Altered sleep architecture following consecutive nights of presleep alcohol.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Alcohol consumption before sleep decreases sleep latency, explaining the common use of alcohol as a sleep aid. The full impact of alcohol on sleep architecture is not well understood, particularly the potential cumulative effects of presleep alcohol consumption across consecutive nights. Here, we describe the effects of presleep alcohol on sleep architecture across three consecutive nights. METHODS: Thirty adult participants took part in a crossover, within-participants study consisting of two sets of three consecutive nights of in-lab polysomnography. For each series of nights, participants drank one of the two beverages: a mixer only or a mixer plus alcohol (targeting a BrAC of 0.08 mg/L), ending 1 hour before lights out. Polysomnography (PSG) was used to stage sleep, and standard sleep variables were extracted. Linear mixed-effect analysis and generalized additive modeling were used to examine the effect of alcohol on sleep architecture. RESULTS: Alcohol before sleep increased the rate of slow wave sleep (SWS) accumulation across all three nights and decreased the rate of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep accumulation at the start of each night. Alcohol also decreased the total amount of REM sleep but did not affect the total amount of SWS each night. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that drinking alcohol before sleep substantially affects sleep architecture, including changes to the rate of accumulation of SWS and REM sleep. We show that alcohol disrupts normal sleep architecture, leading to a significant decrease in REM sleep; thus, the use of alcohol as a sleep aid remains a public health concern.

Mifepristone as a pharmacological intervention for stress-induced alcohol craving: A human laboratory study.

Preclinical and clinical work suggests that mifepristone may be a viable treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). This was a Phase 1/2, outpatient, cross-over, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with non-treatment-seeking individuals with AUD (N = 32). We assessed safety, alcohol craving and consumption, after 1-week mifepristone 600 mg/day administration, in a human laboratory study comprised of a single oral yohimbine administration (32.4 mg), a cue-reactivity procedure and alcohol self-administration. Safety was monitored by adverse events and hemodynamic parameters, alcohol craving by alcohol craving questionnaire and cue-induced saliva output. During the alcohol self-administration, we assessed alcohol pharmacokinetics, subjective effects and consumption. Outcomes were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations and mediation analysis. Mild-moderate adverse events were reported in both conditions. There was no statistically significant difference between mifepristone and placebo in alcohol pharmacokinetics and subjective effects. Furthermore, blood pressure increased only in the placebo condition after the stress-induced laboratory procedures. Mifepristone, compared to placebo, significantly reduced alcohol craving and increased cortisol levels. Mifepristone-induced cortisol increase was not a mediator of alcohol craving. Mifepristone, compared to placebo, did not reduce alcohol consumption in the laboratory or in a naturalistic setting. This study successfully translated a developed preclinical procedure to a human laboratory study, confirming the safety of mifepristone in people with AUD and providing evidence to its role in reducing alcohol craving under stress procedures. The lack of effects on alcohol drinking may be related to the selection of non-treatment seekers and suggests future treatment-oriented trials should investigate mifepristone in people with AUD.

Mifepristone as a pharmacological intervention for stress-Induced alcohol craving: a translational crossover randomized trial.

