RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We have previously reported a simple correction method for estimating pleural pressure (Ppl) using central venous pressure (CVP). However, it remains unclear whether this method is applicable to patients with varying levels of intravascular volumes and/or chest wall compliance. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of our method under different conditions of intravascular volume and chest wall compliance. RESULTS: Ten anesthetized and paralyzed pigs (43.2 ± 1.8 kg) were mechanically ventilated and subjected to lung injury by saline lung lavage. Each pig was subjected to three different intravascular volumes and two different intraabdominal pressures. For each condition, the changes in the esophageal pressure (ΔPes) and the estimated ΔPpl using ΔCVP (cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl) were compared to the directly measured change in pleural pressure (Δd-Ppl), which was the gold standard estimate in this study. The cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl was calculated as κ × ΔCVP, where "κ" was the ratio of the change in airway pressure to the change in CVP during the occlusion test. The means and standard deviations of the Δd-Ppl, ΔPes, and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl for all pigs under all conditions were 7.6 ± 4.5, 7.2 ± 3.6, and 8.0 ± 4.8 cmH2O, respectively. The repeated measures correlations showed that both the ΔPes and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl showed a strong correlation with the Δd-Ppl (ΔPes: r = 0.95, p < 0.0001; cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl: r = 0.97, p < 0.0001, respectively). In the Bland-Altman analysis to test the performance of the cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl to predict the Δd-Ppl, the ΔPes and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl showed almost the same bias and precision (ΔPes: 0.5 and 1.7 cmH2O; cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl: - 0.3 and 1.9 cmH2O, respectively). No significant difference was found in the bias and precision depending on the intravascular volume and intraabdominal pressure in both comparisons between the ΔPes and Δd-Ppl, and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl and Δd-Ppl. CONCLUSIONS: The CVP method can estimate the ΔPpl with reasonable accuracy, similar to Pes measurement. The accuracy was not affected by the intravascular volume or chest wall compliance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Arterial catheterisation in children can be challenging and time-consuming. We aimed to compare the success rates of ultrasound-guided arterial catheterisation utilising the short-axis out-of-plane approach with dynamic needle tip positioning in the radial, dorsalis pedis, and posterior tibial arteries in paediatric patients. We also examined the factors influencing the catheterisation success using dynamic needle tip positioning. METHODS: Paediatric patients (aged <3 yr) undergoing cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to three groups based on puncture sites: radial artery (Group R), dorsalis pedis artery (Group D), and posterior tibial artery (Group P). The first-attempt and overall success rates of arterial catheterisation were compared, followed by multiple logistic regression analysis (dependent variable: first-attempt success; independent variables: body weight, diameter and depth of the artery, targeted artery, and trisomy 21). RESULTS: The study included 270 subjects (n=90 per group). There was no significant difference in the first-attempt (Group R: 82%, Group D: 76%, and Group P: 81%) and overall success rates (Group R: 94%, Group D: 93%, and Group P: 91%) among the three groups. The diameter of the artery (per 0.1 mm) (odds ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.60) and trisomy 21 (odds ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.92) were independent predictors of first-attempt success or failure. CONCLUSION: The first-attempt and overall success rates of arterial catheterisation of the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries were not inferior to those in the radial artery when using dynamic needle tip positioning. These two lower extremity peripheral arteries present viable alternative catheterisation sites in paediatric patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000042847.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Arterias Tibiales , Humanos , Niño , Arterias Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Extremidad Inferior , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
An updated systematic review with meta-analysis comparing perioperative prophylactic administration of corticosteroids with placebo in pediatric cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass was conducted. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE (via PubMed) were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 2000, and February 14, 2023. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, and adverse events. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Corticosteroid administration did not decrease postoperative in-hospital mortality compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.17). Subgroup analyses according to the type of corticosteroids and neonates revealed that corticosteroids did not decrease postoperative in-hospital mortality. In the trial sequential analysis, the last point in the z-curve was within the futility borders. Although the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, -5.54 h; 95% confidence interval (CI), -9.75 - -1.34) and incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 - 0.96) decreased with corticosteroid administration, it did not affect the length of intensive care unit (mean difference, -0.28 days; 95% CI, -0.74 - 0.17) and hospital stay (mean difference, -0.59 days; 95% CI, -1.31 - 0.14). In conclusion, perioperative prophylactic corticosteroid administration in pediatric cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass did not decrease postoperative in-hospital mortality compared with placebo. According to the trial sequential analysis results, additional randomized controlled trials assessing mortality are not required. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD 42023391789.