TP53 Variant in the Blood of a Patient with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Tumor Profiling Tests Diagnosed as Clonal Hematopoiesis.

BACKGROUND Clonal hematopoiesis is the production of a specific single clonal type of cell in the blood and is often found in cancer genomic profiling tests. When the clone carries a pathogenic variant, it may be important to differentiate between somatic or germline origin. The variant in the blood that has a lower minor allele frequency could reflect heterozygous germline origin, somatic mosaicism, and clonal hematopoiesis. It is important to evaluate suspected variants to determine the course of treatment and follow-up of the patient, depending on the patient's medical condition and family situation. CASE REPORT We report a 53-year-old Japanese man with gastric cancer who underwent a cancer genomic profiling test searching for therapeutic agents. The profiling test detected a variant, TP53 c.559+2T>G minor allele frequencies of 9% (168/1865) in tumor tissue and 29.1% (58/199) in paired blood. Since the TP53 variant has the possibility of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, ancillary testing was performed using fingernails, buccal swab, and blood specimens. The genomic analysis revealed no TP53 variant in his fingernails. The patient had previously received platinum-based chemotherapies, suggesting that the variant reflected treatment-induced clonal hematopoiesis. CONCLUSIONS Identifying clonal hematopoiesis when performing genomic profiling tests for patients with cancer is important. Examining multiple tissues to determine whether a variant arises from clonal hematopoiesis or is of germline origin can provide more accurate genetic information and improve patient follow-up care.

Attitudes of clinical geneticists and certified genetic counselors to genome editing and its clinical applications: A nation-wide questionnaire survey in Japan.

Genome editing of the human embryo using CRISPR/Cas9 has the potential to prevent hereditary diseases from being transmitted to the next generation. However, attitudes to this technology have not been examined sufficiently among the genetic professionals who will use it in the near future. We conducted a questionnaire survey of Japanese clinical geneticists and certified genetic counselors. Differences were observed between them in their recognition of this technology and impressions on its difficulty and cost. Both groups worried about misuse of it, with insufficient information and rules. As key elements for such rules, they considered ethics, safety, and purpose. Most disapproved of modifying physical traits as an enhancement, though they hoped for the treatment of severe diseases. At current clinical sites, they tended to adopt a prudent attitude by mentioning only the possibility of genome editing in the future. Academic policies and legislation are required, especially for application in human embryos, through a consensus of professionals and general citizens. Furthermore, professionals should maintain awareness of new developments and regularly reexamine attitudes for the ongoing development of more suitable rules, education systems, and clinical protocols. As preparation for changes, opportunities to address ethical issues and initiate discussions are also required.