[Pain care in Austrian health care centers: Questionnaire study on the current status of Austrian pain clinics]. / Schmerztherapeutische Versorgung österreichischer Gesundheitszentren: Fragebogenstudie zum Istzustand österreichischer Schmerzambulanzen.

BACKGROUND: Pain clinics provide interdisciplinary therapy to treat chronic pain patients and to increase the return-to-work rate. In recent years and due to increased economic pressure in health care, a change in the management of pain in Austrian health care centers has been observed. For the analysis of the current situation, two surveys addressing all Austrian pain clinics were performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 133 heads of Austrian Anesthesia Departments were interviewed online and personally. The data from the first interview were confirmed by an additional telephone survey that was performed by one anesthetist per Austrian state (n = 9). RESULTS: Currently, 44 Austrian pain clinics are active. During the last 5 years, 9 pain clinics closed. Adding the current active pain clinics together, they represent a total of 17.5 full-time-operated clinics. The most common reasons for closing the pain clinics were lack of personnel (47%), lack of time resources (26%), lack of space resources (11%), and financial difficulties (11%). A reduction of >50% of operating hours during the last 3 years was reported by 9 hospitals. The reasons for not running a pain clinic were lack of personnel (36%), lack of time (25%) and department too small (16%). Estimates between actual and required clinics indicate that 49.5 full-time-operating pain clinics are lacking in Austria, resulting in 74% of the Austrian chronic pain patients not receiving interdisciplinary pain management. CONCLUSION: Our survey confirmed the closure of 9 pain clinics during the last 5 years due to lack of personnel and time. Pain clinics appear to provide the simplest economic saving potential. This development is a major concern. Although running a pain clinic seems to be expensive at the first sight, it reduces pain, sick leave, complications, and potential legal issues against health care centers, while simultaneously increasing the hospital's competitiveness. Our results show that 74% of Austrian chronic pain patients do not have access to an interdisciplinary pain clinic. Because of plans to further economize resources, Austria may lose its ability to provide state-of-the-art pain therapy and management.

[Optimising pain therapy for neurological inpatients]. / Optimierung der Schmerztherapie an neurologischen Stationen.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Neurology at the Medical University Graz has implemented a multiprofessional pain management concept and evaluated the outcome by means of a patient survey. METHODS: Standard operating procedures for standardised pain measurement, documentation and therapy were developed. All engaged professional participants were trained before implementation. RESULTS: 88.7 % of the surveyed 63 patients reported pain during the hospitalisation. During the night and in the morning, the occurrence of severe pain was most likely. The position or activity most likely triggering severe pain was mobilisation (19 %). Patients with degenerative diseases of the spine without radiculopathy reported the highest levels of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is an important problem for neurological inpatients. Nocturnal pain, pain induced by mobilisation, and pain therapy for patients with degenerative diseases of the spine without radiculopathy require particular attention.

[Topical pain therapy in oral mucositis: a systematic review]. / Topische Schmerztherapie bei oraler Mukositis : Eine systematische Übersicht.

BACKGROUND: The pain provoked by mucositis is often described as the most excruciating symptom of cancer treatment. It often causes reduced ingestion, malnutrition, and sometimes postponement or withdrawal of the therapy. For health care providers, adequate pain treatment is a major challenge. The aim of this article is to present an overview of studies on the topical treatment of mucositis pain. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed with the keywords "mucositis" "pain" and "topical" or "local". In addition, reference lists and relevant websites were scanned for appropriate literature. RESULTS: A total of 47 articles were included. There is only scarce evidence for the topical treatment of mucositis pain. The most convincing studies tested opioids, corticoids and benzydamine. For the other substances, too few studies were performed, the results were contradictory, or the study quality was low. CONCLUSION: Based on the information gathered in this systematic search of the literature, topical treatment of mucositis pain today is based on empiricism and not on scientific evidence.