Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Plast Surg ; 76 Suppl 1: S29-34, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26808741

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Various management strategies have been reported for sternal wound care; however, they exhibit limited effectiveness or are associated with severe complications. Furthermore, it is difficult for the standard pectoralis major (PM) muscle advance flap to reach the lower third of the sternum. This article examines using the PM-rectus abdominis (RA) bipedicle muscle flap to treat lower-third deep sternal wound infection. METHODS: The outcomes of patients who received a PM-RA bipedicle muscle flap harvest at our institution between 1996 and 2014 were reviewed. The method involves performing a subfascial and subperiosteal dissection of the PM to elevate the muscle flap. Blunt dissection may be performed carefully under an endoscope. Endoscope visualization enables us to identify the critical structures lateral to the PM muscle. In addition, the connective tissue to the RA muscle was preserved. Continuity was carefully preserved from the pectoral-thoracoepigastric fascia to the anterior rectus sheath. The flap could then be transposed to fill the lower-third sternal tissue defect with ease. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients, with a mean age of 71 years (45-89 years), were treated using an endoscope-assisted PM-RA bipedicle muscle flap harvest. Wound microbiology of the 12 patients revealed that 3 patients had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 4 had S. aureus, 1 had coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, 1 had Escherichia coli, 1 had Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 had Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and 1 had a mixed growth of organisms. One instance of recurrent sternal infection was identified among the patients. Moreover, 1 patient died from heart failure 5 weeks after surgery, but the coverage of the sternal wound was successful. Accidental injury to the surrounding neurovascular structure of the patients was avoided, and only 10 to 15 minutes was required to divide the PM muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Performing this harvest method under endoscopic assistance has several advantages, such as preventing excess traction of the skin edge to diminish the skin slough. This method could be an effective alternative for harvesting the PM-RA bipedicle muscle flap to reconstruct the lower-third sternal wound.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Mediastinitis/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Esternotomía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endoscopios , Endoscopía/instrumentación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/etiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mediastinitis/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculos Pectorales/cirugía , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/etiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/cirugía , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/instrumentación , Recto del Abdomen/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/etiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis/etiología , Tuberculosis/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA