RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) are rare and often asymptomatic with slow growth, their natural progression and optimal management are not well understood. Treatment recommendations for RAAs do exist; however, they are supported by limited data. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to explore the management of patients diagnosed with an RAA at our institution from January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2020. Patients were identified through a search of our radiological database, followed by a comprehensive chart review for further assessment. Data collection encompassed patient and aneurysm characteristics, the rationale for initial imaging, treatment, surveillance, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five patients were diagnosed with or treated for RAAs at our center during this timeframe, with most aneurysms having been discovered incidentally. Average aneurysm size was 1.40 cm (±0.05). Of those treated, the mean size was 2.38 cm (±0.24). Among aneurysms larger than 3 cm in size, comprising 3.24% of the total cases, 83.3% underwent treatment procedures. Only 20% of women of childbearing age received treatment for their aneurysms. There was one instance of aneurysm rupture, with no associated mortality or significant morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Our institution's management of RAAs over the period of the study generally aligned with guidelines. One potential area of improvement is more proactive intervention for women of childbearing age.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical success and complication rates of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in the axillary artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched independently by two reviewers to identify observational studies from inception through October 2021. The following outcomes were meta-analyzed: technical success, hematoma, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, infection, and local neurological complications. Complications were also graded as mild, moderate, and severe. A logistic regression evaluating the influence of sheath size for the outcome of technical success rate was performed using individual patient-level data. RESULTS: Of 1496 unique records, 20 observational studies were included, totaling 915 unique arterial access sites. Pooled estimates were as follows: technical success 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78%-89.7%, I2=60.4%), hematoma 7.9% (95% CI: 5.8%-10.6%, I2=0%), dissection 3.1% (95% CI: 1.3%-7.3%, I2=0%), pseudoaneurysm 2.7% (95% CI: 1.3%-5.7%, I2=0%), infection <1% (95% CI: 0%-5.7%, I2=20.5%), and local neurological complications 2.7% (95% CI: 1.7%-4.4%, I2=0%). There was a significant negative association between sheath size and technical success rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87 per 1 French (Fr) increase in sheath size, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94, p=0.0005). Larger sheath sizes were associated with a greater number of access-site complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.21 per 1 Fr increase sheath size, 95% CI: 1.04-1.40, p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Off-label use of VCDs in the axillary artery provides an 85% successful closure rate and variable complication rate, depending on the primary procedure and sheath size. Larger sheaths were associated with a lower technical success and greater rate of access-related complications. CLINICAL IMPACT: Safe arterial access is the foundation for arterial intervention. While the common femoral artery is a well established access site, alternative arterial access sites capable of larger sheath sizes are needed in the modern endovascular era. This article provides the largest synthesis to date on the use of vascular closure devices for percutaneous axillary artery access in endovascular intervention. It should serve clinicians with added confidence around this approach in terms of providing a reference for technical success and complications. Clinically, this data is relevant for patient consent purposes as well as for practice quality improvement in setting safety standards for this access site.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To estimate the rates of technical success and adverse events of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in the brachial artery and compare the rates of adverse events with manual compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for observational studies examining VCDs in the brachial artery. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects for the following outcomes: (a) technical success, (b) hematoma at the access site, (c) pseudoaneurysm, (d) local neurological adverse events, and (e) total number of adverse events. A pairwise meta-analysis compared VCD with manual compression for the outcomes of hematoma and the total number of adverse events. RESULTS: Of 1,761 eligible records, 16 studies including 510 access sites were included. Primary procedures performed were peripheral arterial disease interventions, percutaneous coronary intervention, and endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. The technical success rate was 93% (95% CI, 87%-96%; I2 = 47%). Data on the following adverse events were obtained via meta-analysis: (a) hematoma, 9% (5%-15%; I2 = 54%); (b) stenosis or occlusion at access site, 3% (1%-14%; I2 = 51%); (c) infection, 0% (0%-5%; I2 = 0%); (d) pseudoaneurysm, 4% (1%-13%; I2 = 61%); (e) local neurological adverse events, 5% (2%-13%; I2 = 54%); and (f) total number of adverse events, 15% (10%-22%; I2 = 51%). Angio-Seal success rate was 96% (93%-98%; I2 = 0%), whereas the ExoSeal success rate was 93% (69%-99%; I2 = 61%). When comparing VCD and manual compression, there was no difference in hematoma formation (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.63; I2 = 0%; P = .47) or the total number of adverse events (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.58; I2 = 76%; P = .45). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being off-label, studies suggest that VCDs in the brachial artery have a high technical success rate. There was no significant difference in adverse events between VCDs and manual compression in the brachial artery.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular , Humanos , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular/efectos adversos , Arteria Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Braquial/cirugía , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Arteria Femoral , Hematoma/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the initial clinical experience with a novel endograft system (NEXUS Aortic Arch Stent Graft System) designed to treat aortic arch pathologies and address the morphology and hemodynamic challenges of the aortic arch. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The aortic arch remains the most challenging part of the aorta for both open and endovascular repair. Transcatheter aortic arch repair has the potential to significantly reduce surgical risks. METHODS: Patients underwent transcatheter aortic arch repair with a single branch, 2 stent graft system, implanted over a through-and-through guidewire from the brachiocephalic trunk, to the descending aorta with an ascending aorta stent graft. The ascending aorta stent graft is deployed into a designated docking sleeve to connect the 2 stent grafts and isolate the aortic arch pathology. Proximal landing zone in all cases was in Zone 0. Anatomical inclusion criteria included adequate landing zone in the ascending aorta, brachiocephalic trunk, and descending thoracic aorta. Preparatory debranching procedure was performed in all patients with carotid-carotid crossover bypass and left carotid to left subclavian bypass, or parallel graft from descending aorta to left subclavian artery. Safety and performance were evaluated through 1 year. Survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients, 79% males, with a mean age of 72.2 ± 6.2 years were treated with 100% procedural success. Isolated aortic arch aneurysm was the principle pathology in 17 (60.7%) of patients, while chronic aortic dissection was the principle pathology in 6 (21.4%) of patients. The remaining 5 (17.8%) had combined or other pathologies. At 1 month, the vascular pathology was excluded in 25 of 26 alive patients (96.1%). The 30 days mortality rate was 7.1%, stroke rate was 3.6% (all nondisabling), and combined mortality/stroke rate was 10.7%. One-year mortality was 10.7%, without device or aneurysm-related death. Two patients (7.1%) reported stroke or transient ischemic attack at 1 year that recovered completely. One year combined mortality/stroke rate was 17.8%. There were 3 patients (10.7%) that had device-related unplanned reinterventions through 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The NEXUS Aortic Arch Stent Graft System, a novel single branch, 2 stent graft system used for endovascular aortic arch repair that requires landing in the ascending aorta, demonstrates a high success rate with excellent 1 year safety and performance.
Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aorta , Stents , Disección Aórtica/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Aortic neck angulation (ANA) prior to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and its changes after EVAR are considered important predictors of postoperative complications. We sought to assess the effects of vertebral body height loss on ANA in patients post-EVAR. METHODS: All patients who had undergone EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysms in our institution between August 2010 and December 2018 were assessed. Anterior and posterior vertebral body heights were measured in all patients on preoperative, early postoperative, and follow-up computed tomography scans (T12-L5 vertebral bodies). Patients who had significant height loss in their follow-up period were designated as the Study group. These were matched to a Control group of the same size using propensity-score matching based on age, gender, and duration between follow-up scans. Aortic neck morphology indices including ANA and its changes were measured, and information related to postoperative endoleaks and aneurysm sac size were extracted in the Study and Control groups. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 10 of 185 patients had a radiologically significant vertebral body compression fracture. There was no significant difference between the Study (n = 10) and Control groups in age (77.6 ± 6.9 vs 77.2 ± 7.5 years; P = .64), gender (seven males and three females in each group; P = 1.0), duration between postoperative scans (1830 ± 665 vs 1800 ± 670 days; P = .25), preoperative ANA (36.0° ± 15.6° vs 42.4° ± 18.6°; P = .41), and early postoperative ANA (21.9° ± 11.7° vs 20.9° ± 16.3°; P = .72). Changes in ANA in the postoperative period (7.2° ± 11.1° vs -4.7° ± 6.7°; P = .009; power = .838) were significantly higher in the Study group. CONCLUSIONS: Post-EVAR vertebral body compression fractures exacerbate ANA. Awareness of this can guide both preoperative assessment and postoperative management and follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Fracturas por Compresión , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Endofuga/etiología , Endofuga/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Fracturas por Compresión/complicaciones , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to review the embryology of the lower limb arterial anatomy along with common variants and their clinical relevance. DESIGN: Embryologic variations of the lower limb arterial system may be explained by i.) persistence of primordial arterial segments, ii.) abnormal fusion, iii.) segmental hypoplasia/absence, or a combination of both. Persistent sciatic artery, corona mortis, and popliteal entrapment syndrome will also be discussed with associated symptoms, and potential complications. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of these variations is essential for surgical and endovascular management as failure to recognize them can result in complications.
