 4% lower than SaO2 for 10 (2.5%) of the participants and SpO2 was at least 4% higher than the SaO2 in 3 (0.8%) of the participants. None of the participants with a SpO2 ≥ 92% were hypoxaemic, defined as SaO2 < 90%. There were no clinically significant differences in oximetry accuracy in relation to clinical characteristics or oximeter brand. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of the participants, pulse oximetry was an accurate method to assess SaO2 and had good performance in detecting hypoxaemia. However, in a small proportion of participants, differences between SaO2 and SpO2 could have clinical relevance in terms of patient monitoring and management. A SpO2 ≥ 92% indicates that hypoxaemia, defined as a SaO2 < 90%, is not present. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614001257651). Date of registration: 2/12/2014.

Lung Function of Adults Born at Very Low Birth Weight.

BACKGROUND: Much remains unknown about the consequences of very low birth weight (VLBW) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) on adult lungs. We hypothesized that VLBW adults would have impaired lung function compared with controls, and those with a history of BPD would have worse lung function than those without. METHODS: At age 26 to 30 years, 226 VLBW survivors of the New Zealand VLBW cohort and 100 term controls born in 1986 underwent lung function tests including spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and single-breath nitrogen washout (SBN2). RESULTS: An obstructive spirometry pattern was identified in 35% VLBW subjects versus 14% controls, with the majority showing mild obstruction. Compared with controls, VLBW survivors demonstrated significantly lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (FEV1/FVC), forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of FVC and higher residual volume (RV), RV/total lung capacity (TLC) ratio (RV/TLC), decreased diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and increased phase III slope for SBN2. The differences persisted after adjustment for sex and smoking status. Within the VLBW group, subjects with BPD showed significant reduction in FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of FVC, and increase in RV, RV/TLC, and phase III slope for SBN2, versus subjects without. The differences remained after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Adult VLBW survivors showed a higher incidence of airflow obstruction, gas trapping, reduced gas exchange, and increased ventilatory inhomogeneity versus controls. The findings suggest pulmonary effects due to VLBW persist into adulthood, and BPD is a further insult on small airway function.

Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement.

Background: Spirometry is the most common pulmonary function test. It is widely used in the assessment of lung function to provide objective information used in the diagnosis of lung diseases and monitoring lung health. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society jointly adopted technical standards for conducting spirometry. Improvements in instrumentation and computational capabilities, together with new research studies and enhanced quality assurance approaches, have led to the need to update the 2005 technical standards for spirometry to take full advantage of current technical capabilities.Methods: This spirometry technical standards document was developed by an international joint task force, appointed by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, with expertise in conducting and analyzing pulmonary function tests, laboratory quality assurance, and developing international standards. A comprehensive review of published evidence was performed. A patient survey was developed to capture patients' experiences.Results: Revisions to the 2005 technical standards for spirometry were made, including the addition of factors that were not previously considered. Evidence to support the revisions was cited when applicable. The experience and expertise of task force members were used to develop recommended best practices.Conclusions: Standards and consensus recommendations are presented for manufacturers, clinicians, operators, and researchers with the aims of increasing the accuracy, precision, and quality of spirometric measurements and improving the patient experience. A comprehensive guide to aid in the implementation of these standards was developed as an online supplement.

Spirometry training courses: Content, delivery and assessment - a position statement from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science.

Spirometry training courses are provided by health services and training organizations to enable widespread use of spirometry testing for patient care or for monitoring health. The primary outcome of spirometry training courses should be to enable participants to perform spirometry to international best practice, including testing of subjects, quality assurance and interpretation of results. Where valid results are not achieved or quality assurance programmes identify errors in devices, participants need to be able to adequately manage these issues in accordance with best practice. It is important that potential participants are confident in the integrity of the course they attend and that the course meets their expectations in terms of training. This position statement lists the content that the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science (ANZSRS) has identified as required in a spirometry training course to adequately meet the primary outcomes mentioned above. The content requirements outlined in this position statement are based on the current international spirometry standards set out by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. Furthermore, recommendations around course delivery for theoretical and practical elements of spirometry testing and post-course assessment are outlined in this statement.

