Use of residual neural network for the detection of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on plain cervical radiography.

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) causes serious problems, such as myelopathy and acute spinal cord injury. The early and accurate diagnosis of OPLL would hence prevent the miserable prognoses. Plain lateral radiography is an essential method for the evaluation of OPLL. Therefore, minimizing the diagnostic errors of OPLL on radiography is crucial. Image identification based on a residual neural network (RNN) has been recognized to be potentially effective as a diagnostic strategy for orthopedic diseases; however, the accuracy of detecting OPLL using RNN has remained unclear. An RNN was trained with plain lateral cervical radiography images of 2,318 images from 672 patients (535 images from 304 patients with OPLL and 1,773 images from 368 patients of Negative). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate of diagnosis of the RNN were calculated. The mean accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate of the model were 98.9%, 97.0%, 99.4%, 2.2%, and 1.0%, respectively. The model achieved an overall area under the curve of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.00) in which AUC in each fold estimated was 0.99, 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. An algorithm trained by an RNN could make binary classification of OPLL on cervical lateral X-ray images. RNN may hence be useful as a screening tool to assist physicians in identifying patients with OPLL in future setting. To achieve accurate identification of OPLL patients clinically, RNN has to be trained with other cause of myelopathy.

The impact of sagittal imbalance on walking in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

PURPOSE: Gait and posture disorder severely impedes the quality of life of affected patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). Despite the major health concern, there is a paucity of literature about the relationships among spatiotemporal gait parameters and spinal sagittal parameters. This is a cross sectional study performed in a single tertiary referral center to determine the relationships among spatiotemporal gait parameters and spinal sagittal parameters in patients with LSCS. METHODS: A total of 164 consecutive patients with LSCS, 87 men and 77 women with mean age of 70.7 years, were enrolled. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were studied using a gait analysis system. Spinal sagittal parameters were studied including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic inclination (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT) both in the neutral and stepped positions. RESULTS: SVA was significantly larger in the stepped position than in the neutral position (neutral position, 72.5 mm; stepped position, 96.8 mm; p = 0.003). Parameters regarding the pelvis exhibited significant differences, which could represent pelvic anteversion in the stepped position. By stepwise multiple regression analysis, the prediction models, containing SVA (neutral) and PT (stepped) for double supporting phase, exhibited statistical significance, and accounted for approximately 50% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides statistically established evidence of correlation among spatiotemporal gait parameters and spinal sagittal parameters. Differences between sagittal parameters in neutral and stepped position may stand for the postural control during gait cycle, and increased SVA in neutral position and increased PT in stepped position may correlate with prolonged double supporting phase.

Cervical sagittal alignment in patients with dropped head syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) can be divided into two types, the positive sagittal vertical axis (SVA) type and the negative SVA type. However, the cervical sagittal alignment of DHS including global sagittal spinal alignment and the typical cervical alignment of the types of DHS is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the character of cervical sagittal alignment of DHS and analyze the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and global sagittal spinal alignment. METHODS: The subjects were 35 DHS patients (10 men, 25 women, mean 71.1 years old). They were divided into two groups: negative DHS (N-DHS group, SVA < 0 mm) and positive DHS group (P-DHS group, SVA ≥ 0 mm). As control, 28 age-matched cervical spondylosis patients (CS, 21 men, 7 women, mean 67.4 years old) were analyzed. The following parameters were measured on lateral global-spine standing radiographs: cervical SVA (C2-C7SVA), O-C2A (O-C2 angle), C2 slope (C2S), C2-7A (C2-7 angle), T1 slope (T1S) and C7SVA. RESULTS: The results of measurements of each of the averaged sagittal alignment parameters were (CS, P-DHS, N-DHS): C2-7SVA(26.2 mm, 47.3 mm, 44.5 mm), O-C2 angle (35.0°, 37.1°, 39.3°), C2S (16.5°, 31.4°, 33.8°), C2-7A (9.3°, 9.9°, -16.6°), T1S (22.9°, 39.7°, 25.7°), C7SVA (35.3 mm, 51.0 mm, -43.1 mm). C2-C7SVA and C2S were significantly larger in both types of DHS compared to CS. Comparing P-DHS with N-DHS, C2-C7A and T1S were significantly smaller in N-DHS. CONCLUSIONS: O-C2A did not differ significantly among CS, P-DHS and N-DHS. In DHS patients, C2-7SVA and C2S were significantly larger than those of CS regardless of the type of DHS. The typical cervical sagittal alignment of DHS was different between P-DHS and N-DHS. In P-DHS, C2-7A and T1S were larger than those in N-DHS and the imbalance of thoraco-lumbar alignment should be noted.

