Administration of lipid emulsion reduced the hypnotic potency of propofol more than that of thiamylal in mice.

Administration in a lipid emulsion can modify the pharmacodynamics of drugs via a process known as lipid resuscitation. However, the detailed mechanism remains unclear. We studied the volume and another pharmacodynamic effect, the lipid sink, using propofol and thiamylal. Male adult mice (ddY) were intravenously administered 10 ml/kg propofol or thiamylal diluted with physiological saline, 10% soybean oil, or 20% soybean oil. The 50% effective dose (ED50) for achieving hypnosis was calculated using probit analysis. To investigate the volume effect, 0, 10, or 20 ml/kg of saline or soybean oil was administered, either simultaneously or beforehand. Next, a two- or three-fold dose of the anesthetics was administered and the durations of anesthesia were measured. Finally, at 30 s after the first injection, supplemental soybean oil was administered. The mean (± SE) ED50 values of propofol and thiamylal were 5.79 mg/kg (0.61) and 8.83 mg/kg (0.84), respectively. Lipid dilution increased the ED50 values of both anesthetics. After injection of a dose two-fold the ED50 value, the respective mean (± SD) durations of anesthesia were 125 ± 35 s and 102 ± 38 s. Supplemental administration of soybean oil significantly shortened the duration of anesthesia of propofol, but not that of thiamylal. The results indicate that administration of a lipid emulsion vitiated the anesthetic effect of propofol by reducing the non-emulsified free fraction in the aqueous phase, which may elucidate the lipid resuscitation likely caused by the lipid sink mechanism.

Difficult Airway Management in a Patient With Nicolaides-Baraitser Syndrome Who Had a Small Jaw and Limited Mouth Opening.

Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome (NCBRS) is a rare congenital genetic disorder characterized by distinctive facial features similar to Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS). We report the first case of successful nasal fiberoptic intubation in a patient with NCBRS with micrognathia and limited mouth opening due to trismus. A 9-year-old girl with NCBRS and dental caries was scheduled to undergo general anesthesia for a dental extraction. Initial attempts at oral intubation using a video laryngoscope were unsuccessful. However, subsequent attempts at nasal intubation using a flexible fiberoptic scope were successful. This report highlights that patients with NCBRS may present with difficult airways to manage and intubate.

JM-1232(-) and propofol, a new combination of hypnotics with short-acting and non-cumulative preferable properties.

Drug interactions are significant in anesthesiology because drug combinations can potentially possess novel properties. The pharmacological advantages of a new combination of the benzodiazepine receptor agonist JM-1232(-) and propofol were investigated in mice. Male adult mice were administered JM-1232(-) or propofol or combinations of the two drugs intravenously. Loss of the righting reflex was evaluated as achieving hypnosis, and the time until recovery of the reflex was measured as hypnosis time. After determining the ED50, doses double and triple the ED50 of propofol were injected with JM-1232(-) to compare hypnosis time. The injections were repeated four times, and the hypnosis times were compared. Flumazenil was administered separately immediately after the last dose was injected. The ED50 values ([95% confidence interval]) for hypnosis were 3.76 [3.36-4.10] for JM-1232(-) and 9.88 [8.03-11.58] mg kg-1 for propofol. Co-administration of 0.5 and 1 mg kg-1 JM-1232(-) reduced the ED50 values of propofol to 1.76 [1.21-2.51] and 1.00 [0.46-1.86] mg kg-1, respectively. The drug combination for hypnosis produced a supra-additive interaction. Hypnosis time was significantly shorter in the groups given the mixtures compared to each hypnotic administered alone. After repeated injections, hypnosis time with the mixtures showed smaller prolongation than that with the hypnotic alone. Flumazenil completely restored the recovery time after anesthesia. The combination of JM-1232(-) and propofol showed a supra-additive interaction, and the reduced hypnotic dose contributed to a faster recovery even after multiple injections.

Smaller effect of propofol than sevoflurane anesthesia on dopamine turnover induced by methamphetamine and nomifensine in the rat striatum: an in vivo microdialysis study.

Volatile anesthetics accelerate dopamine turnover in the brain, especially when used in conjunction with psychotropic agents such as methamphetamine and nomifensine. The effect of intravenous propofol anesthesia on the extracellular dopamine concentrations is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two anesthetics on the extracellular concentrations of dopamine and metabolites using an in vivo microdialysis model. Male Sprague Dawley rats were implanted with a microdialysis probe into the right striatum. The probe was perfused with modified Ringer's solution, and the dialysate was directly injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography system every 20 min. The rats were intraperitoneally administered saline, methamphetamine at 2 mg/kg, or nomifensine at 10 mg/kg. After treatment, the rats were anesthetized with intravenous propofol (20 mg/kg followed by 25 or 50 mg/kg/h) or inhalational sevoflurane (2.5%) for 1 h. Propofol showed no effect on the extracellular concentration of dopamine during anesthesia; however, propofol decreased the dopamine concentration after anesthesia in the high-dose group. Sevoflurane anesthesia increased the concentration of metabolites. Systemic administration of methamphetamine and nomifensine increased the extracellular concentration of dopamine. Sevoflurane anesthesia significantly enhanced the increase in the dopamine concentration induced by both methamphetamine and nomifensine, whereas propofol anesthesia showed no effect on the methamphetamine- and nomifensine-induced dopamine increase during anesthesia. The enhancing effect of psychotropic agent-induced acceleration of dopamine turnover was smaller for propofol anesthesia than for sevoflurane anesthesia.