A Genome-Wide Association Study of Endoxifen Serum Concentrations and Adjuvant Tamoxifen Efficacy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.

Tamoxifen is part of the standard of care of endocrine therapy for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, survival outcomes with tamoxifen are highly variable. The concentration of endoxifen, the 30-100 times more potent metabolite of tamoxifen and bioactivated by the CYP2D6 enzyme, has been described as the most relevant metabolite of tamoxifen metabolism. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed with the objective to identify genetic polymorphisms associated with endoxifen serum concentration levels and clinical outcome in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen. A GWAS was conducted in 608 women of the CYPTAM study (NTR1509/PMID: 30120701). Germline DNA and clinical and survival characteristics were readily available. Genotyping was performed on Infinium Global Screening Array (686,082 markers) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) imputation by using 1000 Genomes. Relapse-free survival during tamoxifen (RFSt) was defined the primary clinical outcome. Endoxifen serum concentration was analyzed as a continuous variable. Several genetic variants reached genome-wide significance (P value: ≤5 × 10-8). Endoxifen concentrations analysis identified 430 variants, located in TCF20 and WBP2NL genes (chromosome 22), which are in strong linkage disequilibrium with CYP2D6 variants. In the RFSt analysis, several SNP were identified (LPP gene: rs77693286, HR 18.3, 95% CI: 15.2-21.1; rs6790761, OR 18.2, 95% CI: 15.5-21.1). Endoxifen concentrations have a strong association with the chromosome 22, which contains the CYP2D6 gene.

Medical education in pharmacogenomics-results from a survey on pharmacogenetic knowledge in healthcare professionals within the European pharmacogenomics clinical implementation project Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics (U-PGx).

PURPOSE: Due to the diversity within Europe, the implementation of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical practice faces specific challenges. In the context of the European pharmacogenomics implementation project "Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics" (U-PGx; funded by the European Commission), we studied the current educational background. METHODS: We developed a questionnaire including 29 questions. It was spread out to healthcare professionals working at the future implementation sites (in Austria, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and Great Britain) of the U-PGx project in preparation of an educational programme. Aim of the survey was to analyse the current educational situation at the implementation sites. RESULTS: In total, 70 healthcare professionals participated in the survey. Of participants, 84.3% found pharmacogenomics relevant to their current practice, but experience was still rare. More than two-thirds (65.7%) did not order nor recommend a pharmacogenomic test in the past year. This was mainly attributed to not having enough knowledge on pharmacogenomics (40.0%). Needs were identified in application of pharmacogenomics (identifying drugs 41.4%, interpreting test results 37.2%) as well as in underlining mechanisms (better knowledge on drug metabolism 67.1%, better knowledge on basic principles of pharmacogenomics 60.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study analysed the specific attitudes, experience and education on pharmacogenomics of future users. There was a general positive attitude and interest towards pharmacogenomic testing. However, the grade of own experience, and knowledge about application and interpretation of pharmacogenomics caused uncertainty. Thus, education and training programmes may be helpful for implementation of pharmacogenomics at a homogenous level within Europe.