Integrated microtia and aural atresia management.

Objectives: To present recommendations for the coordinated evaluation and management of the hearing and reconstructive needs of patients with microtia and aural atresia. Methods: A national working group of 9 experts on microtia and atresia evaluated a working document on the evaluation and treatment of patients. Treatment options for auricular reconstruction and hearing habilitation were reviewed and integrated into a coordinated care timeline. Results: Recommendations were created for children with microtia and atresia, including diagnostic considerations, surgical and non-surgical options for hearing management and auricular reconstruction, and the treatment timeline for each option. These recommendations are based on the collective opinion of the group and are intended for otolaryngologists, audiologists, plastic surgeons, anaplastologists, and any provider caring for a patient with microtia and ear canal atresia. Close communication between atresia/hearing reconstruction surgeon and microtia repair surgeon is strongly recommended.

Osseointegrated Prosthetic Ear Reconstruction in Cases of Skin Malignancy: Technique, Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Ear reconstruction with osseointegrated prosthetic implants is a well-established method of reconstruction after resection of skin malignancies on the external ear. There is limited literature reporting technique, outcomes, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: We evaluated our outcomes over a 5-year period looking at osseointegrated prosthetic reconstruction after auriculectomy for external ear skin malignancies. We report demographics, disease characteristics, technique, and complications. The patients were surveyed looking at 6 domains: satisfaction, stability, comfort, ease of use, level of self-consciousness, and preoperative education. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients included in the study, 14 (67%) were treated for invasive melanoma (Breslow depth, >0.8mm), 4 (19%) for squamous cell carcinoma, 2 (10%) for basal cell carcinoma, and 1 (5%) for an atypical fibroxanthoma. Complications rates were low. There were no cases of infection, hematoma, or bleeding. In 2 patients (9.5%), 1 of the 3 implants failed to osseointegrate and was removed, but the prosthesis was able to be secured with the remaining 2 posts. There were 3 cases (14%) of delayed healing and 1 with excessive granulation tissue growth. Survey results showed high satisfaction in all measured domains. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of skin malignancy requiring total or subtotal auriculectomy, prosthetic ear reconstruction with osseointegrated implants is a good alternative to reconstruction with autologous tissue. Our experience demonstrates good outcomes and with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction.

External auricular and facial prosthetics: a collaborative effort of the reconstructive surgeon and anaplastologist.

Surgeons who communicate on a regular basis with an anaplastologist will benefit from having a more comprehensive practice and will be able to provide a broader depth of information to their patients contemplating facial reconstruction. When a prosthesis is chosen as the best option, it is important for the surgeon to understand that early communication with the anaplastologist can lead to improved appearance and function of the prosthesis. When the surgeon and anaplastologist work closely, their efforts complement one another in creating a final reconstructive plan that will ultimately improve the patient's quality of life.