IgA vasculitis induced by carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab in a patient with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma: a case report.

A 73-year-old man with lung squamous cell carcinoma was administered carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab for four cycles. Subsequently, he presented with multiple purpuras on his extremities, joint swelling on his fingers, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, accompanied by acute kidney injury (AKI), increased proteinuria, hematuria, and elevated C-reactive protein levels. Skin biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis as well as IgA and C3 deposition in the vessel walls. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with IgA vasculitis as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) induced by carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab. After discontinuation of pembrolizumab and glucocorticoids, the symptoms immediately resolved. Regular monitoring of skin, blood tests, and urinalysis are necessary, and the possibility of irAE IgA vasculitis should be considered in cases of purpura and AKI during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Induction of resistance to neurotrophic tropomyosin-receptor kinase inhibitors by HMGCS2 via a mevalonate pathway.

INTRODUCTION: A neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has shown dramatic efficacy against malignant tumors harboring an NTRK fusion gene. However, almost all tumors eventually acquire resistance to NTRK-TKIs. METHOD: To investigate the mechanism of resistance to NTRK-TKIs, we established cells resistant to three types of NTRK-TKIs (larotrectinib, entrectinib, and selitrectinib) using KM12 colon cancer cells with a TPM3-NTRK1 rearrangement. RESULT: Overexpression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2 (HMGCS2) was observed in three resistant cells (KM12-LR, KM12-ER, and KM12-SR) by microarray analysis. Lower expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α (PPARα) was found in two cells (KM12-ER and KM12-SR) in which HMGCS2 was overexpressed compared to the parental KM12 and KM12-LR cells. In resistant cells, knockdown of HMGCS2 using small interfering RNA improved the sensitivity to NTRK-TKI. Further treatment with mevalonolactone after HMGCS2 knockdown reintroduced the NTRK-TKI resistance. In addition, simvastatin and silibinin had a synergistic effect with NTRK-TKIs in resistant cells, and delayed tolerance was observed after sustained exposure to clinical concentrations of NTRK-TKI and simvastatin in KM12 cells. In xenograft mouse models, combination treatment with entrectinib and simvastatin reduced resistant tumor growth compared with entrectinib alone. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that HMGCS2 overexpression induces resistance to NTRK-TKIs via the mevalonate pathway in colon cancer cells. Statin inhibition of the mevalonate pathway may be useful for overcoming this mechanistic resistance.

Phosphoproteomic Analysis Identified Mutual Phosphorylation of FAK and Src as a Mechanism of Osimertinib Resistance in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer.

Introduction: Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Although some osimertinib resistance mechanisms have been identified, nearly 50% of the mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This study was aimed at identifying non-genetic mechanisms underlying osimertinib resistance. Methods: We established two osimertinib-resistant cell lines from EGFR mutation-positive PC-9 and HCC827 NSCLC cell lines (PC-9OR and HCC827OR, respectively) using a stepwise method. We compared the phosphoproteomic profiles of the osimertinib-resistant and parental cells using mass spectrometry. Upstream kinases were identified using the application Kinase Enrichment Analysis version 3. Results: Phosphoproteomic analysis revealed 80 phosphorylation sites that were mutually up-regulated in PC-9OR and HCC827OR cells. The Kinase Enrichment Analysis version 3 analysis identified focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (Src) as upstream kinases of these up-regulated phosphoproteins. The small-interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of FAK reduced Src phosphorylation and that of Src reduced FAK phosphorylation in both cell lines. Furthermore, FAK- or Src-specific small-interfering RNA treatments restored EGFR phosphorylation in PC-9OR and HCC827OR cells. The combination of FAK and Src inhibitors inhibited PC-9OR and HCC827OR cell proliferation in vitro and suppressed tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model. Immunohistochemistry of tumors from patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC suggested that phosphorylated FAK and Src are involved in initial and acquired resistance to osimertinib. Conclusions: Phosphoproteomic analysis may help elucidate the mechanisms of resistance to molecular-targeted therapies in lung cancer. Mutual phosphorylation of FAK and Src is involved in osimertinib resistance. Thus, FAK and Src inhibition may be novel treatment strategies for osimertinib-resistant NSCLC.

A phase II study of atezolizumab with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after TKI treatment failure (NEJ043 study).

