Factors improving the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: MRI-targeted biopsy improves detection of significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and grade prediction. The aim of this study was to identify factors improving the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsies (TB) in detecting csPCa. METHODS: Retrospective monocenter study of patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) and diagnosed by transrectal combined biopsies (CB) with elastic MRI/ultrasound fusion. We evaluate the diagnostic performance of standardized (SB), targeted (TB) and CB for csPCa, including sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve. Univariables and logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze factors improving the diagnostic performance of TB in detecting csPCa on final histopathology. RESULTS: Two hundred four men underwent RP after CB with suspicious lesions (PI-RADS≥3) on MRI were included. csPCa was significantly associated with prostate volume, PSA density, a lesion index in the peripheral zone, with a diameter ≥ 7mm. TB were positives for 174 patients (85.3%). Prostate volume, PSA density, radiological coherence, previous biopsies, and a number of biopsies ≥ 3 were significantly associated with a cancer detection. csPCa on TB, a prostate volume <60ml, an index lesion ≥ 7mm and a peripheral zone location were significant predictive factors for diagnostic of csPCa on final histopathology. Area under the ROC curve values, sensitivities and specificities of CB and TB (adjusted model) were 0.78 [0.72-0.84], 77.3 [70.3-83.4], 78.1 [60-90.7], and 0.85 [0.79-0.90], 83.7 [77.3-88.9] and 75 [56.6-88.5] respectively. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the benefit of CB and suggests that TB for a selected population could be as effective as CB.

Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study).

We compared the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using contemporary data to respond to unmet clinical needs. Data from patients included in the registry who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2017 within 20 centres of the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer UroCCR were collected (NCT03293563). Statistical methods included adjusted multivariable analyses. Rates of peri- and post-operative transfusion, and of surgical revision, were lower in the RPN (n = 1434) than the OPN (n = 571) group (2.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0012; 3.8% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001; 2.4% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariable analyses, RPN was independently associated with fewer early post-operative complications than OPN (overall: odds-ratio [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.48 [0.35-0.66]; severe: 0.29 [0.16-0.54], p < 0.0001 for both) and shorter hospital stays (34% [30%; 37%], p < 0.0001). RPN was also a significantly associated with a decresedrisk of post-operative acute renal failure, and new-onset chronic kidney disease at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. There were no between-group differences in oncological outcomes. In comparison with OPN, RPN was associated with improved peri- and post-operative morbidity, better functional outcomes, and shorter hospital stays. Our results support the use of RPN, even for large and complex tumours.

[Impact of antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments on bleeding complications in patients treated with HoLEP]. / Impact des anticoagulants et antiagrégants sur complications hémorragiques chez les patients traités par HoLEP.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the impact of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy for patients undergoing HoLEP. METHODS: We performed a study during the learning curve on a consecutive series of patients who underwent HoLEP surgery from 2015 to 2018. The patients were divided into 3 groups: a control group, patients with antiplatelet therapy and patients with anticoagulation therapy. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients underwent HoLEP surgery during this period: 124 in the control group, 63 in the antiplatelet group and 36 in the anticoagulant group. In the anticoagulant group, we observe significant differences with the control group for the catheterization time (2.05 days vs 5.17 days; P<0.001), the hospital length of stay (1.5 nights vs 4.49 nights; P<0.001) and complications (8.9% vs 58%; P<0.001). No difference between the control and antiplatelet groups in terms of catheterization time, hospital length of stay and complications (2.05 days vs 2.68 days; 1.5 nights vs 1.6 nights) but variation in terms of complications and bleeding complications (8.9% vs 21%; P<0,001; 8.1% vs 19%; P<0,001) CONCLUSION: Our study shows that HoLEP is therefore associated with a higher risk of bleeding for patients treated with anticoagulation therapy. Complications increase morbidity with longer catheterization time, hospitalization times and higher transfusion's rates, revision surgery and readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.