Multiple rib fractures confused with loss of lung volume on chest X-ray.

A 90-year-old woman with osteoporosis and no recent injury history visited the hospital for a regular checkup. Chest X-ray showed a loss of right upper lung volume. Although we suspected pulmonary parenchymal or pleural disease, computed tomography revealed multiple rib fractures on the right side, which caused thoracic deformation.

Simple risk-score model for in-hospital major bleeding based on multiple blood variables in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital bleeding is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to investigate whether a combination of pre-procedural blood tests could predict the incidence of in-hospital major bleeding in patients with AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1684 consecutive AMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were recruited and randomly divided into derivation (n = 1010) and validation (n = 674) cohorts. A risk-score model was created based on a combination of parameters assessed on routine blood tests on admission. In the derivation cohort, multivariate analysis revealed that the following 5 variables were significantly associated with in-hospital major bleeding: hemoglobin level < 12 g/dL (odds ratio [OR], 3.32), white blood cell count >10,000/µL (OR, 2.58), platelet count <150,000/µL (OR, 2.51), albumin level < 3.8 mg/dL (OR, 2.51), and estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR, 2.31). Zero to five points were given according to the number of these factors each patient had. Incremental risk scores were significantly associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital major bleeding in both cohorts (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of risk models showed adequate discrimination between patients with and without in-hospital major bleeding (derivation cohort: area under the curve [AUC], 0.807; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.759-0.848; validation cohort: AUC, 0.793; 95% CI, 0.725-0.847). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel laboratory-based bleeding risk model could be useful for simple and objective prediction of in-hospital major bleeding events in patients with AMI.

Serum Albumin and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (from the HAGAKURE-ACS Registry).

Low serum albumin (SA) on admission in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been reported to be associated with adverse cardiovascular events. The relation between low SA and post-AMI bleeding events is presently unknown. We analyzed 1,724 patients with AMI enrolled in the HAGAKURE-ACS registry who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2014 to December 2018. To assess the influence of low SA at admission, patients were divided into 3 groups according to the albumin tertiles: the low SA group (<3.8 g/100 ml), the middle SA (MSA) group (3.8 to 4.1 g/100 ml), and the normal SA (NSA) group (≥4.2 g/100 ml). The primary end point was the incidence of Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries moderate/severe bleeding. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary end point was significantly higher in the low SA group than in the MSA and NSA groups (30.8% and 11.9% vs 7.7%; p <0.001). In the landmark analysis at 30 days, the cumulative incidences of the primary end point were also significantly higher in the low SA group than in the MSA and NSA groups, both within and beyond 30 days (20.1% and 6.1% vs 3.5%; p <0.001, and 12.4% and 6.2% vs 4.5%; p <0.001, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, the low SA group showed excess risk of bleeding events relative to NSA (hazard ratio 1.56; 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.30; p = 0.026), whereas risk of bleeding was neutral in MSA relative to NSA (hazard ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.34; p = 0.752). In conclusion, low SA at admission was independently associated with higher risk for bleeding events in patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Effect of pioglitazone on cardiometabolic profiles and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary artery intervention: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

Pioglitazone has superior antiatherosclerotic effects compared with other classes of antidiabetic agents, and there is substantial evidence that pioglitazone improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, there is also a potential risk of worsening heart failure (HF). Therefore, it is clinically important to determine whether pioglitazone is safe in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who require treatment for secondary prevention of CV disease, since they have an intrinsically higher risk of HF. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized study investigated the effects of pioglitazone on cardiometabolic profiles and CV safety in T2DM patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using bare-metal stents or first-generation drug-eluting stents. A total of 94 eligible patients were randomly assigned to either a pioglitazone or conventional (control) group, and pioglitazone was started the day before PCI. Cardiometabolic profiles were evaluated before PCI and at primary follow-up coronary angiography (5-8 months). Pioglitazone treatment reduced HbA1c levels to a similar degree as conventional treatment (pioglitazone group 6.5 to 6.0%, P < 0.01; control group 6.5 to 5.9%, P < 0.001), without body weight gain. Levels of high-molecular weight adiponectin increased more in the pioglitazone group than the control group (P < 0.001), and the changes were irrespective of baseline glycemic control. Furthermore, pioglitazone significantly reduced plasma levels of natriuretic peptides and preserved cardiac systolic and diastolic function (assessed by echocardiography) without incident hospitalization for worsening HF. The incidence of clinical adverse events was also comparable between the groups. These results indicate that pioglitazone treatment before and after elective PCI may be tolerable and clinically safe and may improve cardiometabolic profiles in T2DM patients.

Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 188 patients were enrolled who had type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic profiles (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≥6.2%). Patients were assigned to one of three age groups (<65, 65-74 and ≥75 years) and received 50-100 mg of sitagliptin daily for 12 months. Changes in HbA1c classified by age and body mass index (BMI) were assessed in addition to physiological parameters. RESULTS: Mean HbA1c decreased significantly in all age groups (<65 years 8.01 ± 1.59% to 7.29 ± 1.23%; 65-74 years 7.61 ± 1.11% to 7.05 ± 0.99%; ≥75 years 7.21 ± 0.87% to 6.74 ± 0.96%). Reductions in HbA1c were not significantly different among age groups (P = 0.324). In older patients aged 65-74 years and ≥75 years, HbA1c decreased significantly in lean (BMI <25 kg/m2 ) patients (7.52 ± 1.10% to 6.99 ± 1.08%; P < 0.001) and in obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 ) patients (7.25% ± 0.90% to 6.86% ± 0.86%; P = 0.015); the changes in HbA1c were not significantly different between the lean and the obese groups (P = 0.943). Adverse events occurred in 12 patients (10.3%) aged ≥65 years, although there was no significant difference among the three age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin treatment offers elderly patients aged ≥65 years efficacious and safe reductions in HbA1c values regardless of BMI. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 631-639.

Association Between Blood Pressure Lowering and Quality of Life by Treatment of Azilsartan.

The authors assessed the effects of switching from a conventional angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to azilsartan on blood pressure (BP) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Key eligibility criteria were uncontrolled hypertension treated for ≥ 1 month with an ARB, excluding azilsartan, that did not reach the target BP. We recruited 147 patients (64 males and 83 females; mean ± standard deviation age 73 ± 15 years). Azilsartan reduced both systolic and diastolic BP significantly, from 151 ± 16/82 ± 12 to 134 ± 17/73 ± 12 mm Hg, 3 months after switching. Although scores on the comprehensive QOL scale, the EuroQoL 5 dimensions (EQ5D), and the simplified menopausal index (SMI) did not change, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score improved significantly, and there was a significant association between the change in the GDS score and systolic BP lowering (r = 0.2554, P = 0.030). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) improved significantly only in the female subgroup. Besides sufficient BP lowering activity, anti-hypertensive treatment with azilsartan may have a favorable impact on depression in geriatric patients with uncontrolled hypertension.