Preclinical and clinical work suggests that mifepristone (glucocorticoid receptor antagonist), may be a viable treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). The aim of this work was to translate our preclinical mifepristone study using yohimbine (α2 receptor antagonist) stress-induced reinstatement of alcohol-seeking to a clinical setting. This was a Phase 1/2, outpatient, cross-over, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with non-treatment-seeking individuals with AUD ( N =32). We investigated the safety, alcohol craving and consumption after oral administration of mifepristone (600mg daily for a week) in a human laboratory study comprised of administration of yohimbine in a cue-reactivity procedure and alcohol self-administration. Outcomes were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations and mediation and moderation analyses assessed mechanisms of action and precision medicine targets. We did not observe serious adverse events related to the study drugs or study procedure and mild to moderate non-serious adverse events were reported by both study conditions. Also, there was no statistically-significant difference between the mifepristone and placebo in the hemodynamic response, alcohol subjective effects and pharmacokinetics parameters. Mifepristone significantly reduced alcohol craving and increased cortisol levels. Mifepristone-induced cortisol increase was not a mediator of alcohol craving. Moderation analysis with family history density of AUD (FHDA) and mifepristone, suggested that reduced craving was present in individuals with low , but not high FHDA. Mifepristone, compared to placebo, did not reduce alcohol consumption in the laboratory or in a naturalistic setting. This study successfully translated a preclinical paradigm to a human laboratory study confirming safety, tolerability and efficacy of mifepristone in an alcohol paradigm. Mediation analysis showed that the effect of mifepristone on craving was not related to mifepristone-induced increases in cortisol and moderation of FHDA suggested the importance of evaluating AUD endophenotypes for pharmacotherapies. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT02243709. IND/FDA: 121984, mifepristone and yohimbine (Holder: Haass-Koffler).

Synchronised transcranial magnetic stimulation for substance use-disordered Veterans: protocol for the pilot sham-controlled acceptability trial.

INTRODUCTION: Substance use disorders (SUDs) take an enormous toll on US Veterans and civilians alike. Existing empirically supported interventions vary by substance and demonstrate only moderate efficacy. Non-invasive brain stimulation represents an innovative treatment for SUDs, yet aspects of traditional neurostimulation may hinder its implementation in SUD populations. Synchronised transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) uses rotating rare earth magnets to deliver low-field stimulation synchronised to an individual's alpha peak frequency that is safe for at-home administration. The current trial aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of sTMS, as well as the safety of at-home sTMS administration for substance-disordered Veterans. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty Veterans in substance treatment at the Providence Veterans Affairs will be randomised to receive 6 weeks of active or sham sTMS treatment. Eligibility will be confirmed by meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria for an alcohol, cocaine or opioid use disorder. Daily supervised sTMS treatment will occur either in clinic or at home through video monitoring. Clinical and self-report assessments will be completed at baseline, end of treatment and 1-month follow-up. Urine drug screening will occur once per week during the treatment phase. Primary outcomes include treatment adherence/retention and satisfaction to evaluate sTMS feasibility and acceptability in Veterans with SUDs. The safety of at-home sTMS administration will be assessed via adverse event monitoring. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The sTMS device received a significant risk determination for at-home use by the Food and Drug Administration in July 2021. Ethics approval was obtained in August 2021 from the Providence Veterans Affairs institutional review board and research and development committee. Data collection began in September 2021 and is planned to continue through December 2023. Findings will be disseminated at national conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. Results will serve to inform the development of large-scale clinical trials of sTMS efficacy for substance-disordered Veterans. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04336293).

An inpatient human laboratory study assessing the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and biobehavioral effect of GET 73 when co-administered with alcohol in individuals with alcohol use disorder.

RATIONALE: Previous work suggests that GET 73, a novel compound with putative activity on the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5), may represent a novel pharmacological treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and biobehavioral effects of GET 73, when co-administered with alcohol, in individuals with alcohol dependence (AD). METHODS: This was an inpatient, cross-over, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, human laboratory study with non-treatment-seeking, alcohol-dependent individuals. The study used a within-subject design, with two counterbalanced stages, during which participants received GET 73 and then placebo, or vice versa. During each stage, participants underwent an alcohol interaction session and, on a separate day, an alcohol cue reactivity, followed by an alcohol self-administration session. RESULTS: Safety outcomes of GET 73 were excellent with no serious adverse events, nor adverse events of severe grade. The co-administration of alcohol and GET 73 did not affect the pharmacokinetics of GET 73 or alcohol. GET 73, compared to placebo, did not affect the alcohol-related stimulation effects, but increased the subjective sedative effects of alcohol. GET 73 did not affect alcohol cue-induced craving, or alcohol self-administration in the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the safety and tolerability of GET 73 when co-administered with alcohol. Although, under this experimental condition, we did not detect an effect on alcohol craving and consumption in the laboratory, additional studies should be conducted administering GET 73 for an extended period in an outpatient setting.

