Comparison of Late Toxicity After Whole-pelvis Versus Prostate-only VMAT for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate whether whole-pelvis (WP) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is associated with increased late toxicity compared with prostate-only (PO) VMAT in patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants comprised 384 consecutive patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions from July 2011 to August 2016. Of these, 183 patients received PO-VMAT and 201 patients received initial WP-VMAT to 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were prospectively scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 months (range=16-88 months) in the PO-VMAT group and 52 months (range=10-85 months) in the WP-VMAT group. Frequencies of Grade 3 late GI and GU toxicities were ≤3% across both groups. No patients experienced Grade 4+ toxicity. Cumulative incidences of Grade 2+ late GI and GU toxicities were similar between PO- and WP-VMAT groups (p=0.508 and p=0.838, respectively). Five-year cumulative incidences of Grade 2+ late GI and GU toxicities were 12.2% and 6.6% for the PO-VMAT group and 12.3% and 8.9% for the WP-VMAT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: WP-VMAT did not increase late GI and GU toxicities. This suggests that concerns about increasing toxicity profile are insufficient reason for omitting WPRT for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Lack of dose dependency for radiation pneumonitis after chemoradiotherapy with the use of tomotherapy for lung cancer.

A 71-year-old man with stage IIB (Union for International Cancer Control, 8th edition) non-small cell lung cancer underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a dose of 66 Gy administered in 33 fractions concomitant with carboplatin and paclitaxel therapy. On computed tomography after completion of radiation therapy, ground-glass opacity, which was larger on the contralateral side, was observed, but it was not observed in the high-dose area on the ipsilateral side. Although the adverse event theoretically shows dose dependency, it was finally diagnosed as radiation pneumonitis. The presence of an atypical distribution of radiation pneumonitis should be recognized to improve the diagnosis, and it is suggested that the relative volume of the normal contralateral lung receiving a dose of ≥5 Gy is a possible risk factor for radiation pneumonitis.

Bowel and urinary quality of life after whole-pelvic versus prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare bowel and urinary health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between prostate-only (PO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and whole-pelvis (WP) VMAT in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 234 patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions were enrolled. Of these, 108 patients received PO-VMAT and 126 patients received initial WP-VMAT to 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. HRQOL was prospectively assessed before radiation therapy (baseline), and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). RESULTS: Baseline HRQOL scores did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No significant between-group differences in HRQOL change from baseline were observed for all bowel and urinary EPIC domains. The proportion of patients showing a clinically relevant decrease in bowel and urinary HRQOL scores from baseline was similar between the groups throughout the follow-up period. An analysis of individual HRQOL items showed that patients undergoing WP-VMAT were more likely to report moderate/big problems with bloody stools (P = .039) and overall bowel problems (P = .008) than those undergoing PO-VMAT at 12 months. There was no significant between-group difference in any individual items at 24 months, however. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel and urinary HRQOL is largely similar for patients receiving PO-VMAT and WP-VMAT during 24 months of follow-up, with the only differences seen in responses to specific bowel HRQOL items at 12 months.

Dose Escalation Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With the Use of Involved-field Conformal Radiotherapy and Accelerated Hyperfractionation in Combination With Cisplatin and Vinorelbine Chemotherapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Final Report.

OBJECTIVES: A phase I study to determine a recommended dose of thoracic radiotherapy using accelerated hyperfractionation for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used chemotherapy of a cisplatin doublet and 2 dose levels of radiation with accelerated hyperfractionation. The radiation dose levels were: a total dose of 60 Gy in 40 fractions at level 1, and 66 Gy in 44 fractions at level 2. Eligible patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer received cisplatin and vinorelbine. Radiation therapy started on day 2 of chemotherapy and was delivered twice daily for 5 days a week. RESULTS: Total 12 patients were enrolled, with 6 patients each at dose levels 1 and 2. Dose-limiting toxicity was noted in 2 patients at level 1; one patient had grade 3 febrile neutropenia and the other patient had grade 3 esophagitis. No dose-limiting toxicity was noted in the 6 patients at level 2. Grade 3 to 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia were noted in 11 (92%), 9 (75%), and 8 (67%) of the total 12 patients, respectively. Grade 3 anorexia and infection were noted in 2 patients (17%) at each level. Grade 3 nausea, fatigue, esophagitis, and febrile neutropenia were noted in 1 patient (8%) at each level. The response rate in the total 12 patients was 83.3%. The median progression-free survival time and the median overall survival time were 10.7 and 24.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-six gray in 44 fractions is the recommended dose for the following phase II study.

Pain Management of Malignant Psoas Syndrome Under Epidural Analgesia During Palliative Radiotherapy.

