Enhancing alloreactivity does not restore GVHD induction but augments skin graft rejection by CD4⁺ effector memory T cells.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) caused by donor T cells attacking recipient tissues is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Studies have shown that effector memory T (T(EM) ) cells do not cause GVHD but are capable of immune functions post-transplant, including graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects, but the reasons for this are unclear. In mice, the T(EM) pool may have a less diverse T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire than naive T (T(N) ) cells with fewer alloreactive clones. We therefore tested whether enhancing the alloreactivity of T(EM) cells would restore their ability to cause GVHD. In an MHC-matched system, alloreactive T(EM) cells were created by transferring GVHD effector cells into syngeneic recipients and allowing conversion to T(EM) cells. Upon retransfer to freshly transplanted recipients, these cells caused only mild GVHD. Similarly, in an MHC-mismatched system, T(EM) cells with a proven increased precursor frequency of alloreactive clones only caused limited GVHD. Nonetheless, these same cells mounted strong in vitro alloresponses and caused rapid skin graft rejection. T(EM) cells created from CD4(+) T cells that had undergone lymphopenia-induced proliferation (LIP) also caused only mild GVHD. Our findings establish that conversion to T(EM) cells significantly reduces GVHD potency, even in cells with a substantially enhanced alloreactive repertoire.

CTLA4 expression is an indicator and regulator of steady-state CD4+ FoxP3+ T cell homeostasis.

The presence of FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) is necessary for control of deleterious immune responses in the steady state; however, mechanisms for maintaining the frequency and quality of endogenous Tregs are not well defined. In this study, we used in vivo modulators of the CD28 and CTLA4 pathways administered to intact mice to reveal mechanisms controlling the homeostasis and phenotype of endogenous Tregs. We demonstrate that expression of the negative costimulatory regulator CTLA4 on FoxP3(+) Tregs in vivo is a direct consequence of their rapid, perpetual homeostasis. Up-regulation of CTLA4 expression occurs only on FoxP3(+) Tregs undergoing extensive proliferation and can be abrogated by inhibiting the CD28 pathway, coinciding with a reduction in FoxP3(+) Treg proliferation and frequency. We further demonstrate that CTLA4 negatively regulates steady-state Treg homeostasis, given that inhibiting CTLA4 signaling with an anti-CTLA4 blocking Ab greatly enhances Treg proliferation and overall Treg frequency. Our findings provide new insight into the origin and role of CTLA4 expression on natural FoxP3(+) Tregs and reveal opposing effects of costimulation modulators on the steady-state level and quality of Tregs, with implications regarding their effects on endogenous Tregs in patients receiving immunotherapy.

Generation, homeostasis, and regulation of memory T cells in transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sensitized individuals experience higher rates of acute rejection and decreased graft survival. Memory T cells have been implicated in these processes, and in the prevention of tolerance induction. A greater understanding of T-cell memory generation, maintenance, and regulation is needed to design new immunosuppressive strategies that prolong graft survival in the presence of alloreactive memory. RECENT FINDINGS: Memory T cells are generated against alloantigens via homologous and cross-reactive priming, and recent studies demonstrate that T-cell depletion can also paradoxically result in memory generation. While initially thought to be impervious to regulation due to their enhanced functional properties, memory T cells have shown susceptibility to certain immunomodulating therapies and immunosuppressants and, furthermore, newer targets for memory T-cell regulation show promise in controlling immunological recall. SUMMARY: Current immunosuppression protocols should be designed with consideration of their effects not only on naive T-cell activation, but also on memory generation, activation, and effector function. Additionally, research efforts should continue to identify and manipulate new costimulatory targets and immunosuppressants, which may be key to abrogating memory T-cell responses.

Reshaping the past: Strategies for modulating T-cell memory immune responses.

Memory T cells are generated following an initial encounter with antigen, persist over the lifetime of an individual, and mediate rapid and robust functional responses upon antigenic recall. While immune memory is generally associated with protective immune response to pathogens, memory T cells can be generated to diverse types of antigens including autoantigens and alloantigens through homologous or crossreactive priming and comprise the majority of circulating T cells during adulthood. Memory T cells can therefore play critical roles in propagating and perpetuating autoimmune disease and in mediating allograft rejection, although the precise pathways for regulation of memory immune responses remain largely undefined. Moreover, evaluating and designing strategies to modulate memory T-cell responses are challenging given the remarkable heterogeneity of memory T cells, with different subsets predominating in lymphoid versus non-lymphoid tissue sites. In this review, we discuss what is presently known regarding the effect of current immunomodulation strategies on the memory T-cell compartment and potential strategies for controlling immunological recall.