Eight cases of sudden-onset dropped head syndrome: patient series.

BACKGROUND: As the proportion of elderly people continues to increase, the number of patients with dropped head syndrome (DHS) also grows. However, the relationship between onset and clinical course of DHS has hardly been studied, particularly, that of sudden-onset DHS has not been reported and remains unclear. OBSERVATIONS: Sudden-onset DHS was defined as presenting with chin on chest deformity within 3 days from the time of awareness of cervical weakness. Sixty-six patients with DHS visited our facility. Among them, 8 of the total cases (12.1%) had experienced sudden onset DHS (6 females and 2 males; average age: 71.9 ± 10.9 years). Six of 8 cases showed recovery by conservative treatment, whose first interventions were from 0.1 to 12 months, but 3 experienced recurrence. Diffuse spinal kyphotic-type DHS was seen in 2 cases, and both had recurring horizontal gaze disturbance after initial recovery. Two unimproved cases underwent surgery of combined anterior and posterior cervical fixation, and their first interventions were at 5 and 24 months. After surgery, cervical sagittal alignment was improved, and they could walk maintaining horizontal gaze. LESSONS: Sudden-onset DHS can be expected to have a better outcome, but recurrence is possible in global imbalanced-type DHS.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative presence of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS) worsens the minimum 10-year outcome of patients undergoing microendoscopic decompression (MED) for lumbar spinal stenosis (SS). METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing MED were classified into 2 groups: DS group (34 SS with DS patients) and SS group (46 SS without DS patients). The degrees of improvement (DOIs) by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and intensities of improvement (IOIs) by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 120-159 (mean, 138.4) months after MED of the DS and SS groups were statistically compared. Patients with DS were classified into 2 groups based on the effectiveness by VAS or JOABPEQ: effective group (E group: IOI or DOI ≥20) and ineffective group (I group). All preoperative radiologic measurements were statistically compared between the E and I groups. RESULTS: Significant decreases in low back pain, leg pain, and numbness, as measured by VAS, were noted at follow-up in the DS and SS groups. The effectiveness rates of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, and gait disturbance by JOABPEQ were almost equally high in the DS and SS groups. Statistical comparisons of the DOIs in all 5 functional scores and IOIs in low back pain, leg pain, and numbness showed no significant differences between the DS and SS groups. No significant differences were confirmed between the E and I groups concerning preoperative spondylolisthesis and instability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that preoperative DS did not worsen the outcome of patients with SS undergoing MED.

Artificial intelligence for the detection of vertebral fractures on plain spinal radiography.

Vertebral fractures (VFs) cause serious problems, such as substantial functional loss and a high mortality rate, and a delayed diagnosis may further worsen the prognosis. Plain thoracolumbar radiography (PTLR) is an essential method for the evaluation of VFs. Therefore, minimizing the diagnostic errors of VFs on PTLR is crucial. Image identification based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) has been recognized to be potentially effective as a diagnostic strategy; however, the accuracy for detecting VFs has not been fully investigated. A DCNN was trained with PTLR images of 300 patients (150 patients with and 150 without VFs). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of diagnosis of the model were calculated and compared with those of orthopedic residents, orthopedic surgeons, and spine surgeons. The DCNN achieved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates of 86.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.0-90.0%], 84.7% (95% CI 78.8-90.5%), and 87.3% (95% CI 81.9-92.7%), respectively. Both the accuracy and sensitivity of the model were suggested to be noninferior to those of orthopedic surgeons. The DCNN can assist clinicians in the early identification of VFs and in managing patients, to prevent further invasive interventions and a decreased quality of life.