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment failure are limited. An exploratory analysis of 26 patients in the IMpower150 study indicated that treatment with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) was effective in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of ABCP in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after TKI treatment. METHODS: Patients with non-squamous NSCLC harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations were enrolled. ABCP therapy was administered every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to extramural review (ER). Key secondary endpoints and preplanned analysis included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and differences in the efficacy of ABCP according to prior EGFR-TKI administration, liver metastases, and brain metastases. RESULTS: Sixty patients from 26 centers were enrolled. Median PFS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-8.2). The median OS was 23.1 months (95% CI: 13.1-not reached), and the ORR was 55.9%. PFS was significantly shorter in patients who had received osimertinib as a first-line treatment (7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.932, p = 0.023), those with brain metastases (5.7 months vs. 8 months, HR 1.86, p = 0.032), or those with liver metastases (5.4 months vs. 7.9 months, HR 2.779, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, ABCP showed clinically meaningful efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

Predictive Impact of Diffuse Positivity for TTF-1 Expression in Patients Treated With Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC.

Introduction: Pervious studies reported the association of TTF-1 expression with the efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Nevertheless, the predictive value of extent of TTF-1 expression (diffuse or focal TTF-1 positivity) remains unclear. Methods: The present study retrospectively reviewed 74 patients with TTF-1-positive recurrent or advanced nonsquamous NSCLC receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy in a single institution in Japan. TTF-1 expression score in pretreatment tumor specimens was evaluated using immunohistochemistry, and the impact of chemoimmunotherapy response was analyzed. Results: In the total cohort, ≥50% of the tumor cells were TTF-1 positive (i.e., diffusely TTF-1 positive) in specimens of 61 patients (82.4%), whereas 10% to 49% of the tumor cells were TTF-1 positive (i.e., focally TTF-1 positive) in specimens of the remaining 13 patients (17.6%). In multivariate analysis, the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with diffusely TTF-1-positive tumors than in those with focally TTF-1-positive tumors (14.2 versus 9.2 mo, p = 0.01 and 30.2 versus 17.3 mo, p = 0.01, respectively). Moreover, the median OS was significantly longer in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy including pemetrexed than in those receiving chemoimmunotherapy not including pemetrexed among the patients with diffusely TTF-1-positive tumors (not attained versus 23.2 mo, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The positive extent of diffuse TTF-1 expression associated with patient outcome was an independent predictive factor for better progression-free survival and OS in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Osimertinib early dose reduction as a risk to brain metastasis control in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a risk factor associated with brain metastases (BMs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of osimertinib early dose reduction on BM worsening. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib as first-line treatment between August 2018 and October 2021. To evaluate the impact of osimertinib early dose reduction, we performed a landmark analysis of patients who achieved disease control at 4 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the osimertinib dose was reduced or not, within 4 months after the start of treatment. We evaluated the time to BMs onset or progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 62 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were analyzed. Thirteen patients experienced early dose reduction of osimertinib treatment. Seven patients received osimertinib 40 mg daily, and six received 80 mg every other day. The most common reason for dose reduction was gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 4), followed by skin rashes (n = 3). The time to BMs onset or progression was significantly shorter in patients who experienced early dose reduction than in those who continued regular treatment (Hazard ratio 4.47, 95% confidence interval, 1.52-13.11). The 1-year cumulative incidence of BM onset or progression was 23.1% in the reduced-dose group and 5.0% in the standard dose group. The risk of worsening BMs with early dose reduction of osimertinib treatment was higher in patients who had BMs before treatment and in younger patients. CONCLUSION: Early dose reduction of osimertinib was a risk factor for the worsening of BMs. A higher risk was associated with younger patients and those presenting BMs before treatment.

Standard versus low-dose nab-paclitaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized phase II trial (JMTO LC14-01).

BACKGROUND: Nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has better transfer to tumor tissue than cremophor-based paclitaxel. It suggests that the optimum dose of nab-PTX might be lower than the dose and schedule that is widely used. We designed a randomized phase II trial to examine the clinical utility and safety of nab-PTX in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive nab-PTX monotherapy at 100 mg/m2 (group A) or 70 mg/m2 (group B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Finally, 81 patients were randomized. Similar results were observed in both groups for PFS (3.75 vs. 3.71 months), OS (13.50 vs. 16.13 months), or ORR (20.5% vs. 23.1%). The incidences of grade 3 or worse AEs were 57.5% in group A and 41.5% in group B. The proportion of serious side effects was 10.0% in group A and 4.9% in group B. CONCLUSION: Both standard dose and low dose of nab-PTX monotherapy are active for previously treated NSCLC patients with better safety profile. Therefore, nab-PTX 70 mg/m2 dose and schedule in the trial would be a reasonable option.

