Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vaccine ; 32(50): 6847-54, 2014 Nov 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24530403

RESUMEN

NuThrax™ (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed with CPG 7909 Adjuvant) (AV7909) is in development. Samples obtained in a phase Ib clinical trial were tested to confirm biomarkers of innate immunity and evaluate effects of CPG 7909 (PF-03512676) on adaptive immunity. Subjects received two intramuscular doses of commercial BioThrax(®) (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed, AVA), or two intramuscular doses of one of four formulations of AV7909. IP-10, IL-6, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were elevated 24-48 h after administration of AV7909 formulations, returning to baseline by Day 7. AVA (no CPG 7909) resulted in elevated IL-6 and CRP, but not IP-10. Another marker of CpG, transiently decreased absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), correlated with transiently increased IP-10. Cellular recall responses to anthrax protective antigen (PA) or PA peptides were assessed by IFN-γ ELISpot assay performed on cryopreserved PBMCs obtained from subjects prior to immunization and 7 days following the second immunization (study day 21). One-half of subjects that received AV7909 with low-dose (0.25mg/dose) CPG 7909 possessed positive Day 21 T cell responses to PA. In contrast, positive T cell responses occurred at an 11% average rate (1/9) for AVA-treated subjects. Differences in cellular responses due to dose level of CPG 7909 were not associated with differences in humoral anti-PA IgG responses, which were elevated for recipients of AV7909 compared to recipients of AVA. Serum markers at 24 or 48 h (i.e. % ALC decrease, or increase in IL-6, IP-10, or CRP) correlated with the humoral (antibody) responses 1 month later, but did not correlate with cellular ELISpot responses. In summary, biomarkers of early responses to CPG 7909 were confirmed, and adding a CpG adjuvant to a vaccine administered twice resulted in increased T cell effects relative to vaccine alone. Changes in early biomarkers correlated with subsequent adaptive humoral immunity but not cellular immunity.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Carbunco/inmunología , Carbunco/prevención & control , Inmunidad Innata , Oligodesoxirribonucleótidos/administración & dosificación , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Carbunco/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Carbunco/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Citocinas/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Ensayo de Immunospot Ligado a Enzimas , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Vacunación/métodos
2.
Vet Ther ; 11(2): E1-6, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20957616

RESUMEN

Twelve cats were vaccinated at 8 and 11 weeks of age with a commercially available inactivated FeLV vaccine (Nobivac FeLV, Intervet/Schering-Plough Animal Health). Eleven cats served as age-matched, placebo-vaccinated controls. All cats were kept in isolation for 2 years after vaccination and were then challenged with virulent FeLV to evaluate vaccine efficacy and duration of immunity. Cats were monitored for 12 weeks after challenge for development of persistent viremia using a commercial FeLV p27 ELISA. Persistent viremia developed in all 11 (100%) of the control cats, whereas 10 of 12 (83%) vaccinated cats were fully protected from persistent viremia following challenge. The results demonstrate that the vaccine used in this study protects cats from persistent FeLV viremia for at least 2 years after vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Leucemia Felina/inmunología , Leucemia Felina/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Animales , Gatos , Organismos Libres de Patógenos Específicos , Vacunación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Viremia
3.
J Aquat Anim Health ; 22(3): 158-66, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21192545

