Congenital Sodium Diarrhea: Antenatal Diagnosis May Prevent Unnecessary Surgery in the Neonate.

Congenital sodium diarrhea (CSD) is a rare, life-threatening condition characterized by intractable diarrhea, hyponatremia, and metabolic acidosis. It presents similarly to other congenital disorders and, therefore, is often misdiagnosed and mistreated. We present a case of CSD that presented with dilated loops of bowel and polyhydramnios at 18 weeks and was thought to be a congenital bowel obstruction. The patient was therefore managed surgically after birth with a diverting ileostomy, however was later found to have elevated stool sodium levels and metabolic derangements consistent with CSD. Our case demonstrates the need for high index of suspicion for congenital diarrheal disorders to prevent unnecessary surgery and a delay in appropriate medical management of this rare condition.

Emergency department staff perspectives on caring for patients experiencing early pregnancy loss (Boston, Massachusetts 2021).

OBJECTIVES: A preimplementation study to examine the context of, and barriers and facilitators to, providing early pregnancy loss care in one emergency department (ED), to inform implementation strategies to improve ED-based early pregnancy loss care. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited a purposive sample of participants and conducted semistructured individual qualitative interviews focused on caring for patients experiencing pregnancy loss in the ED until saturation was reached. For analysis, we used framework coding and directed content analysis. RESULTS: Participant roles in the ED included administrators (N = 5), attending physicians (N = 5), resident physicians (N = 5), and registered nurses (N = 5). Most (70%, N = 14) participants identified as female. Primary themes included (1) caring for early pregnancy loss patients is challenging and uncomfortable, (2) inability to provide compassionate early pregnancy loss care causes moral injury, and (3) stigma influences early pregnancy loss care. Participants explained that early pregnancy loss is challenging due to added pressure, patient expectations, and gaps in knowledge. They reported barriers to providing compassionate care that are out of their control, such as systematic workflows, limited physical space, and insufficient time and expressed that these barriers lead to moral injury. Participants also reflected on how early pregnancy loss and abortion stigma affect patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Caring for patients experiencing early pregnancy loss in the ED requires unique considerations. ED staff recognize this and desire more early pregnancy loss education, clearer early pregnancy loss tools and protocols, and early pregnancy loss-specific workflows. With concrete needs identified, an implementation plan to improve ED-based early pregnancy loss care can be created, which is important now more than ever, due to the impending influx in the ED for early pregnancy loss care after the Dobbs decision. IMPLICATIONS: Since the Dobbs decision, patients are self-managing abortions and/or seeking out-of-state abortion care. Without access to follow-up, more patients are presenting to the ED with early pregnancy loss. By demonstrating the unique challenges emergency medicine clinicians face, this study can support initiatives to improve ED-based early pregnancy loss care.

Implementation and Evaluation of an Electronic Maternal Early Warning Trigger Tool to Reduce Maternal Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: We compare maternal morbidity and clinical care metrics before and after the electronic implementation of a maternal early warning trigger (MEWT) tool. STUDY DESIGN: This is a study of maternal morbidity and clinical care within three linked hospitals comparing 1 year before and after electronic MEWT implementation. We compare severe maternal morbidity overall as well as within the subcategories of hemorrhage, hypertension, cardiopulmonary, and sepsis in addition to relevant process metrics in each category. We describe the MEWT trigger rate in addition to MEWT sensitivity and specificity for morbidity overall and by morbidity type. RESULTS: The morbidity rate ratio increased from 1.6 per 100 deliveries in the pre-MEWT period to 2.06 per 100 deliveries in the post-MEWT period (incidence rate ratio = 1.28, p = 0.018); however, in cases of septic morbidity, time to appropriate antibiotics decreased (pre-MEWT: 1.87 hours [1.11-2.63] vs. post-MEWT: 0.75 hours [0.31-1.19], p = 0.036) and in cases of hypertensive morbidity, the proportion of cases treated with appropriate antihypertensive medication within 60 minutes improved (pre-MEWT: 62% vs. post-MEWT: 83%, p = 0.040). The MEWT trigger rate was 2.3%, ranging from 0.8% in the less acute centers to 2.9% in our tertiary center. The MEWT sensitivity for morbidity overall was 50%; detection of hemorrhage morbidity was lowest (30%); however, it ranged between 69% for septic morbidity, 74% for cardiopulmonary morbidity, and 82% for cases of hypertensive morbidity. CONCLUSION: Overall, maternal morbidity did not decrease after implementation of the MEWT system; however, important clinical metrics such as time to antibiotics and antihypertensive care improved. We suspect increased morbidity was related to annual variation and unexpected lower morbidity in the pre-MEWT comparison year. Because MEWT sensitivity for hemorrhage was low, and because hemorrhage dominates administrative metrics of morbidity, process metrics around sepsis, hypertension, and cardiopulmonary morbidity are important to track as markers of MEWT efficacy. KEY POINTS: · MEWT was not associated with a decrease in maternal morbidity.. · MEWT was associated with improvements in some clinical care metrics.. · MEWT is more sensitive in detecting septic, hypertensive, and cardiopulmonary morbidities than hemorrhage morbidity..