Resistant hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Resistant hypertension (RH) is characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure despite the concurrent use of three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic, at optimal doses. This clinical phenomenon poses a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide due to its association with increased cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS: Ongoing studies on device-based treatment of RH, with aim to reduce sympathetic nervous system outflow, have shown promising evidence in management of RH which may in turn decrease the incidence of composite cardiovascular outcome faced by the affected population. SUMMARY: This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RH, and review some of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in management of RH.

Secondary hypertension: evaluation and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertension (HTN) that can be attributed to a particular source is known as secondary HTN (SH). Often, SH is difficult to control and thus referred to as resistant HTN, although the two terms are not mutually exclusive. RECENT FINDINGS: A common theme across several contributors to SH are coactivation of the sympathetic drive and hormonal changes, independent of hormonal axis activation. The key to effective management of SH is early recognition and treatment to avoid catastrophic cardiovascular disease effects and mortality. SUMMARY: This review article provides a contemporary summary of the conditions associated with SH and briefly reviews diagnostics and management.

Prediction of Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation Post-ablation Based on Atrial Fibrosis Seen on Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI: A Metaanalysis.

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) post-ablation based on the various stages of fibrosis seen in the late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched using specific terms and identified nine studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,787 patients underwent LGE-MRI to assess atrial fibrosis before catheter ablation for AF. We performed three analyses: first, we compared stage IV versus stage I (reference group). The second set examined the combined stages III and IV versus stages I and II (reference group). The third set compared stage IV versus combined stages I, II, and III. The metanalysis relied on a random-effects model to pool the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the DerSimonian and Laird method. The data was analyzed using StatsDirect software in England. RESULTS: The study showed a higher rate of AF recurrence after ablation in stage IV atrial fibrosis than in stage I (OR, 9.54; 95% CI, 3.81 to 28.89; P<00001). Also, in patients with combined stages III & IV of atrial fibrosis, AF recurrence was significantly higher after ablation than in stages I & II groups (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.61 to 3.50; P<00001). Similarly, compared to combined stages I, II, and III, patients with stage IV have higher odds of recurrence post-ablation (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 2.39- 7.52, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This metanalysis demonstrates the strong association between left atrial fibrosis in LGE-MRI and AF post-ablation recurrence. The finding of this study will further assist clinicians in predicting the recurrence rate of AF based on the amount of fibrosis and tailor therapeutic decisions for further management.

An assessment of race and gender-based biases among readmission predicting tools (HOSPITAL, LACE, and RAHF) in heart failure population.

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study is to retrospectively investigate if the HOSPITAL score, LACE index, and RAHF scale exhibit any bias based on gender and race in heart failure readmissions. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with all adult medical patients discharged with congestive heart failure from 2016 to 2018 from Southern Illinois University School of Medicine Hospitalist service. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed comparing prediction tools (HOSPITAL score, LACE index, and RAHF scale) performance based on gender and race by measuring the area under the curve (AUC). Absolute Between-ROC Area (ABROCA) values were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.2. RESULTS: The performance of the HOSPITAL score in the majority and minority population showed a statistically significant difference between AUCs (0.714 and 0.633, p = 0.029) and an ABROCA of 0.081 indicating superior performance in predicting hospital readmissions in the majority group vs. the minority. The performance of RAHF score in females and males showed statistically significant differences between AUCs (0.567 and 0.527, p = 0.04) and an ABROCA of 0.04 indicating the superior performance of the RAHF score in females compared with males. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the HOSPITAL score and the RAHF scale showed significant differences in predicting 30-day readmissions risk based on race and gender, respectively, in heart failure patients, whereas the LACE index did not show any significant difference.

Social Vulnerability Indices as a Risk Factor for Heart Failure Readmissions.