Risk factors of dysphagia in patients with ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL) occasionally leads to dysphagia by the anterior osteophyte. A recent report explained that the dysphagia after an occipito-cervical fusion is caused by the narrowing of pharyngeal space due to the cranio-cervical malalignment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cranio-cervical alignment in patients with OALL complaining of the dysphagia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 11 cases with complaining of dysphagia due to cervical OALL who underwent anterior cervical OALL resection and as control, age-matched 12 cases without dysphagia who have diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in cervical spine. All subjects were male, and the mean age was 59.5 ± 9.1 years. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the symptoms of dysphagia (dysphagia, group A; control, group B). The O-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, and the maximum thickness of OALL and the cranio-cervical alignment (pharyngeal inlet angle; PIA) and swallowing line (S-line) were measured before and after the operation on the lateral cervical radiogram at the sitting position. RESULTS: Group A showed significantly large maximum thickness of OALL, small cervical range of motion, small O-C2 angle, large C2-C7 angle, and small PIA. The S-line crossed the anterior apex of cervical osteophyte in group A. After OALL resection, dysphagia had improved, PIA had increased, and the S-line uncrossed the apex of cervical vertebrae in all cases. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of dysphagia in patients with cervical OALL was influenced by the thickness of osteophyte, cervical mobility, and cranio-cervical alignment.

Global sagittal spinal alignment at cervical flexion in patients with dropped head syndrome.

PURPOSE: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is characterized by the passively correctable chin-on-chest deformity. The characteristic feature is emphasized in the cervical flexion position. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of cervical flexion on sagittal spinal alignment in patients with DHS. METHODS: The study included 15 DHS subjects and 55 cervical spondylosis (CS) subjects as the control group. The following parameters were analyzed: cervical sagittal vertical axis (C-SVA), occipitoaxial angle (O-C2A), C2 slope (C2S), C2-C7 angle (C2-C7A), T1 slope (T1S), sagittal vertical axis, T1-T4 angle (T1-T4A), T5-T8 angle (T5-T8A), T9-T12 angle, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt, in cervical flexion and neutral positions. RESULTS: The values of C-SVA, O-C2A, C2S, and T1S were significantly different between CS and DHS at cervical neutral and flexion positions. C2-C7A showed significant difference in cervical neutral position, but the difference disappeared in flexion position. T1-T4A did not present a significant difference, but T5-T8A showed a difference in neutral and flexion positions. CONCLUSIONS: Malalignment of DHS extended not only to cervical spine but also to cranio-cervical junction and thoracic spine, except T1-T4. It is known that global sagittal spinal alignment is correlated with adjacent parameters, although in DHS the reciprocal change was lost from cranio-cervical junction to the middle part of thoracic spine at cervical flexion.

Mode of onset of dropped head syndrome and efficacy of conservative treatment.

PURPOSE: The initial treatment of dropped head syndrome (DHS) is basically nonsurgical, but the mode of onset of DHS and efficacy of conservative treatment have not been fully clarified. METHODS: The subjects were 38 DHS patients without neuromuscular disease (11 men and 27 women, average age 74.5 years). Cervical collar, physical therapy, and temporary medication for cervical pain were provided for all DHS patients. The following parameters were measured on lateral global spine standing radiographs: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical sagittal vertical axis, C2-C7 angle, first thoracic slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence. According to the mode of onset of DHS, the subjects were classified into acute-onset group (<3 months) and chronic-onset group (≥3 months). RESULTS: Acute- and chronic-onset DHS were observed in 20 and 18 patients, respectively. A history of cervical trauma was involved in nine and two cases of acute- and chronic-onset DHS, respectively. Acute-onset DHS included more balanced-SVA (B-SVA: -30 mm

