Virtual CT cholangioscopy: comparison with fiberoptic cholangioscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: No studies comparing virtual computed tomography (CT) cholangioscopy of the common bile duct compared with fiberoptic cholangioscopy are available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of virtual CT cholangioscopy of the common bile duct. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 52 patients (25 women, 27 men; mean age 56.5, range 32 - 81) with biliopancreatic disorders. Endoscopic images were produced by a volume-rendering method and a perspective projection. The ability to detect the endoluminal view and abnormalities of the common bile duct by virtual CT cholangioscopy and fiberoptic cholangioscopy was evaluated. RESULTS: Except for two cases (4 %), virtual CT cholangioscopy revealed excellent and moderate endoluminal visualization. There was no significant difference between the techniques (virtual CT cholangioscopy vs. fiberoptic cholangioscopy: excellent, 73 % vs. 85 %, P = 0.149; moderate 23 % vs. 15 % (P = 0.319); poor, 4 % vs. 0 %, P = 0.153). Virtual CT cholangioscopy revealed no significantly different ability to detect stenosis and obstruction of the common bile duct, compared with fiberoptic cholangioscopy. However, the ability of virtual CT cholangioscopy to detect minute papillary tumors (virtual CT cholangioscopy 30 % vs. fiberoptic cholangioscopy 100 %, P = 0.001) and stones smaller than 5 mm (virtual CT cholangioscopy 25 % vs. fiberoptic cholangioscopy 100 %; P = 0.002 was significantly less than that of fiberoptic cholangioscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual CT cholangioscopy cannot replace fiberoptic cholangioscopy completely. However, the use of this technique, instead of fiberoptic cholangioscopy, may be feasible for following up patients after biliary intervention.

Pancreas: imaging diagnosis with color/power Doppler ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and intraductal ultrasonography.

Recent advances of ultrasound imaging have made possible to depict various diseases and conditions of the pancreas. Color/power Doppler ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and intraductal ultrasonography are feasible to show vascular abnormalities, differentiate the solid and cystic tumors, decide tumor extent, and help to perform interventional treatments of the pancreatic diseases. Those techniques will contribute to the more precise and easier diagnosis and to prompt decision of the treatments of the pancreatic disorders. Radiologists should recognize the diagnostic feasibility and limitations of those techniques in order to avoid unnecessary examinations on the patients, and obtain precise diagnostic images.

Power Doppler sonography: evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with transarterial embolization or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare tumor detectability by assessing the vascularity on power and color Doppler sonography and CT after transarterial embolization or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy or both in hepatocellular carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma (size, 28 +/- 7 mm [mean +/- standard deviation]; range, 20-40 mm) in 38 patients were treated with transarterial embolization (n = 6), percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (n = 23), and transarterial embolization plus percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (n = 9). Power Doppler sonography, color Doppler sonography, and CT were performed before and 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the treatments. The existence of hepatocellular carcinoma was confirmed by positive findings for color signals on both Doppler sonography techniques and for tumor stains on CT. All the tumors were determined to be malignant by microscopic examination of biopsy specimens. RESULTS: Before the treatments, power Doppler sonography (100%) and CT (100%) were significantly more effective than color Doppler sonography (61.7%) (p < 0.001, for both). Six months after the treatments, the sensitivity of power Doppler sonography (87.5%) was significantly better than that of color Doppler sonography (12.5%) but was not significant in comparison with CT (66.6%). However, power Doppler sonography detected color signals in two of three tumors in which iodized oil was accumulated and no tumor stain appeared on CT, and the two lesions detected with power Doppler sonography were carcinomas. CONCLUSION: Power Doppler sonography can be considered the most sensitive technique in assessing the viability of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial embolization or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy or both.