Alcohol-related changes in behaviors and characteristics from the baseline to the randomization session for treatment and non-treatment seeking participants with alcohol use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Participants who are enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may be more motivated to change their behaviors after being enrolled in a study and that motivation may vary by treatment status. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this secondary analysis were to investigate if changes in alcohol-related behaviors/characteristics from the baseline to the randomization session differed overall and to assess those differences between non-treatment and treatment seeking individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHODS: Our sample included participants from eight RCTs conducted at Brown University (N = 281, 34% female). To assess differences across alcohol-related behaviors/characteristics, we investigated changes in craving (obsessive compulsive drinking scale) and alcohol drinking (percent abstinent days, drinks per week (DPW) and percent heavy drinking days (HDD)) overall and between treatment status. RESULTS: Results showed that there were baseline differences, such as increased AUD severity and craving for alcohol in treatment seeking participants (p's < .05) in the overall sample. Next, we showed that craving, DPW and HDD decreased and percent abstinent days increased from baseline to randomization (p's < .05). When controlling for treatment status and sociodemographic characteristics, treatment seeking, compared to non-treatment seeking participants, had a greater reduction in alcohol craving (p < .001) and a greater increase in percentage of drinking days (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that alcohol-related behaviors and characteristics changed after enrollment. Severity, craving and drinking behaviors also differed between treatment-seeking status, which can potentially impact medication development stages for AUD such as clinical trial eligibility, enrollment and study outcomes.

Randomized controlled trials for alcohol use disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) altered the logistics of ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The need to reduce in-person research and clinical activities, however, presented an additional level of complexity in order to continue conducting RCTs that focused on the development of medications for Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). The visits required a systematic objective evaluation from the physician and mental health professional and clinical staff, as many of the safety and efficacy assessments are self-reported. The following commentary addresses the successes and limitations our RCTs encountered during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Brief Report: Relationship Between Cotinine Levels and Peripheral Endogenous Concentrations of Oxytocin, ß-Endorphin, and Orexin in Individuals With Both Alcohol and Nicotine Use Disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this secondary analysis of a pilot clinical trial with individuals with alcohol and nicotine use disorders, we investigate the relationship between serum concentrations of oxytocin, ß-endorphin, melatonin, α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, substance P, and orexin, with objective biomarkers (salivary cotinine and serum γ-glutamyl transferase [GGT]) as well as with self-reported smoking and alcohol drinking. METHODS: Biomarkers for a total of N = 19 participants were analyzed using multiplexed, competitive format immune-assay (peptides) and enzyme competitive immunoassay (saliva). A regression analysis using Pearson's correlation coefficient was utilized to determine correlations. We controlled for multiple comparisons, checked for collinearities, and ran two-sided statistical tests. RESULTS: We found significant positive correlations for cotinine and oxytocin (P = .002), ß-endorphin (P = .008), and orexin (P < .001), but not for either GGT or self-reported smoking or alcohol drinking. CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: These preliminary results suggest a relationship between cotinine and oxytocin, ß-endorphin, and orexin, which opens up new potential hypotheses on the potential role of these endocrine pathways in tobacco smokers. (Am J Addict 2021;30:88-91).

Differences in Sociodemographic and Alcohol-Related Clinical Characteristics Between Treatment Seekers and Nontreatment Seekers and Their Role in Predicting Outcomes in the COMBINE Study for Alcohol Use Disorder.

