Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410824, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739389

RESUMEN

Importance: Acute kidney injury (AKI) complicates 20% to 25% of hospital admissions and is associated with long-term mortality, especially from cardiovascular disease. Lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) following AKI may be associated with lower mortality, but potentially at the cost of higher short-term complications. Objective: To determine associations of SBP with mortality and hospital readmissions following AKI, and to determine whether time from discharge affects these associations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of adults with AKI during a hospitalization in Veteran Healthcare Association (VHA) hospitals was conducted between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients with 1 year or less of data within the VA system prior to admission, severe or end-stage liver disease, stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, metastatic cancer, and no blood pressure values within 30 days of discharge were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from May 2022 to February 2024. Exposure: SBP was treated as time-dependent (categorized as <120 mm Hg, 120-129 mm Hg, 130-139 mm Hg, 140-149 mm Hg, 150-159 mm Hg, and ≥160 mm Hg [comparator]). Time spent in each SBP category was accumulated over time and represented in 30-day increments. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were time to mortality and time to all-cause hospital readmission. Cox proportional hazards regression was adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. To evaluate associations over time, hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated at 60 days, 90 days, 120 days, 180 days, 270 days, and 365 days from discharge. Results: Of 237 409 admissions with AKI, 80 960 (57 242 aged 65 years or older [70.7%]; 77 965 male [96.3%] and 2995 female [3.7%]) were included. The cohort had high rates of diabetes (16 060 patients [20.0%]), congestive heart failure (22 516 patients [28.1%]), and chronic lung disease (27 682 patients [34.2%]), and 1-year mortality was 15.9% (12 876 patients). Overall, patients with SBP between 130 and 139 mm Hg had the most favorable risk level for mortality and readmission. There were clear, time-dependent mediations on associations in all groups. Compared with patients with SBP of 160 mm Hg or greater, the risk of mortality for patients with SBP between 130 and 139 mm Hg decreased between 60 days (adjusted HR, 1.20; 99% CI, 1.00-1.44) and 365 days (adjusted HR, 0.58; 99% CI, 0.45-0.76). SBP less than 120 mm Hg was associated with increased risk of mortality at all time points. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of post-AKI patients, there were important time-dependent mediations of the association of blood pressure with mortality and readmission. These findings may inform timing of post-AKI blood pressure treatment.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Presión Sanguínea , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
South Med J ; 116(10): 819-825, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788816

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Annual program evaluations are important activities of all graduate medical education programs. Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provides general guidelines, there is substantial scope for educational innovation. Strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results (SOAR) is a strengths-based framework for strategic planning. Because SOAR emphasizes positivity and engagement, it is an appealing framework for evaluating graduate medical education programs. Our objective was to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of SOAR in a program evaluation committee of a fellowship program to generate strategic initiatives. METHODS: The authors used the four steps of SOAR within the program evaluation committee in 2022. Interviewers collected positive stories to understand program strengths. Then, rapid ideation was used to translate strengths into opportunities. These opportunities were condensed and refined for fellows to assess how well they align with aspirations. The ones that aligned best with aspirations were prioritized for implementation. Results were monitored through a scorecard based on specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals every month. RESULTS: Of 15 divisional members, 11 participated (73.3%). Five major strengths were identified: supportive environment, variety of cases, scheduling flexibility, integration with larger networks, and multidisciplinary collaboration. These 5 yielded 15 opportunities, which were refined and condensed to 9. Four were selected for implementation: scholarly works accountability group, hybrid-flex curriculum, fellowship weekly huddles, and structured electives. Scorecards have shown successful implementation during a 4-month period. CONCLUSIONS: SOAR is an innovative and feasible approach to program evaluation that uses trainee engagement to translate and synergize existing program strengths into actionable program improvement.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Becas , Acreditación
3.
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 5(11): 600-608, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37724836

