RESUMEN
PRECIS: As the only microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) with a reusable component, the cost per procedure of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) diminishes with each successive use. We present a cost comparison of ECP with other MIGS devices, based on our clinical practice. PURPOSE: ECP delivers diode laser via a reusable probe to the ciliary processes under direct visualization. The aim of our study is to evaluate the direct cost of ECP based on a retrospective review of cases and compare the cost per procedure with other MIGS devices. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of ECP procedures performed at St Thomas' Hospital over 4.5 years. The cost of the ECP endoscope and diode laser consoles, reusable probes, and maintenance contracts were obtained from the hospital procurement log. The on-site Central Sterile Services Department was contacted for probe sterilization and repackaging costs. The cost per device for ECP and commonly performed MIGS procedures were obtained from the product specialists of each company. RESULTS: A total of 332 procedures were performed using 37 ECP probes during the study period. Each reusable ECP laser probe was found to give an average of 8.97 laser treatments. The cost per procedure decreased over the course of 4.5 years from £819.43 for the first 42 cases to £341.50 after 332 cases. Compared with other MIGS devices, the cost per procedure of ECP after 100 procedures is second lowest to the Kahook Dual Blade and reduces with each successive procedure performed. CONCLUSION: The ability to reuse each ECP probe significantly lowers the cost per procedure compared with other MIGS devices in the United Kingdom. The cost per procedure continues to reduce with each successive procedure.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/economía , Glaucoma/economía , Glaucoma/cirugía , Terapia por Láser/economía , Láseres de Semiconductores/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Endoscopía/métodos , Endoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Glaucoma/epidemiología , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Terapia por Láser/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oftalmología/economía , Oftalmología/métodos , Oftalmología/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/economía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether children tolerate cyclopentolate 1% spray better than drops and to assess the adequacy of cycloplegia achieved by spray for objective refraction. METHODS: The effects of cyclopentolate 1% drops and spray on distress levels were assessed prospectively using a guardian questionnaire in consecutive patients 10 years of age or younger. Distress was graded at various points during the appointment using a Likert scale of 1 to 10 (1 = no distress, 10 = severe distress). The adequacy of cycloplegia in children receiving cyclopentolate spray and the waiting times were assessed via a Likert questionnaire completed by the examining physician. RESULTS: The guardians of 72 and 77 children who received cyclopentolate 1% drops or spray, respectively, completed the questionnaire. The children were divided in three age groups: 1 to 4 years, 5 to 7 years, and 8 to 10 years. Children 7 years or younger were significantly less distressed by administration of cyclopentolate 1% spray (P < .005). There was no statistical difference in distress levels in children older than 7 years (P = .9719). Thirteen of the 77 children who received cyclopentolate 1% spray did not have adequate cycloplegia to allow objective refraction. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate cyclopentolate 1% spray is less distressing at the time of administration than cyclopentolate 1% drops for children 7 years or younger. However, the cycloplegia achieved is not adequate in a high percentage of children.
Asunto(s)
Aerosoles , Ciclopentolato/administración & dosificación , Midriáticos/administración & dosificación , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Pupila/efectos de los fármacos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Refracción Ocular , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pruebas de VisiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The association between intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) and tamsulosin has been well-described. The rate of IFIS in association with other α-1 antagonists needs further clarification. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of IFIS and associated cataract surgery complications in patients taking tamsulosin or doxazosin. METHODS: Patients receiving tamsulosin or doxazosin, and an equivalent number of controls, were identified using the electronic patient record for cataract surgery performed over 2 years. The presence of IFIS and intraoperative complications were ascertained. Modifications of surgical technique in the form of preoperative 1 % atropine, intraoperative diluted phenylephrine, iris hooks, or highly viscous viscoelastic materials were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 2,785 cataract operations performed in 2,028 patients, 52 cases (1.9 %) were on tamsulosin and 109 were on doxazosin (3.9 %). In the doxazosin group (excluding three cases with incomplete data), significantly more eyes (17 of 106 eyes, 16 %) showed at least one IFIS characteristic than controls, six eyes (6 %) required adjustment of surgical technique, and intraoperative complications occurred in two eyes (1.9 %). In the tamsulosin group, significantly more eyes (25 of 52 eyes, 48 %) demonstrated at least one IFIS feature than control or doxazosin eyes; 18 eyes (35 %) needed adjustment of surgical technique, and seven (13.5 %) suffered intraoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Incidence of IFIS was significantly higher in tamsulosin and doxazosin patients. The presence of IFIS was associated with a significantly higher complication rate. We would advise that all patients receiving α1 antagonists (not only those receiving tamsulosin) should be identified preoperatively, receive appropriate modifications in preparation, and have alternative techniques and a senior surgeon available at the time of surgery.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efectos adversos , Doxazosina/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Enfermedades del Iris/epidemiología , Facoemulsificación/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Atropina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Enfermedades del Iris/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Iris/prevención & control , Masculino , Músculo Liso/efectos de los fármacos , Midriáticos/administración & dosificación , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Fenilefrina/administración & dosificación , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Pupila/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Tamsulosina , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Group C Streptococcus is a well recognised pathogen in acute pharyngitis and sinusitis. To our knowledge group c streptococcus has not been reported to cause orbital cellulitis or subperiosteal abscess. We wish to report a case of a child with orbital subperiosteal abscess caused by Group C streptococcus.