BACKGROUND: One of the challenges in early-stage clinical research aimed at developing novel treatments for alcohol use disorder (AUD) is that the enrolled participants are heavy drinkers, but do not seek treatment for AUD. AIMS: To compare nontreatment seekers with alcohol dependence (AD) from 4 human laboratory studies conducted at Brown University (N = 240; 65.4% male) to treatment seekers with AD from the multisite COMBINE study (N = 1,383; 69.1% male) across sociodemographic and alcohol-related clinical variables and to evaluate whether the variables that significantly differentiate the 2 samples predict the 3 main COMBINE clinical outcomes: time to relapse, percent days abstinent (PDA), and good clinical outcome. METHODS: Sample characteristics were assessed by parametric and nonparametric testing. Three regression models measured the association between the differing variables and the 3 main COMBINE clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The nontreatment seekers, compared to the treatment seekers, were more ethnically diverse, less educated, single, and working part-time or unemployed (p's < 0.05); they met fewer DSM-IV AD criteria and had significantly lower scores on alcohol-related scales (p's < 0.05); they were less likely to have a father with alcohol problems (p < 0.0001) and had a significantly earlier age of onset and longer duration of AD (p's < 0.05); they also had significantly more total drinks, drinks per drinking day, heavy drinking days (HDD), and lower PDA in the 30 days prior to baseline (p's < 0.0001 to <0.05). Having more HDD in the 30 days prior to baseline predicted all of the 3 COMBINE clinical outcomes. All the other characteristics mentioned above that differed significantly between the 2 groups predicted at least 1 of the 3 COMBINE clinical outcomes, except for level of education, age of onset, and duration of AD. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences between groups should be considered in efforts across participant recruitment at different stages of the development of new treatments for AUD.

Alcohol Consumption among Samoan Adults in 2010: Patterns, Correlates and Health Implications.

AIMS: We aim to describe alcohol consumption and related problems from a nationwide survey in 2010 in Samoa in association with sociodemographic variables as part of an intervention development. METHODS: The sample consisted of 3463 adults, 25-65 years of age. Participants self-reported alcohol consumption in the previous 12 months, patterns of drinking and alcohol-related psychosocial problems. Data about age, census region of residence, highest attained education level, employment, marital status, household assets score and current smoking status were gathered. RESULTS: More than one-third of men, 36.1%, and 4.1% of women consumed alcohol in the past year. There were greater proportions of alcohol users among younger adults, <45 years, in both men and women. Among men, being unemployed and residing outside of rural Savai'i and smoking cigarettes were associated with current alcohol use. Among women, tertiary education and cigarette smoking were strongly associated with alcohol use. Among alcohol consumers, almost 75% of both men and women reported being drunk more than once in the prior month, and 58% of men and 81% of women drank heavily, consuming >4 drinks for women and >5 drinks for men at least once per episode in the prior week. More men than women, 51% versus 26%, felt that alcohol consumption had interfered with their daily life. CONCLUSION: Our analyses identified correlates of alcohol consumption and associated problems that can help guide the development of targeted interventions for different sex and age groups to mitigate the social and physiological harms of alcohol misuse.

Effects of 6-Week Use of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Smokers With Serious Mental Illness.

INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration is considering implementing a reduced-nicotine standard for cigarettes. Given the high rate of smoking among people with serious mental illness (SMI), it is important to examine the responses of these smokers to very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes. METHODS: This trial compared the effects of VLNC (0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco) and normal nicotine content cigarettes (15.8 mg/g) over a 6-week period in non-treatment-seeking smokers with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder (n = 58). Linear regression was used to examine the effects of cigarette condition on cigarettes per day, subjective responses, nicotine and tobacco toxicant exposure, craving, withdrawal symptoms, and psychiatric symptoms. RESULTS: At week 6, participants in the VLNC condition smoked fewer cigarettes per day, had lower breath carbon monoxide levels, lower craving scores, and rated their study cigarettes lower in satisfaction, reward, enjoyment, and craving reduction than those in the normal nicotine content condition (ps < .05). Week 6 psychiatric and extrapyramidal symptoms did not differ by condition, except for scores on a measure of parkinsonism, which were lower in the VLNC condition (p < .05). There were no differences across conditions on total nicotine exposure, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol, withdrawal symptoms, or responses to abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a reduced-nicotine standard for cigarettes would reduce smoking among smokers with SMI. However, the lack of effect on total nicotine exposure indicates VLNC noncompliance, suggesting that smokers with SMI may respond to a reduced-nicotine standard by substituting alternative forms of nicotine. IMPLICATIONS: Results from this trial suggest that a reduced-nicotine standard for cigarettes would reduce smoking rates and smoke exposure in smokers with SMI, without increasing psychiatric symptoms. However, noncompliance with VLNC cigarettes was observed, suggesting that these smokers might respond to a reduced-nicotine standard by substituting alternative forms of nicotine.