Malignant psoas syndrome is a rare malignant condition presenting as lumbosacral plexopathy and painful fixed flexion of the hip. Metastasis to the psoas muscle is observed, which damages the nerve bundles in the lumbosacral plexuses. The syndrome presents as refractory lower back pain with several other neurological symptoms. The pain is difficult to control because it is a mixture of nociceptive and neuropathic pain, which indicates that treatment requires a versatile approach. The authors report a case of severe back pain caused by metastasis to the psoas muscle of advanced gastric cancer in a patient who underwent palliative radiotherapy under epidural analgesia. Despite conventional analgesics and subcutaneous oxycodone, he had difficulties in maintaining supine position because of the back pain and had a problem to receive radiotherapy, which required him to stay still in the same position during the treatment. By epidural analgesia, he could remain in supine position and complete radiotherapy without increasing opioid administration. His back pain was improved after the radiotherapy. Epidural analgesia is an effective treatment choice for a patient who is unable to keep the position during palliative radiotherapy.

Optimal bladder volume at treatment planning for prostate cancer patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate optimal bladder volumes at treatment planning (TP) in prostate cancer patients who undergo volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To determine the minimum value, 122 patients were classified into 6 groups according to the bladder volume at TP: <100 mL (group 1), 100-149 mL (group 2), 150-199 mL (group 3), 200-249 mL (group 4), 250-299 mL (group 5), and ≥300 mL (group 6). Bladder volumes receiving more than 70 Gy (V70Gy) and V50Gy were calculated in each subgroup and compared with the bladder dose-volume constraints specified in our institution. To determine the maximum value, 64 patients who underwent uniform nursing interventions were classified into the same 6 groups. Bladder volumes on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were measured once weekly during treatment, for a total of 8 measurements. Relative bladder volumes (bladder volume on CBCT image [mL]/bladder volume at TP [mL] × 100%) were evaluated in each of the 6 subgroups. RESULTS: The upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals of the mean V70Gy and V50Gy values in group 1 exceeded the dose constraints at our institution. The mean relative bladder volumes were 104%, 91%, 77%, 81%, 63%, and 59% in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The institutional criterion of 70% for the mean relative bladder volume was achieved in groups 1-4, but it could not be achieved in groups 5-6. Therefore, the patients in groups 2-4 met both institutional dose constraints for the bladder at TP and the institutional criterion for the mean relative bladder volume during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal bladder volumes at TP were between 100 and 250 mL in this setting. Nursing intervention needs to be implemented before treatment planning to ensure that patients achieve the optimal bladder volume range.

Spontaneous pneumothorax due to bronchopleural fistula following reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent squamous cell lung cancer.

Spontaneous pneumothorax following radiotherapy for pulmonary malignancy is an unusual clinical condition. Here, we report a case of a 78-year-old male suffering from dyspnea during radiotherapy for squamous cell lung cancer of the right main bronchus. Imaging studies and fiberoptic bronchoscopy revealed that pneumothorax was due to a bronchopleural fistula.

Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity after whole-pelvic vs prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image guidance for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity rates between whole-pelvic (WP) and prostate-only (PO) volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 224 consecutive patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions were enrolled. Of these, 119 patients received initial WP VMAT at 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique, and 105 patients received PO VMAT. Image-guided radiotherapy was practised with daily cone beam CT. RESULTS: The mean rectal dose, the rectal volume receiving ≥30 Gy (V30Gy), rectal V50Gy, the mean bladder dose, bladder V30Gy and bladder V50Gy were significantly increased in the WP group (p < 0.05 each); however, the rectal V70Gy did not differ between groups (p = 0.101), and the bladder V70Gy was significantly lower in the WP group (p = 0.029). The WP group experienced a significantly increased frequency of acute grade 2 diarrhoea relative to the PO group (5.9% vs 0%; p = 0.015). No differences were seen between the WP and PO groups in terms of acute grade 2 proctitis (10.1% vs 6.7%; p = 0.360) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity (12.6% vs 10.5%; p = 0.620). CONCLUSION: Despite larger rectum and bladder volumes at low- and medium-dose levels, WP VMAT resulted in no significant increase in acute proctitis or GU toxicity when compared with PO VMAT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates that whole-pelvic radiotherapy has comparable acute toxicity to those observed with prostate-only radiotherapy when VMAT with daily image guidance is used.