Lenvatinib rechallenge in a patient with advanced thymic carcinoma: A case report.

Advanced thymic carcinomas have limited treatment options. Recently, lenvatinib was approved for advanced thymic carcinoma treatment. However, the clinical benefit of lenvatinib re-administration in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who developed prior lenvatinib treatment resistance (lenvatinib rechallenge) remains unclear. Here, we present a case treated with lenvatinib rechallenge for advanced thymic carcinoma who was previously treated with lenvatinib as the second-line treatment followed by multiple cytotoxic agents. Disease control rapidly deteriorated after the eighth line of treatment because of uncontrollable right pleural and pericardial effusion, which required repeated thoracic and pericardial drainage. Shortly after lenvatinib re-administration, rapid pleural and pericardial effusion reduction was observed. Thereafter, the patient achieved sustained clinical response with good pleural and pericardial effusion control for approximately 7 months. Our case might suggest lenvatinib rechallenge as a treatment option for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma, especially those with poor pleural and pericardial effusion control.

Carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of thymic carcinoma.

Thymic carcinoma is a relatively rare type of malignant tumor. The present retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced thymic carcinoma. The study included data from 12 patients with advanced thymic carcinoma treated in the Nippon Medical School Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Response to treatment, patient survival and treatment safety were assessed. The objective response rate was 66.7% (8/12 patients). Disease control was achieved in 11 patients (91.7%). At the median follow-up time of 27.6 months (range, 6.2-75.1 months), the median progression-free survival and median first-line overall survival times were 16.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.2-37.7] and 14.3 months (95% CI, 4.7-54.6), respectively. There was no occurrence of febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death. The results of the present study showed that carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel was effective and safe. Therefore, it is a promising chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced thymic carcinoma.

Alpha-actinin-4 (ACTN4) gene amplification is a predictive biomarker for adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil in stage I lung adenocarcinomas.

Although adjuvant tegafur/uracil (UFT) is recommended for patients with completely resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan, only one-third of cases has received adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) according to real-world data. Therefore, robust predictive biomarkers for selecting ADJ or observation (OBS) without ADJ are needed. Patients who underwent complete resection of stage I lung adenocarcinoma with or without adjuvant UFT were enrolled. The status of ACTN4 gene amplification was analyzed by FISH. Statistical analyses to determine whether the status of ACTN4 gene amplification affected recurrence-free survival (RFS) were carried out. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from 1136 lung adenocarcinomas were submitted for analysis of ACTN4 gene amplification. Ninety-nine (8.9%) of 1114 cases were positive for ACTN4 gene amplification. In the subgroup analysis of patients aged 65 years or older, the ADJ group had better RFS than the OBS group in the ACTN4-positive cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.084, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.009-0.806; P = .032). The difference in RFS between the ADJ group and the OBS group was not significant in ACTN4-negative cases (all ages: HR, 1.214; 95% CI, 0.848-1.738; P = .289). Analyses of ACTN4 gene amplification contributed to the decision regarding postoperative ADJ for stage I lung adenocarcinomas, preventing recurrence, improving the quality of medical care, preventing the unnecessary side-effects of ADJ, and saving medical costs.

Artificial intelligence analysis of three-dimensional imaging data derives factors associated with postoperative recurrence in patients with radiologically solid-predominant small-sized lung cancers.

OBJECTIVES: Indications of limited resection, such as segmentectomy, have recently been reported for patients with solid-predominant lung cancers ≤2 cm. This study aims to identify unfavourable prognostic factors using three-dimensional imaging analysis with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. METHODS: A total of 157 patients who had clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer with a radiological size ≤2 cm, and a consolidation tumour ratio > 0.5, who underwent anatomical lung resection between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled. To evaluate the three-dimensional structure, the ground-glass nodule/Solid Automatic Identification AI software Beta Version (AI software; Fujifilm Corporation, Japan) was used. RESULTS: Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and solid-part volume measured by AI software (AI-SV) showed significant differences between the 139 patients with adenocarcinoma and the 18 patients with non-adenocarcinoma. Among the adenocarcinoma patients, 42 patients (30.2%) were found to be pathological upstaging. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that high SUVmax, high carcinoembryonic antigen level and high AI-SV were significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS; P < 0.05). The 5-year RFS was compared between patients with tumours showing high SUVmax and those showing low SUVmax (67.7% vs 95.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). The 5-year RFS was 91.0% in patients with small AI-SV and 68.1% in those with high AI-SV (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High AI-SV, high SUVmax and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen level were unfavourable prognostic factors of patients with solid-predominant lung adenocarcinoma with a radiological size ≤2 cm. Our results suggest that lobectomy should be preferred to segmentectomy for patients with these prognostic factors.

