Patients with progression of spinal metastases who present to the clinic have better outcomes compared to those who present to the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: As cancer therapies have improved, spinal metastases are increasingly common. Resulting complications have a significant impact on patient's quality of life. Optimal methods of surveillance and avoidance of neurologic deficits are understudied. This study compares the clinical course of patients who initially presented to the emergency department (ED) versus a multidisciplinary spine oncology clinic and who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) secondary to progression/presentation of metastatic spine disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of adult oncologic patients who underwent spinal SBRT at a single hospital from 2010 to 2021. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 498 spinal radiographic treatment sites in 390 patients. Of these patients, 118 (30.3%) presented to the ED. Patients presenting to the ED compared to the clinic had significantly more severe spinal compression (52.5% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.0001), severe pain (28.8% vs. 10.3%; p < 0.0001), weakness (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001), and difficulty walking (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001). Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic were significantly more likely to have surgical intervention followed by SBRT (55.4% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.0001) compared to SBRT alone. Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic had a significantly quicker interval to distant spine progression (5.1 ± 6.5 vs. 9.1 ± 10.2 months; p = 0.004), systemic progression (5.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.2 ± 10.7 months; p < 0.0001), and worse overall survival (9.3 ± 10.0 vs. 14.3 ± 13.7 months; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The establishment of multidisciplinary spine oncology clinics is an opportunity to potentially allow for earlier, more data-driven treatment of their spinal metastatic disease.

Local Control in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma to the Spine: The Experience of an Institution with a Multidisciplinary Spine Oncology Program.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to the spine who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) through a multidisciplinary spine oncology program are not well described. We sought to describe the clinical course and local control rates at 1 and 2 years for these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of adult oncologic patients receiving SBRT to the spine through a multidisciplinary spine oncology program at a single institution from 2010 to 2021 was performed. Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of RCC were included. RESULTS: A total of 75 spinal sites were treated in 60 patients. Of the 60 patients, 75.0% were men, and the mean patient age was 59.2 ± 11.3 years. At 1 year after treatment, 6 of the 60 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 54 patients, 18 were censored by death and 7 treatment sites showed local recurrence, for 37 of 44 treatment sites with local control (87.8%). At 2 years, 1 additional local recurrence had developed, 15 patients were censored by death, and no additional patients had been lost to follow-up, resulting in 28 of 36 treatment sites with local control (83.2%). None of the patients who had undergone repeat SBRT had local recurrence at 1 or 2 years. For those with local recurrence, the average time from treatment to progression was 6.6 ± 6.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, one of the largest reported studies of spine SBRT for metastatic RCC, local control was high at 1 and 2 years. Our findings support the role of coordinated, algorithmic treatment for these patients.

Bone metastasis from glioblastoma: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating disease with poor overall survival. Despite the common occurrence of GBM among primary brain tumors, metastatic disease is rare. Our goal was to perform a systematic literature review on GBM with osseous metastases and understand the rate of metastasis to the vertebral column as compared to the remainder of the skeleton, and how this histology would fit into our current paradigm of treatment for bone metastases. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant literature search was performed using the PubMed database from 1952 to 2021. Search terms included "GBM", "glioblastoma", "high-grade glioma", "bone metastasis", and "bone metastases". RESULTS: Of 659 studies initially identified, 67 articles were included in the current review. From these 67 articles, a total of 92 distinct patient case presentations of metastatic glioblastoma to bone were identified. Of these cases, 58 (63%) involved the vertebral column while the remainder involved lesions within the skull, sternum, rib cage, and appendicular skeleton. CONCLUSION: Metastatic dissemination of GBM to bone occurs. While the true incidence is unknown, workup for metastatic disease, especially involving the spinal column, is warranted in symptomatic patients. Lastly, management of patients with GBM vertebral column metastases can follow the International Spine Oncology Consortium two-step multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases.

Differential immune landscapes in appendicular versus axial skeleton.

Roughly 400,000 people in the U.S. are living with bone metastases, the vast majority occurring in the spine. Metastases to the spine result in fractures, pain, paralysis, and significant health care costs. This predilection for cancer to metastasize to the bone is seen across most cancer histologies, with the greatest incidence seen in prostate, breast, and lung cancer. The molecular process involved in this predilection for axial versus appendicular skeleton is not fully understood, although it is likely that a combination of tumor and local micro-environmental factors plays a role. Immune cells are an important constituent of the bone marrow microenvironment and many of these cells have been shown to play a significant role in tumor growth and progression in soft tissue and bone disease. With this in mind, we sought to examine the differences in immune landscape between axial and appendicular bones in the normal noncancerous setting in order to obtain an understanding of these landscapes. To accomplish this, we utilized mass cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) to examine differences in the immune cell landscapes between the long bone and vertebral body bone marrow from patient clinical samples and C57BL/6J mice. We demonstrate significant differences between immune populations in both murine and human marrow with a predominance of myeloid progenitor cells in the spine. Additionally, cytokine analysis revealed differences in concentrations favoring a more myeloid enriched population of cells in the vertebral body bone marrow. These differences could have clinical implications with respect to the distribution and permissive growth of bone metastases.

Pre- and intraoperative thoracic spine localization techniques: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: In the era of modern medicine with an armamentarium full of state-of-the art technologies at our disposal, the incidence of wrong-level spinal surgery remains problematic. In particular, the thoracic spine presents a challenge for accurate localization due partly to body habitus, anatomical variations, and radiographic artifact from the ribs and scapula. The present review aims to assess and describe thoracic spine localization techniques. METHODS: The authors performed a literature search using the PubMed database from 1990 to 2020, compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of 27 articles were included in this qualitative review. RESULTS: A number of pre- and intraoperative strategies have been devised and employed to facilitate correct-level localization. Some of the more well-described approaches include fiducial metallic markers (screw or gold), metallic coils, polymethylmethacrylate, methylene blue, marking wire, use of intraoperative neuronavigation, intraoperative localization techniques (including using a needle, temperature probe, fluoroscopy, MRI, and ultrasonography), and skin marking. CONCLUSIONS: While a number of techniques exist to accurately localize lesions in the thoracic spine, each has its advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, the localization technique deployed by the spine surgeon will be patient-specific but often based on surgeon preference.

Dura promotes metastatic potential in prostate cancer through the CXCR2 pathway.

PURPOSE: Spinal metastases are common in cancer. This preferential migration/growth in the spine is not fully understood. Dura has been shown to affect the surrounding microenvironment and promote cancer growth. Here, we investigate the role of dural cytokines in promoting the metastatic potential of prostate cancer (PCa) and the involvement of the CXCR2 signaling pathway. METHODS: The role of dural conditioned media (DCM) in proliferation, migration and invasion of five PCa cell lines with various hormone sensitivities was assessed in the presence or absence of the CXCR2 inhibitor, SB225002. CXCR2 surface protein was examined by FACS. Cytokine levels were measured using a mouse cytokine array. RESULTS: We observed high levels of cytokines produced by dura and within the vertebral body bone marrow, namely CXCL1 and CXCL2, that act on the CXCR2 receptor. All prostate cell lines treated with DCM demonstrated significant increase in growth, migration and invasion regardless of androgen sensitivity, except PC3, which did not significantly increase in invasiveness. When treated with SB225002, the growth response to DCM by cells expressing the highest levels of CXCR2 as measured by FACS (LNCaP and 22Rv1) was blunted. The increase in migration was significantly decreased in all lines in the presence of SB225002. Interestingly, the invasion increase seen with DCM was unchanged when these cells were treated with the CXCR2 inhibitor, except PC3 did demonstrate a significant decrease in invasion. CONCLUSION: DCM enhances the metastatic potential of PCa with increased proliferation, migration and invasion. This phenomenon is partly mediated through the CXCR2 pathway.

Resection of a Lumbar Intradural Extramedullary Schwannoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Schwannomas are typically benign tumors that arise from the sheaths of nerves in the peripheral nervous system. In the spine, schwannomas usually arise from spinal nerve roots and are therefore extramedullary in nature. Surgical resection-achieving a gross total resection, is the main treatment modality and is typically curative for patients with sporadic tumors. In this video, we present the case of a 38-yr-old male with worsening left leg radiculopathy, found to have a lumbar schwannoma. Preoperative imaging demonstrated that the tumor was at the level of L4-L5. A laminectomy at this level was performed with gross total resection of the tumor. The key points of the video include use of intraoperative fluoroscopy to confirm surgical level and help plan surgical exposure, use of ultrasound for intradural tumor localization, and advocating for maximum safe resection using neurostimulation. The patient tolerated the surgery well without any complications. He was discharged home with no additional therapy needed. Appropriate patient consent was obtained.