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Design thinking is a creative problem-solving process used to better understand users' needs and experiences so that a product or service can be improved. Its emphasis on empathy, iterative prototyping, and participatory collaboration make it an ideal methodology for innovation in medical education. We apply this framework to the virtual rheumatology fellowship interview process so that interviews can become more applicant centered. METHODS: This educational quality improvement project uses a design-thinking framework to identify opportunities and challenges for rheumatology fellowship applicants. The investigators use the 5-step process (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) and incorporate rapid qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews to innovate the interview experience. The iterative and collaborative nature of this process has empowered participants to codesign an applicant-centered interview experience. RESULTS: Interviews with fellowship applicants (n = 9), fellow physicians (n = 4), and faculty members (n = 3) identified three major dynamics of the interview process: (1) Is it a safe environment to ask questions? (2) How do I exchange information effectively? and (3) How do I fit all these data into the bigger picture? Creative brainstorming techniques at a series of three workshops yielded four prototypes emphasizing customization, hybridization, facilitation, and preparation. A finalized applicant-centered interview template was devised in preparation for the 2023-2024 application season. CONCLUSION: Design thinking has yielded insights into three important dynamics that drive applicant experiences. These insights allow for a redesign of processes so that virtual interviews can be more applicant centered. This framework allows for further iterations and modifications as the needs of applicants and programs evolve over time.

4.
J Hypertens ; 41(6): 995-1002, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37071434

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is the most common risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several guidelines have lowered diagnostic blood pressure (BP) thresholds and treatment targets for hypertension. We evaluated the impact of the more stringent guidelines among Veterans, a population at high risk of CVD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Veterans with at least two office BP measurements between January 2016 and December 2017. Prevalent hypertension was defined as diagnostic codes related to hypertension, prescribed antihypertensive drugs, or office BP values according to the BP cutoffs at least 140/90 mmHg (Joint National Committee 7 [JNC 7]), at least 130/80 mmHg [American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)], or the 2020 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) guideline (BP ≥130/90 mmHg). Uncontrolled BP was defined per the VHA guideline as mean SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypertension increased from 71% for BP at least 140/90 to 81% for BP at least 130/90 mmHg and further to 87% for BP at least 130/80 mmHg. Among Veterans with known hypertension ( n  = 2 768 826), a majority [ n  = 1 818 951 (66%)] were considered to have uncontrolled BP per the VHA guideline. Lowering the treatment targets for SBP and DBP significantly increased the number of Veterans who would require initiation of or intensification of pharmacotherapy. The majority of Veterans with uncontrolled BP and at least one CVD risk factor remained uncontrolled after 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Lowering the BP diagnostic and treatment cutoffs increases the burden on healthcare systems significantly. Targeted interventions are needed to achieve the BP treatment goals.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hipertensión , Hipotensión , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salud de los Veteranos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología
5.
South Med J ; 115(5): 322-327, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35504614

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Legislation dictating federal healthcare policy is drafted largely by members of the US Senate and House of Representatives. As such, their personal and professional backgrounds play important roles in setting the national healthcare agenda. We examine the professional and legislative records of the 28 federal physician legislators with voting privileges between 2011 and 2020. METHODS: Two researchers compiled the names of every federal legislator in both the US Senate and the US House of Representatives who served at any time between 2011 and 2020. The researchers used publicly available records to abstract information regarding their professional and legislative records. Data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The majority of the 28 federal physician legislators are Doctor of Medicine graduates (96%), Republican (86%), represent southern states (71%), were in private practice before serving as legislators (78.5%), and have not previously held elected positions as legislators (57%). Approximately 15% of the bills that they sponsor are related to health policy. Obstetrics/Gynecology, Surgery, and Family Medicine are the most common specialties. On average, it takes 25 years from medical school graduation to election to their federal legislative position. Approximately half represent states, or districts within states, in which they attended medical school or completed residency. CONCLUSIONS: To engage in meaningful healthcare policy advocacy, professional organizations must support and encourage leadership training for physicians, increase the geographic and professional diversity of physician legislators, prioritize the election of physicians from both political parties, and inculcate deep and lasting professional relationships to physicians in Congress.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Médicos , Femenino , Política de Salud , Humanos , Política , Embarazo
6.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(2): 62-68, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The advent of multiple safe and effective vaccines to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection represents a major step in resolving the COVID-19 global pandemic. Vaccination of individuals with rheumatologic diseases on immunomodulators represents an additional challenge because data suggest that certain immunomodulators may impact vaccine efficacy. METHODS: At a large, predominantly rural Midwestern Veterans Affairs rheumatology clinic, an interprofessional group of investigators conducted a quality improvement project to develop a COVID-19 vaccine readiness kit, consisting of patient education materials and a readiness questionnaire to help guide veteran decision-making. Using a Lean Six Sigma approach and the DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) framework, the investigators identified customer values, needs, and barriers to participation. Return rates and responses from the questionnaire were tracked over 28 days. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine veterans were identified and mailed kits; 129 (73%) returned the questionnaire within 28 days. Ninety-seven percent of those opted to hold immunomodulators after at least 1 administration of the vaccine; 3.1% were not interested in vaccination. Veterans voiced satisfaction at the simplicity of the process, comprehensibility of materials, and the clarity of communication. CONCLUSIONS: The Lean Six Sigma approach, systematically focusing on identifying the values, needs, and barriers of veterans on immunomodulators, was critical to high participation rates from veterans. This approach is cost-effective for resource-poor settings, audiences without access or familiarity to digital content, and rural settings separated by large geographic distances.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , COVID-19 , Veteranos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Cureus ; 13(9): e18382, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34646714