Asunto(s)
Arterias/embriología , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Arterias/anomalías , Arterias/anatomía & histología , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration requiring intervention presents significant therapeutic challenges. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with a fenestrated endograft is a feasible option, but false lumen branches without an adjacent re-entry or perforation in the septum can pose a significant challenge. We present two cases of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for chronic type B aortic dissection in which a renal artery from the false lumen was cannulated by creating a "neofenestration" through the dissection flap using a radiofrequency PowerWire (Baylis Medical Inc, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) technique (Toronto PowerWire fenestration technique).
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía Intervencional , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention technique has been used to overcome antegrade recanalization failures for peripheral lower limb arterial occlusive disease. There are few outcomes published for this technique and we sought to evaluate outcomes at our institution over a 7-year period. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention procedures of infrainguinal occlusive disease from 2009 to 2016. Retrograde and antegrade accesses were combined when occlusions could not be crossed from the antegrade direction. Baseline patient characteristics, procedures, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast used, and radiation dose were collected. Posterior tibial waveforms, ankle-brachial index, limb salvage, vessel patency, and the presence of symptoms were assessed at follow-up. RESULTS: Treatment was performed in 52 limbs in 52 patients (35 men and 17 women; mean age, 77.62 ± 11.61 years) with critical limb ischemia and no appropriate venous conduit for surgical bypass. Among the cohort, 63.5% were diabetics, 98% had hypertension, 53.8% had a prior myocardial infarction, and 36.5% end-stage renal disease. The average Rutherford Category before the intervention was 5.08 ± 1.01. Retrograde pedal access was most commonly obtained in the anterior tibial artery/dorsalis pedis (55.7%), followed by the posterior tibial artery (40.3%). The technical success rate was 63.5% (33/52); adjunctive stenting was needed in 19 (36.5%) to optimize results. Preprocedural ankle-brachial index score was 0.54 ± 0.25, which improved after the procedure to an ankle-brachial index score of 0.77 ± 0.25. The primary patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 65% and 60%, respectively. The limb salvage rate at a mean follow-up of 5.4 months was 78.8%. There were 5 complications; 4 were hematomas managed conservatively and 1 was a major retroperitoneal bleed resulting in patient death. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde pedal access is a viable revascularization technique for achieving limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia with acceptable patency for limb-threatening ischemia. This technique expands revascularization options after failed conventional endovascular antegrade approaches.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Isquemia/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Angiografía , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Crítica , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Ontario , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is an underdiagnosed potential complication of acute or recurrent pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Multiple studies suggest that up to 5% of patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease go on to develop CTEPH. The prognosis of untreated CTEPH is poor, but advances in medical and surgical treatments over the past few decades have improved patient outcomes. The gold standard and curative treatment for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy; however, some patients are inoperable and others who have undergone pulmonary endarterectomy experience persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension despite medical therapy. In recent years, balloon pulmonary angioplasty has emerged as a primary and adjunctive treatment for these CTEPH patients at expert or specialized centers. This review outlines an approach to balloon pulmonary angioplasty for CTEPH, including clinical presentation and evaluation; patient selection and indications; treatment planning; equipment and technique; overcoming technical challenges; recognition and management of complications; postprocedural care and clinical follow-up; and expected outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Presión Arterial , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Arteria Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Selección de Paciente , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Purpose To determine the outcomes of type II endoleak embolization with aneurysm sac obliteration and whether the approach - direct sac puncture or transarterial - affects outcome. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repairs and subsequent type II endoleak embolization over 10 years was performed. Twenty-three patients (median age: 73 years, range: 40-88 years) underwent 35 embolizations. Embolization was performed with the goal of obliterating both the endoleak sac and feeding vessels. Embolization agents used include cyanoacrylate glue only (48%), glue and coils (36%), coils only (13%), and other (3%). Results Mean follow-up was 21.8 months. Patients underwent an average of 1.5 embolizations, with 35% requiring more than one. Technical success rate was 89%. Freedom from aneurysm sac expansion was achieved in 91%. Freedom from type II endoleak was accomplished in 70%. There were no ruptured aneurysms during the follow-up period. Direct sac puncture and transarterial approaches had similar incidences of aneurysm sac growth ( p = 0.74), persistent type II endoleak ( p = 0.32), and complications ( p = 0.64). However, direct sac puncture had significantly shorter fluoroscopy ( p < 0.001) and total procedure times ( p < 0.001) than transarterial embolizations. Conclusion Direct sac puncture and transarterial embolization of type II endoleak with aneurysm sac obliteration are similarly effective for the prevention of aneurysm sac growth. However, direct sac puncture is our preferred approach given its significantly shorter fluoroscopic and procedural times.