A treatment-planning comparison of three beam arrangement strategies for stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located lung tumors using volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

The purpose of this study was to determine appropriate beam arrangement for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of patients with centrally located lung tumors. Fifteen consecutive patients with centrally located lung tumors treated at our institution were enrolled. For each patient, three VMAT plans were generated using two coplanar partial arcs (CP VMAT), two non-coplanar partial arcs (NCP VMAT), and one coplanar full arc (Full VMAT). All plans were designed to deliver 70 Gy in 10 fractions. Target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were compared across techniques. PTV coverage was almost identical for all approaches. The whole lung V10Gy was significantly lower with CP VMAT plans than with NCP VMAT plans, whereas no significant differences in the mean lung dose, V5Gy, V20Gy or V40Gy were observed. Full VMAT increased mean contralateral lung V5Gy by 12.57% and 9.15% when compared with NCP VMAT and CP VMAT, respectively. Although NCP VMAT plans best achieved the dose-volume constraints for mediastinal OARs, the absolute differences in dose were small when compared with CP VMAT. These results suggest that partial-arc VMAT may be preferable to minimize unnecessary exposure to the contralateral lung, and use of NCP VMAT should be considered when the dose-volume constraints are not achieved by CP VMAT.

Results of surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy for patients with malignant parotid tumor.

PURPOSE: The latest version of the World Health Organization (WHO) histologic classification of salivary gland malignancies was published in 2005. To contribute to data accumulation on the basis of this latest version, a retrospective study was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants comprised 27 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy between 2000 and 2013. Two, eight, and 17 patients were allocated to low, intermediate, and high-grade groups, respectively, in accordance with the latest WHO classification. The radiation field included the tumor bed and ipsilateral regional lymph nodes for 25 patients. The radiation dose was 46-60 Gy (median 56 Gy). RESULTS: Median duration of follow-up was 41 months. Five-year locoregional control was 89 %. Two patients experienced local recurrence and 7 patients developed distant metastases. No patients in the low or intermediate-grade groups developed distant metastases. Overall 3 and 5-year survival for all patients were 81 and 75 %, respectively. Five-year overall survival for patients in the low and intermediate-grade groups was 100 %, compared with 59 % for patients in the high-grade group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Favorable locoregional control was achieved for patients with malignant parotid tumors who underwent surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy. Patients with high-grade tumors frequently experienced distant metastases and prognosis was poor.

Whole-pelvic volumetric-modulated arc therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: treatment planning and acute toxicity.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate dosimetric quality and acute toxicity of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and daily image guidance in high-risk prostate cancer patients. A total of 100 consecutive high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with definitive VMAT with prophylactic whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) were enrolled. All patients were treated with a double-arc VMAT plan delivering 52 Gy to the prostate planning target volume (PTV), while simultaneously delivering 46.8 Gy to the pelvic nodal PTV in 26 fractions, followed by a single-arc VMAT plan delivering 26 Gy to the prostate PTV in 13 fractions. Image-guided RT was performed with daily cone-beam computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters for the PTV and the organs at risk (OARs), total number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment time were evaluated. Acute toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. All dosimetric parameters met the present plan acceptance criteria. Mean MU and treatment time were 471 and 146 s for double-arc VMAT, respectively, and were 520 and 76 s for single-arc VMAT, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was reported. Acute Grade 2 proctitis, diarrhea, and genitourinary toxicity occurred in 12 patients (12%), 6 patients (6%) and 13 patients (13%), respectively. The present study demonstrated that VMAT for WPRT in prostate cancer results in favorable PTV coverage and OAR sparing with short treatment time and an acceptable rate of acute toxicity. These findings support the use of VMAT for delivering WPRT to high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Lung cancer: a 6-field technique using lateral beams in conformal radiotherapy for bilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases.

A 6-field technique using lateral beams in conformal radiotherapy was developed for patients with bilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis of lung cancer. The possibility of using this technique in practice was evaluated. Six fields with the same isocenter point (IP) were arranged. Two fields using anterior-posterior opposed beams involved all of the planning target volume (PTV). The next 2 fields using off-cord oblique beams involved the PTV inferior to the IP. The remaining 2 fields using lateral opposed beams, that shielded the spinal cord, involved the PTV superior to the IP. The oblique 2 fields and lateral 2 fields were connected using a half-beam technique. In 6 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 4) or small-cell lung cancer (SCLC, n = 2), treatment re-planning based on this technique was performed. This technique was applicable in 4 patients with NSCLC, in whom the general criteria of radiotherapy for lung cancer were met. In 2 patients with SCLC, the cumulative volume of lung that received more than 20 Gy exceeded 37% of the total lung volume. This technique was usable in 67% of the patients and was not necessarily contraindicated in the other 33%.

A Phase I study of chemoradiotherapy with use of involved-field conformal radiotherapy and accelerated hyperfractionation for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer: WJTOG 3305.