Objectives: The objective of our study was to use the parameters of social vulnerability index (SVI) to observe their association with the 30-day hospital readmissions in the heart failure population.Methods: Data required for analysis were extracted from the electronic medical record. The geographic SVI data was then merged with the clinical data. Qualitative variables and reported as frequency and quantitative variables and reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Variables from univariate analysis with a P value of ≤ 0.10 were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression with stepwise backward variable selection and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis.Results: The odds ratio of readmission predicted by HOSPITAL score was 1.137 (P value = 0.004, 95% CI = 1.041-1.241). SVI parameter recording disability showed odds ratio of 1.521 (P value = 0.006, 95% CI = 1.125-2.058) and SVI parameter tracking vehicle ownership showed odds ratio of 15.355 (P value = 0.014, 95% CI = 1.755 - 134.383). The ROCs were generated for three scenarios: (i) HOSPITAL score only which had area under the curve (AUC) of 0.702 (P value = 0.015), (ii) SVI indicators tracking vehicle ownership and disability resulted in the AUC of 0.589 (P value = 0.016), and (iii) all of the above combined increased the AUC increased to 0.718 (P value = 0.015).Conclusions: Two social parameters (limited vehicle access and prevalence of disability) from the SVI showed a strong association with 30-day hospital readmissions.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on in-hospital outcomes and readmission rate after edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) is a treatment option for patients with 3+ or greater mitral regurgitation who cannot undergo mitral valve surgery. Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) are unclear. We sought to evaluate the TMVR in-hospital outcomes, readmission rates and its impact on kidney function. METHODS: Data from 2016 National Readmission Database was used to obtain all patients who underwent TMVR. Patients were classified by their CKD status: no CKD, CKD, or ESRD. The primary outcomes were: in-hospital mortality, 30- and 90-day readmission rate, and change in CKD status on readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess in-hospital, readmission outcomes and kidney function stage. RESULTS: A total of 4,645 patients were assessed (mean age 78.5 ± 10.3 years). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with CKD (4.0%, odds ratio [OR]:2.01 [95% CI, confidence interval: 1.27-3.18]) and ESRD (6.6%, OR: 6.38 [95% CI: 1.49-27.36]) compared with non-CKD (2.4%). 30-day readmission rate was higher in ESRD versus non-CKD patients (17.8% vs. 10.4%, OR: 2.24 [95% CI: 1.30-3.87]) as was 90-day readmission (41.2% vs. 21% OR: 2.51 [95% CI:1.70-3.72]). Kidney function improved in 25% of patients with CKD stage 3 and in 50% with CKD stage 4-5 at 30-and 90-day readmission. Incidence of AKI, major bleeding, and respiratory failure were higher in CKD group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD and ESRD have worse outcomes and higher readmission rate after TMVR. In patients who were readmitted after TMVR, renal function improved in some patients, suggesting that TMVR could potentially improve CKD stage.

Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome for Short- Versus Standard-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

Newer generation drug eluting stents (DES) and pharmacotherapy have decreased thrombotic events post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is lack of wide-ranging safety and efficacy evaluation in both stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome in short-term (3-6 months) versus Standard-term (12 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We searched electronic databases using specific terms to identify randomized control trials comparing different durations of DAPT after PCI with DES. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, major bleeding, target lesion and vessel revascularization, and stroke at follow-up duration ≥12 months post index PCI. Studies that compared DAPT <3 months or DAPT ≥12 months were excluded. Thirteen randomized control trials (n = 31,831) were included; 8401 patients received DAPT for 3 months and 7482 patients received DAPT in the 6 months group. Major bleeding rate was lower in the short-term (3-6 months) versus Standard-term (12 months) group (risk ratio 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.84, P < 0.05). Repeat revascularization rate was higher in the short-term (3-6 months) versus Standard-term (12 months) (risk ratio 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.36, P < 0.05) of DAPT duration after PCI with DES. No difference in other outcomes were observed when comparing short versus standard duration of DAPT in both stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome.

Pulmonary Blastomycosis: A case series and review of unique radiological findings.

Blastomycosis is a systemic fungal infection which primarily involves the lungs but can disseminate to involve extrapulmonary sites. Current testing that exists includes sputum, urine, serum, and pathological tissue analysis. Radiological testing is often non-specific and highly variable. Here we present five cases of pulmonary blastomycosis with challenging radiographic presentations.

