Effectiveness of a web-based, electronic medical records-integrated patient agenda tool to improve doctor-patient communication in primary care consultations: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial study.

BACKGROUND: Doctors may struggle to identify patient agendas during busy primary care consultations. Therefore, an online patient agenda tool (the Values in Shared Interactions Tool- VISIT) was developed which allowed patients to enter their agenda items pre-consultation for doctors to view on their electronic medical records (EMR). This study aimed to measure the impact of this EMR-integrated website on patient satisfaction, number of agenda items discussed and consultation time. METHODS: An unblinded cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university-based primary care clinic between June-October 2019. Twenty-five family medicine trainees were randomized into using the VISIT tool (intervention) and usual care (control). Descriptive analysis showed significant differences between arms for age, occupation and mobile device proficiency scores. These were entered as covariates in trial analyses. Primary outcome was mean self-reported patient satisfaction score using the Healthcare Provider-Patient Communication (HCPPC) questionnaire, secondary outcomes were mean agenda items per consultation and mean consultation time. RESULTS: The intervention arm had 12 doctors and 109 patients; the control arm had 13 doctors and 137 patients. Participation rates were 25.5% for intervention vs 53.6% for control. There was no difference between arms for patient satisfaction scores (133.3, 95% CI: 130.67-135.88 intervention vs 134.0, 95% CI: 131.76-136.29 control, P =.680) and consultation duration (15.83 min, 95% CI: 13.66-17.99 intervention vs 15.45 min, 95% CI: 13.57-17.34 control, P =.805). Mean number of agenda items discussed was higher in the intervention arm (2.25 items, 95% CI: 2.06-2.44 intervention vs 1.94 items, CI 95%: 1.78-2.11, P =.024). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating patient agendas into the EMR did not affect patient satisfaction compared to usual care but was associated with a slightly increased number of agenda items without an increase in consultation time. This shows it may be useful for a busy primary care setting with multiple comorbidities and short consultation times.

Factors associated with level of shared decision making in Malaysian primary care consultations.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the level of shared decision-making (SDM) in primary care consultations in Malaysia, a multicultural, middle-income developing country. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in an urban, public primary care clinic. Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants, and audio-recorded consultations were scored for SDM levels by two independent raters using the OPTION tool. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine factors significantly associated with SDM levels. RESULTS: 199 patients and 31 doctors participated. Mean consultation time was 14.3 min (+ SD 5.75). Patients' age ranged from 18 to 87 years (median age of 57.5 years). 52.8 % of patients were female, with three main ethnicities (Malay, Chinese, Indian). The mean OPTION score was found to be 7.8 (+ SD 3.31) out of 48. After a multivariate analysis, only patient ethnicity (ß= -0.142, p < 0.05) and increased consultation time (ß = 0.407, p < 0.01) were associated with higher OPTION scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in Malaysia experience extremely poor levels of SDM in general practice. Higher scores were associated with increased consultation time and patient ethnicity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Malaysian general practitioners should aim to develop and practice cultural competency skills to avoid biased SDM practice towards certain ethnicities.