Impact of Spinopelvic sagittal alignment on the surgical outcomes of dropped head syndrome: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Most of the previous studies about the surgical treatment of dropped head syndrome (DHS) are small case series, and their primary outcome measures were cervical alignment parameters. Therefore, little is known about the associations between pre- and postoperative global sagittal alignment in the whole spine and the clinical outcomes of the surgical treatment of DHS. In this study, we investigated the surgical outcomes of DHS, including correction of cervical and global spinal sagittal alignment. METHODS: This study was a retrospective observational study. Fifteen patients with DHS who had undergone correction surgery were enrolled. Surgical outcomes, including complications and implant failures, were investigated. We assessed cervical alignment parameters as well as spinopelvic global alignment parameters, including pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and C7-sacral sagittal vertical axis (SVA). We examined the changes in these parameters using pre- and posoperative whole spine lateral radiographs. The parameters were compared between the failure and nonfailure groups. RESULTS: Recurrence of sagittal imbalance and horizontal gaze difficulty was observed in 6 cases (40%). In all, 3 cases (20%) exhibited a distal junctional failure and required multiple surgeries with extension of fusion. Of all the radiographic parameters compared between the failure and nonfailure groups, significant differences were only observed in pre and postoperative SVA and PI-LL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the global sagittal alignment parameters, including PI-LL and SVA, were different between the patients with failure and non failure, and these parameters might have notable impacts on surgical outcomes. Surgeons should consider PI-LL and SVA while determining the surgical course for patients with DHS.

Relationship between cervical and global sagittal balance in patients with dropped head syndrome.

BACKGROUND: DHS is characterized by chin-on-chest deformity and devastatingly impedes activities of daily living in affected individuals. There is a paucity of literature about the pathophysiology of DHS including knowledge about spinal sagittal alignment. We conducted this study to clarify the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and global sagittal balance in DHS. METHODS: This is a retrospective radiographic study of a case series of DHS. Forty-one patients with diagnosed DHS were enrolled. Measurements were made using lateral standing radiograph. RESULTS: C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was estimated as 52.0 ± 2.4 mm. Among sagittal parameters, C7-S1 SVA positively correlated with C2-C7 angle (C2-C7 A) (r = 0.33). For the correlations between C7 and S1 SVA and C2-C7 A, both logistic and linear regression models were used to determine the threshold for C2-C7 A value responsible for global sagittal balance. C2-C7 A of - 15.0 and 6.0 were predicted by logistic and linear regression models and were considered responsible for the occurrence of global positive imbalance. Therefore, we divided into two groups, namely, cervical kyphosis group (C type) and diffuse kyphosis group (D type) by median value of C2-C7 A. Enlarged thoracic kyphosis and global positive imbalance were observed in D type compared to C type. CONCLUSION: C2-C7 A exhibited correlations with cervical balance and also with global balance. There should be various type of thoraco-lumbar alignment in DHS. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Five-year Reoperation Rates and Causes for Reoperations Following Lumbar Microendoscopic Discectomy and Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected outcome data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate reoperation cases and determine whether or not the experience period of a single surgeon was associated with the causes of reoperations following lumbar microendoscopic discectomy for disc herniation (MEDH) and microendoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis (MEDS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been few studies that investigated reoperation cases following MEDH and MEDS. METHODS: Between June 2005 (first experience of MEDH) and September 2013, the same surgeon had been using MEDH and/or MEDS on 441 consecutive patients. The follow-up rate was 89.3%. The causes and rates of reoperations (RORs) were determined at 5 years after the initial operations. We also investigated the experience period of a single surgeon (EPS, interval between June 2005 and initial operation: median, 37 months). RESULTS: The 5-year reoperation rate for all patients combined was 12.4% (49/394). The main causes for reoperations were recurrence of disc herniation (ROR, 7.01%) and increase of postoperative spondylolisthesis and/or instability (ROR, 9/394 = 2.28%); two of the nine cases were caused by excessive decompression, and the EPSs were 11 and 16 months. The other causes for reoperations were postoperative epidural hematoma (ROR, 0.76%; median EPS, 20 months), insufficient decompression (ROR, 0.25%; EPS, 17 months), and residual segmental scoliosis (ROR, 7.69%); two segmental scoliosis cases did not provide relief from sciatica, and therefore L4/5 transforaminal interbody fusions were performed. CONCLUSION: Postoperative epidural hematoma and excessive or insufficient decompression were often observed in the initial series of patients as the causes for reoperations. We think that it is important to be aware of and prevent such potential problems in any initial series of patients, as there are limitations to any surgical indications for the use of microendoscopic decompression for degenerative segmental scoliosis because of original traction and/or kinking of nerve roots. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The factors related to the poor ADL in the patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture after instrumentation surgery.