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and 30-Day Readmission.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies identify heart failure (HF) as a potential risk for hospital readmission; however, studies on predictability of heart failure readmission is limited. The objective of this work was to investigate whether a specific type of heart failure (HFpEF or HFrEF) has a higher association to the rate of 30-day hospital readmission and compare their predictability with the two risk scores: HOSPITAL score and LACE index. DESIGN: Retrospective study from single academic center. METHODS: Sample size included adult patients from an academic hospital in a two-year period (2015 - 2017). Exclusion criteria included death, transfer to another hospital, and unadvised leave from hospital. Baseline characteristics, diagnosis-related group, and ICD diagnosis codes were obtained. Variables affecting HOSPITAL score and LACE index and types of heart failure present were also extracted. Qualitative variables were compared using Pearson chi2 or Fisher's exact test (reported as frequency) and quantitative variables using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test (reported as mean ± standard deviation). Variables from univariate analysis with P values of 0.05 or less were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Odds ratio was used to measure potential risk. RESULTS: The sample size of adult patients in the study period was 1,916. All eligible cohort of patients who were readmitted were analyzed. Cumulative score indicators of HOSPITAL Score, LACE index (including the Charlson Comorbidity Index) predicted 30-day readmissions with P values of <0.001. The P value of HFpEF was found to be significant in the readmitted group (P < 0.001) compared to HFrEF (P = 0.141). Multivariate logistic regression further demonstrated the association of HFpEF with higher risk of readmission with odds ratio of 1.77 (95% CI: 1.25 - 2.50) and P value of 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from an academic tertiary care center supports HFpEF as an independent risk factor for readmission. Multidisciplinary management of HFpEF may be an important target for interventions to reduce hospital readmissions.

HOSPITAL Score, LACE Index and LACE+ Index as predictors of 30-day readmission in patients with heart failure.

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the HOSPITAL Score (Haemoglobin level at discharge, Oncology at discharge, Sodium level at discharge, Procedure during hospitalization, Index admission, number of hospital admissions, Length of stay) LACE index (Length of stay, Acute/emergent admission, Charlson comorbidy index score, Emerency department visits in previous 6 months) and LACE+ index in predicting 30-day readmission in patients with diastolic dysfunction. Heart failure remains one of the most common hospital readmissions in adults, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Different models have been used to predict 30-day hospital readmissions. All adult medical patients discharged from the SIU School of Medicine Hospitalist service from 12 June 2016 to 12 June 2018 with an International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of diastolic heart failure were studied retrospectively to evaluate the performance of the HOSPITAL Score, LACE index and LACE+ index readmission risk prediction tools in this patient population. Of the 730 patient discharges with a diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 692 discharges met the inclusion criteria. Of these discharges, 189 (27%) were readmitted to the same hospital within 30 days. A receiver operating characteristic evaluation showed C-statistic values to be 0.595 (95% CI 0.549 to 0.641) for the HOSPITAL Score, 0.551 (95% CI 0.503 to 0.598) for the LACE index and 0.568 (95% CI 0.522 to 0.615) for the LACE+ index, indicating poor specificity in predicting 30-day readmission. The result of this study demonstrates that the HOSPITAL Score, LACE index and LACE+ index are not effective predictors of 30-day readmission for patients with HFpEF. Further analysis and development of new prediction models are needed to better estimate the 30-day readmission rates in this patient population.

Meta-Analysis Evaluating Outcomes of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion During Cardiac Surgery.

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (S-LAAO) has become a common procedure performed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery; however, evidence to support this procedure remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of S-LAAO in terms of ischemic stroke, postoperative atrial fibrillation, and all-cause mortality. A thorough literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We identified 10 relevant studies for our meta-analysis. It included 6,779 patients who underwent S-LAAO and 6,573 who did not undergo LAAO. In terms of ischemic stroke, the S-LAAO cohort had a lower events (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.655 (0.518 to 0.829), p = 0.0004) compared with the non-LAAO cohort. S-LAAO cohort also had lower events of all-cause mortality (pooled OR 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.99), p = 0.0408) when compared with the non-LAAO cohort. In regards to postoperative atrial fibrillation, there was no difference between the 2 groups (pooled OR 1.29 (95% confidence interval 0.81 to 2.06), p = 0.2752). In conclusion, S-LAAO was associated with lower events of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and all-cause mortality when compared to the non-LAAO group.