Intravenous administration of ghrelin increases serum cortisol and aldosterone concentrations in heavy-drinking alcohol-dependent individuals: Results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled human laboratory study.

Increasing evidence supports the role of appetite-regulating hormones, including ghrelin, in alcohol use disorder (AUD). Effects of ghrelin administration on cortisol and aldosterone, two hormones known to influence the development and maintenance of AUD, have been observed in ghrelin-exposed tissues or cells, as well as rodents and healthy volunteers, however whether these effects replicate in individuals with AUD is unknown. Here, we tested the hypothesis that intravenous administration of ghrelin leads to increase in endogenous serum cortisol and aldosterone concentrations in alcohol-dependent, heavy drinking individuals, and that these changes may predict ghrelin-induced alcohol craving. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled human laboratory study in non-treatment-seeking, heavy-drinking, alcohol-dependent individuals randomized to receive either placebo, 1 mcg/kg or 3 mcg/kg of intravenous ghrelin. Then, participants underwent a cue-reactivity procedure in a bar-like setting, which included exposure to both neutral (juice) and alcohol cues. Repeated blood samples were collected and used to measure endogenous cortisol and aldosterone serum concentrations, in response to exogenous ghrelin administration. Furthermore, cortisol and aldosterone serum concentrations were used to develop a model to predict the effect of exogenous ghrelin administration on alcohol craving. Intravenous ghrelin administration increased endogenous cortisol and aldosterone serum concentrations. While the effects on cortisol were greater than those on aldosterone, only the ghrelin-induced changes in aldosterone serum concentrations predicted craving. These findings provide initial evidence of ghrelin effects on glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids in individuals with AUD, thereby providing additional information on the potential mechanisms by which the ghrelin system may play a role in alcohol craving and seeking in AUD.

Noradrenergic targets for the treatment of alcohol use disorder.

The role of norepinephrine (NE) in the development of alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been studied over the past several decades. However, the NE system has been largely ignored for many years as a potential target for medication development for AUD. More recently, preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the potential value of targeting NE signaling for developing new pharmacological treatments for AUD. This review contributes to a special issue of Psychopharmacology focused on promising targets for alcohol addiction. Specifically, this review coalesces preclinical and clinical neuroscience that re-evaluate the noradrenergic system, and in particular the alpha-1 receptor, as a potential target for AUD.

Administration of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 allosteric modulator GET 73 with alcohol: A translational study in rats and humans.

Preclinical work suggests that GET 73 (N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl]-4-methoxybutyramide), a novel metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 negative allosteric modulator, may represent a novel pharmacological treatment for alcohol use disorder. Two independent experiments evaluated the effect of acutely administered GET 73 (0, 30, and 100 mg/kg, intragastrically) on alcohol-induced hypolocomotion ( n=72) and sedation/hypnosis ( n=36) in rats. In healthy male volunteers ( n=14), an open-label, randomised, crossover study was conducted to compare adverse events and pharmacokinetic parameters, in two experiments in which 300 mg GET 73 was administered, with and without alcohol, once and thrice. In rats, when administered with alcohol-vehicle, 100 mg/kg, but not 30 mg/kg, GET 73 reduced spontaneous locomotor activity. When administered with alcohol, no dose of GET 73 altered either alcohol-induced hypolocomotion or sedation/hypnosis. In humans, both single and thrice 300 mg GET 73 administration were well tolerated, in the presence and absence of alcohol, with no differences in adverse events. There were no significant differences in relative bioavailability between administering 300 mg GET 73 in the presence or absence of alcohol.