PURPOSE: Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) with nonunion or neurological deficit may be a candidate for surgical treatment. However, some patients do not show improvement as expected. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide multicenter study to determine the predictors for postoperative poor activity of daily living (ADL) in patients with OVF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case histories of 309 patients with OVF who underwent surgery. To determine the factors predicting postoperative poor ADL, uni- and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The frequency of poor ADL at final follow-up period was 9.1%. In univariate analysis, preoperative neurological deficit (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.8-10.3; P < 0.001), perioperative complication (OR, 3.4; P = 0.006), absence of preoperative bone-modifying agent (BMA) administration (OR, 2.7; P = 0.03), and absence of postoperative recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rPTH) administration (OR, 3.9; P = 0.006) were significantly associated. In multivariate analysis, preoperative neurological deficit (OR, 4.6; P < 0.001), perioperative complication (OR, 3.4; P = 0.01), and absence of postoperative rPTH administration (OR, 3.9; P = 0.02) showed statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative neurological deficit, perioperative complication, and absence of postoperative rPTH administration were considered as predictors for postoperative poor ADL in patients with OVF. Neurological deficits and complications are often inevitable factors; therefore, rPTH is an important option for postoperative treatment for OVF. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Long-term Outcomes Following Lumbar Microendoscopic Diskectomy and Microendoscopic Decompression: Minimum 10-year Follow-up Evaluation Performed Using a Patient-based Outcome Measure.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected outcome data. BACKGROUND: No studies have evaluated the long-term outcomes following microendoscopic diskectomy for lumbar disk herniation (MEDH) and microendoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (MEDS) using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). OBJECTIVE: To assess the minimum 10-year outcomes following MEDH and MEDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients were classified into three groups: disk herniation (DH) group (33 patients underwent MEDH); spinal stenosis (SS) group (23 patients underwent MEDS); and degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) group (20 DS patients underwent MEDS). The follow-up rate was 50.3% (76/151). The results were statistically compared using Scheffé's F test for differences among the DH, SS, and DS groups. The paired t test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores. The degrees of improvement (DOIs) on JOABPEQ and the intensities of improvement (IOIs) on VAS at the first follow-up evaluation (FFE) (mean: 12 months after the operation) and at the most recent follow-up evaluation (MRFE) (mean: 126 months) of the DH group were statistically compared by the paired t test. DOIs and IOIs at MRFE of the SS group (mean: 126 months) and DS group (mean: 125 months) were statistically compared by the unpaired t test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Statistical comparisons of the DOIs in all five functional scores and IOIs in low back pain (LBP), leg pain, and leg numbness showed no significant differences among the DH, SS, and DS groups. The effectiveness rates of pain-related disorders, gait disturbance, and social life disturbance in JOABPEQ were almost equally high in all three groups. Significant decreases in LBP, leg pain, and numbness, as measured with VAS, were noted at MRFE in all three groups. No significant differences were observed between FFE and MRFE concerning the DOIs and IOIs of the DH group, and between the SS and DS groups concerning the DOIs and IOIs at MRFE. CONCLUSION: Clinical 1-year outcomes of MEDH were thought to be maintained for > 10 years, and MEDS leads to the same clinical long-term outcomes with DS as without DS. Moreover, MEDH and MEDS were almost equally effective for > 10 years not only in improving LBP, leg pain, and numbness but also especially in improving pain-related disorders, gait disturbance, and social life disturbance by detailed quality-of-life assessment using JOABPEQ.

Global sagittal spinal alignment in patients with degenerative low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE: Global sagittal spinal alignment undergoes changes on the basis of sagittal malalignment (trunk inclined forward) in natural degenerative progression. We hypothesized that this change would associate with the disease state of the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS). This study aimed to evaluate the global sagittal spinal alignment of low-grade DS by classifying in accordance with sagittal vertical axis (SVA). METHODS: The DS group was classified into three types according to the adult spinal deformity classification: type 1, SVA < 40 mm; type 2, 40 mm ≤ SVA < 95 mm; and type 3, 95 mm ≤ SVA. Age and sagittal spinal parameters (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI)) were compared among three types. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in age, LL, PI, and PT among the three types. In comparison between two types, there was a statistically significant difference between type 1 and type 2 and between type 1 and type 3, but not between type 2 and type 3 in these parameters. PI tended to increase as the type increases. Furthermore, there was significant difference between types 1 and 3. CONCLUSION: We evaluated the features of the DS types classified by sagittal alignment. Large PI is one of the risk factors for SVA deterioration of DS. PI may be involved in the onset and progression of DS.