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Endofuga/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aortografía/métodos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Endofuga/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Punciones , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We propose a novel technique for endovenous treatment of varicose veins (VVs) using combined coil embolization and foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein (GSV). METHODS: A retrospective case-series analysis on patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided coil embolization of the GSV and foam sclerotherapy of the GSV and below-knee varices at a single Canadian center. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent the procedure on 23 legs. Most patients (78.3%) presented for follow-up 57.2 ± 21.9 days postoperatively. Doppler studies demonstrated complete GSV occlusion in all patients. While 3 patients (13.6%) noted skin discoloration overlying the treated VVs, none complained of pain on follow-up or developed leg numbness, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary emboli. CONCLUSIONS: Coil embolization and foam sclerotherapy are a novel and effective treatment for VVs that uses existing and readily available angiographic equipment.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Vena Safena , Soluciones Esclerosantes/administración & dosificación , Tetradecil Sulfato de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Várices/terapia , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Flebografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Soluciones Esclerosantes/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tetradecil Sulfato de Sodio/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Várices/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess efficacy of two different techniques of lidocaine injection in the uterine arteries to reduce pain following uterine artery embolization (UAE) for leiomyomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized single-blinded study was performed with 60 patients enrolled between November 2014 and December 2015 equally randomized to 3 arms. Group A received 10 mL lidocaine 1% (100 mg) mixed with polyvinyl alcohol particles (355-500 µm). Group B received the same dose of lidocaine injected after embolization. Group C was a control group. Pain was assessed on a 100-point visual analog scale at 4, 7, and 24 hours after the procedure. Narcotic agent dose to 24 hours was recorded. Outcomes were examined by analysis of variance and pairwise comparison. Leiomyoma infarction was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging 3 months after the procedure. RESULTS: Technical success rate of UAE was 100%. Mean pain score at 4 hours was significantly lower in the lidocaine groups (group A, 28.6; group B, 35.8) compared with the control group (59.4; P = .001). Pain scores at 7 and 24 hours were not statistically different among the 3 arms. The mean in-hospital narcotic agent dose was significantly lower in both lidocaine groups than in the control group (group A, 8.5 mg [P = .002]; group B, 11.1 mg [P = .03]; group C, 17.4 mg). There were no adverse events related to the use of lidocaine. The number of patients with complete infarction of leiomyomas at 3 months was significantly lower in group A at 38.9% (group B, 77.8%; group C, 75%; P = .0451). CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine injected in the uterine arteries reduced postprocedural pain and narcotic agent dose after UAE. There were more cases of incomplete necrosis when lidocaine was mixed with the particles.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Leiomioma/terapia , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor/prevención & control , Alcohol Polivinílico/efectos adversos , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Adulto , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Análisis de Varianza , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarteriales , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Lidocaína/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Alcohol Polivinílico/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Placement of peritoneal ports has become a favorable technique for direct chemotherapy infusion in treating peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer. We aim to outline an approach to the percutaneous insertion of peritoneal ports and to characterize success and complication rates compared to surgically inserted ports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was collected from 87 patients who had peritoneal port insertion (28 inserted surgically and 59 percutaneously) for treatment of peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer from July 2004 to July 2014. Complications were classified according to the SIR Clinical Practice Guidelines as major or minor. RESULTS: Technical success rates for surgically and percutaneously inserted ports were 100 and 96.7 %, respectively (p = 0.44), with the two percutaneous failures successful at a later date. There were no major complications in either group. Minor complication rates for surgically versus percutaneously inserted ports were 46.4 versus 22.0 %, respectively (p = 0.02). The infection rate for surgically inserted versus percutaneously inserted ports was 14.3 and 0 %, respectively (p = 0.002). The relative risk of developing a complication from percutaneous peritoneal port insertion without ascites was 3.4 (p = 0.04). For percutaneously inserted ports, the mean in-room procedure time was 81 ± 1.3 min and mean fluoroscopy time was 5.0 ± 4.5 min. CONCLUSION: Percutaneously inserted peritoneal ports are a safe alternative to surgically inserted ports, demonstrating similar technical success and lower complication rates.