PURPOSE: A Phase I study to determine a recommended dose of thoracic radiotherapy using accelerated hyperfractionation for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer was conducted. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were treated intravenously with carboplatin (area under the concentration curve 2) and paclitaxel (40 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (1.5 Gy per fraction) beginning on Day 1 followed by two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy using carboplatin (area under the concentration curve 5) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)). Total doses were 54 Gy in 36 fractions, 60 Gy in 40 fractions, 66 Gy in 44 fractions, and 72 Gy in 48 fractions at Levels 1 to 4. The dose-limiting toxicity, defined as Grade ≥4 esophagitis and neutropenic fever and Grade ≥3 other nonhematologic toxicities, was monitored for 90 days. RESULTS: Of 26 patients enrolled, 22 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. When 4 patients entered Level 4, enrollment was closed to avoid severe late toxicities. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 patients. They were Grade 3 neuropathy at Level 1 and Level 3 and Grade 3 infection at Level 1. However, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The median survival time was 28.6 months for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, although the dose of radiation was escalated to 72 Gy in 48 fractions. However, a dose of 66 Gy in 44 fractions was adopted for this study because late toxicity data were insufficient.

Limited-stage small cell lung cancer: local failure after concurrent chemoradiotherapy with use of accelerated hyperfractionation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to update data of radiation therapy regimens for improvement in local control in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer, a retrospective study was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of early concurrent chemoradiotherapy with accelerated hyperfractionation in 30 patients between 1998 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy in 30 fractions in all patients. RESULTS: All patients received a full dose of radiation therapy; however, interruptions for >or=5 days, mainly due to hematologic toxicity, were required in 18 patients (60%). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate and the median survival time were 26% and 26 months, respectively. The 4-year in-field control rate was 56%. Sites of relapse were local relapse in 9 patients (6 for in-field relapse, 3 for marginal relapse) and distant metastases in 16 patients (11 for distant metastases only, 5 for distant metastases with local relapse). The sites of marginal relapse were the upper margin in two patients and the peripheral margin in one patient. Grade 3 radiation esophagitis was observed in only three patients. CONCLUSION: Because in-field control was insufficient, a more effective approach should be sought to provide better local control.

Phase II study of etoposide and cisplatin with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy followed by irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902.

PURPOSE: We initially conducted a randomized phase II study to compare irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) versus irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide (IPE) after etoposide and cisplatin (EP) with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We amended the protocol to evaluate IP after EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT in a single-arm phase II study because of an unacceptable toxicity in IPE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with LD-SCLC were treated intravenously with etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 with concurrent twice-daily TRT (1.5 Gy per fraction, a total dose of 45 Gy) beginning on day 2 followed by three cycles of irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients enrolled, 49 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate and complete response rate were 88% and 41%, respectively. The median survival time for all patients was 23 months. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 49% and 29.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 11.8 months. The major toxicities observed were neutropenia (grade 4, 84%), febrile neutropenia (grade 3, 31%), infection (grade 3 to 4, 33%), electrolytes imbalance (grade 3 to 4, 20%), and diarrhea (grade 3 to 4, 14%). CONCLUSION: EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT followed by the consolidation of IP appears to be an active regimen which deserves further phase III testing in patients with LD-SCLC.

Phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The combination of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is considered as a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the frequent interaction of anticancer agents and irradiation may produce stronger radio-sensitizing effects, the daily administration of these agents is complicated. We therefore used weekly administration of these agents, and conducted a phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent TRT. The purpose of this study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the recommended dose of this treatment. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. Both cisplatin and vinorelbine were given intravenously on a weekly schedule for 6 weeks, starting on the first day of TRT, i.e., on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. The total dose of TRT was 60 Gy. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 20 mg/m(2) per week. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 15 mg/m(2) per week (dose level 1). RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled in this study. All three patients at dose level 1 experienced DLTs. We decreased the dose of vinorelbine to 10 mg/m(2) per week (dose level 0). Two of the six patients at dose level 0 experienced DLTs. Therefore, dose level 1 was considered as the MTD, and dose level 0 as the recommended dose. The DLTs of this treatment were esophagitis, fatigue, infection, and hyponatremia. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of cisplatin is 20 mg/m(2) per week and that of vinorelbine is 10 mg/m(2) per week with standard TRT. A phase II study of this treatment is warranted.

Relapse of stage I small cell lung cancer ten or more years after the start of treatment.

Most patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) usually show relapse within 1 or 2 years. Relapses after a 5-year disease-free survival are extremely rare. This report describes two patients with stage I SCLC in whom the disease recurred 10 or more years after the start of initial therapy. Because the recurrence of SCLC was noted in the mediastinal lymph nodes of the same side, we concluded that the patients had a late relapse of SCLC rather than a metachronous lung cancer.