Bronchodilator Response in FVC Is Larger and More Relevant Than in FEV1 in Severe Airflow Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations on interpreting tests of bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) are conflicting. We investigated the dependence of BDR criteria on sex, age, height, ethnicity, and severity of respiratory impairment. METHODS: BDR test data were available from clinical patients in the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the United States (n = 15,278; female subjects, 51.7%) and from surveys in Canada, Norway, and five Latin-American countries (n = 16,250; female subjects, 54.7%). BDR calculated according to FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC was expressed as absolute change, a percentage of the baseline level (% baseline), a percentage of the predicted value (% predicted), and z score. RESULTS: Change (Δ) in FEV1 and FVC, in milliliters, was unrelated to the baseline value but was biased toward age, height, sex, and level of airways obstruction; ΔFEV1 was significantly lower in African Americans. In 1,106 subjects with low FEV1 (200-1,621 mL) the FEV1 increased by 12% to 44.7% relative to baseline but < 200 mL. Expressing BDR as a percentage of the predicted value or as a z score attenuated the bias and made the 200-mL criterion redundant, but reduced positive responses by half. ΔFEV1 % baseline increased with the level of airflow obstruction but decreased with severe obstruction when expressed as z scores or % predicted; ΔFVC, however expressed, increased with the level of airflow obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Expressing FEV1 responsiveness as % baseline spuriously suggests that responsiveness increases with the severity of respiratory impairment. Expressing change in FEV1 or FVC as % predicted or as z scores eliminates this artifact and renders the required 200-mL minimum increase redundant. In severe airways obstruction ΔFVC should be critically evaluated as an index of clinically important relief of hyperinflation, with implications for bronchodilator drug trials.

Reference values for spirometry and their use in test interpretation: A Position Statement from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science.

Traditionally, spirometry testing tended to be confined to the realm of hospital-based laboratories but is now performed in a variety of health care settings. Regardless of the setting in which the test is conducted, the fundamental basis of spirometry is that the test is both performed and interpreted according to the international standards. The purpose of this Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science (ANZSRS) statement is to provide the background and recommendations for the interpretation of spirometry results in clinical practice. This includes the benchmarking of an individual's results to population reference data, as well as providing the platform for a statistically and conceptually based approach to the interpretation of spirometry results. Given the many limitations of older reference equations, it is imperative that the most up-to-date and relevant reference equations are used for test interpretation. Given this, the ANZSRS recommends the adoption of the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012 spirometry reference values throughout Australia and New Zealand. The ANZSRS also recommends that interpretation of spirometry results is based on the lower limit of normal from the reference values and the use of Z-scores where available.

The New Zealand 1986 very low birth weight cohort as young adults: mapping the road ahead.

BACKGROUND: Very low birth weight (less than 1500 g) is associated with increased morbidity and costs of health care in childhood. Emerging evidence suggests these infants face a range of health and social problems as young adults. We studied all New Zealand very low birth weight infants born in 1986 (when 58% were exposed to antenatal corticosteroids) in infancy, with later follow-up at 7 to 8 years and 23 to 24 years. We now aim to assess the cohort at 26-28 years compared with controls. METHODS/DESIGN: The case sample will comprise a minimum of 250 members of the 1986 New Zealand national very low birth weight cohort (77% of survivors). Outcomes will be compared with a control group of 100 young adults born at term in 1986. Following written informed consent, participants will travel to Christchurch for 2 days of assessments undertaken by experienced staff. Medical assessments include growth measures, vision, respiratory function, blood pressure and echocardiogram, renal function, dental examination and blood tests. Cognitive and neuropsychological functioning will be assessed with standard tests, and mental health and social functioning by participant interview. A telephone interview will be conducted with a parent or significant other person nominated by the respondent to gain a further perspective on the young person's health and functioning. All those born at less than 28 weeks' gestation, plus a random subset of the cohort to a total of 150 cases and 50 controls, will be offered cranial magnetic-resonance imaging. Statistical analysis will examine comparison with controls and long-term trajectories for the very low birth weight cohort. DISCUSSION: The research will provide crucial New Zealand data on the young adult outcomes for very low birth weight infants and address gaps in the international literature, particularly regarding cardiovascular, respiratory, visual and neurocognitive outcomes. These data will inform future neonatal care, provide evidence-based guidelines for care of preterm graduates transitioning to adult care, and help shape health education and social policies for this high risk group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000995875 . Registered 1 October 2012.

The development of a community-based spirometry service in the Canterbury region of New Zealand: observations on new service delivery.

In 2008, as part of the changes to develop integrated health care services in the Canterbury region of New Zealand, the local health board in collaboration with general practitioners, respiratory specialists and scientists introduced a programme for general practices to provide laboratory-quality spirometry in the community. The service adhered to the 2005 ATS/ERS international spirometry standards. The spirometry service was provided by trained practice nurses and community respiratory nurses, and was monitored and quality assured by certified respiratory scientists in the Respiratory Physiology Laboratory, Christchurch Hospital and CISO (Canterbury Initiative Services Organisation). These two organisations were responsible for organising training seminars and refresher courses on spirometry technique and interpretation of results. A total of 10 practices have now become approved spirometry providers, with the number of tests carried out in the primary care setting increasing gradually. Consistently high-quality spirometry tests have been obtained and are now presented on a centrally available results database for all hospital and community clinicians to review. Although the service has proved to be more convenient for patients, the tests have not been delivered as quickly as those carried out by the Respiratory Physiology Laboratory. However, the time scales for testing achieved by the community service is considered suitable for investigation of chronic disease. The success of the service has been dependent on several key factors including hospital and clinical support and a centralised quality assurance programme, a comprehensive training schedule and online clinical guidance and close integration between primary and secondary care clinicians.