Hybrid Therapy for Metastatic Disease.

Metastatic spine disease represents a complex clinical entity, requiring a multidisciplinary treatment team to formulate treatment plans that treat disease, palliate symptoms, and give patients the greatest quality-of-life. With the improvement in focused radiation technologies, the role of surgery has changed from a standalone treatment to an adjuvant supporting other treatment modalities. As patients within this population are often exceptionally frail, there has been increased emphasis on the smallest possible surgery to achieve the team's treatment goals. Surgeons have increasingly turned to more minimally invasive techniques for treating spinal metastases. The use of these procedures, called separation surgery, centers around the goal of decompressing the neural elements, creating or maintaining mechanical stability, and allowing enough room for high-dose radiation to minimize cord dose.

Survival, fusion, and hardware failure after surgery for spinal metastatic disease.

OBJECTIVE: Decompression with instrumented fusion is commonly employed for spinal metastatic disease. Arthrodesis is typically sought despite limited knowledge of fusion outcomes, high procedural morbidity, and poor prognosis. This study aimed to describe survival, fusion, and hardware failure after decompression and fusion for spinal metastatic disease. METHODS: The authors retrospectively examined a prospectively collected, single-institution database of adult patients undergoing decompression and instrumented fusion for spinal metastases. Patients were followed clinically until death or loss to follow-up. Fusion was assessed using CT when performed for oncological surveillance at 6-month intervals through 24 months postoperatively. Estimated cumulative incidences for fusion and hardware failure accounted for the competing risk of death. Potential risk factors were analyzed with univariate Fine and Gray proportional subdistribution hazard models. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four patients were identified. The mean age ± SD was 62.2 ± 10.8 years, 61.6% of patients were male, 98.8% received allograft and/or autograft, and 89.6% received postoperative radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival was 11.0 months (IQR 3.5-37.8 months). The estimated cumulative incidences of any fusion and of complete fusion were 28.8% (95% CI 21.3%-36.7%) and 8.2% (95% CI 4.1%-13.9%). Of patients surviving 6 and 12 months, complete fusion was observed in 12.5% and 16.1%, respectively. The estimated cumulative incidence of hardware failure was 4.2% (95% CI 1.5-9.3%). Increasing age predicted hardware failure (HR 1.2, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Low rates of complete fusion and hardware failure were observed due to the high competing risk of death. Further prospective, case-control studies incorporating nonfusion instrumentation techniques may be warranted.

Impact of Michigan's new opioid prescribing laws on spine surgery patients: analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative.

OBJECTIVE: In 2017, Michigan passed new legislation designed to reduce opioid abuse. This study evaluated the impact of these new restrictive laws on preoperative narcotic use, short-term outcomes, and readmission rates after spinal surgery. METHODS: Patient data from 1 year before and 1 year after initiation of the new opioid laws (beginning July 1, 2018) were queried from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative database. Before and after implementation of the major elements of the new laws, 12,325 and 11,988 patients, respectively, were treated. RESULTS: Patients before and after passage of the opioid laws had generally similar demographic and surgical characteristics. Notably, after passage of the opioid laws, the number of patients taking daily narcotics preoperatively decreased from 3783 (48.7%) to 2698 (39.7%; p < 0.0001). Three months postoperatively, there were no differences in minimum clinically important difference (56.0% vs 58.0%, p = 0.1068), numeric rating scale (NRS) score of back pain (3.5 vs 3.4, p = 0.1156), NRS score of leg pain (2.7 vs 2.7, p = 0.3595), satisfaction (84.4% vs 84.7%, p = 0.6852), or 90-day readmission rate (5.8% vs 6.2%, p = 0.3202) between groups. Although there was no difference in readmission rates, pain as a reason for readmission was marginally more common (0.86% vs 1.22%, p = 0.0323). CONCLUSIONS: There was a meaningful decrease in preoperative narcotic use, but notably there was no apparent negative impact on postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction, or short-term outcomes after spinal surgery despite more restrictive opioid prescribing. Although the readmission rate did not significantly increase, pain as a reason for readmission was marginally more frequently observed.