Usefulness of FDG-microPET for early evaluation of therapeutic effects on VX2 rabbit carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the potential use of high-resolution FDG-microPET for predicting the primary effects of radiotherapy and/or hyperthermia on tumor-bearing rabbits. METHODS: Twenty-eight VX2 xenografts in the thighs of rabbits were divided into the following 5 treatment groups: radiotherapy at a single dose of 10, 20 or 30 Gy, hyperthermia (43 degrees Celsius, 1 hour), and the combination of radiotherapy and hyperthermia (10 Gy + 43 degrees Celsius, 1 hour). FDG-microPET images were obtained by using a microPET P4 system at pretreatment and at 24 hours and 7 days after treatment. For the evaluation by FDG-microPET, tumor/muscle (T/M) ratios, retention index [RI = (T/M ratio at 120 min - T/M ratio at 60 min) / T/M ratio at 60 min], and time activity curve (TAC) were acquired. RESULTS: We divided the xenografts into a responder group (partial response + stable disease, n=14) and a non-responder group (progressive disease, n = 14). The T/M ratio at 24 hours after the treatment in the responder group was decreased remarkably with that at pre-treatment (p < 0.05), while in the non-responder group it showed no significant change between the time points. The RI and TAC patterns were comparable to T/M ratios in each treatment group. T/M ratios, RI, and TAC indicated marked changes at the time point of 24 hours in the responder group, although the tumors did not show any significant hange in volume at that time. Photomicrographs of sections showed that the number of viable tumor cells in the responder group decreased at 24 hours after treatment and that inflammatory cell infiltration was marked and almost all viable tumor cells had disappeared by day 7 after treatment. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that early evaluation by FDG-microPET, especially 24 hours after treatment, is useful to predict the primary effects of the treatment. Histological analysis showed that inflammatory cell infiltration at 7 days after treatment was considered to be a cause of accumulation of FDG in the tumors that showed a significant decrease in tumor cell number. This false-positive should be noted when predicting tumor response by FDG accumulation.

Non-small cell lung cancer: radiation therapy for locoregional recurrence after complete resection.

BACKGROUND: We investigated patterns of failure after radical radiation therapy in relation to the radiation field in patients with postsurgical locoregional recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002, 31 patients with locoregional recurrence were treated with radiation therapy. At the time of radiation therapy, the sites of recurrence were the bronchial stump, the regional lymph nodes, the chest wall, and both the regional lymph nodes and the chest wall in 7, 20, 3, and 1 patient, respectively. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks in all patients. RESULTS: The response rate was 87%. The overall 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 61%, 30%, and 15%, respectively, and the median survival time was 14 months. Locoregional relapse with or without distant metastasis occurred in 15 patients (in-field, 7; marginal, 7; out-field, 1), and distant metastasis alone occurred in 7 patients. The sites of marginal relapse were the upper margin in two patients, the ipsilateral margin in one patient, the contralateral margin in one patient, and the lower margin in three patients, respectively (in one patient, the data for marginal relapse overlapped). In all patients with relapse on the lower margin, the mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected at the initial surgery. CONCLUSION: Postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer showed distinctive features: the response rate was high, and the incidence of marginal relapse was also high, as in small cell lung cancer. The incidence of lower marginal relapse was high, in contrast to that in surgery-naive patients.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: reirradiation for loco-regional relapse previously treated with radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation for patients with loco-regional relapse of non-small-cell lung cancer after radiation therapy. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002, 19 patients with loco-regional relapse underwent reirradiation. The median interval between the initial irradiation and reirradiation was 16 months, with a range of 5 to 60 months. The prescribed dose of reirradiation was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks for 18 patients and 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks for 1 patient. RESULTS: Five patients could not receive the prescribed dose of reirradiation. The response rate was 43% among the 14 patients who received the prescribed dose of reirradiation. The overall 1-year and 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 26% and 11%, respectively, and the median survival time was 7.1 months. The median survival times associated with intervals between the initial irradiation and reirradiation of less than 12 months, 12-18 months, and more than 18 months were 2.1, 7.1, and 11.5 months, respectively. There were significant differences in survival between patients with an interval of less than 12 months and those with an interval of 12-18 months, and between those with an interval of less than 12 months and those with an interval of more than 18 months (generalized Wilcoxon method; P < 0.05 for both). Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis and grade 2 radiation esophagitis occurred in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation is considered to contribute to salvage in selected patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with a long interval after the initial irradiation are good candidates for reirradiation. On the other hand, patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3 were not good candidates.