Analysis of survival of patients treated with vemurafenib, ipilimumab and dabrafenib for advanced skin melanoma in daily clinical practice (Real-World Data): retrospective analysis of patients treated under drug/reimbursement programmes in Poland in 2013-2016.

Vemurafenib, ipilimumab and dabrafenib were registered for the treatment of advanced skin melanoma pursuant to the results of randomized phase III clinical trials. Real-world data on survival time for patients treated with those drugs in daily clinical practice are so far limited. Patients with advanced skin melanoma treated under reimbursement programmes (drug programmes), for which they were qualified pursuant to uniform inclusion criteria in force in all oncology centres in Poland. Data were obtained from the electronic databases of the national payer (NFZ) responsible for the implementation and monitoring of reimbursement (drug) programmes. The analysis included all patients included for treatment with vemurafenib (since March of 2013), ipilimumab (since March of 2014) and dabrafenib (since July of 2015) until December 2016. The end date of the observation was set to 31 December 2016. The total survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Until 31 December 2016, 759 patients were treated with vemurafenib, 370 with ipilimumab and 181 with dabrafenib. The overall survival (OS) median was 9.8 months for patients treated with vemurafenib (95% confidence interval: 8.8-10.6) and 6.9 months for patients treated with ipilimumab (95% confidence interval: 5.7-9.2). For patients treated with dabrafenib, the OS median was not reached because of an overly short observation period. The probability of surviving 12 months in the group of patients treated with vemurafenib was 40.5%, ipilimumab was 35.1% and dabrafenib was 60.7%. The probability of surviving 24 and 36 months in the group of patients treated with vemurafenib or ipilimumab amounted to, respectively, 20.1, 15.4 and 21, 18.8%. OS of patients with advanced melanoma treated in daily clinical practice may be comparable to the ones achieved in registration trials. The use of appropriate treatment inclusion criteria may affect the obtained OS.

The assessment of overall survival (OS) after adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with malignant endometrial cancer in Poland.

OBJECTIVES: In 2013 malignant endometrial cancers have amounted to 7.3% of all cancers diagnosed among women in the report by the Polish National Cancer Registry Raw prevalence rate amounted to 28.7, whereas standardised prevalence rate 15.6 per 100 000 population. Among the causes of death, these cancers amounted to 3% and were ranked ninth on the list of the most common causes of oncologic mortality of women. In the year 2013 a total of 1243 women died of malignant endometrial cancers. A stable increase of malignant endometrial cancer incidence has been observed for 2 decades. Despite that fact, the increase of the mortality incidence is at a much lower level, which demonstrates the much higher effectiveness of the treatment of such cancers. The recording rate of the malignant endometrial cancer mortality amounts to 95%, so the presented absolute numbers are reliable. Examining the clinical stages of malignant endometrial cancers, we can establish that approx. 85% of them are diagnosed at stage I or II according to the FIGO classification. Patients with advanced stages of cancer represent less than 15%. MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective analysis of endometrial body cancer prevalence data for the entire population of Poland, assessment of malignant endometrial cancer prevalence in the years 2008-2015 and overall survival probability in the population of patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: The number of patients with a diagnosed malignant endometrial cancer within the studied period in Poland remains on a stable level (2008 - 30.6 thousand patients, 2015 - 40.2 thousand patients). Among all listed patients with the indica-tion of C54 each year approx. 20% enters hospital treatment. System therapy with chemotherapy drugs was used in approx. 1-2% of patients treated in hospitals. The average age of the patients was 64.9 years, and the median age 65 years. The num-ber of observations was 2085, including 1088 censored observations. The average survival for the sample under study was 30.67 month (SD = ± 0.6); median survival time was 23.93 month. The number of censored observations was 1088 (52.16%). Probable survival of 1 year is achieved by 67.57% of patients, 2 years by 49.73%, 3 years by 40.68%, above 5 years 30.77%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of endometrial cancer in Poland in the years 2008-2015 continues to grow at 5% upward trend (in Europe 3.4-5.9). In Poland in 2012, crude incidence rate for cancer of the uterus was 29.8 and did not differ significantly from the results in countries such as Finland, Slovakia, Sweden, Belgium and Bulgaria. The overall survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with malignant endometrial cancer in Poland shows considerable differences depending on the region of the country.

First-line sunitinib versus pazopanib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib (SU) and pazopanib (PZ) are standards of care for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, how the efficacy of these drugs translates into effectiveness on a population-based level is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and performed proportional hazard regression adjusting for IMDC prognostic groups. Second-line OS (OS2) and second-line PFS (PFS2) were also evaluated. RESULTS: We obtained data from 7438 patients with mRCC treated with either first-line SU (n = 6519) or PZ (n = 919) with an overall median follow-up of 40.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.2-42.1). There were no significant differences in IMDC prognostic groups (p = 0.36). There was no OS difference between SU and PZ (22.3 versus 22.6 months, respectively, p = 0.65). When adjusted for IMDC criteria, the hazard ratio (HR) of death for PZ versus SU was 1.03 (95% CI 0.92-1.17, p = 0.58). There was no PFS difference between SU and PZ (8.4 versus 8.3 months, respectively, p = 0.17). When adjusted for IMDC criteria, the HR for PFS for PZ versus SU was 1.08 (95% CI 0.981-1.19, p = 0.12). There was no difference in RR between SU and PZ (30% versus 28%, respectively, p = 0.15). We also found no difference in any second-line treatment between either post-SU or post-PZ groups for OS2 (13.1 versus 11 months, p = 0.27) and PFS2 (3.7 versus 5.0 months, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed in real-world practice that SU and PZ have similar efficacy in the first-line setting for mRCC and do not affect outcomes with subsequent second-line treatment.