RESUMEN

A dose titration study was conducted to determine the dosage of florfenicol (FFC) in feed to control Streptococcus iniae-associated mortality in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Six tanks were assigned to each of five treatments: (1) not challenged with S. iniae and fed unmedicated feed; (2) challenged with S. iniae by injection and fed unmedicated feed; (3) challenged with S. iniae and given FFC at 5 mg/kg of body weight (bw) in medicated feed; (4) challenged with S. iniae and given 10 mg FFC/kg bw; and (5) challenged with S. iniae and given 15 mg FFC/kg bw. Treatment was initiated the day after inoculation, and feed was administered for 10 d. Cumulative mortality was 0% in the unchallenged, untreated group; 35.8 +/- 4.4% (mean +/- SE) in the challenged, unmedicated group; 19.2 +/- 2.7% in the 5-mg/kg treated group, 12.5 +/- 3.8% in the 10-mg/kg group, and 2.5 +/- 1.1% in the 15-mg/kg group. The cumulative mortality was significantly less in each challenged, FFC-treated group than in the challenged, unmedicated controls (5 mg/ kg: P = 0.0156; 10 mg/kg: P = 0.0007; 15 mg/kg: P < 0.0001). The efficacy of the 10- and 15-mg/kg FFC dosages was studied in a separate dose confirmation study. Fish in all tanks were injected with S. iniae. At 4 h postinoculation, 10 tanks were assigned to each of three feed treatments: (1) unmedicated feed; (2) 10 mg FFC/kg bw; and (3) 15 mg FFC/kg bw. Cumulative mortality was 20.5 +/- 2.0% in the challenged, unmedicated group; 11.0 +/- 2.1% in the 10-mg/kg group; and 5.5 +/- 2.4% in the 15-mg/kg group. Mortality was significantly less in the medicated groups than in the challenged, unmedicated control group (10 mg/kg: P = 0.0270; 15 mg/kg: P = 0.0007). Fish in both studies were necropsied, cultured for bacteria, and examined for gross lesions. The minimum inhibitory concentration of FFC against S. iniae in both studies ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 microg/mL. Florfenicol was palatable, safe, and efficacious for control of Nile tilapia mortality due to S. iniae infection.


Asunto(s)
Cíclidos , Enfermedades de los Peces/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/veterinaria , Streptococcus/clasificación , Tianfenicol/análogos & derivados , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Enfermedades de los Peces/microbiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Tianfenicol/administración & dosificación , Tianfenicol/uso terapéutico
4.
Vet Ther ; 10(3): 103-12, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20037964

RESUMEN

Canine influenza virus (CIV) subtype H3N8 is an emerging pathogen with sustained horizontal transmission in the dog population in the United States. This study evaluated the efficacy of an inactivated CIV vaccine in 6- to 8-week-old beagle pups challenged with virulent CIV. One group of CIV-seronegative pups was vaccinated with two doses of a CIV vaccine 3 weeks apart; a second group of pups received adjuvanted placebo as a control. Blood samples were collected at various times to determine antibody titers. All pups were challenged with a virulent CIV isolate 13 days after the second vaccination and monitored for clinical signs of respiratory disease, virus shedding, and lung consolidation. Vaccinated pups developed hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers after vaccination. The severity of clinical signs (P < .001) and the magnitude and duration of virus shedding (P < .0001) were significantly lower in vaccinated pups compared with control pups. These results demonstrate that the CIV vaccine used in this study provides protection against virulent CIV challenge in dogs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Subtipo H3N8 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/normas , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/veterinaria , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Antígenos Virales/análisis , Perros , Femenino , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación/veterinaria , Inmunohistoquímica/veterinaria , Subtipo H3N8 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Pulmón/patología , Pulmón/virología , Masculino , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/patología , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/virología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/normas , Esparcimiento de Virus
5.
Vet Ther ; 9(4): 257-62, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19177330

RESUMEN

Three groups of healthy dogs with low antibody titers to Bordetella bronchiseptica (Bb), canine parainfluenza virus (CPI), and canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2) were used in this study. One group was vaccinated with a single dose of monovalent attenuated Bb vaccine and one group with a trivalent vaccine containing attenuated Bb, CPI, and CAV-2; dogs were vaccinated intranasally with a single dose of the respective vaccines. The third group served as unvaccinated controls. All vaccinated dogs subsequently developed serum antibody titers to Bb that persisted for at least 1 year. Following Bb challenge 1 year after vaccination, all vaccinated dogs, regardless of group, showed significantly fewer clinical signs and shed significantly fewer challenge organisms than unvaccinated controls. These results demonstrate that intranasal administration of a single dose of monovalent attenuated Bb vaccine or trivalent vaccine containing attenuated Bb, CPI, and CAV-2 provides 1 year of protection against Bb.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacunas Bacterianas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Bordetella/veterinaria , Bordetella bronchiseptica/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Adenoviridae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Adenoviridae/veterinaria , Adenovirus Caninos/inmunología , Administración Intranasal , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Infecciones por Bordetella/prevención & control , Perros , Femenino , Masculino , Vacunas contra la Parainfluenza/administración & dosificación , Virus de la Parainfluenza 2 Humana/inmunología , Distribución Aleatoria , Infecciones por Rubulavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Rubulavirus/veterinaria , Vacunas Atenuadas
6.
Vet Ther ; 9(4): 283-9, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19177333