The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity.

OBJECTIVE: The lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) technique is used to treat many common spinal degenerative pathologies including kyphoscoliosis. The use of spinal navigation for LLIF has not been broadly adopted, especially in adult spinal deformity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility as well as the intraoperative and navigation-related complications of computer-assisted 3D navigation (CaN) during multiple-level LLIF for spinal deformity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and operative characteristics was performed for all patients > 18 years of age who underwent multiple-level CaN LLIF combined with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity at the University of Michigan between 2014 and 2020. Intraoperative CaN-related complications, LLIF approach-related postoperative complications, and medical postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were identified. The mean age was 66.3 years (range 42-83 years) and body mass index was 27.6 kg/m2 (range 18-43 kg/m2). The average coronal Cobb angle was 26.8° (range 3.6°-67.0°) and sagittal vertical axis was 6.3 cm (range -2.3 to 14.7 cm). The average number of LLIF and posterior instrumentation levels were 2.97 cages (range 2-5 cages) and 5.78 levels (range 3-14 levels), respectively. A total of 6 intraoperative complications related to the LLIF stage occurred in 5 patients. Three of these were CaN-related and occurred in 2 patients (3.4%), including 1 misplaced lateral interbody cage (0.6% of 175 total lateral cages placed) requiring intraoperative revision. No patient required a return to the operating room for a misplaced interbody cage. A total of 12 intraoperative complications related to the posterior stage occurred in 11 patients, with 5 being CaN-related and occurring in 4 patients (6.8%). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no statistically significant risk factors for intraoperative and CaN-related complications. Transient hip weakness and numbness were found to be in 20.3% and 22.0% of patients, respectively. At the 1-month follow-up, weakness was observed in 3.4% and numbness in 11.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CaN in multiple-level LLIF in the treatment of adult spinal deformity appears to be a safe and effective technique. The incidence of approach-related complications with CaN was 3.4% and cage placement accuracy was high.

Effect of Fenestrated Pedicle Screws with Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is a well-known risk factor for instrumentation failure and subsequent pseudoarthrosis after spinal fusion. In the present systematic review, we analyzed the biomechanical properties, clinical efficacy, and complications of cement augmentation via fenestrated pedicle screws in spinal fusion. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Reports appearing in the PubMed database up to March 31, 2020 were queried using the key words "cement," "pedicle screw," and "osteoporosis." We excluded non-English language studies, studies reported before 2000, studies that had involved use of cement without fenestrated pedicle screws, nonhuman studies, technical reports, and individual case reports. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies had tested the biomechanics of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws. The magnitude of improvement achieved by cement augmentation of pedicle screws increased with the degree of osteoporosis. The cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw was superior biomechanically to the alternative "solid-fill" technique. Fourteen studies had evaluated complications. Cement extravasation with fenestrated screw usage was highly variable, ranging from 0% to 79.7%. However, cement extravasation was largely asymptomatic. Thirteen studies had assessed the outcomes. The use of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicles decreased screw pull out and improved fusion rates; however, the clinical outcomes were similar to those with traditional pedicle screw placement. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws can be an effective strategy for achieving improved pedicle screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis. A potential risk is cement extravasation; however, this complication will typically be asymptomatic. Larger comparative studies are needed to better delineate the clinical efficacy.