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Recién Nacido , Niño , Humanos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Gasto Cardíaco Bajo/etiología , Gasto Cardíaco Bajo/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided approach with and without dynamic needle-tip positioning and the palpation technique regarding success for peripheral venous catheterization in children. DESIGN: A systematic review with network meta-analysis. SETTING: Databases of MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (<18 years) undergoing peripheral venous catheter insertion. INTERVENTIONS: Randomized clinical trials were included to compare the following techniques: the ultrasound-guided short-axis out-of-plane approach with dynamic needle-tip positioning, the approach without dynamic needle-tip positioning, and the palpation technique. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The outcomes were first-attempt and overall success rates. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analyses. According to the estimate of network comparison, dynamic needle-tip positioning was associated with higher first-attempt (risk ratio [RR] 1.67; 95% CI 1.33-2.09) and overall success rates (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.08-1.44) than palpation. The approach without dynamic needle-tip positioning was not associated with higher first-attempt (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.91-1.49) and overall success rates (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.90-1.33) than palpation. Compared to the approach without dynamic needle-tip positioning, dynamic needle-tip positioning was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate (RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.07-1.92), but not a higher overall success rate (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.92-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic needle-tip positioning is efficacious for peripheral venous catheterization in children. It would be better to include dynamic needle-tip positioning for the ultrasound-guided short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Humanos , Niño , Metaanálisis en Red , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Agujas , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodosRESUMEN
This study reports a case wherein a new thrombus was detected by transesophageal echocardiography in the conduit during extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure. Immediately after weaning from the cardiopulmonary bypass and administration of protamine, a thrombus was noted in the conduit by transesophageal echocardiography. Since the patient was hemodynamically stable, anticoagulation therapy was initiated after admission to the intensive care unit. One week post-surgery, imaging results showed residual thrombus, but the patient was safely discharged. Even during Fontan procedure, careful observation with transesophageal echocardiography is important because of the possibility of thrombus formation in the conduit.
Asunto(s)
Procedimiento de Fontan , Trombosis , Humanos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Destete , Procedimiento de Fontan/efectos adversos , Procedimiento de Fontan/métodos , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Generally, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for labor analgesia is performed in the lateral or sitting position; however, only few studies have investigated the effect of maternal position on labor analgesia induction. We aimed to retrospectively assess the influence of maternal position on induction time and complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed anesthetic and medical records regarding labor analgesia in 201 parturients treated between January 2019 and November 2019. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on their position (sitting or lateral) during induction. The primary outcome was the time required for CSEA induction. We compared 2 groups on the primary outcome and the occurrences of other complications during CSEA induction using hyperbaric bupivacaine. Moreover, we performed multiple linear regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with induction time. RESULTS: There was no significant between-group difference in the time required for induction. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed an independent association of the distance from the skin to the epidural space with the time required for induction. The lateral group had a significantly higher incidence of paresthesia than the sitting group (P = 0.028). The lateral group had a significantly higher ephedrine requirement (P < 0.001) than the sitting group. CONCLUSION: Maternal position was not associated with the time required for CSEA induction. However, the sitting group had a lower paresthesia occurrence and ephedrine requirement than the lateral group. Other technical complications were not associated with maternal position during CSEA induction.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Analgesia , Anestesia Epidural , Anestesia Raquidea , Humanos , Efedrina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Parestesia , Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Analgésicos , Analgesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Analgesia Epidural/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The efficacy of the short-axis out-of-plane (SA-OOP) approach with and without dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) remains unclear. This systematic review with network meta-analysis aimed to compare the success rate of arterial line insertion in children using the SA-OOP approach with and without DNTP and the palpation technique. We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized controlled trials that compared two of the following techniques for arterial line insertion in children: (1) the ultrasound-guided SA-OOP approach with DNTP; (2) the ultrasound-guided SA-OOP approach without DNTP; and (3) the palpation technique. A network meta-analysis was performed. The outcomes were first-attempt and overall success rates. Eight studies were finally included in this network meta-analysis. The ultrasound-guided SA-OOP approach with DNTP was associated with increased first-attempt (relative risk RR = 3.