Effect of cervical flexion and extension on thoracic sagittal alignment.

INTRODUCTION: The cervical spine has the largest sagittal motion in the whole spine, and cervical alignment affects the thoracic sagittal alignment. However, the effects of cervical flexion and extension on thoracic sagittal alignment have not been investigated in detail. The purpose of this study was to analyze the change of thoracic sagittal alignment following cervical flexion and extension. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive patients (42 men and 13 women; average age 49.1 years) who presented to our department with spinal degenerative disease between January 2016 and September 2017 were enrolled in our study. Subjects with a history of trauma, infection, tumor, inflammatory disease, ossification, or cervical deformities, and those who had undergone spinal surgery were excluded. The following parameters were analyzed: occipito-axial angle (O-C2), C2 slope (C2S), C2-C7 angle, T1 slope (T1S), thoracic kyphosis, T1-T4 angle, T5-T8 angle, T9-T12 angle, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt in cervical flexion, neutral, and extension. RESULTS: Cervical flexion significantly decreased O-C2, C2-C7 angles and T1S, and increased C2S. Cervical extension conversely changed these parameters. At cervical flexion, the correlation of C2-C7 angle with thoracic parameters was maintained, except for the T1-T4 angle. At cervical extension, the correlation was observed with T1S and T1-T4 angle. CONCLUSION: Cervical flexion affects the T1S and T5-T8 angle, but there is no significant change in T1-T4 and T9 and lower spino-pelvic columns. This study suggests that T2-T4 can be considered as a stable distal end when cervical long fixation for corrective surgery is performed.

Differences in cervical sagittal alignment between the standing and sitting positions.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal spinal alignment has mainly analyzed in the standing position. According to previous studies, there are significant differences in lumbopelvic alignment between the standing and sitting positions and cervical alignment is affected by lumbopelvic alignment. In this study, therefore, we hypothesized that cervical sagittal alignments are different between the standing and sitting positions. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with spinal degenerative diseases underwent whole spine radiography. Cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 SVA, T1S, C7-S1 SVA, TK, LL, SS, PT, and PI were measured in the standing and sitting positions. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the changes in CL (ΔCL, CL in the sitting position - CL in the standing position); ΔCL < -3° (Decreased group: DG; 28.7%), -3° ≤ ΔCL ≤ 3° (Unchanged group: UG; 41.7%), and ΔCL > 3° (Increased group: IG; 29.6%). RESULTS: The parameters of the UG in the standing position were closer to the ideal alignment (SRS-Schwab classification). In the DG, CL, T1S, and C7-S1 SVA in the standing position were significantly higher than in the UG. In the IG, PI-LL in the standing position was significantly higher than in the UG. In the sitting position, pelvis was rotated posteriorly (decrease in SS and increase in PT) and lumbar lordosis was flattened (decrease in LL) in all groups, and C2-7 SVA was significantly higher in the DG than in the UG. CONCLUSIONS: CL was different between the standing and sitting positions in 58.3% of individuals. However, patients with good spinal sagittal alignment appeared to not undergo any changes in cervical alignment. Our results suggest the possibility that patients who had a positive imbalance and large PI-LL mismatch in the standing position had decreased CL and increased CL, respectively, when in the sitting position.

Overview of dropped head syndrome (Combined survey report of three facilities).

