Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Extended-Release Tablet: a Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Comparison Trial.

AIMS: Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that lowers serum triglyceride levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is approved for treating dyslipidemia as twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets. A once-daily extended-release (XR) tablet has also been developed. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day; once daily) to IR (0.2 mg/day; twice daily) in lowering triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. METHODS: This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included patients with fasting triglycerides ≥ 200 mg/dL who received IR (0.2 mg/day) or XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Common treatment effects at weeks 4 through 12 were compared between groups using repeated analysis of covariance. RESULTS: In 356 randomized patients, fasting triglyceride levels decreased by 48.0%, 43.8%, and 48.0% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively, confirming the non-inferiority of both XR regimens to IR. The proportion of patients who achieved fasting triglycerides ＜150 mg/dL was 45.7%, 37.4%, and 51.7%, while the percentage change of triglycerides in the subgroup with baseline triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL was -59.3%, -52.2%, and -66.3% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: XR (0.2 and 0.4 mg/day) was non-inferior to IR (0.2 mg/day). XR 0.4 mg/day demonstrated a more potent triglyceride-lowering effect than XR 0.2 mg/day and should be considered for patients with high triglyceride levels.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of K-924 Pitavastatin/Ezetimibe Fixed-dose Combination in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia: A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label Trial.

AIM: Ezetimibe administration with ongoing statin therapy is an effective option for further lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Thus, we investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of pitavastatin/ezetimibe (K-924 LD: 2 mg/10 mg; K-924 HD: 4 mg/10 mg). METHODS: We conducted a phase III, multicenter, open-label trial involving patients with hypercholesterolemia receiving pitavastatin (2 or 4 mg) who had not achieved their LDL-C management target. Patients were enrolled into the K-924 LD and HD groups based on whether they had received pitavastatin 2 and 4 mg, respectively, and treated for 52 weeks. K-924 was administered orally once daily. The primary objective was to examine the percent change in LDL-C from baseline at week 52 with last observation carried forward imputation (LOCF) in all patients. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients evaluated, 62 and 47 were assigned to the K-924 LD and HD groups, respectively. In all patients, LDL-C decreased by -30.3±14.3% (p＜0.001) from baseline (134.4±37.9 mg/dL). Consequently, 91.8% and 37.5% of the patients for primary and secondary prevention reached their LDL-C management target, respectively. These results were consistent in both the K-924 LD and HD groups. In the safety analysis, a single adverse drug reaction occurred in a patient in the K-924 HD group. CONCLUSION: After replacing pitavastatin monotherapy, K-924 was found to be effective and well-tolerated over 52 weeks. Thus, K-924 can contribute to intensifying LDL-C-lowering therapy without increasing the number of medications.

Efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild COVID-19 in Japan and Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug administered to hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Fundamental research suggests that ivermectin is effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment option. METHODS: This multi-regional (Japan and Thailand), multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild COVID-19 (IVERMILCO Study). The participants took a specified number of the investigational product (ivermectin or placebo) tablets of, adjusted to a dose of 0.3-0.4 mg/kg, orally on an empty stomach once daily for three days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time at which clinical symptoms first showed an improving trend by 168 h after investigational product administration. RESULTS: A total of 1030 eligible participants were assigned to receive the investigational product; 502 participants received ivermectin and 527 participants received a placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was approximately 96 h (approximately four days) for both ivermectin and placebo groups, which did not show statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank test, p = 0.61). The incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions did not show statistically significant differences between the ivermectin and placebo groups (chi-square test, p = 0.97, p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that ivermectin (0.3-0.4 mg/kg), as a treatment for patients with mild COVID-19, is ineffective; however, its safety has been confirmed for participants, including minor participants of 12 years or older (IVERMILCO Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05056883.).

Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin/Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination vs. Pitavastatin: Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

AIM: We compared the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin/ezetimibe fixed-dose combination with those of pitavastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: This trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. A total of 293 patients were randomly assigned into four groups receiving 2 mg pitavastatin, 4 mg pitavastatin, 2 mg pitavastatin/10 mg ezetimibe (K-924 LD), and 4 mg pitavastatin/10 mg ezetimibe (K-924 HD) once daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: The percentage changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the primary endpoint, were -39.5% for 2 mg pitavastatin, -45.2% for 4 mg pitavastatin, -51.4% for K-924 LD, and -57.8% for K-924 HD. Compared with pitavastatin monotherapy, the pitavastatin/ezetimibe fixed-dose combination significantly reduced LDL-C, total cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Meanwhile, the cholesterol synthesis marker, lathosterol, was significantly decreased with pitavastatin monotherapy and the pitavastatin/ezetimibe fixed-dose combination, although the decrease was attenuated in the latter. On the other hand, the cholesterol absorption markers, beta-sitosterol and campesterol, were reduced with the fixed-dose combination but not with pitavastatin monotherapy. The incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions was not significantly different between the two groups receiving the fixed-dose combination and monotherapy. The mean values of laboratory tests that are related to liver function and myopathy increased but remained within the reference range in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The pitavastatin/ezetimibe fixed-dose combination showed an excellent LDL-C-reducing effect by the complementary pharmacological action of each component, and its safety profile was similar to that of pitavastatin monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04289649).

