Outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: role of triggers and complement abnormalities in the response to C5 inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Atypical-hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy often due to uncontrolled complement activation, characterized by high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Eculizumab has improved the outcome, however, its efficacy varies among patients and its discontinuation is debated. METHODS: To identify characteristics associated with treatment response, we analyzed 244 aHUS patients referred to our center. Patients were classified according to the presence/absence of complement abnormalities and/or triggers at onset in 4 categories: (1) primary (complement abnormality without trigger), (2) secondary (trigger without complement abnormality), (3) combined (trigger and complement abnormality), (4) idiopathic (no trigger, no complement abnormality). Response to treatment was evaluated by comparing the response to eculizumab with that of conventional therapy. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated with the relapse rate after discontinuation of C5-inhibition. RESULTS: Patients had a better outcome with eculizumab compared to conventional treatment, with a response rate of 81.9% vs 56.9%, p < 0.001 and a long-term cumulative incidence of ESKD of 5.8% vs 22.5% (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.80). The excellent global response was driven by the primary and combined groups (89.8% vs 54.0% and 89.3% vs 54.2%, respectively). The relapse rate following discontinuation of the C5-inhibitor was as high as 66.7% in the primary group, 18.7% in the combined, and 0% in the secondary and idiopathic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a better outcome in aHUS patients treated with C5-inhibition, particularly in the primary and combined forms, which have a high risk of relapse after discontinuation that is not observed in the secondary and idiopathic forms.

Acute Kidney Injury in Non-Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Hospitalizations for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients who undergo hospitalization. Abundant evidence exists concerning the epidemiology of AKI in patients hospitalized in the ICU for COVID-19 but limited data are available about the occurrence of AKI in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients being hospitalized in a non-ICU setting. Aim and Methods: We have carried out a retrospective study to evaluate frequency and risk factors for AKI among patients consecutively admitted at a third-level university hospital starting from February 2020 (the beginning of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic); all patients were hospitalized outside the ICU. Results: A total of 387 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were included in the current study; 372 (96.1%) had SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia. In-hospital AKI onset was recorded in 119 (30.7%) patients, mainly with AKI stage 1 (n = 74, 62.2%); eighteen (4.6%) patients reported AKI stage 3 and six (1.5%) patients had HD-dependent AKI. There were 235 (60.7%) patients with severe COVID-19, and this was more common in patients developing AKI, 94.5% (86/119) vs. 86.1% (149/268), p = 0.02. Multivariate regression model (n = 144 patients) reported an independent and significant relationship between AKI occurrence and greater levels of ferritin (p = 0.036), IL-6 (p = 0.032), and azotemia at admission (p = 0.0001). A total of 69 (17.8%) SARS-CoV-2-positive patients died and strong predictors of in-hospital death resulted from age (p < 0.0001), serum ferritin (p < 0.0001) and white blood cells (p < 0.001). According to multivariable analysis (n = 163 patients), there was a consistent link between in-hospital death and AKI stage (1) (p = 0.021) and -stage (2) (p = 0.009). Our results support the notion that AKI occurs frequently among hospitalized COVID-19 patients even in a non-ICU setting and plays a pivotal role in the mortality of this population. Further studies are ongoing in order to clearly establish the frequency of AKI in patients with COVID-19; the mechanisms underlying kidney injury in this population are an area of active investigation. These data provide solid evidence to support close monitoring of COVID-19 patients for the development of AKI and measures taken to prevent this.

[Left atrial appendage occlusion as replacement of coumarin anticoagulants in calciphylaxis].

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA), often referred to as calciphylaxis, is a rare condition potentially life-threatening seen in 1-4% of patients with kidney failure on chronic dialysis. Pathogenesis is not clear, but several risk factors have been identified, one of the most known among them is coumarin anticoagulants therapy (tAC). When CUA occurs, tAC is contraindicated: the left atrial appendage occlusion, in dialysed patients affected by non-valvular atrial fibrillation, could be contemplated in replacement of tAC, that should be considered by nephrologist and discussed by a multidisciplinary team including cardiologists.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody in Chronic Kidney Disease (Dialysis Independent and Not).

Background: The evidence in the medical literature regarding the prevalence of antibody towards SARS-CoV-2 in patients with chronic kidney disease is limited, particularly among those at the pre-dialysis stage. Aim: We have prospectively performed a cohort study at a third-level university hospital to evaluate frequency and risk factors for anti-SARS-CoV-2-positive serology among chronic kidney disease patients. Methods: We have tested a cohort of consecutive outpatients with chronic kidney disease on regular follow-up at a major metropolitan hospital, during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Italy. We adopted an enzyme immunoassay for the assessment of IgM/IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in human serum or plasma (DIA.PRO COVID-19 Serological Assay); the assay detects antibodies against Spike (1/2) and Nucleocapsid proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Results: There were 199 (65.8%) out of 302 patients with dialysis-independent CKD; 2 patients were anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody positive, 23 were anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG positive and 37 had detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody in serum. The prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 20.5% (60/302). All patients positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tested negative by nasopharyngeal swab. A significant and independent relationship between anti-SARS-CoV-2-positive serologic status and serum albumin (a marker of nutritional status) was observed (p < 0.046). The prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was greater in CKD than in control populations (health care workers and blood donors) attending the hospital a few months before the current study (7.6% and 5.2%, respectively). Conclusions: The great prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody in our study group could be, at least partially, explained with the fact that our patients were living in Milan, an area severely hit by SARS-CoV-2 infection. It seems that a poor nutritional status supports the acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 antibody in CKD patients. Clinical studies to understand the mechanisms responsible for the high frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection are under way.