Utilization of a Resuscitative Care Unit for Initial Triage, Management, and Disposition of Minor Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Management of minor intracranial hemorrhage typically involves ICU admission. ICU capacity is increasingly strained, resulting in increased emergency department boarding of critically ill patients. Our objectives were to implement a novel protocol using our emergency department-based resuscitative care unit for management of management of minor intracranial hemorrhage patients in the emergency department setting, to provide timely and appropriate critical care, and to decrease inpatient ICU utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Single large academic medical center in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult patients presenting to the emergency department with management of minor intracranial hemorrhage managed via our resuscitative care unit-management of minor intracranial hemorrhage protocol from September 2017 to April 2019. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a resuscitative care unit-management of minor intracranial hemorrhage protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic data, need for vasoactive infusions in the emergency department, emergency department and hospital length of stay, emergency department disposition, and 30-day outcomes (readmission, mortality, need for neurosurgical procedure) were collected. Fifty-five patients were identified, with mean age 67.1 ± 20.0 years. Mean Glasgow Coma Scale on presentation was 14.8 ± 0.5, and 66% had a history of trauma. Locations of hemorrhage were subdural (42%), intraparenchymal (35%), subarachnoid (15%), intratumoral (7%), and intraventricular (2%). Nineteen patients (35%) were discharged from the emergency department, 22 (40%) were admitted to general care, and 14 (26%) were admitted to intensive care. In discharged patients, there was no mortality or neurosurgical interventions at 30 days. In a subgroup analysis of 36 patients with a traumatic mechanism, 18 (50%) were able to be discharged from the emergency department after management in the resuscitative care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Initial management of emergency department patients with minor intracranial hemorrhage in a resuscitative care unit appears safe and feasible and was associated with a substantial rate of discharge from the emergency department (35%) and a low rate of admission to an inpatient ICU (26%). Use of this strategy was associated with rapid initiation of ICU-level care, which may help alleviate the challenge of increasing emergency department boarding time of critically ill patients facing many institutions.

Hybrid Therapy for Spinal Metastases.

The combination of separation surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy optimizes the treatment of metastatic spine tumors. The integration of SBRT into treatment paradigms produces superb local control rates and consequently has diminished the role of surgery from principle treatment to one of adjuvant therapy. Under this paradigm, hybrid therapy for the treatment of metastatic spine tumors employs separation surgery to decompress the spinal cord and stabilize the spine while creating a safe target for ablative SBRT. Hybrid therapy is well tolerated, allows an early return to systemic therapy, and provides durable, local tumor control compared with more aggressive traditional approaches.

Local Control and Toxicity of Multilevel Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) is commonly limited to 1 or 2 vertebral levels given a paucity of efficacy and toxicity data when more than 2 levels are treated. OBJECTIVE: To prove our hypothesis that multilevel sSBRT could provide similar rates of local control (LC) (primary endpoint) and toxicity as single-level treatment using the same clinical target, planning target, and planning organ-at-risk volumes. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive cases of sSBRT treated from 2013 to 2017. Time-to-event outcomes for single-level and multilevel cases were compared using mixed effect Cox models and differences in toxicity rates were evaluated using linear mixed effect models. All models incorporate a patient-level random intercept to account for any within-patient correlation across cases. RESULTS: There were 101 single-level and 84 multilevel sSBRT cases (2-7 continuous vertebral levels). One-year LC was 95% vs 85%, respectively. After adjusting for baseline covariates, dose delivered, and accounting for within-patient correlation, there was no significant difference in time to local failure (hazard ratio, HR 1.79 [0.59-5.4]; P = .30). Pain improved in 83.5% of the 139 initially symptomatic tumors. There were no significant differences in grade 2+ acute or late toxicities between single-level and multilevel sSBRT. CONCLUSION: With rigorous patient immobilization, quality assurance, and image guidance, multilevel sSBRT provides high rates of LC, similar to single-level treatment, without need for larger planning volume margins. Efforts to improve prognostication and case selection for multilevel sSBRT are warranted to ensure that the benefits of improved LC over palliative radiation are justified.

Pupillary changes after clinically asymptomatic high-acceleration head impacts in high school football athletes.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that clinically asymptomatic high-acceleration head impacts (HHIs) may be associated with neuronal and axonal injury, as measured by advanced imaging and biomarkers. Unfortunately, these methods of measurement are time-consuming, invasive, and costly. A quick noninvasive measurement tool is needed to aid studies of head injury and its biological impact. Quantitative pupillometry is a potential objective, rapid, noninvasive measurement tool that may be used to assess the neurological effects of HHIs. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of HHIs on pupillary metrics, as measured using a pupillometer, in the absence of a diagnosed concussion. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study involving 18 high school football athletes was performed. These athletes were monitored for both the frequency and magnitude of head impacts that they sustained throughout a playing season by using the Head Impact Telemetry System. An HHI was defined as an impact exceeding 95g linear acceleration and 3760 rad/sec2 rotational acceleration. Pupillary assessments were performed at baseline, midseason, after occurrence of an HHI, and at the end of the season by using the NeurOptics NPi-200 pupillometer. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, 5th Edition (SCAT5), was also used at each time point. Comparisons of data obtained at the various time points were calculated using a repeated-measures analysis of variance and a t-test. RESULTS: Seven athletes sustained HHIs without a related diagnosed concussion. Following these HHIs, the athletes demonstrated decreases in pupil dilation velocity (mean difference 0.139 mm/sec; p = 0.048), percent change in pupil diameter (mean difference 3.643%; p = 0.002), and maximum constriction velocity (mean difference 0.744 mm/sec; p = 0.010), compared to measurements obtained at the athletes' own midseason evaluations. No significant changes occurred between the SCAT5 subtest scores calculated at midseason and those after a high impact, although the effect sizes (Cohen's d) on individual components ranged from 0.41 to 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: Measurable changes in pupil response were demonstrated following an HHI. These results suggest that clinically asymptomatic HHIs may affect brain reflex pathways, reflecting a biological injury previously seen when more invasive methods were applied.