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.51-4.74]) and overall success rates (RR = 1.81 [1.41-2.32]) when compared with palpation. The same approach performed without DNTP was also associated with increased first-attempt (RR = 1.96 [1.59-2.42]) and overall success rates (RR = 1.25 [1.05-1.49]) when compared with palpation. The ultrasound-guided SA-OOP approach with DNTP was associated with increased first-attempt (RR = 1.76 [1.26-2.44]) and overall success rates (RR = 1.45 [1.10-1.91]) when compared with the same approach performed without DNTP. DNTP should be performed during the ultrasound-guided SA-OOP approach for arterial line insertion in children, as this can help increase first attempt and overall success rates.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Humanos , Niño , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Metaanálisis en Red , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sedation during cardiac catheter examination in neonates with complex congenital heart disease is challenging, as even the slightest change in the circulatory or respiratory status can lead to hemodynamic collapse. Here, we report a case wherein we achieved adequate sedation with a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for catheter examination in a neonate with a congenital cardiac anomaly. CASE PRESENTATION: An 11-day-old boy with hypoplastic left heart syndrome was scheduled for a cardiac catheter examination prior to the Norwood procedure. He underwent bilateral pulmonary artery banding (PAB) on day 1 and was receiving dobutamine, milrinone, alprostadil, and dexmedetomidine in addition to air and nitrogen insufflation via HFNC, which was applied following extubation on day 3 and nitrogen therapy on day 6 owing to persistent pulmonary overcirculation symptoms (tachypnea and low arterial blood pressure) despite bilateral PAB. A catheter examination was performed on day 11 with careful monitoring of expired carbon dioxide and observation of chest wall motion. Adequate sedation was provided with supplemental midazolam and fentanyl along with HFNC without tracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this case suggest that HFNC is a safe and effective tool for oxygenation during cardiac catheter examination under sedation in neonates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonographic guidance is widely used for central venous catheterization. Several studies have revealed that ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization increases the rate of success during the first attempt and reduces the procedural duration when compared to the anatomical landmark-guided insertion technique, which could result in protection from infectious complications. However, the effect of ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization on catheter-related bloodstream infections remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the value of ultrasound guidance in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections and catheter colonization associated with central venous catheterization. METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE (via PubMed) were searched up to May 9, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ultrasound-guided and anatomical landmark-guided insertion techniques for central venous catheterization. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for RCTs. A meta-analysis was performed for catheter-related bloodstream infections and catheter colonization, as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 1268 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization was associated with a slightly lower incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (risk ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-1.32) and was not associated with a lower incidence of catheter colonization (risk ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.57-3.26). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization might reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Additional RCTs are necessary to further evaluate the value of ultrasound guidance in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections with central venous catheterization.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Sepsis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/complicaciones , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Sepsis/etiología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodosRESUMEN
The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach reportedly prevents such penetration in adults. To test the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the combined approach to the long-axis in-plane approach, we compared the two approaches in infants and small children. Patients were randomized based on whether they underwent ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization using the combined or long-axis in-plane approach. Posterior wall penetration rates, first-attempt success rates, overall success rates within 20 min; scanning, puncture, and procedure durations; and number of attempts were compared between the groups. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups (n = 55 per group), the posterior wall penetration rates were 5.5% (3/55) and 3.6% (2/55) (P = 0.65), the first-attempt success rates were 94.5% (52/55) and 92.7% (51/55) (P = 0.70), and the overall success rates within 20 min were 100% (55/55) and 98.2% (54/55) (P = 0.32), respectively. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups, the median (interquartile range) scanning durations were 21 (16.5-34.8) s and 47 (29.3-65) s (P<0.0001), the puncture durations were 114 (83-170) s and 74 (52.3-117.3) s (P = 0.0002), and the procedure durations were 141 (99-97.8) s and 118 (88.5-195.5) s (P = 0.14), respectively. The median number of attempts was 1 (interquartile range: 1-1, range: 1-3) in both groups (P = 0.72). Similar to the long-axis in-plane approach, the combined approach for internal jugular vein catheterization prevented posterior wall penetration in infants and small children. Trial registration: This trial was registered before patient enrollment in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, registration number UMIN000039387 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000044907).
