The effect of unilateral tubal block diagnosed by hysterosalpingogram on clinical pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination cycles: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fallopian tube occlusion is a common cause of infertility, but the effect of unilateral tubal block (UTB) on pregnancy rates (PR) after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination (COH-IUI) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PR after COH-IUI among infertile women with proximal and distal UTB diagnosed by hysterosalpingogram (HSG), compared against women with bilateral patent tubes experiencing unexplained infertility. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and PUBMED from inception to 14 January 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies that report PR/cycle or cumulative PR among women with UTB and controls were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected and extracted study characteristics and data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. MAIN RESULTS: Among 2965 patients and 5749 IUI cycles across ten studies, no significant difference in PR/cycle (odds ratio, OR = 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 0.69-1.12) and cumulative PR (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62-1.04) was observed. Patients with proximal UTB demonstrated similar PR/cycle (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.68-1.66) and cumulative PR (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.75-1.62), compared with controls, whereas patients with distal UTB had significantly lower cumulative PR (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25-0.97, P = 0.04). Patients with proximal block also demonstrated significantly improved cumulative PR, compared with patients with distal block (OR=2.41, 95% CI = 1.37-4.25, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Infertile patients with proximal UTB diagnosed by HSG can expect similar pregnancy rates after COH-IUI, compared with those with bilateral tubal patency and unexplained infertility, whereas patients with distal UTB have lower odds of pregnancy. These differences may reflect inherent diagnostic limitations of HSG or differences in underlying pathologies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Meta-analysis evaluates pregnancy outcomes after COH-IUI in women with unilateral tubal block diagnosed by HSG.

Does using testicular sperm retrieval rather than ejaculated spermatozoa improve reproductive outcomes in couples with previous ART failure and poor ovarian response? A case-controlled study.

The objective of this study was to assess whether testicular-retrieved spermatozoa improve reproductive outcomes compared to fresh ejaculate in women with poor ovarian response and a history of previous ART failure. The study was performed as a retrospective case-control study at a university-based reproductive center in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Eighteen poor-responder patients were matched 3 : 1 with 54 controls. Poor responders were defined as those with ≤3 oocytes retrieved at oocyte pickup. Cases were identified as poor responders, and only those with previous IVF failure(s) as an indication for testicular-retrieved spermatozoa were included. Controls were age and cycle attempt number matched. All patients were included only once. From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2015, all patients and controls underwent an IVF cycle using ICSI with either testicular spermatozoa or ejaculated spermatozoa, respectively. Outcomes included live birth rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, oocyte number, and embryo transfer (ET) day. The results showed live birth rates, pregnancy rates, and miscarriage rates were similar. There were fewer day 2 ETs (8.5% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.01) and more day 5 blastocyst transfers (25.0% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.05) in the testicular sperm retrieval group compared to controls and thus an overall suggestion of better embryo quality in the testicular sperm group. Overall, however, the use of testicular sperm retrieval appears to add little. Women with poor ovarian response typically have a poor prognosis with respect to live birth rates, and this is further supported in this study. The suggestion of better embryo quality in the testicular-retrieved sperm group would need to be further assessed in a larger multicentered study.