Proof-of-Mechanism Study of the Phosphodiesterase 10 Inhibitor RG7203 in Patients With Schizophrenia and Negative Symptoms.

Background: Reduced activation of dopamine D1 receptor signaling may be implicated in reward functioning as a potential driver of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A), an enzyme that is highly expressed in the striatum, modulates both dopamine D2- and D1-dependent signaling. Methods: We assessed whether augmentation of D1 signaling by the PDE10 inhibitor RG7203 enhances imaging and behavioral markers of reward functions in patients with schizophrenia and negative symptoms. In a 3-period, double-blind, crossover study, we investigated the effects of RG7203 (5 mg and 15 mg doses) and placebo as adjunctive treatment to stable background antipsychotic treatment in patients with chronic schizophrenia with moderate levels of negative symptoms. Effects on reward functioning and reward-based effortful behavior were evaluated using the monetary incentive delay task during functional magnetic resonance imaging and the effort-cost-benefit and working memory reinforcement learning tasks. Results: Patients (N = 33; 30 male, mean age ± SD 36.6 ± 7.0 years; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptom factor score 23.0 ± 3.5 at screening) were assessed at three study centers in the United States; 24 patients completed the study. RG7203 at 5 mg significantly increased reward expectation-related activity in the monetary incentive delay task, but in the context of significantly decreased overall activity across all task conditions. Conclusions: In contrast to our expectations, RG7203 significantly worsened reward-based effortful behavior and indices of reward learning. The results do not support the utility of RG7203 as adjunctive treatment for negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Intervenciones farmacológicas que mejoren la cognición y el funcionamiento adaptativo en el síndrome de Down: Progresos hasta la fecha / No disponible

Pese al creciente número de ensayos clínicos desarrollados para evaluar la cognición en el síndrome de Down, sus resultados para identificar intervenciones eficaces han sido muy limitados hasta la fecha. Las intervenciones en los modelos animales, con frecuencia muy favorables, no se han visto reflejadas en los ensayos clínicos. Esta revisión describe los resultados de los principales ensayos realizados. Ofrece consideraciones a los investigadores y describe estrategias a la industria farmacéutica para que se implique crecientemente en el descubrimiento de fármacos en el síndrome de Down

Although an increasing number of clinical trials have been developed for cognition in Down syndrome, there has been limited success to date in identifying effective interventions. This review describes the progression from pre-clinical studies with mouse models to human clinical trials research using pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome. We also provide considerations for investigators when conducting human clinical trials and describe strategies for the pharmaceutical industry to advance the field in drug discovery for Down syndrome

Pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome: Strides to date.

Although an increasing number of clinical trials have been developed for cognition in Down syndrome, there has been limited success to date in identifying effective interventions. This review describes the progression from pre-clinical studies with mouse models to human clinical trials research using pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome. We also provide considerations for investigators when conducting human clinical trials and describe strategies for the pharmaceutical industry to advance the field in drug discovery for Down syndrome. Future research focusing on earlier pharmaceutical interventions, development of appropriate outcome measures, and greater collaboration between industry, academia, advocacy, and regulatory groups will be important for addressing limitations from prior studies and developing potential effective interventions for cognition in Down syndrome.

Efficacy and Safety of Basimglurant as Adjunctive Therapy for Major Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Antagonism of the postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptor is a novel approach to modulate glutamatergic function and has proven efficacy in a number of preclinical behavioral models of depression. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of basimglurant modified-release (MR) vs placebo as adjunctive therapy to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy in patients with MDD who had inadequate response within the current episode. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this phase 2b, double blind, randomized clinical trial of 333 adult patients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of MDD across 59 research clinics globally, patients were assigned to 1 of 2 doses of basimglurant MR (0.5 or 1.5 mg) or placebo once daily, adjunctive to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor). Patients were enrolled from October 5, 2011, through July 26, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Six-week treatment with 0.5 mg of basimglurant MR, 1.5-mg basimglurant MR, or placebo once daily, adjunctive to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the mean change from baseline score on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), as rated by the clinician at week 6. Other measures included patient-rated MADRS, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, Patient Global Impression-Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 596 patients were screened, and 333 were randomized into the study (mean [SD] age, 47 [11.2] years; 216 female [65.1%]). The primary end point (mean change in clinician-rated MADRS score from baseline to end of treatment) was not met (effect size [ES] = 0.16, P = .42; intent-to-treat [ITT] mixed-effects model for repeated measures [MMRM] analysis for comparing 1.5-mg basimglurant MR and placebo). Across secondary and exploratory end points, 1.5-mg basimglurant MR revealed larger improvements vs placebo on the patient-rated MADRS (-16.2 vs -13.3, ES = 0.28, nominal P = .04), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (-7.5 vs -5.8; ES = 0.37, nominal P = .009), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement mean score, and Patient Global Impression-Improvement mean score. Improvements were also seen in the patient-rated MADRS remission rate (36.0% vs 22.0%; nominal P = .03) and response rate (50.5% vs 40.4%; nominal P = .13), A 0.5-mg dose of basimglurant MR had no benefit over placebo in any of these measures. The most common adverse event was dizziness, which was mostly transient and of mild intensity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: No difference was observed on the study's primary outcome measure, the clinician-rated MADRS change from baseline to end of treatment, between adjunctive basimglurant MR vs placebo. Adjunctive 1.5-mg basimglurant MR daily revealed, however, an antidepressant effect across secondary end points, particularly in patient-rated measures. These findings combined with good tolerability warrant further investigation with this compound in depressive disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01437657.