RESUMEN

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is one of the primary etiologic agents for diarrhea in neonatal calves. Immunization of dams can provide passive protection in neonatal calves; antibodies transferred through colostrum block colonization of bacteria, thereby preventing disease. In this study, healthy pregnant heifers were vaccinated at approximately 3 months of gestation with either a polyvalent oil-adjuvanted vaccine containing inactivated coronavirus, rotavirus, E. coli K99 subunit antigen, and Clostridium perfringens b and e toxoid or normal saline as a placebo. Calves were allowed to nurse immediately after birth, were orally challenged with virulent heterologous enterotoxigenic E. coli at 1 day of age, and were observed for clinical signs of scours for 10 days. Signs of severe scours were noted in 75% of control calves and 28.6% of vaccinates, and the severity of scours was significantly higher (P = .0382) in the control group. The mortality rate was significantly higher (P = .0007) in the control group (80%) than in the vaccinate group (14%). These findings indicate that the vaccination of pregnant heifers at as early as 3 months of gestation (6 months before calving) provides passive protection in neonatal calves against colibacillosis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Bovinos/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control , Escherichia coli Enterotoxigénica/inmunología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/veterinaria , Inmunización Pasiva/veterinaria , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/análisis , Antígenos Bacterianos/inmunología , Bovinos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/inmunología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/prevención & control , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos , Embarazo , Distribución Aleatoria
7.
Vet Ther ; 8(1): 32-40, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17447223

RESUMEN

Healthy dogs with low antibody titer to Bordetella bronchiseptica were vaccinated intranasally with an avirulent live vaccine, subcutaneously with an antigen extract vaccine, or subcutaneously and intranasally with a placebo. Intranasally vaccinated dogs developed B. bronchiseptica-specific IgA titers in nasal secretions that remained at high levels until the end of the study; dogs vaccinated subcutaneously with the antigen extract or placebo did not develop measurable antigen-specific IgA titers in nasal secretions. Dogs were challenged with virulent live B. bronchiseptica 63 days after vaccination. Intranasally vaccinated dogs had significantly lower cough scores (P < or =.0058) and shed significantly fewer challenge organisms (P <.0001) than dogs in either of the other groups. Cough scores of subcutaneously vaccinated dogs were not significantly different from placebo-vaccinated dogs.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/inmunología , Vacunas Bacterianas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bordetella/veterinaria , Bordetella bronchiseptica/inmunología , Bronquitis/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Administración Intranasal , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacunas Bacterianas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Bordetella/prevención & control , Bronquitis/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Perros/inmunología , Perros , Inmunoglobulina A/metabolismo , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/veterinaria , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/veterinaria
8.
Vet Ther ; 3(1): 64-71, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12050829

RESUMEN

Two topically applied spot-on products used for flea and tick control on dogs, 65% permethrin (Defend EXspot Treatment for Dogs, Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp., Union, NJ) and selamectin (Revolution [United States] or Stronghold [Europe], Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY), were evaluated for repellency and efficacy against Ixodes ricinus, the primary vector of Lyme disease in Europe. Eighteen dogs were evenly and randomly allocated to the following treatments: 1) 65% permethrin, 2) selamectin, 3) untreated control. Dogs were treated by topical application of the assigned product in accordance with product label directions on Day 0. At 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after treatment, each dog was exposed for 2 hours to 50 unfed, adult ticks in a cage with a carpet that covered approximately 70% of the floor area. After the exposure period, dogs were removed from the cages and live and dead ticks were counted on the dogs and in the cages. The number of live ticks recovered was reduced by 90.3% to 99.5% for dogs treated with 65% permethrin (P <.0001 versus controls and selamectin), compared with 10.9% to 31.1% for dogs treated with selamectin (P >.05 versus controls). The repellency of 65% permethrin was 63.4% to 80.2% against I. ricinus ticks (P <.0001 versus controls, P <.0007 versus selamectin), compared with 0% to 10.9% repellency for selamectin (P >.05 versus controls).


Asunto(s)
Antiparasitarios/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Ivermectina/análogos & derivados , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Ixodes , Permetrina/uso terapéutico , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/veterinaria , Administración Cutánea , Animales , Antiparasitarios/administración & dosificación , Dorso , Perros , Femenino , Ivermectina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Permetrina/administración & dosificación , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...