Measurement of oxygen concentration delivered via nasal cannulae by tracheal sampling.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Oxygen is used in many clinical scenarios, however the variable performance of nasal cannulae makes determining the precise fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2 ) difficult. We developed a novel method for measurement of the tracheal FiO2 using a catheter placed via bronchoscopy. We investigate the effects of oxygen delivery, respiratory rate, mouth position and estimated minute ventilation (VE ) on the FiO2 delivered by nasal cannulae. METHODS: The catheter was placed in 20 subjects. Tracheal gas concentrations were analysed during six 5-min treatments controlling for oxygen delivery rate, respiratory rate and mouth position. Ventilation was monitored with respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP). The FiO2 delivered by nasal cannulae was compared between treatments, and we investigated the relationships among the FiO2 , alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PA O2 ) and VE . RESULTS: The FiO2 increased by 0.038/L/min of oxygen. Respiratory rate had a significant effect on the FiO2 . A normal respiratory rate of 15 breaths/min and oxygen supplementation via nasal cannula at 2 L/min resulted in an FiO2 of 0.296; however, FiO2 decreased by 0.012 at 20 breaths/min and 0.004 at 10 breaths/min. The mean FiO2 decreased by 0.024 with the mouth open. The FiO2 and PA O2 were observed to decrease with increasing VE . CONCLUSIONS: Continuous measurement of the FiO2 using a transtracheal catheter provides detailed insight into inspiratory changes of the FiO2 delivered by nasal cannulae. Our study confirms that respiratory rate, VE and mouth position significantly influence the inspired oxygen concentration. These parameters should be accounted for when prescribing oxygen.

Effect of salbutamol on the measurement of single-breath diffusing capacity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The bronchodilation and cardiovascular effects of bronchodilators may alter alveolar ventilation and perfusion distribution, which could subsequently affect single-breath diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DL ,CO) measurements. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of salbutamol on DL ,CO in subjects with and without airway obstruction and reversibility. METHODS: Sixty subjects were investigated with 20 in each of the three groups: normal spirometry; irreversible obstruction; and reversible obstruction. Baseline spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, DL ,CO, pulse rate and arterial blood gases were measured. The same testing sequence was repeated after administration of a placebo inhaler and again after 400 µg salbutamol. RESULTS: Salbutamol did not affect the mean alveolar volume (VA ) (P > 0.05), transfer coefficient for carbon monoxide (DL ,CO/VA , KCO) (P > 0.05) or DL ,CO (P > 0.05) in the normal and irreversible obstruction groups. In the reversible obstruction group, salbutamol caused an increase in the mean VA compared with placebo (P < 0.001). However, the mean KCO was reduced (P < 0.001). The mean change in DL ,CO was not significant (P > 0.05). A considerable reduction in DL ,CO was found after salbutamol in four subjects in the reversible group as a result of a minor increase in VA and substantial decrease in KCO. No statistical difference in pulse rate or arterial blood gases values was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Salbutamol had no effect on the mean DL ,CO in any group. However, salbutamol may considerably reduce DL ,CO in some individuals with reversibility secondary to its effects on VA and KCO.

Quantification of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in breath using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry--HCN is not a biomarker of Pseudomonas in chronic suppurative lung disease.

Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in exhaled breath has been proposed as a biomarker for airway inflammation, and also a marker of the presence in the airways of specific organisms, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However the production of HCN by salivary peroxidase in the oral cavity increases orally exhaled concentrations, and may not reflect the condition of the lower airways. Using SIFT-MS we aimed to determine an appropriate single-exhalation breathing maneuver which avoids the interference of HCN produced in the oral cavity. We have established that the SIFT-MS Voice200™ is suitable for the online measurement of HCN in exhaled breath. In healthy volunteers a significantly higher end exhaled HCN concentration was measured in oral exhalations compared to nasal exhalations (mean ± SD) 4.5 ± 0.6 ppb versus 2.4 ± 0.3 ppb, p < 0.01. For the accurate and reproducible quantification of end exhaled HCN in breath a nasal inhalation to full vital capacity and nasal exhalation at controlled flow is recommended. This technique was subsequently used to measure exhaled HCN in a group of patients with chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD) and known microbiological colonization status to determine utility of HCN measurement to detect P. aeruginosa. Median nasal end exhaled HCN concentrations were higher in patients with CSLD (3.7 ppb) than normal subjects (2.0 ppb). However no differences between exhaled HCN concentrations of subjects colonized with P. aeruginosa and other organisms were identified, indicating that breath HCN is not a suitable biomarker of P. aeruginosa colonization.