Randomised clinical trial: Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator (SPPARMα), versus placebo in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Pemafibrate is a novel, selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator (SPPARMα). In mice, Pemafibrate improved the histological features of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). In patients with dyslipidaemia, it improved serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT). AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pemafibrate in patients with high-risk, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised multicentre, phase 2 trial randomised 118 patients (1:1) to either 0.2 mg Pemafibrate or placebo, orally, twice daily for 72 weeks. The key inclusion criteria included liver fat content of ≥10% by magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF); liver stiffness of ≥2.5 kPa, by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE); and elevated ALT levels. The primary endpoint was the percentage change in MRI-PDFF from baseline to week 24. The secondary endpoints included MRE-based liver stiffness, ALT, serum liver fibrosis markers and lipid parameters. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the primary endpoint (-5.3% vs -4.2%; treatment difference -1.0%, P = 0.85). However, MRE-based liver stiffness significantly decreased compared to placebo at week 48 (treatment difference -5.7%, P = 0.036), and was maintained at week 72 (treatment difference -6.2%, P = 0.024), with significant reduction in ALT and LDL-C. Adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups and therapy was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Pemafibrate did not decrease liver fat content but had significant reduction in MRE-based liver stiffness. Pemafibrate may be a promising therapeutic agent for NAFLD/NASH, and also be a candidate for combination therapy with agents that reduce liver fat content. ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT03350165.

Evaluation of Data Errors and Monitoring Activities in a Trial in Japan Using a Risk-Based Approach Including Central Monitoring and Site Risk Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Risk-based monitoring (RBM) is a slow uptake in some trial sponsors. There are three main reasons for this. First, there is the fear of making large investments into advanced RBM technology solutions. Second, it is considered that RBM is most suitable for large, complex trials. Third, there is the fear of errors in both critical and non-critical data, appearing as reduced on-site monitoring is being conducted. METHODS: Our RBM team identified, evaluated, and mitigated trial risks, as well as devised a monitoring strategy. The clinical research associate (CRA) assessed the site risks, and the RBM team conducted central monitoring. We compared all data errors and on-site monitoring time between the partial switching sites [sites that had switched to partial source data verification (SDV) and source data review (SDR)] and the 100% SDV and SDR sites (sites that had implemented 100% SDV and SDR). RESULTS: Partial switching sites did not require any critical data correction and had a smaller number of data corrections through on-site monitoring than the 100% SDV and SDR sites. The RBM strategy reduced the on-site monitoring time by 30%. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that RBM can be successfully implemented through the use of site risk assessment and central monitoring with practically no additional investment in technology and still produced similar results in terms of subject safety and data quality, as well as the cost savings that have been reported in global complex studies.

Thymine at -5 is crucial for cpc promoter activity of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6714.

The levels of transcripts of the cpc operon were highly reduced in a PD-1 mutant of cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6714. This was due to a substitution of C for T that occurred at 5 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site of the cpc operon. Any substitution for T at the -5 position drastically reduced both in vivo and in vitro promoter activity in cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 but not the in vivo activity in Escherichia coli. This suggests that the requirement of -5T appears to be specific for a cyanobacterial RNA polymerase-promoter combination.

Transcriptional activation of NtcA-dependent promoters of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 by 2-oxoglutarate in vitro.

The transcription factor NtcA is a global regulator of nitrogen homeostasis in cyanobacteria. It thus positively regulates the expression of genes related to nitrogen assimilation such as glnA (which encodes glutamine synthetase) and ntcA itself in response to nitrogen shortage or depletion. The binding of NtcA to the glnA and ntcA promoters of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 in vitro now has been shown to be enhanced by 2-oxoglutarate. In vitro analysis of gene transcription also revealed that the interaction of NtcA with its promoter element was not sufficient for activation of transcription, and 2-oxoglutarate was required for transcriptional initiation by NtcA. Given that the intracellular concentration of 2-oxoglutarate is inversely related to nitrogen availability, it is proposed that this metabolite functions as a signaling molecule that transmits information on cellular nitrogen status to NtcA and thereby regulates the transcription of genes related to nitrogen assimilation in cyanobacteria.