Electroencephalographic Arousal Patterns Under Dexmedetomidine Sedation.

BACKGROUND: The depth of dexmedetomidine-induced sedation is difficult to assess without arousing the patient. We evaluated frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) as an objective measure of dexmedetomidine-induced sedation. Our aims were to characterize the response patterns of EEG during a wide range of dexmedetomidine-induced sedation and to determine which spectral power best correlated with assessed levels of dexmedetomidine-induced sedation. METHODS: Sedline EEG sensor was positioned on the forehead of 16 volunteers. Frontal EEG data were collected at 250 Hz using the Sedline monitor. A computer-controlled infusion pump was used to infuse dexmedetomidine to four 15-minute target plasma concentrations of 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 ng/mL. Arterial blood samples for dexmedetomidine plasma concentration and sedation (self-reported numerical rating scale) and arousal were measured at baseline and at the end of each infusion step. The EEG signal was used to estimate spectral power in sequential 4-second data segments with 75% overlap for 3 power bands: delta = 0.5-1.5 Hz, alpha = 9-14 Hz, beta = 15-24 Hz. We quantified the relationships among the plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine, level of sedation, and various EEG parameters. RESULTS: EEG data at the end of the dexmedetomidine infusion steps show progressive loss of high frequencies (beta) and increase in alpha and delta powers, with increasing dexmedetomidine concentrations. Beta prearousal spectral power was best in predicting dexmedetomidine-induced level of sedation (R = -0.60, 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.75). The respective values for delta and alpha powers were R = 0.28 (95% CI, 0.03-0.45) and R = 0.16 (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.38). When the beta power has dropped below -16 dB or the delta power is above 15 dB, the subjects show moderate to deep levels of sedation. When awakening the subject, there is a reduction in power in the delta and alpha bands at the 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 ng/mL dexmedetomidine target levels (P < .001 for all). In beta band, there is a rapid awakening-induced increase in power (P < .001) followed by a slow return toward baseline values. After arousing the subjects, the EEG powers returned toward baseline values significantly slower than our clinical observation of the subjects' wakefulness would have suggested. CONCLUSIONS: Using a wide range of dexmedetomidine doses, we found that frontal EEG beta power of less than -16 dB and/or a delta power of over 15 dB was associated with a state of moderate to deep sedation and that poststimulus return of EEG powers toward baseline values took significantly longer than expected from observation of the arousal response. It is unclear whether these observations are robust enough for clinical applicability.

Republished: Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care expert consensus statement: Anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Literature on the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. Anesthetic management during these procedures is still mostly dependent on individual or institutional preferences. Thus, the Society of Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC) created a task force to provide expert consensus recommendations on anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of AIS. The task force conducted a systematic literature review (up to August 2012). Because of the limited number of research articles relating to this subject, the task force solicited opinions from experts in this area. The task force created a draft consensus statement based on the available data. Classes of recommendations and levels of evidence were assigned to articles specifically addressing anesthetic management during endovascular treatment of stroke using the standard American Heart Association evidence rating scheme. The draft consensus statement was reviewed by the Task Force, SNACC Executive Committee and representatives of Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) and Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) reaching consensus on the final document. For this consensus statement the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of AIS was subdivided into 12 topics. Each topic includes a summary of available data followed by recommendations. This consensus statement is intended for use by individuals involved in the care of patients with acute ischemic stroke, such as anesthesiologists, interventional neuroradiologists, neurologists, neurointensivists and neurosurgeons.

Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Expert consensus statement: anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke*: endorsed by the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery and the Neurocritical Care Society.

Literature on the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. Anesthetic management during these procedures is still mostly dependent on individual or institutional preferences. Thus, the Society of Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC) created a task force to provide expert consensus recommendations on anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of AIS. The task force conducted a systematic literature review (up to August 2012). Because of the limited number of research articles relating to this subject, the task force solicited opinions from experts in this area. The task force created a draft consensus statement based on the available data. Classes of recommendations and levels of evidence were assigned to articles specifically addressing anesthetic management during endovascular treatment of stroke using the standard American Heart Association evidence rating scheme. The draft consensus statement was reviewed by the Task Force, SNACC Executive Committee and representatives of Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) and Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) reaching consensus on the final document. For this consensus statement the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of AIS was subdivided into 12 topics. Each topic includes a summary of available data followed by recommendations. This consensus statement is intended for use by individuals involved in the care of patients with acute ischemic stroke, such as anesthesiologists, interventional neuroradiologists, neurologists, neurointensivists, and neurosurgeons.

Enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants increase plasma clearance of dexmedetomidine: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is useful during mapping of epileptic foci as it facilitates electrocorticography unlike most other anesthetic agents. Patients with seizure disorders taking enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants appear to be resistant to its sedative effects. The objective of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers with volunteers with seizure disorders receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant medications. METHODS: Dexmedetomidine was administered using a step-wise, computer-controlled infusion to healthy volunteers (n = 8) and volunteers with seizure disorders (n = 8) taking phenytoin or carbamazapine. Sedation and dexmedetomidine plasma levels were assessed at baseline, during the infusion steps, and after discontinuation of the infusion. Sedation was assessed by using the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, Ramsay Sedation Scale, and Visual Analog Scale and processed electroencephalography (entropy) monitoring. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on both groups, and differences between groups were determined using the standard two-stage approach. RESULTS: A two-compartment model was fit to dexmedetomidine concentration-time data. Dexmedetomidine plasma clearance was 43% higher in the seizure group compared with the control group (42.7 vs. 29.9 l/h; P = 0.007). In contrast, distributional clearance and the volume of distribution of the central and peripheral compartments were similar between the groups. No difference in sedation was detected between the two groups during a controlled range of target plasma concentrations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that subjects with seizure disorders taking enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant medications have an increased plasma clearance of dexmedetomidine as compared with healthy control subjects.

Hemodynamic stability after intraarterial injection of verapamil for cerebral vasospasm.

BACKGROUND: Vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage is a common and potentially life-threatening complication. Treatment of vasospasm may include intraarterial (IA) injections of verapamil into the cerebral vasculature. Clinical experience suggests that the average patient experiences an acute reduction in systemic blood pressure after IA verapamil. Our study objective was to (1) identify the effects of IA injection of verapamil on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in patients with cerebral vasospasm and (2) determine the effect of verapamil dose on change in MAP and HR. We hypothesized that (1) selective IA injection of verapamil for treatment of cerebral vasospasm is associated with a reduction in MAP and an increase in HR and (2) the change in MAP and HR are linearly related to the dose of verapamil administered. METHODS: We prospectively studied subjects with vasospasm scheduled for cerebral angiography with possible IA injection of verapamil. All subjects were given a general anesthetic. Invasive arterial blood pressure and HR were monitored continuously and recorded at 10-second intervals throughout the procedure. We identified the lowest MAP and highest HR before and after verapamil injection. The association between IA verapamil and change in MAP and HR was determined using repeated-measures multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounding factors (weight, preoperative vasopressor use, and preinjection MAP). Data are reported as adjusted coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 20 subjects who underwent a total of 46 injections of IA verapamil. On the basis of our multivariate model, on average, each 5 mg of IA verapamil was associated with a 3.5 mm Hg reduction in MAP (95% CI -5.0 to -2.0, P < 0.001). HR was not significantly altered by IA verapamil on both unadjusted and adjusted analyses (nonsignificant increase of 0.4 beats per minute for each 5 mg of IA verapamil, 95% CI -1.6 to 2.4, P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Under general anesthesia, injection of IA verapamil into cerebral arteries reduces MAP but does not change HR in the average patient. Further research is required to determine the clinical significance of these results.

Intraoperative clonidine administration to neurosurgical patients.

The goals of this two-part study were to determine the dose of clonidine to prevent postoperative shivering after mild hypothermia and to evaluate the effect of clonidine on recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial lesions. We enrolled 48 patients undergoing elective supratentorial neurosurgical procedures into one of two studies. In study 1 (n=14) we determined the ED50 of clonidine to prevent postoperative shivering after mild hypothermia (35 degrees C) using Dixon's up-and-down method. Clonidine dose for the first study patient was 3 microg/kg. The dose was then adjusted in 1-microg/kg increments for the following patients. Shivering was assessed for 1 h postoperatively. Study 2 (n=34) was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the effect of 3 microg/kg clonidine on recovery from anesthesia. At the beginning of dural closure, patients randomly received a 15-min infusion of either clonidine or normal saline. Recovery variables were studied for 2 h after the end of anesthesia. The ED50 of clonidine to prevent shivering was 1.1 +/- 1.5 microg/kg in neurosurgical patients whose target core temperature was 35 degrees C at the end of surgery. Compared with saline, 3 microg/kg of clonidine administered to neurosurgical patients 1 h before the end of anesthesia did not delay emergence from anesthesia nor did it have clinically significant sedative or hemodynamic effects. Our results imply that clonidine may be used in neurosurgical patients to prevent postoperative shivering after mild hypothermia.