Hypoxemia in healthy subjects at moderate altitude.

BACKGROUND: Healthy individuals are known to have significantly reduced oxygen saturations at rest when acutely exposed to moderate altitudes, such as during commercial flight. There is a paucity of data on the response of healthy individuals to exercise at these altitudes. The aim of this study was to establish the normal response to exercise during acute, moderate altitude exposure with regard to oxygen saturations. Secondary aims were to establish if this response can be predicted from pulmonary function measurements at sea level. METHODS: At sea level, 20 subjects performed pulmonary function tests, including submaximal steady state exercise, followed by replication of submaximal steady state exercise during acute altitude exposure at 6844 ft (2086 m). RESULTS: Mean resting oxygen saturation at 6844 ft (2086 m) was 96%, a significant reduction from the sea level value of 99%. Mean nadir oxygen saturation during steady state exercise at moderate altitude was 89%. There was a weak negative correlation between aerobic capacity and end exercise oxygen saturation at altitude. Modified BORG dyspnea scores were unchanged at rest at 6844 ft (2086 m) and higher post-exercise at 6844 ft (2086 m) when compared to sea level, although absolute values were low. DISCUSSION: Healthy individuals desaturate at rest and upon exercise during acute altitude exposure at 6844 ft (2086 m). A quarter of participants experienced SpO2 < or = 85% upon exercise at altitude, although this had no correlation with dyspnea scores or baseline pulmonary function measurements. The weak negative correlation between aerobic capacity and end exercise oxygen saturation is unexplained and merits further research.

The Global Lung Initiative 2012 reference values reflect contemporary Australasian spirometry.

We aimed to ascertain the fit of the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Initiative 2012 reference ranges to contemporary Australasian spirometric data. Z-scores for spirometry from Caucasian subjects aged 4-80 years were calculated. The mean (SD) Z-scores were 0.23 (1.00) for forced expirtory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), 0.23 (1.00) for forced vital capacity (FVC), -0.03 (0.87) for FEV(1)/FVC and 0.07 (0.95) for forced expiratory flows between 25% and 75% of FVC. These results support the use of the Global Lung Initiative 2012 reference ranges to interpret spirometry in Caucasian Australasians.

Measurement of breath acetone concentrations by selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry in type 2 diabetes.

Selected ion flow tube-mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) can measure volatile compounds in breath on-line in real time and has the potential to provide accurate breath tests for a number of inflammatory, infectious and metabolic diseases, including diabetes. Breath concentrations of acetone in type 2 diabetic subjects undertaking a long-term dietary modification programme were studied. Acetone concentrations in the breath of 38 subjects with type 2 diabetes were determined by SIFT-MS. Anthropomorphic measurements, dietary intake and medication use were recorded. Blood was analysed for beta hydroxybutyrate (a ketone body), HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin) and glucose using point-of-care capillary (fingerprick) testing. All subjects were able to undertake breath manoeuvres suitable for analysis. Breath acetone varied between 160 and 862 ppb (median 337 ppb) and was significantly higher in men (median 480 ppb versus 296 ppb, p = 0.01). In this cross-sectional study, no association was observed between breath acetone and either dietary macronutrients or point-of-care capillary blood tests. Breath analysis by SIFT-MS offers a rapid, reproducible and easily performed measurement of acetone concentration in ambulatory patients with type 2 diabetes. The high inter-individual variability in breath acetone concentration may limit its usefulness in cross-sectional studies. Breath acetone may nevertheless be useful for monitoring metabolic changes in longitudinal metabolic studies, in a variety of clinical and research settings.

The all-age spirometry reference ranges reflect contemporary Australasian spirometry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Advances in statistical modelling have allowed the creation of smoothly changing spirometry reference ranges that apply across a wide age range and better define the lower limit of normal. The objective of this study was to assess the agreement of the Stanojevic 2009 all-age reference ranges to contemporary lung function data to verify the appropriateness of this reference for clinical use in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: Spirometry data from healthy Caucasians measured between 2000-2009 in Australia and New Zealand were collected. Z-scores were calculated for the standard spirometry outcomes based on the all-age reference ranges. RESULTS: Spirometry from 2066 subjects aged 4-80 years (55% male) from 14 centres were eligible. Statistically, the collated contemporary dataset differed from the all-age reference ranges, but these differences were relatively small and clinically irrelevant representing differences of approximately 3% predicted. Significant differences were also observed between some centres and equipment, potentially indicating varying influence of equipment or subject selection. CONCLUSIONS: Spirometry from contemporary Australasian healthy subjects fits the all-age reference ranges well. While the current study supports the use of the all-age reference ranges, the between-centre differences highlight the need for spirometry to be used in conjunction with other clinical findings.