Osimertinib in poor performance status patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after progression of first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI treatments (NEJ032B).

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is effective in patients with T790M mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, its effectiveness and safety in patients with poor performance status (PS) are unknown. METHODS: Enrolled patients showed disease progression after treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib; T790M mutation; stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent disease; and PS of 2-4. Osimertinib was orally administered at a dose of 80 mg/day. The primary endpoint of this phase II study (registration, jRCTs061180018) was response rate and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled, of which 69.7% and 24.2% had PS of 2 and 3, respectively. One patient was excluded due to protocol violation; in the remaining 32 patients, the response rate was 53.1%; disease control rate was 75.0%; PFS was 5.1 months; and OS was 10.0 months. The most frequent adverse event of grade 3 or higher severity was lymphopenia (12.1%). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was observed at all grades and at grades 3-5 in 15.2% (5/33) and 6.1% (2/33) of patients, respectively. Treatment-related death due to ILD occurred in one patient. Patients negative for activating EGFR mutations after osimertinib administration had longer median PFS than those positive for these mutations. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib was sufficiently effective in EGFR-TKI-resistant, poor PS patients with T790M mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Plasma EGFR mutation clearance after TKI treatment could predict the response to EGFR-TKIs.

Serum-derived exosomal PD-L1 expression to predict anti-PD-1 response and in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PD-L1 expression is the most useful predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+ TILs) play an essential role in the clinical activity of immunotherapy. PD-L1 is found on the exosome's surface, and PD-L1 expressing exosomes can inhibit antitumor immune responses. This study aimed to analyze tumor PD-L1 expression, serum exosomal PD-L1, and CD8+ TILs to investigate anti-PD-1 response and clinicopathological outcomes in NSCLC. One hundred twenty patients with stage I-III NSCLC were enrolled, and serum samples collected during the initial surgery were pooled. The Human CD274/PD-L1 ELISA kit was used to quantify the exosomal PD-L1. Exosomal PD-L1 levels were significantly correlated with tumor PD-L1 levels (p < 0.001) and the number of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.001). Patients with exosomal PD-L1 ≥ 166 pg/mL tended to have a worse RFS than those with < 166 pg/mL in all stage (p = 0.163) and stage I patients (p = 0.116). Seventeen patients exhibited postoperative recurrences and received anti-PD-1 treatment. The disease control rate of patients with exosomal PD-L1 ≥ 166 pg/mL was 100%. The measurement of serum exosomal PD-L1 as a quantitative factor with tumor PD-L1 status may help predict anti-PD-1 response and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC.

Evaluation of a Tool that Enables Cancer Patients to Participate in the Decision-Making Process during Treatment Selection.