Comparing and Combining Topiramate and Aripiprazole on Alcohol-Related Outcomes in a Human Laboratory Study.

AIMS: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of topiramate up to 200 mg/day and of aripiprazole up to 15 mg/day, alone and combined, in reducing alcohol-related outcomes in a human laboratory study. METHOD: This was a 5 week, between-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled human laboratory study with topiramate [0 mg/day (placebo), 100 mg/day, 200 mg/day] and aripiprazole [0 mg/day (placebo), 7.5 mg/day, 15 mg/day] in 90 non-treatment seeking, heavy drinking, alcohol-dependent individuals. Main outcomes were the efficacy of 200 mg/day topiramate and 15 mg/day aripiprazole, alone and combined, in reducing drinks consumed during an alcohol self-administration procedure (human laboratory phase) and while receiving the study medications prior to the laboratory session (naturalistic drinking phase). Other outcomes in the laboratory phase included alcohol craving, and alcohol biphasic effects. RESULTS: In the human laboratory phase, topiramate 200 mg/day reduced alcohol craving [**P < 0.01] and amplified alcohol-induced stimulation [*P < 0.05], but did not reduce the number of drinks consumed. Topiramate 200 mg/day was also effective in reducing drinking days [*P < 0.05], and alcohol craving [*P < 0.05], in the naturalistic drinking phase. No significant findings were found for aripiprazole for any of the outcomes analyzed. CONCLUSION: Participants receiving 200 mg/day topiramate reported reduced alcohol drinking and craving, and increased alcohol-related stimulation. These findings provide further support for the role of topiramate as a pharmacological treatment for AUD. CLINICALTRIAL.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00884884. SHORT SUMMARY: This study tested topiramate and aripiprazole alone and in combination. The results replicate past findings and suggest that topiramate may be an effective treatment for alcohol use disorder. The present results suggest that the combination of topiramate and aripiprazole do not warrant further evaluation.

Dataset for Phase I randomized clinical trial for safety and tolerability of GET 73 in single and repeated ascending doses including preliminary pharmacokinetic parameters.

The data in this article outline the methods used for the administration of GET 73 in the first time-in-human manuscript entitled "Phase I randomized clinical trial for the safety, tolerability and preliminary pharmacokinetics of the mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator GET 73 following single and repeated doses in healthy male volunteers" (Haass-Koffler et al., 2017) [1]. Data sets are provided in two different manners. The first series of tables provided includes procedural information about the experiments conducted. The next series of tables provided includes Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for GET 73 and its main metabolite MET 2. This set of data is comprised by two experiments: Experiment 1 references a single ascending dose administration of GET 73 and Experiment 2 references a repeated ascending dose administration of GET 73.

A Phase I randomized clinical trial testing the safety, tolerability and preliminary pharmacokinetics of the mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator GET 73 following single and repeated doses in healthy volunteers.

Preclinical work suggests that the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu5) may represent a novel target to treat neuropsychiatric disorders, including alcohol use disorder and obesity. The goal of this first-in-man study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of GET 73 (PubChem SID: 329974174), a novel mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending dose, Phase I study conducted in healthy male volunteers in two experiments. GET 73 was administered as single ascending doses (N=48; Experiment 1; 10, 30, 100, 300, 450, 600-mg) or multiple ascending doses (N=32; Experiment 2; 100, 300, 450, 450-mg twice a day). Primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among drug conditions and drug tolerability. The secondary endpoints were the PK parameters of GET 73 and its metabolite MET 2. Single GET 73 doses of up to 600-mg and repeated ascending doses of up to 450-mg twice/day were safe and well-tolerated. There were no serious or severe AEs. All AEs were mild or moderate in severity. Total GET 73 exposure increased with each increased GET 73 dose. A dose-related increase in mean maximum plasma drug concentration was observed after repeated dosing. Maximum plasma drug concentrations occurred between 0.5 and 2.05h after administration in all groups for both single and repeated doses. This first-in-human study indicates that GET 73, as single or multiple ascending doses, is safe and well-tolerated when administered to healthy male volunteers.