Stewart-Treves syndrome angiosarcoma expresses phenotypes of both blood and lymphatic capillaries.

BACKGROUND: The development of angiosarcoma in oedematous tissue is referred to as Stewart-Treves syndrome (STS). This rare and fatal complication is associated with chronic post mastectomy lymphoedema and radiotherapy for breast cancer. Angiosarcoma spread is facilitated by the formation of blood vessels (angiogenesis) and lymph vessels (lymphangiogenesis). In the future antiangiogenic therapy may improve the poor outcome of current treatments. There was evidence that blocking the angiogenenesis would inhibit progression of angiosarcoma. It seems reasonable to hypothesize that blocking the lymphangiogenesis may yield similar results. Although angiosarcomas commonly derive from blood vessels, in case of STS angiosarcomas chronic lymphoedema may suggest its lymphatic origin. The goal of this study was to visualize interstitial space and lymphatics in the central and peripheral regions of STS angiosarcoma. METHODS: On tissue samples obtained from STS angiosarcoma we have performed: first colour stereoscopic lymphography to visualise the morphology of lymphatic vessels and extracellular spaces, second immunohistochemical staining specific for lymphatic vessels endothelium (LYVE-1) and blood endothelial cells (CD31, factor VIII) and prolymphangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-C) for precise identification of lymphatic endothelia. STS angiosarcoma morphology was assessed by comparison of pictures obtained on lymphography, microscopy and confocal microscopy. RESULTS: STS angiosarcomas present heterogenous morphology with areas dominated by hemangiosarcoma and lymphangiosarcoma structures. STS angiosarcoma expressed phenotypes of both blood and lymphatic endothelia. LYVE-1 and VEGF-C is expressed by STS angiosarcoma and may be used to discriminate tumour differentiation. Morphology of lymphatic vessels and spaces in the tumour suggest absence of their normal lymphatic function. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed both hemangio- and lymphangiogenic origin of STS angiosarcoma. Expression of VEGF-C makes STS angiosarcoma a good candidate for targeted antilymphangiogenic therapy. However, morphology of intratumoral lymphatics on colour lymphography suggested their impaired function, which can hamper drug distribution.

Developmental stage-specific shift in responsiveness to chemokines during human B-cell development.

OBJECTIVES: To better understand the role of chemokines during human B-cell development in bone marrow. METHODS: Differentiation stage-specific B cells (pro-B, pre-B, immature, and mature) were analyzed for chemokine receptor expression and for migration to corresponding ligands. We also hypothesized that inflammatory conditions may cause the upregulation of certain chemokine receptors on early B cells, rendering them sensitive to extramedullary chemotactic cues. To test this hypothesis, we used human pre-B 697 cells to investigate whether various inflammatory agents could modify chemokine receptor expression and function. RESULTS: Chemotaxis to CXCL12 was observed for all B cell subsets. However, chemotactic responses to CCL19, CCL21, CXCL13, and CCL20 were limited to late-stage, IgM+ bone marrow B cells (immature B and mature B). Chemotactic responses to corresponding ligands correlated with the pattern of chemokine receptor expression. The expression of CCR7, however, was low on early (pro-B and pre-B) B cells and did not induce chemotaxis. Interestingly, both CCL19 and CCL21 could trigger ERK1/2 phosphorylation in early B cells. Exposure of pre-B 697 cells to TNF-alpha upregulated CCR7 and CXCR5 expression, whereas it had no effect on CCR6 surface expression. Correspondingly, TNF-alpha-stimulated pre-B cells chemotaxed towards CCL19 and CXCL13, in contrast to non-TNF-alpha-stimulated controls. CONCLUSION: We postulate that CXCR5, CCR7, and CCR6 participate in bone marrow trafficking and/or bone marrow egress of late-stage B cells under steady-state conditions, whereas inflammation-induced expression of CCR7 and CXCR5 may facilitate early B-cell emigration out of the bone marrow and their positioning in secondary lymphoid organs.

Human bone marrow stromal cells express a distinct set of biologically functional chemokine receptors.

Stromal cells isolated from bone marrow (BMSCs), often referred to as mesenchymal stem cells, are currently under investigation for a variety of therapeutic applications. However, limited data are available regarding receptors that can influence their homing to and positioning within the bone marrow. In the present study, we found that second passage BMSCs express a unique set of chemokine receptors: three CC chemokine receptors (CCR1, CCR7, and CCR9) and three CXC chemokine receptors (CXCR4, CXCR5, and CXCR6). BMSCs cultured in serum-free medium secrete several chemokine ligands (CCL2, CCL4, CCL5, CCL20, CXCL12, CXCL8, and CX3CL1). The surface-expressed chemokine receptors were functional by several criteria. Stimulation of BMSCs with chemokine ligands triggers phosphorylation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (e.g., extracellular signal-related kinase [ERK]-1 and ERK-2) and focal adhesion kinase signaling pathways. In addition, CXCL12 selectively activates signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-5 whereas CCL5 activates STAT-1. In cell biologic assays, all of the chemokines tested stimulate chemotaxis of BMSCs, and CXCL12 induces cytoskeleton F-actin polymerization. Studies of culture-expanded BMSCs, for example, 12-16 passages, indicate loss of surface expression of all chemokine receptors and lack of chemotactic response to chemokines. The loss in chemokine receptor expression is accompanied by a decrease in expression of adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1) and CD157, while expression of CD90 and CD105 is maintained. The change in BMSC phenotype is associated with slowing of cell growth and increased spontaneous apoptosis. These findings suggest that several chemokine axes may operate in BMSC biology and may be important parameters in the validation of cultured BMSCs intended for cell therapy.