BACKGROUND: Patient participation in decisions related to their treatment is strongly recommended. This study was conducted to develop and evaluate a support tool that can help patients make decisions related to their own treatment. METHODS: Twenty cancer patients who were hospitalized for first-line treatment were enrolled. Before hospitalization, a 'Check sheet on treatment selection', which contained 14 questions, was distributed to patients and/or their families. After hospitalization, the attending physician explained the treatment while referring to the written check sheet. At discharge, patients' responses to the 'Questionnaire on check sheet and treatment selection' were collected to evaluate the utility of the check sheet. Finally, the 'Questionnaire of the check sheet' was handed to the attending physician to evaluate. RESULTS: Of the fourteen patients who responded to the questionnaire, all indicated that the check sheets were helpful for decision-making and that using the sheets empowered them to ask their doctors questions. Only one person felt uncomfortable with compiling the check sheet. Physicians stated that the check sheet facilitated patient decision-making and improved communication with patients. However, some felt that this activity increased the administrative burden of medical professionals. CONCLUSION: Almost all patients stated that the present check sheet was useful as a decision support tool and facilitated communication between doctors and patients. Before incorporation into general clinical practice, this increased benefit should be weighed against the potential extra administrative workload imposed on clinicians.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated interstitial lung diseases correlate with better prognosis in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a potentially life-threatening adverse event. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), especially ILD, was associated with treatment efficacy and to research the features and risk factors of ILD in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Between December 2015 and November 2018, 130 advanced NSCLC patients were treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. The patients were categorized into two groups (irAEs group or non-irAEs group). Subsequently, we divided the irAEs group into two groups based on the incidence of ILD (ILD group and irAEs-non-ILD group). Treatment efficacy and the characteristics of ILD were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 39 (30%) patients developed irAEs. ILD was observed in 16 (12%) patients. Patients with ILD had a higher objective response rate (ORR) compared with irAEs-non-ILD patients and non-irAEs patients (63%, 43% and 22%, respectively). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 15.9 months in ILD patients, 5.4 months in irAEs-non-ILD patients and 3.3 months in non-irAEs patients (log-rank test, P = 0.033). Pre-existing interstitial pneumonia (IP) was an independent risk factor for ILD-induced ICIs (odds ratio [OR] 14.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.16-99.6, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: ORR and PFS were significantly better in ILD patients than in irAEs-non-ILD and non-irAEs patients. Pre-existing history of IP was an independent risk factor for ILD-induced ICIs.

Weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer complicated by idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: a single-arm phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) are associated with increased risk of lung cancer. In Japan, acute exaberation of IIPs induced by anticancer treatment is a critical issue. For this reason, there is limited available evidence regarding the optimal treatment approach for lung cancer patients complicated with IIPs. Our previous prospective pilot study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with IIPs. The current study was conducted to confirm the results of the same combination therapy used in a larger patient population. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced stage or post-operative recurrent NSCLC patients complicated by IIPs were enrolled. Patients received paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15, and carboplatin (AUC 5.0) once every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-three of 35 enrolled patients were evaluable for analysis and received a median of four treatment cycles (range 1-6). Four patients (12.1%; 95% confidence interval 3.4-28.2%) had acute exacerbation (AEx)-related IIPs to the study treatment. However, no fatalities due to AEx were observed. The overall response was 69.7%. The median progression-free survival, median survival time, and 1-year survival were 6.3 months, 19.8 months, and 55.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel treatment for advanced NSCLC patients with IIPs was comparable to that of conventional chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients without IIPs. Moreover, the primary endpoint was set to the frequency of treatment-related acute exacerbation, and the primary endpoint was met. These results suggest that patients with advanced NSCLC complicated by IIPs may benefit from this combination chemotherapy.

Intralymphatic histiocytosis in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma treated with pembrolizumab: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death-1 protein monoclonal antibody, is effective for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab induce various immune-related adverse events, involving the lung, liver, gastrointestinal, endocrine system, and skin. Intralymphatic histiocytosis (ILH) is a rare, chronic cutaneous disorder with a reactive inflammatory component, which often occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 67-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma who developed ILH associated with pembrolizumab treatment. He was treated with palliative thoracic radiotherapy for superior vena cava syndrome. Subsequently, he received four cycles of pembrolizumab. Approximately 2.5 months after the initiation of pembrolizumab, he developed erythema on the trunk of his body. Based on findings of skin biopsies, he was diagnosed with pembrolizumab-induced ILH. Moreover, the upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-α was observed during pembrolizumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of ILH induced by pembrolizumab in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma.

Tenascin XB Is a Novel Diagnostic Marker for Malignant Mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. The establishment of a new diagnostic and therapeutic approach for MM is expected. This study investigated the diagnostic significance of tenascin XB (TNXB) for MM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TNXB gene expression was found to be significantly higher in MM tumor tissues compared to paired normal tissues, as assessed by the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The inhibition of TNXB using small interfering RNAs suppressed the proliferation and colony formation of MM cells. Expression of TNXB and calretinin, a current diagnostic marker of MM, was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of TNXB for MM were 80.0% and 69.5%, respectively. When the detection of TNXB was combined with that of calretinin, 83.3% of MM cases were detected. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that TNXB is a novel diagnostic biomarker for MM. A combination of detecting TNXB and calretinin may be useful for the differential diagnosis of MM from lung adenocarcinoma.