Trochleoplasty Provides Good Outcomes for Recurrent Patellofemoral Dislocations with No Clear Superiority across Different Techniques.

Background: Literature is sparse on outcome comparisons between different trochleoplasty techniques in the treatment of patella instability. To date, it is unclear whether there is a technique that offers superior outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare and evaluate the outcomes of trochleoplasty techniques in the treatment of patellofemoral instability in trochlea dysplasia to establish whether there is an ideal choice of trochleoplasty technique for superior outcomes. Methods: 21 studies involving 880 knees were included. The mean age of the patients was 21.7 years (range 8-49 years). Mean follow-up timeframe of 43.5 months (range 8.8-100 months). Clinical outcomes assessed included rates of recurrence of patellofemoral dislocation, patient satisfaction, Kujala score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner score, and Lysholm score. Egger's test showed no publication bias across all outcomes assessed. Results: Favourable results were seen across all outcomes assessed and patient satisfaction. Improvements were seen with Kujala, IKDC, and Lysholm scores. Tegner scores showed good return to function. Post-operative dislocation and complication rates were low across the different techniques. Meta-regression for Kujala and IKDC scores showed good outcomes regardless of trochleoplasty technique used (Kujala, p = 0.549, relative risk 492.06; IKDC, p = 0.193, RR 0.001). The exact risk that trochleoplasty poses to the cartilage remains uncertain, as no study had a conservatively managed arm for comparison. Conclusions: Trochleoplasty yielded good outcomes irrespective of technique used with no clear superiority demonstrated in any technique in terms of outcome scores, satisfaction, post-operative dislocation rates or complications.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Promote Growth Plate Repair and Reduce Limb-Length Discrepancy in Young Rats.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) exosomes in a rat model of growth plate injury. METHODS: A growth plate defect was surgically created on the distal part of the right femur of 40 female Sprague-Dawley rats. A single intra-articular injection of 100 µg of MSC exosomes in 100 µL of phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS), or an equivalent volume of PBS alone, was administered to the right knee immediately after surgery. At 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment, limb length was measured with micro-CT, and tissue repair was assessed with histological, immunohistochemical, and histomorphometric analyses. RESULTS: A single injection of MSC exosomes significantly increased limb length from 3.29 ± 0.07 cm at 4 weeks to 3.37 ± 0.11 cm at 8 weeks (p = 0.047). However, no improvement in limb length was observed in the PBS control group. The limb-length discrepancy between the involved limb and the contralateral limb in the exosome-treated group was significantly less than the discrepancy in the PBS-treated group at both 4 weeks (2.52% ± 1.30% versus 4.11% ± 0.93%; p = 0.006) and 8 weeks (5.27% ± 2.11% versus 8.06% ± 2.56%; p = 0.016). Consistent with the reduced limb-length discrepancy, the exosome-treated defects displayed significantly more chondrocytes (p < 0.05) and a higher area percentage with deposition of sulphated glycosaminoglycan (p < 0.05) and collagen II (p < 0.05) than PBS-treated defects at 8 weeks. However, bone bridge formation was not inhibited in either group. CONCLUSIONS: A single intra-articular injection of MSC exosomes significantly enhanced physeal repair and reduced limb-length discrepancy but did not inhibit bone-bridge formation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates for the first time the potential use of MSC exosomes as a minimally invasive cell-free therapeutic to promote physeal repair and reduce limb-length discrepancy following growth plate injuries.

Robot-Assisted versus Conventional Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes.

The study aims to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis comparing radiological and functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using either robotic assistance or conventional methods from the latest assemblage of evidence. This study was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. All studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane that reported radiological and functional outcomes after TKA or UKA with either robotic or conventional methods were included in the review. Selected endpoints for random effects, pairwise meta-analysis included operative details, radiological outcomes (mechanical axis, component angle deviation, and outliers), and functional outcomes (American Knee Society Score, Knee Society Function Score, revision and complication rate, range of motion (ROM), Hospital for Special Surgery score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). A total of 23 studies comprising 2,765 knees were included from the initial search. Robot-assisted TKA and UKA were associated with significantly better component angle alignment accuracy (low-to-high quality evidence) at the cost of significantly greater operation time. Robot-assisted UKA was found to have significantly better short-term functional outcomes compared with conventional UKA (moderate-to-high quality evidence). Robot-assisted TKA, however, did not exhibit significantly better short- and midterm subjective knee outcome scores compared with its conventional counterpart (high-quality evidence). Robot-assisted TKA and UKA were associated with nonstatistically significant improved ROM and lesser rates of revision. Robot-assisted total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to better radiological outcomes, with no significant differences in mid- and long-term functional outcomes compared with conventional methods for the former. Larger prospective studies with mid- and long-term outcomes are required to further substantiate findings from the present study.

Computer-Navigated versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes from Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials.

The main purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis comparing functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using either computer navigation (NAV-TKA) or conventional methods (CON-TKA) from the latest assemblage of evidence. This study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. All Level I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane that compared functional outcomes after NAV- and CON-TKA were included in the review. Selected end points for random effects, pairwise meta-analysis included Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), KS Function Score (KSFS), KS Total Score (KSTS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion at three arbitrary follow-up times. A total of 24 prospective RCTs comprising 3,778 knees were included from the initial search. At long-term follow-up (>5 years), NAV-TKA exhibited significantly better raw KSKS (p = 0.001) (low-quality evidence), contrary to CON-TKA, which reflected significantly better raw KSTS (p = 0.004) (high-quality evidence). While change scores (KSKS, WOMAC) from preoperative values favor CON-TKA at short-term (<6 months) and medium-term follow-up (6-60 months), long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest the superiority of NAV-TKA over CON-TKA (p = 0.02) (very low-quality evidence). Overall, sizeable dispersion of nonstatistically significant functional outcomes in the medium term was observed to eventually converge in the long term, with less differences in functional outcome scores between the two treatment methods in short- and long-term follow-up. While raw functional outcome scores reflect no differences between NAV and CON-TKA, long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest superiority of NAV-TKA over its conventional counterpart. Prospective studies with larger power are required to support the pattern of diminishing differences in functional outcome scores from medium- to long-term follow-up between the two modalities.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes for Cartilage Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Preclinical In Vivo Studies.

Clinical and animal studies have demonstrated efficacy of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) in cartilage repair. Although MSCs were originally predicated to mediate tissue repair through cellular differentiation and cell replacement, it is now recognized that MSCs exert most of their paracrine effects on tissue repair through the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs). In particular, 50-200 nm small EVs that also include exosomes carry a rich cargo of lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins, and have been reported to be therapeutically efficacious in various disease indications, including osteochondral injuries and osteoarthritis (OA). This systematic review aimed to assess the preclinical studies that used MSC exosomes for cartilage repair. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant controlled preclinical animal studies. A total of 13 studies were identified, with the total sample size being 434. This included 378 (87.1%) mice or rats and 56 (12.9%) rabbits. According to Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation risk of bias assessment, all the studies presented with unclear-to-low risk in bias. In general, MSC exosomes were found to be efficacious in promoting repair and regeneration of osteochondral defects and alleviating OA degeneration. In most studies, exosome-treated animals displayed increased cellular proliferation, enhanced matrix deposition, and improved histological scores. Having assessed the relevant preclinical animal studies reported to date, this systematic review shows the therapeutic benefit of MSC exosome therapy in cartilage repair. Standardization of animal models and outcome measurements would be needed to facilitate more robust analysis and improve the validity of the results in future studies.