RESUMEN

Background Tests composed of multiple-choice questions are an established tool to help evaluate knowledge of medical content. Within the field of rheumatology, there is an absence of free and easily-accessible sets of multiple-choice questions that have been rigorously evaluated and analyzed. Objective To develop a question bank composed of multiple-choice questions that evaluate trainee knowledge of rheumatology, as well as to investigate the psychometric properties (reliability, discrimination indices, difficulty indices) of items within the question bank. Methods Multiple-choice questions were drafted according to a strict methodology devised by the investigators. Between January and December 2020, questions were administered in sets of 20-25 questions to test-takers who were either current trainees or had recently graduated from training programs. Performance was evaluated through descriptive statistics (mean, median, range, standard deviation) and test-item statistics (difficulty index, discrimination index, reliability). Results Investigators drafted 1900 multiple choice questions within 45 sections each composed of 20 to 25 questions each. These questions were administered to 32 participants. The mean discrimination index was 0.57 (standard deviation: 0.22) and mean difficulty index was 0.38 (standard deviation: 0.23). Reliability indices for the 45 sections ranged from 0.45 to 0.85 (mean: 0.613, standard deviation: 0.09). The overall reliability index for the entire item bank was greater than 0.95. Conclusion The investigators developed a 1900-item question bank composed of items that have sufficient difficulty and discrimination indices to be used for low- and moderate-stakes settings. A rigorous methodology was employed to create the first freely-accessible reliable tool for the assessment of rheumatology knowledge. This tool can be purposed for both summative and formative evaluation in multiple settings and platforms.

9.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 27(8): e404-e411, 2021 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658045

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Physician well-being is being increasingly recognized for its important role in high-quality patient care, integrity of the healthcare system, and vitality of the workforce. However, little is known about well-being, resiliency, and burnout among rheumatologists, particularly early-career rheumatologists. In this qualitative study, the investigators explore these concepts among early-career rheumatologists. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using semistructured phone interviews of rheumatologists who completed fellowship in 2017. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling. Twenty questions were devised by the investigators, covering sample demographics, exploring definitions of well-being, resiliency, and burnout, and probing potential solutions.Interviews were recorded and transcribed independently and verified for consistency. The investigators used grounded theory to code the transcripts and iteratively derive categories, subthemes, and themes until reaching theoretical sufficiency. RESULTS: Sixty-four rheumatologists were interviewed, accounting for 30.6 hours of material. Seven major themes were identified: (1) well-being as a holistic state where an individual is able to translate one's potential to maximal performance, (2) work-family balance as a dynamic equilibrium changing over time, (3) inadequacy of training in addressing self-doubt over autonomy, (4) uncertainty over career development and progression, (5) excessive administrative burdens, (6) protective nature of longitudinal relationships, and (7) addressing burnout requires a multifaceted approach at multiple levels. CONCLUSIONS: New rheumatologists face a series of challenges as they enter the workforce. Investments into well-being can help reduce the risk of burnout and enlarge our community. Our results highlight drivers and potential solutions, as identified by recent fellowship graduates.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Médicos , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Reumatólogos , Recursos Humanos
10.
BMC Nephrol ; 21(1): 424, 2020 10 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33023489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Kidney disease accounts for more than 49 billion dollars in healthcare expenditures annually. Early detection and intervention may reduce the burden of disease. We describe a quality improvement project to develop a telenephrology dashboard that proactively monitors kidney disease. METHODS: One hundred eighty-four thousands Veterans within the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System were eligible for telenephrology consultation. The dashboard accessed the charts of 53,085 Veterans at risk for kidney disease. We utilized Lean-Six Sigma tools and principles and the Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control Framework to develop and deploy a telenephrology dashboard in 4 community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs). The primary measure was the number of days to complete consultation. Secondary measures included number of electronic consultations per month, distance and cost of Veteran travel saved, and number of steps for completion of consult. RESULTS: The data of 1384 Veterans at the 4 CBOCs were analyzed by the telenephrology dashboard, of which 459 generated telenephrology consults. The number of days to complete any type of consultation was unchanged (48.9 days in 2019, compared to 41.6 days in 2017). The average Veteran saved between $21.60 to $63.90 per trip to Iowa City. Between March 2019 and August 2019, there were 27.3 telenephrology consults per month. The number of steps needed to complete the consult request was decreased from 13 to 9. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of the telenephrology dashboard system contributed to an increase in consultations completed through electronic means without decreasing face-to-face consults. Electronic consults now outnumber traditional face-to-face consultations at our institution. Telenephrology consultation improved early detection and identification of kidney disease and saved time and costs for Veterans in travel, but did not decrease the average number of days to complete consultation requests.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Datos , Enfermedades Renales , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Telemedicina , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Veteranos , Actitud hacia los Computadores , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Nefrología , Servicios de Salud Rural , Gestión de la Calidad Total , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
11.
BMC Med Educ ; 20(1): 175, 2020 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32487056