Higher pretreatment blood pressure is associated with greater alcohol drinking reduction in alcohol-dependent individuals treated with doxazosin.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical research suggest that the α1 receptor antagonist prazosin reduces alcohol consumption. Furthermore, clinical studies indicate a role for prazosin in treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms and a recent trial suggested that pre-treatment blood pressure (BP) predicts therapeutic response for prazosin in PTSD patients. Whether pre-treatment BP may predict response to α1 blockers in alcohol-dependent (AD) patients is unknown. We previously reported a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where doxazosin, an α1 receptor antagonist with a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile than prazosin, reduced drinks per week (DPW) and heavy drinking days (HDD) in AD patients with a high family history density of alcoholism. In this study, we tested pre-treatment BP as another potentially valuable clinical moderator of doxazosin's response on alcohol consumption. METHODS: This was a double-blind placebo-controlled RCT testing doxazosin up to 16mg/day in AD treatment-seeking patients (N=41). The hypothesized moderator effect of baseline standing systolic and diastolic BP on DPW and HDD was tested. RESULTS: With pre-treatment standing diastolic BP as a moderator, there were significant BP x medication interactions for both DPW [**p=0.009, d=0.80] and HDD [*p=0.018, d=1.11]. Post-hoc analyses indicated significant doxazosin effects in patients with higher standing BP in reducing both DPW and HDD. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that higher standing diastolic BP at baseline (pre-treatment) may represent a predictor of doxazosin's response on alcohol consumption in AD patients. These results further elucidate the possible efficacy and mechanisms of action of α1 receptor antagonism in AD individuals.

Varenicline versus nicotine patch with brief advice for smokers with substance use disorders with or without depression: effects on smoking, substance use and depressive symptoms.

AIMS: Varenicline was compared with transdermal nicotine (NRT) for smokers with current substance use disorders (SUD) for effects on 3-month smoking abstinence (primary outcome) and, secondarily, on 3- and 6 month abstinence while adjusting for medication adherence, and on additional smoking and substance use outcomes. Moderation by major depressive disorder history (MDD) and adherence were investigated. DESIGN: Double-blind double-placebo-controlled randomized design, stratifying by MDD, gender and nicotine dependence, with 3 and 6 months follow-up. SETTING: University offices in Rhode Island, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Adult smokers (n = 137), in SUD treatment, substance abstinent <12 months (n = 77 varenicline, 60 NRT). INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Twelve weeks of varenicline (2 mg/day, after 1-week dose run-up) or NRT (21 mg/day decreasing to 7 mg/day). MEASUREMENTS: Primary: point-prevalence smoking abstinence (7-day, confirmed) at 3 months. Secondary: point-prevalence abstinence at 6 months, quantity and frequency of smoking and substance use at 3 and 6 months, and within-treatment abstinence, medication adherence and depressive symptoms. Smoking outcome analyses were repeated controlling for adherence and investigating adherence as a moderator. FINDINGS: Effects on 3-month abstinence were P < 0.065 without a covariate (Bayes factor 3.35, supporting the effect strongly) and differed significantly when controlling for baseline smoking [varenicline: 13%, NRT: 3%; odds ratio (OR) = 4.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00, 23.13, P < 0.05]. The threefold difference at 6 months was not significant. Medication effect on abstinence across time was significant (P < 0.05) covarying adherence and baseline smoking (OR = 6.40, 95% CI = 1.00, 40.93). Medication differences in 3-month abstinence occurred among participants with ≥ 77% adherence (P < 0.02). No significant medication effects on heavy drinking, drug use or depressive symptoms were found. CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline appears to improve the chances of achieving at least 3 months of smoking abstinence in smokers with substance use disorders trying to stop, compared with transdermal nicotine patches, the effect being independent of history of depressive disorder.