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Adulto , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Punciones/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodosAsunto(s)
Anestesia Obstétrica , Anestesia Raquidea , Hipotensión , Gasto Cardíaco , Cesárea , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Fenilefrina , Embarazo , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Herein, we report the case of a 2-year-old boy in whom a bent peripheral venous catheter was inserted using ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning via a short-axis out-of-plane approach. The peripheral venous catheter appeared to be successfully inserted into the cephalic vein in the forearm using dynamic needle tip positioning via a short-axis out-of-plane approach. However, after removing the inner needle, no blood return was confirmed. The removed catheter was noted to be bent at approximately one-third of the catheter length from the tip. A large change in the puncture angle during dynamic needle tip positioning for a deeply located vein might have caused this bend. Deeply located veins are not targeted when a blind puncture technique is used, as they are not visible and palpable. They can be visualized by ultrasonography and can be targeted using DNTP; however, the catheter may bend. Clinicians should be aware of this issue and, therefore, they are suggested to ensure that the puncture angle is not too steep and use a long length catheter; in addition, very deep veins should not be targeted.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Agujas , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentaciónAsunto(s)
Cateterismo/métodos , Agujas , Palpación/métodos , Arterias Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Femenino , Pie/irrigación sanguínea , Pie/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of posterior wall puncture between the long-axis in-plane and the short-axis out-of-plane approaches in a randomized controlled trial of pediatric patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery under general anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Operating room of Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients less than 5 years old who underwent cardiovascular surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization using the long-axis in-plane approach and short-axis out-of-plane approach. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The occurrence of posterior wall puncture was compared between the long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization. Patients were randomly allocated to a long-axis group or a short-axis group and underwent ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in the internal jugular vein using either the long-axis in-plane approach (long-axis group) or the short-axis out-of-plane approach (short-axis group). After exclusion, 97 patients were allocated to the long-axis (n = 49) or short-axis (n = 48) groups. Posterior wall puncture rates were 8.2% (4/49) and 39.6% (19/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.076-0.56; p = 0.0003). First attempt success rates were 67.3% (33/49) and 64.6% (31/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.78-1.39; p = 0.77). Overall success rates within 20 minutes were 93.9% (46/49) and 93.8% (45/48) in the long-axis and short-axis groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.11; p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is a useful technique for avoiding posterior wall puncture in pediatric patients, compared with the short-axis out-of-plane approach.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate our prenatal risk stratification system for risk-adjusted management in fetuses with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: Ninety-four infants prenatally diagnosed with isolated CDH treated between 1998 and 2017 at our institution were included in this retrospective single-center cohort study. RESULTS: The patients were prenatally classified into four risk groups: Group A (nâ¯=â¯54), which consisted of infants with neither liver-up nor a contralateral lung-to-thorax transverse area (L/T) ratio <0.08. The infants in group A were divided into two subgroups: Group A-1 (nâ¯=â¯24) consisted of mild conditions; and Group A-2 (nâ¯=â¯30) consisted of severe conditions; Group B (nâ¯=â¯23), which consisted of infants with either liver-up or L/T ratio <0.08; and Group C (nâ¯=â¯17), which consisted of infants with both liver-up and L/T ratio <0.08. The rates of survival to discharge in Groups A-1, A-2, B, and C were 100.0%, 100.0%, 87.0%, and 58.8%, respectively. The rates of intact discharge were 91.7%, 90.0%, 52.1%, and 23.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our prenatal risk stratification system demonstrated a significant difference in the severity of postnatal status and clinical outcomes between the groups. STUDY TYPE: Case Series, Retrospective Review. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: LEVEL IV.
Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Femenino , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/epidemiología , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The objective of the study is to develop a correction method for estimating the change in pleural pressure (ΔPpl) and plateau transpulmonary pressure (PL) by using the change in central venous pressure (ΔCVP). Seven children (aged < 15 years) with acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FIO2 < 300 mmHg), who were paralyzed and mechanically ventilated with a PEEP of < 10 cmH2O and had central venous catheters and esophageal balloon catheters placed for clinical purposes, were enrolled prospectively. We compared change in esophageal pressure (ΔPes), ΔCVP, and ΔPpl calculated using a corrected ΔCVP (cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl). cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl was calculated as κ × ΔCVP, where κ was the ratio of the change in airway pressure (ΔPaw) to ΔCVP during the occlusion test. cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl correlated better than ΔCVP with ΔPes (R2 = 0.48, p = 0.08 vs. R2 = 0.14, p = 0.4) with lesser bias and precision in Bland-Altman analysis. The plateau PL calculated using the cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl (17.6 ± 2.6 cmH2O) correlated well with the ΔPes-derived plateau PL (18.1 ± 2.3 cmH2O) (R2 = 0.90, p = 0.001). Our correction method can estimate ΔPpl and plateau PL from ΔCVP with a reasonable accuracy in paralyzed and mechanically ventilated pediatric patients with respiratory failure.
Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Presión Venosa Central , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Presión , Respiración Artificial , Presión Sanguínea , Cateterismo , Preescolar , Esófago , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Oscilometría , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Mecánica Respiratoria , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications and the clinical outcomes of the fetuses managed with ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all fetuses who underwent EXIT procedures between 2003 and 2018. RESULTS: EXIT procedures were performed in nine cases. The prenatal diagnosis of the neonates was congenital high airway obstruction syndrome in four cases, the neck masse in five cases. Although the airway management under the EXIT procedure was successful in eight cases, the airway management failed in one case. During the EXIT procedures, the airway was managed by endotracheal intubation in two cases, whereas six cases underwent tracheostomy. Six cases with fetal airway obstruction survived to discharge, whereas three cases died due to airway management failure or complications of the underlying disease. A case with a cervical teratoma underwent tumor resection the day after birth due to rapid enlargement of the neck mass. Long-term survival was achieved in five cases. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the EXIT procedure was effective and could be performed safely in the airway management of fetuses with suspected airway obstruction. The treatment strategy for the neck masses should be planned before birth.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/cirugía , Enfermedades Fetales/cirugía , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Traqueostomía/métodos , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/congénito , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , ÚteroRESUMEN
In 2014, our hospital introduced inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy combined with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy after extubation following the Fontan procedure in patients with unstable hemodynamics. We report the benefits of HFNC-iNO therapy in these patients. This was a single-center, retrospective review of 38 patients who underwent the Fontan procedure between January 2010 and June 2016, and required iNO therapy before extubation. The patients were divided into two groups: patients in Epoch 1 (n = 24) were treated between January 2010 and December 2013, receiving only iNO therapy; patients in Epoch 2 (n = 14) were treated between January 2014 and June 2016, receiving iNO therapy and additional HFNC-iNO therapy after extubation. There were no significant differences between Epoch 1 and 2 regarding preoperative cardiac function, age at surgery, body weight, initial diagnosis (hypoplastic left heart syndrome, 4 vs. 2; total anomalous pulmonary venous return, 5 vs. 4; heterotaxy, 7 vs. 8), intraoperative fluid balance, or central venous pressure upon admission to the intensive care unit. Epoch 2 had a significantly shorter duration of postoperative intubation [7.2 (3.7-49) vs. 3.5 (3.0-4.6) hours, p = 0.033], pleural drainage [23 (13-34) vs. 9.5 (8.3-18) days, p = 0.007], and postoperative hospitalization [36 (29-49) vs. 27 (22-36) days, p = 0.017]. Two patients in Epoch 1 (8.3%), but none in Epoch 2, required re-intubation. Our results suggest that HFNC-iNO therapy reduces the duration of postoperative intubation, pleural drainage, and hospitalization.