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians. METHODS: Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument). RESULTS: Fifteen studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after 6 months to 1 year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9. CONCLUSIONS: Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of methodologically rigorous studies evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies, focusing particularly on the validity of content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables, are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Educación , Liderazgo , Canadá , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados Unidos
12.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 436, 2019 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31752808

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Program directors are often perceived as strong and independent leaders within the academic medical environment. However, they are not as omnipotent as they initially appear. Indeed, PDs are beholden to a variety of different agents, including trainees (current residents, residency applicants, residency alumni), internal influencers (departmental faculty, hospital administration, institutional graduate medical education), and external influencers (the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), medical education community, and society-at-large). Altogether, these agents form a complex ecosystem whose dynamics and relationships shape the effectiveness of program directors. MAIN BODY: This perspective uses management theory to examine the characteristics of effective PD leadership. We underline the importance of authority, accessibility, adaptability, authenticity, accountability, and autonomy as core features of successful program directors. Additionally, we review how program directors can use the six power bases (legitimacy, referent, informational, expert, reward, and coercive) to achieve positive and constructive change within the complexity of the academic medical ecosystem. Lastly, we describe how local and national institutions can better structure power relationships within the ecosystem so that PD leadership can be most effective. CONCLUSION: Keen leadership skills are required by program directors to face a variety of challenges within their educational environments. Understanding power structures and relationships may aid program directors to exercise leadership judiciously towards fulfilling the educational missions of their departments.


Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo , Educación Médica , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Liderazgo , Humanos , Autonomía Profesional , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Responsabilidad Social
15.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 62(6): 1155-9, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23830800

RESUMEN

Type 1 primary hyperoxaluria is a genetic disorder caused by deficiency of the liver-specific peroxisomal enzyme alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase. This enzyme deficiency leads to excess oxalate production and deposition of calcium oxalate salts, resulting in kidney failure and systemic oxalosis. Aside from combined liver/kidney transplantation, no curative treatment exists. Various strategies for optimizing dialysis treatment have been evaluated, but neither conventional hemodialysis nor peritoneal dialysis can keep pace with oxalate production in this patient population. In this report, we describe a patient with end-stage renal disease from type 1 primary hyperoxaluria managed with nocturnal home hemodialysis. Performing hemodialysis 8-10 hours each night with blood flow of 350 mL/min and total dialysate volume of 60 L, she has maintained pre- and postdialysis serum oxalate levels at or below the level of supersaturation. We also review published literature regarding oxalate removal in various modalities of dialysis in patients with type 1 primary hyperoxaluria. In our patient, nocturnal hemodialysis has controlled serum oxalate levels better than conventional hemodialysis therapies. Home nocturnal hemodialysis should be considered an option for management of patients with end-stage renal disease from type 1 hyperoxaluria who are awaiting transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Ritmo Circadiano , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio , Hiperoxaluria Primaria/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Adulto , Sustitución de Aminoácidos/genética , Arginina/genética , Terapia Combinada , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Exones/genética , Femenino , Glicina/genética , Humanos , Hiperoxaluria Primaria/sangre , Hiperoxaluria Primaria/genética , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/genética , Oxalatos/sangre , Piridoxina/uso terapéutico , Transaminasas/deficiencia , Transaminasas/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...