Perceptions of community care among nursing students: A cross-sectional study with implications to nursing workforce.

BACKGROUND: A shift of health care services towards community care has driven the need to develop the community care nursing workforce. However, challenges exist in attracting nursing graduates to a career in community care. AIM: To examine perceptions of community care and placement preference among undergraduate nursing students across different years of study in a Singapore university. METHODS: This study examined perceptions of community care and placement preference among undergraduate nursing students across different years of study. A cross-sectional study was conducted using the 'Scale on COmmunity care Perceptions' (SCOPE). RESULTS: Only 31.3 % of the 501 nursing students who completed the survey preferred community care placement. They rated opportunities for advancement, work status and enthusiastic colleagues in community care with relatively lower scores in the SCOPE. Students' placement preferences and year of study were predictive factors of their perceptions of community care nursing. Students who indicated their placement preference in home-based care (p < 0.001) and intermediate long-term care (p < 0.05) reported significantly positive perceptions towards community nursing as compared to students who indicated acute care as their preferred placement. Despite pre-perceived ideas among the year 1 cohort, the community care placement within their course curriculum had an impact on year 2 to 4 students' perceptions of community care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings identified key strategies to increase the community care nursing workforce which include promoting a better understanding of the role of a community nurse, providing quality community placement opportunities supported by preceptors who are good role models and fostering an optimistic career outlook and advancement in community nursing.

Healthcare professionals' experiences of interprofessional collaboration in patient education: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This study explores interprofessional collaboration amongst healthcare professionals in patient education. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. A search in seven databases was conducted from 2011 to 2022 and screened against the inclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was done independently by two reviewers. Studies were extracted and synthesised using the data-based convergent synthesis design. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included. Five themes on factors affecting interprofessional collaboration in patient education emerged: 1) role clarification, 2) communication infrastructure, 3) shared space for collaboration, 4) interprofessional trust, and 5) organisational support. CONCLUSION: Findings highlighted the importance of developing trustful relationships within the multidisciplinary team in delivering patient education. Channels for additional infrastructural support, guidelines and training in patient education delivery is required. Future research could explore patients' perspectives on how their learning needs in patient education may be optimised through a multidisciplinary approach. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare leaders could promote shared goals within the team by facilitating a common space and time for interprofessional team rounding, and by developing shared patient education resources and documentation processes. Interprofessional education focusing on the delivery of team-based patient education could be implemented to foster understanding of the interdependent role of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals.

Interprofessional collaboration in telemedicine for long-term care: An exploratory qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Widespread and sustained adoption of telemedicine in long-term residential care is emerging. Nursing home (NH) nurses play a key role in collaborating with remote physicians to manage residents' medical conditions through videoconferencing. Therefore, understanding of interprofessional collaboration and effective communication between nurses and physicians is critical to ensure quality of care and safety during teleconsultations. AIMS: To explore NH nurses' and physicians' experiences of interprofessional collaboration and communication during teleconsultations. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Purposive sampling was conducted to recruit 22 physicians and nurses involved in NH teleconsultations. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted, and data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) Manner of communication in telemedicine, (2) sociocultural influences in collaborative practice, and (3) role expectations in telemedicine. Both nurses and physicians recognized the importance of building and maintaining trust as physicians heavily depended on nurses for provision of objective information for clinical decision-making. However, practice differences were observed between nurses and physicians during teleconsultations. Sociocultural influences such as power relations and language barriers also affected the nurse-physician relationship and interpersonal communication. Additionally, different performance expectations were identified between nurses and physicians. CONCLUSION: Interprofessional collaboration in teleconsultations is challenging because of lack of in-person assessment and dependence on nurses for clinical information. In addition, expectations and communication styles differ among healthcare professionals. This study called for interprofessional telemedicine training with incorporation of shared mental models to improve role clarity and communication. Given the international-dominated healthcare workforce in long-term care, the development of cultural competency could also be considered in telemedicine training to enhance nurse-physician collaborative practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Telemedicine is increasingly adopted in long-term care settings, where multidisciplinary healthcare professionals from different health institutions are involved in resident care. Interprofessional collaboration should be incorporated into telehealth education for enhanced clinical practice in this care delivery model.

Home-based nursing care competencies: A scoping review.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify and consolidate the available evidence about nursing-related competencies for home-based care. BACKGROUND: Over recent years, the demand for home-based nursing care has increased because of the need to meet the increasing need for chronic disease care to be delivered in patients' homes. However, knowledge is lacking about the expected competencies for home-based care nurses. DESIGN: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's six-step scoping review framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The review identified literature using five electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus) and a hand search for grey literature in relevant home-based care journals and online searches. Key search terms and inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as strategies to identify relevant articles. RESULTS: Sixty-four articles were eligible for inclusion. Mapping and narrative synthesis of 116 elements related to home-based nursing care competencies identified the following 10 competencies: (1) care assessments; (2) performance of nursing procedures; (3) management of health conditions; (4) critical thinking and problem-solving skills; (5) interpersonal relationships and communication; (6) interdisciplinary collaboration; (7) leadership and resource management; (8) professional development; (9) technological literacy; (10) quality and safety. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review provides insight into current knowledge about home-based nursing care competencies. These competencies could be used to evaluate nurses' competence level for home-based care or for development of appropriate professional education. The review also outlines the scope of nursing practice in home-based care, which provides support for some form of standardisation of home-based nursing care expectations across various stakeholders.