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cavidad Peritoneal/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study if <30 % residual stenosis post angioplasty (PTA) correlates with primary access circuit patency, and if any variables predict technical success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed between January 2009 and December 2012, wherein 76 patients underwent 154 PTA events in 56 prosthetic grafts (AVG) and 98 autogenous fistulas (AVF). Data collected included patient age, gender, lesion location and laterality, access type and location, number of prior interventions, and transonic flow rates pre- and postintervention. Impact of technical outcome on access patency was assessed. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the impact of variables on technical success with significant factors assessed with a multiple variable model. RESULTS: Technical success rates of PTA in AVFs and AVGs were 79.6 and 76.7 %, respectively. Technical failures of PTA were associated with an increased risk of patency loss among circuits with AVFs (p < 0.05), but not with AVGs (p = 0.7). In AVFs, primary access patency rates between technical successes and failures at three and 6 months were 74.4 versus 61.9 % (p = 0.3) and 53.8 versus 23.8 % (p < 0.05), respectively. In AVGs, primary access patency rates between technical successes and failures at three and six months were 72.1 versus 53.9 % (p = 0.5) and 33.6 versus 38.5 % (p = 0.8), respectively. Transonic flow rates did not significantly differ among technically successful or failed outcomes at one or three months. CONCLUSION: Technical failures of PTA had a significant impact on access patency among AVFs with a trend toward poorer access patency within AVGs.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia/métodos , Fístula Arteriovenosa/fisiopatología , Fístula Arteriovenosa/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Falla de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study determined the 30-day morbidity and mortality and in-hospital costs of elective fenestrated (fEVAR) and branched (bEVAR) endovascular aneurysm repairs at a single academic institution and determined factors that influence them. METHODS: All elective fEVAR or bEVAR patients treated between November 2007 and March 2014 in a Canadian academic hospital were included. Procedural details, 30-day morbidity and mortality rates, and cost of hospitalization were analyzed. Nonparametric bootstrap analysis was used to compare means between groups and calculate confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There were 84 consecutive fEVAR (n = 61) and bEVAR (n = 23) procedures. The 30-day mortality was 3.3% for fEVAR and 4.3% for bEVAR. Mean hospital stay was 7.2 ± 0.8 days for fEVAR and 12.6 ± 2.2 days for bEVAR. The mean cost of the index hospitalization was $57,000 for fEVAR and $91,000 for bEVAR. Device-related costs accounted for 55% of the total costs. The occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative events were used to further divide each of the fEVAR and bEVAR groups into "complicated hospitalization" (fEVAR, n = 10; bEVAR, n = 13) and "uncomplicated hospitalization" (fEVAR, n = 51; bEVAR, n = 10) groups. Device-related costs were not significantly different between the complicated and uncomplicated hospitalization groups (mean difference [95% CI] fEVAR: $3383 [-$3405 to $9809], P = .3; and bEVAR: $1930 [-$7892 to $11,288], P = .68). However, there were significant differences between the complicated and uncomplicated hospitalization groups in hospital length of stay (mean difference [95% CI] fEVAR: 8.1 [3.0-13.2] days, P = .001; and bEVAR: 10.8 [5.9-19.9] days, P = .002) and nondevice-related costs (mean difference [95% CI,] fEVAR: $25,843 [$11,689-$43,247], P = .001; and bEVAR; $20,326 [$9362-$36,615], P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: bEVAR and fEVAR are expensive interventions. Intraoperative adverse events and postoperative systemic complications dramatically increase costs and length of stay. Measures to minimize complications will reduce hospitalization costs and improve patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prótesis Vascular/economía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Endofuga/epidemiología , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of in situ fenestration on the fabric of stent grafts deployed in a patient-specific phantom of a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patient-specific juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm polyurethane models were created, and bifurcated Zenith (Cook, Inc, Bloomington, Indiana) and Endurant (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minneapolis) endografts were deployed into the models, covering the renal arteries. Antegrade in situ fenestration was carried out with radiofrequency puncture followed by balloon dilation with either conventional or cutting balloons. Renal covered stents were deployed and flared. Specimens were mounted onto an accelerated fatigue tester for 40M cycles (1 patient life-year), and evaluated with microscopy, caliper measurements, and fabric counts. RESULTS: Cutting balloons resulted in more fabric fraying. None of the fenestrations grew beyond the targeted 6-mm diameter despite accelerated fatigue. Fluoroscopic images demonstrated a very prominent waist of the renal fenestration in the Cook device when a conventional