Analysis of Outcomes Between Traditional Open versus Mini-Open Approach in Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of spinal metastasis carries significant surgical morbidity, and decompression and stabilization are often necessary. Less invasive techniques may reduce risks and postoperative pain. This study describes the differences between a mini-open (MO) procedure and a traditional open surgery (OS) for symptomatic spinal metastasis, and reports differences in outcome for similar patients undergoing each procedure. METHODS: We describe a MO technique and retrospective analysis of 20 OS patients who were matched to 20 MO patients by histology, spinal region, and levels instrumented. MO surgery combined a traditional midline exposure for tumor resection with transfascial pedicle screw fixation. Outcome measures included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), transfusion rate, complication rate, ASIA Impairment Scale motor score (AMS), and pain scores. Statistical analysis used unpaired t tests and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Average age of the patients was 58.3 years. Forty-eight percent of patients were women. Average number of levels treated was 5.9. Both groups had similar LOS (P = 0.98), OT (P = 0.30), perioperative complication rates (P = 0.51), transfusion rates (P = 0.33), and AMS (P = 0.17). EBL was found to be significantly lower in the MO group than the open group (805 ± 138 mL vs. 1732 ± 359 mL, respectively; P = 0.019). The MO group had a significant reduction in postoperative pain (-1.71 ± 0.5 vs. 0.33 ± 0.7, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies are needed, the MO approach appears to result in decreased blood loss and postoperative pain, without compromising neural element decompression or spinal stability. These findings are consistent with the use of muscle sparing, minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation.

Computed Tomography Myelosimulation Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration to Delineate the Spinal Cord During Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Underestimation of the spinal cord's volume or position during spine stereotactic radiosurgery can lead to severe myelopathy, whereas overestimation can lead to tumor underdosage. Spinal cord delineation is commonly achieved by registering a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study with a computed tomography (CT) simulation scan or by performing myelography during CT simulation (myelosim). We compared treatment planning outcomes for these 2 techniques. METHODS: Twenty-three cases of spine stereotactic radiosurgery were analyzed that had both a myelosim and corresponding MRI study for registration. The spinal cord was contoured on both imaging data sets by 2 independent blinded physicians, and Dice similarity coefficients were calculated to compare their spatial overlap. Two treatment plans (16 Gy and 18 Gy) were created using the MRI and CT contours (92 plans total). Dosimetric parameters were extracted and compared by modality to assess tumor coverage and spinal cord dose. RESULTS: No differences were found in the partial spinal cord volumes contoured on MRI versus myelosim (4.71 ± 1.09 vs. 4.55 ± 1.03 cm3; P = 0.34) despite imperfect spatial agreement (mean Dice similarity coefficient, 0.68 ± 0.05). When the registered MRI contours were used for treatment planning, significantly worse tumor coverage and greater spinal cord doses were found compared with myelosim planning. For the 18-Gy plans, 10 of 23 MRI cases (43%) exceeded the spinal cord or cauda dose constraints when using myelosim as the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: Significant spatial, rather than volumetric, differences were found between the MRI- and myelosim-defined spinal cord structures. Tumor coverage was compromised with MRI-based planning, and the high spinal cord doses were a concern. Future work is necessary to compare thin-cut, volumetric MRI registration or MRI simulation with myelosim.