Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 178(2): 535-540, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28714061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hair and scalp problems are common. Unfortunately, many uncertainties exist around the most effective management and treatment strategies for these disorders. OBJECTIVES: To identify uncertainties in hair-loss management, prevention, diagnosis and treatment that are important to both people with hair loss and healthcare professionals. METHODS: A Hair Loss Priority Setting Partnership was established between patients, their carers and relatives, and healthcare professionals to identify the most important uncertainties in hair loss. The methodology of the James Lind Alliance was followed to ensure a balanced, inclusive and transparent process. RESULTS: In total, 2747 treatment uncertainties were submitted by 912 participants; following exclusions 884 uncertainties relating to hair loss (excluding alopecia areata) were analysed. Questions were combined into 'indicative uncertainties' following a structured format. A series of ranking exercises further reduced this list to a top 25 that was taken to a final prioritization workshop where the top 10 priorities were agreed. CONCLUSIONS: We present the top 10 research priorities for hair loss (excluding alopecia areata) to guide researchers and funding bodies to support studies important to both patients and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia/terapia , Investigación , Alopecia/diagnóstico , Alopecia/prevención & control , Consenso , Dermatología/organización & administración , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Br J Dermatol ; 176(5): 1316-1320, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27696375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a common hair loss disorder that results in patchy to complete hair loss. Many uncertainties exist around the most effective treatments for this condition. OBJECTIVES: To identify uncertainties in AA management and treatment that are important to both service users (people with hair loss, carers and relatives) and healthcare professionals. METHODS: An AA priority setting partnership was established between patients, their carers and relatives, and healthcare professionals to identify the most important uncertainties in AA. The methodology of the James Lind Alliance was followed to ensure a balanced, inclusive and transparent process. RESULTS: In total, 2747 treatment uncertainties were submitted by 912 participants, of which 1012 uncertainties relating to AA (and variants) were analysed. Questions were combined into 'indicative uncertainties' following a structured format. A series of ranking exercises further reduced this list to a top 25 that were taken to a final prioritization workshop where the top 10 priorities were agreed. CONCLUSIONS: We present the top 10 research priorities for AA to guide researchers and funding bodies to support studies important to both patients and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata/terapia , Investigación , Cuidadores , Prioridades en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Relaciones Profesional-Familia
6.
Lasers Med Sci ; 30(1): 453-67, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24173910

RESUMEN

We describe the diversity of indications for laser hair removal (LHR) therapy and compare our experience with the literature. Patients' case notes referred to the Birmingham Regional Skin Laser Centre between 2003 and 2011 for laser hair removal, with indications other than hirsutism, were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-one treated patients with the following indications were identified: hair-bearing skin grafts/flaps, intra-oral hair-bearing flap, Becker's naevus, localised nevoid hypertrichosis, peristomal hair-bearing skin, scrotal skin prior to vaginoplasty in male-to-female (MTF) gender reassignment, pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), pseudofolliculitis barbae (PFB) and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Seven patients with the following indications have been reported before: intra-oral hair-bearing graft, naevoid hypertrichosis and peristomal hair-bearing skin. A clinical review of the evidence available for each indication is provided. Our experience and that in the published literature suggest that LHR is a safe, well-tolerated and effective treatment modality for the indications we report, leading to significant symptom and functional improvement with high patient satisfaction. LHR appears effective in the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions such as PSD, PFB and HS, particularly at an early disease stage. We aim to increase awareness of the diversity of laser hair removal indications and add evidence to the medical literature of the wide range of indications for this useful treatment modality.


Asunto(s)
Remoción del Cabello , Terapia por Láser , Rayos Láser , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
Br J Dermatol ; 171(5): 1206-10, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24628291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acral peeling skin syndrome (APSS) is a rare skin fragility disorder usually caused by mutations in the transglutaminase 5 gene (TGM5). METHODS: We investigated the mutation spectrum of APSS in the U.K., Germany and Poland. RESULTS: We identified 59 children with APSS from 52 families. The phenotype was readily recognizable, with some variation in severity both within and between families. Most cases had been misdiagnosed as the localized form of epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS-loc). Eighteen different TGM5 mutations were identified, 15 of which were novel. Eight mutations were unique to a single family, nine each occurred in two families, while the common p.Gly113Cys mutation linked to a second missense variant p.Thr109Met occurred in 47 of the 52 families and was homozygous in 28. Most patients were of nonconsanguineous white European origin. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that APSS is under-reported and widely misdiagnosed as EBS-loc, with significant counselling implications as APSS is autosomal recessive while EBS-loc is dominant. We recommend screening for TGM5 mutations when EBS-loc is suspected but not confirmed by mutations in KRT5 or KRT14. Our report trebles the number of known TGM5 mutations. It provides further evidence that p.Gly113Cys is a founder mutation in the European population. This is consistent with the striking ethnic distribution of APSS in U.K., where the majority of patients are of nonconsanguineous white European origin, in contrast to the pattern of other recessive skin disorders.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Exfoliativa/genética , Mutación/genética , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/genética , Transglutaminasas/genética , Niño , Dermatitis Exfoliativa/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Exfoliativa/etnología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Epidermólisis Ampollosa Simple/diagnóstico , Efecto Fundador , Pruebas Genéticas , Alemania/etnología , Heterocigoto , Homocigoto , Humanos , Queratina-14/genética , Queratina-5/genética , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/etnología , Polonia/etnología , Enfermedades de la Piel/congénito , Reino Unido/etnología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...