Enhancing the verbal handover process for nurses in inpatient orthopedic wards: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: This evidence-based quality improvement project aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a handover guide in improving handovers from registered nurses to enrolled nurses. INTRODUCTION: Nursing handover involves the transfer of the responsibility of care for a patient from one nurse to another. Handover techniques vary in different healthcare organizations. Non-standardized, incomplete handovers can lead to delays or errors in treatment, increased lengths of stay, and poor health outcomes. METHODS: This project was conducted in two orthopedic wards of a tertiary hospital, and occurred in four phases over 12 months. The project utilized the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and the Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools. RESULTS: The baseline audit in March 2017 revealed a poor compliance in handover of essential patient information. The post-intervention audit showed a significant increase (P < 0.001) in the compliance of handover of essential patient information. Registered nurses' handovers of patient information to enrolled nurses improved from 11% to 27% (P < 0.000). Verbal face-to-face handovers occurred throughout the implementation. Eighty-two per cent of the nurses felt that the handover guide had reduced the number of monitoring errors and delays in treatment. CONCLUSION: The project has successfully improved nurses' clinical handovers and contributed to safe patient care. Further audits are required to sustain the evidence-based practice change. Nursing leaders play a significant role in supporting the project and building a positive evidence-based practice environment.

Play and Learn with Patients-Designing and Evaluating a Serious Game to Enhance Nurses' Inhaler Teaching Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To describe the development and evaluation of a nurse-patient interactive serious game in improving nurses' self-efficacy and performances in teaching the correct inhaler technique. Materials and Methods: The technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) framework was applied to guide the development of the serious game. The learning effectiveness of the serious game was evaluated through a randomized controlled trial that involved 46 registered nurses. Participants in the experimental group were asked to teach the inhaler technique to a standardized patient using the serious game as a teaching tool, whereas participants in the control group were asked to provide their own usual teaching to a standardized patient without the serious game. The performances of both groups were assessed based on their feedback to a standardized patient who made several errors while demonstrating the inhaler technique. Self-efficacy levels of teaching the inhaler technique were examined before and after the intervention. Results: A significantly higher number of participants from the experimental group obtained perfect performance scores than those in the control group (65.21% vs. 21.74%, χ2 = 15.18, P < 0.01). The posttest self-efficacy mean scores for the experimental group improved significantly (P < 0.001) after the intervention, and significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to the posttest mean scores of the control group. Conclusion: The study provided evidence on the effectiveness of a serious game in improving the self-efficacy and immediate postintervention performances of nurses teaching the inhaler technique. This game provides a practical and accessible learning tool to help nurses ensure effective patient education.

Expectations and experiences of patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total joint arthroplasty: An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of educational interventions for osteoarthritic patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty remains inconclusive. It is essential to understand the educational needs of these patients from their perspectives. AIM: The aim of this study was to systematically summarize and synthesize osteoarthritic patients' expectations and experiences in undergoing total joint arthroplasty to identify their educational needs. DESIGN: An integrative review was conducted. METHODS: Twenty studies (13 qualitative and 7 quantitative), published between 2006 and 2016, were independently appraised by 2 reviewers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for quantitative studies. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and the findings were synthesized in a narrative summary. RESULTS: Six themes describing patients' preoperative and post-operative educational needs were identified: (1) preoperative anxiety, (2) unrealistic expectations of recovery, (3) post-operative pain, (4) regaining functional abilities, (5) physical and psychological sense of loss, and (6) lack of continuity of care. CONCLUSION: This review is the first to capture the osteoarthritic patients' educational needs from their perspectives. The biopsychosocial model can address the multidimensionality (biological, psychological, and social) of patients' educational needs. A robust infrastructure supporting interprofessional collaborative practice and continuity of care should be adopted to enhance current educational efforts.

Designing and evaluating the effectiveness of a serious game for safe administration of blood transfusion: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preparing nursing students for the knowledge and skills required for the administration and monitoring of blood components is crucial for entry into clinical practice. Serious games create opportunities to develop this competency, which can be used as a self-directed learning strategy to complement existing didactic learning and simulation-based strategies. AIM: To describe the development and evaluation of a serious game to improve nursing students' knowledge, confidence, and performance in blood transfusion. METHOD: An experiential gaming model was applied to guide the design of the serious game environment. A clustered, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 103 second-year undergraduate nursing students who were randomized into control or experimental groups. After a baseline evaluation of the participants' knowledge and confidence on blood transfusion procedure, the experimental group undertook a blood transfusion serious game and completed a questionnaire to evaluate their learning experience. All participants' clinical performances were evaluated in a simulated environment. RESULTS: The post-test knowledge and confidence mean scores of the experimental group improved significantly (p<0.001) after the serious game intervention compared to pre-test mean scores and to post-test mean scores of the control group (p<0.001). However, no significance difference (p=0.11) was found between the experimental and control groups on the post-test performance mean scores. The participants evaluated the serious game positively. CONCLUSION: The study provided evidence on the effectiveness of a serious game in improving the knowledge and confidence of nursing students on blood transfusion practice. The features of this serious game could be further developed to incorporate additional scenarios with repetitive exercises and feedback to enhance the impact on clinical performance. Given the flexibility, practicality, and scalability of such a game, they can serve as a promising approach to optimize learning when blended with high-fidelity simulation.