balloon was used compared with a cutting balloon. The average fenestration diameter for the Cook device was only 3.1 mm with the conventional balloon compared with 4.8 mm with the cutting balloon. The average fenestration diameter for the Medtronic device was 3.8 mm with the conventional balloon compared with 5.1 mm with the cutting balloon. The fabric counts suggested crowding of yarns around the fenestrations with conventional balloons but less with cutting balloons. CONCLUSIONS: This experimental work suggests that the size of in situ renal fenestrations does not expand beyond the target diameter despite cyclic fatigue. Although the small number of devices tested and selected aortorenal anatomy in this study may limit conclusions, textile analysis suggests that cutting balloons should be used for the Cook Zenith device, whereas conventional balloons should be used for the Medtronic Endurant device when performing in situ fenestration.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Prótesis Vascular , Flujo Pulsátil , Stents , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/instrumentación , Humanos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Poliésteres/química , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of ovarian artery embolization (OAE) treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. METHODS: A retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent OAE in conjunction with uterine artery embolization in a 6-year period (2006-2012) was performed. Ten patients had previous failed embolization, while 7 had not received any embolization therapy before. Percent uterine volume change, percent dominant fibroid volume change, and percent dominant fibroid infarction were assessed with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Resolution of menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea/pain, and bulk and/or pressure symptoms including urinary frequency were evaluated clinically. Change in menopausal state was also an outcome of interest. RESULTS: Mean MR imaging follow-up was performed 3 months post-OAE. MR images showed complete infarction in the majority of cases (64.7%; n = 11), with infarction rates of 90%-100% in 3 cases, 1 case with 30%-50% infarction, and 2 cases with 0%-10% infarction. Average uterine size reduction on MR was 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.5%-42.2%; P < .001). The average size reduction for the dominant fibroid was 42.4% (95% CI: 27.7%-57.0%; P = .01). The mean time to final follow-up visit was 11 months. At this point complete symptom resolution (menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea and bulk-related) was achieved in 82.4% (n = 14) of cases. At the final follow-up 11.8% (n = 2) of cases reported menopause. CONCLUSIONS: We observed OAE to be an effective and safe adjunct to uterine artery embolization when hypertrophic ovarian artery(ies) require intervention. However, incomplete fibroid infarction of 23% remains a concern with a potential for long-term treatment failure. In addition, long-term effect on ovarian function is uncertain.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Leiomioma/terapia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Ovario/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Adulto , Arterias , Dismenorrea/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Leiomioma/patología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Menopausia , Menorragia/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologíaRESUMEN
A patent false lumen with persistent flow after endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with an ongoing risk of aortic dilation and rupture. We describe the case of a 64-year-old man who initially underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute complicated TBAD, but continued to have symptomatic retrograde aneurysm filling and dilatation because of a patent false lumen. Coil embolization of the patent false lumen successfully excluded the aneurysmal thoracic aorta from further perfusion, and led to a decease in aneurysm size on follow-up. Our case report is followed by a discussion on this management strategy and a review of literature.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/terapia , Disección Aórtica/terapia , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aortografía/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Stents , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are routinely used to evaluate patients with vascular disease. They have the ability to detect unexpected non-vascular pathology. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and significance of extravascular incidental findings in patients undergoing CTA or MRA. A retrospective review of 737 patients who underwent CTA and 184 patients who underwent MRA during a five-year period was performed. Incidental findings were classified as low, moderate or high significance findings. For patients with high significance extravascular findings, assessment of the rates of appropriate follow-up was conducted. Among the CTA patients, 539 (73.1%) had incidental findings. Low, moderate and high significance findings were discovered in 514 (69.7%), 95 (12.9%) and 41 (5.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty (48.8%) patients with high significance findings received appropriate follow-up investigations. Among the MRA patients, 95 (51.6%) had extravascular findings. Low, moderate and high significance findings were present in 80 (43.5%), 27 (14.7%), and 3 (1.6%) patients, respectively. Two (66.7%) patients with high significance findings were properly followed up. In conclusion, incidental findings on CTA and MRA are very common. A small percentage of these findings could be serious and were not all adequately followed-up in our study population. Referring physicians should be aware of the potential for serious incidental findings and manage them appropriately.