BACKGROUND: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is a low prevalence and the clinical features remain unclear. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the general overview of DHS. METHODS: The subjects were 67 consecutive DHS patients (17 men and 50 women; average age 72.9 ± 10.2 years) presenting difficulty of horizontal gaze in up-right position. The patients' background, global spinal alignment, clinical findings and treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: The peak population of DHS was 75-79-year-old females. The comorbidities included Parkinson's disease in 9 cases, minor trauma in 9 cases, post-cervical operation in 3 cases, mental depression in 3 cases, malignant tumor in 3 cases, diabetes mellitus in 2 cases and rheumatoid arthritis in 2 cases. The C2-C7 cervical coronal vertical axis was distributed more to the right side (2.6 ± 12.8 mm). Regarding sagittal alignment, 24 cases (35.8%) showed negative balanced DHS (N-DHS) and 43 cases (64.2%) showed positive balanced DHS (P-DHS). There were significant differences in C2-C7 angle, T1S, LL and PI-LL between the two groups. Cervical or back pain was present in 62 cases (92.5%), and average numerical rating scale was 3.0 ± 2.6. Fourteen cases (20.9%) recovered (average 11.3 months), but 29 cases (43.3%) did not recover without surgery. Twenty-four cases (35.8%) underwent surgery, 20 for cervical spine and 4 for thoraco-lumbar spine, and horizontal gaze difficulty was improved in all patients post-surgery. CONCLUSION: DHS was mainly observed in elderly women. About 20% of DHS patients recovered without surgical treatment. DHS was accompanied by scoliosis in 37.3% of the cases.

Spinal sagittal alignment and trapezoidal deformity in patients with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis.

Degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) is a cervical deformity arising from regressive changes where trapezoidal deformity characterized by hypertrophic osteophytes of spinal elements is often observed. There is a paucity of literature about the spinal contour of DCS and trapezoidal vertebrae. We conducted this research to clarify the relationship between spinal sagittal alignment and trapezoidal deformity in DCS. Total seventy-nine patients with cervical spondylosis were enrolled. Twenty-four patients who exhibited cervical spondylolisthesis were classified into DCS group. Other patients were classified into a control group. Measurements of radiographic parameters and trapezoidal deformity were made. DCS was found mostly in C3-C4 and C4-C5 (16 and 10 cases, respectively). T1S and T1-T4 TK was larger in the DCS group than in the control (T1S: 29.9 ± 2.3° vs. 23.7 ± 1.5°, T1-T4 TK: 14.9 ± 2.1° vs. 9.0 ± 1.4°). C2-C7A was smaller in DCS (3.5 ± 3.6° vs. 11.9 ± 2.3°). Trapezoidal deformity was apparent in the vertebra below the slipped segment. Among sagittal parameters, T1S and T1-T4 TK were positively correlated with DCS (r = 0.523 and r = 0.438, respectively). For these correlations with DCS, both logistic and linear regression models predicted threshold values of approximately 30° for T1S and 15° for T1-T4 TK responsible for DCS. DCS was mostly found in the middle cervical region. Among sagittal parameters, enlarged T1S and T1-T4 TK, which were strongly correlated with amount of slippage, was considered affected to DCS. Cervical kyphosis and trapezoidal deformity also exhibited strong correlations with DCS, and were considered responsible for clinical instability.

Impact of pelvic incidence on change in lumbo-pelvic sagittal alignment between sitting and standing positions.

PURPOSE: Lumbo-pelvic sagittal alignment is affected by pelvic incidence (PI), and the PI represents the compensatory capacity of lumbo-pelvic sagittal alignment. The purpose of this study was to analyze changes in lumbo-pelvic sagittal alignment between the standing and sitting positions and to analyze its association with PI. METHODS: This study included 253 subjects (160 men and 93 women; age 53.6 ± 7.4 years). The subjects were divided into three groups (younger age group (YG), from 20 to 49 years; middle age group, from 50 to 69 years, and older age group (OG), of 70 years and above). Lumbar lordotic angle (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and the associations between the changes in LL (∆LL), SS (∆SS), PT (∆PT), and PI were analyzed. RESULTS: In the YG, the amount of change in LL, SS, and PT was larger than in the OG. These parameters correlated with age in the standing position but not in the sitting position. On the other hand, in all groups, there were positive correlations between PI and changes between the standing and sitting positions. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ∆LL = 3.81 - 0.72 × PT + 0.52 × PI, ∆SS = - 4.50 - 5.3 × PT + 0.34 × PI, and ∆PT = - 9.1 + 3.5 × PT - 0.21 × PI. CONCLUSIONS: Change in lumbo-pelvic parameters between the sitting and standing positions correlated with PI. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.