Early Intervention and Use of Autologous Grafts in Growing Skull Fractures Results in Better Outcomes: Experience From a Tertiary Pediatric Neurosurgery Center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Growing skull fracture (GSF) is a rare complication of pediatric head trauma. Definitive treatment is surgical repair. We have attempted to assess whether use of autologous grafts for duraplasty and cranioplasty leads to better outcomes. We have also attempted to understand how timing of surgery might affect the degree of underlying damage to cortical tissue. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study based on review from the Great Ormond Street Hospital Neurosurgery prospective surgical database. All patients undergoing surgery for GSF repair between 1991 and 2015 were included. Surgical techniques included split calvarial grafts in 4 patients, whereas rest had full-thickness bone grafting. In all cases with full-thickness graft, the donor site was covered with morselized bone chips mixed with fibrin glue (Salami technique). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were identified (16 males, 12 females). The average age at the time of injury was 13 months. The mean duration of onset of symptoms from the time of injury was 4.4 months. The time interval from symptom onset to surgical repair was 5.92 months. Seven patients had Type I GSF (leptomeningeal cyst with minimal brain parenchyma), 13 had type II (hernia containing gliotic brain), and 8 had type III (porencephalic cyst extending through the skull defect into subgaleal space). Patients with delayed presentation had severe brain injury (Type III) and had more long-term complications (refractory epilepsy requiring temporo-occipito-parietal disconnection and development of hydrocephalus requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion). CONCLUSION: Autologous pericranium for duraplasty and split-thickness bone graft or the Salami technique are recommended for cranioplasty. Synthetic materials should be used if the index operation fails or there are complications. Patients with high-risk findings should be identified at the time of initial presentation and followed up in clinic early to prevent onset of neurological deficit. Early repair is associated with better neurological outcomes.

International Consensus Statement on the Radiological Evaluation of Dysraphic Malformations of the Spine and Spinal Cord.

Dysraphic malformations of the spine and spinal cord (DMSSC) represent a spectrum of common congenital anomalies typically (though not exclusively) affecting the lower spinal segments. These may be responsible for varying degrees of neurologic, orthopedic, and urologic morbidity. With advances in neuroimaging, it is now possible to better diagnose and evaluate these disorders both prenatally and postnatally. Neuroimaging, performed at the right time and with technique optimization, is integral in guiding clinical management. However, the terminology used to describe these lesions has become increasingly confusing, and there is a lack of consensus regarding the essential radiologic features and their clinical weighting. This variability in radiologic practice risks unstructured decision making and increases the likelihood of suboptimal, less informed clinical management. In this manuscript, the first of a series of consensus statements, we outline a standardized international consensus statement for the radiologic evaluation of children with suspected DMSSC derived from a critical review of the literature, and the collective clinical experience of a multinational group of experts. We provide recommendations for plain radiography, sonography, CT, and MR imaging in the evaluation of DMSSC with an emphasis on technique of imaging and imaging protocols.