Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (LSG): A Comparative Review.

Obesity is one of the most debilitating conditions. In a quest to mitigate disease severity, various interventions have been proposed, with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and laparoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (LSG) being among the recent interventions that have received growing attention. This systematic review sought to conduct a comparative analysis regarding the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of both interventions. The study involved a systematic review in which key search engines were used to select articles documented and published in the last decade. The articles for inclusion were those existing as peer-reviewed studies touching upon the aforementioned subject, with both controlled and uncontrolled trials included. Furthermore, there was the implementation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol that governs systematic reviews, in which the article selection process entailed four key procedures in the form of identification, screening, determining eligibility, and the inclusion process. In the findings, the selected articles documented mixed outcomes, but a common denominator was that the safety profile of ESG tends to be superior to that of LSG due to the observations that ESG comes with fewer adverse events such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and severe nausea and vomiting. However, the majority of the studies contended that LSG proved superior to ESG in terms of effectiveness and efficacy. Hence, individuals with mild-to-moderate obesity are more likely to benefit from ESG, but those with severe obesity whose goal is to achieve long-term weight management might benefit more from LSG. In conclusion, the management of obesity and the decision to employ ESG or LSG ought to be patient-centered and dictated by factors such as patient preferences, safety, and the sustainability of the devised plan of care.

Revision Endoscopic Gastroplasty: An Overview and Review of Literature.

The main aim of this paper was to examine the efficacy and safety of revision endoscopic gastroplasty and some of the adverse events likely to arise from the procedure, as well as the implications for future scholarly research. The study is a systematic review in which the PRISMA protocol was used to govern the article's inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies include those on revising endoscopic gastroplasty's effectiveness and safety. The studies were selected based on multiple parameters. The outcome included weight recidivism, excessive BMI loss, and absolute, total, or percentage weight loss. The outcome of this review confirmed that revision endoscopic gastroplasty is effective and safe. Mainly, revision endoscopic gastroplasty (R-EG) was found to counter-weight recidivism, especially short-term and mid-term. However, there is a need for additional scholarly investigations that would last several years to decades to inform the long-term efficacy of R-EG with precision.

Endoscopic Transcecal Appendectomy (ETA): A Literature Review on Risks and Benefits.

Different colorectal lesions have attracted different procedures in their management. One of the novel approaches that have been documented in recent times is endoscopic transcecal appendectomy (ETA). ETA is an endoscopic and less invasive approach to the excision of lesions within the appendix. The appendix is also completely resected in the process. The main aim of this paper is to establish some of the benefits and risks that come with ETA. The study was conducted from a systematic review perspective using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, which governs the implementation of systematic reviews. Key considerations in the PRISMA framework used in this article include identifying the articles, screening them, and determining their eligibility and their final inclusion or exclusion based on the specified criteria. To arrive at relevant articles, some keywords were used in the various search engines of the databases that were consulted. Some of the keywords that were used included ETA, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), adverse events, risks, safety, efficacy, and the appendiceal orifice. It was established that the key benefits of the ETA include the ability to avoid postoperative appendicitis and residual lesions in tissue. On the other hand, some risks that could come with ETA were found to include potential tumor seeding and postoperative bleeding. However, the key study limitation is that most of the referenced studies in this literature review are retrospective case series and case reports that are prone to selection bias. Furthermore, most ETA procedures in this literature review were performed by a few experienced and highly skilled endoscopists, making the ability to make such results generalizable to all endoscopists and patient populations a debatable issue. In the future, there is a need for more multicenter and large studies to be conducted with longer follow-up periods to ascertain the results obtained in this review. This will ensure a more informed decision-making process for or against ETA implementation in real-world clinical environments.

The Use of Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Review of the Literature.

Around the world, about 15 to 40% of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) rely on cannabis and cannabinoids to reduce the need for other medications, as well as increase appetite and reduce pain. Whereas more and more patients continue to report benefits accruing from cannabis and cannabinoid usage in IBD, agreement relative to the use of cannabis and its derivatives in IBD remains unclear. This paper reviewed the interplay between cannabinoid use and IBD disease treatment, remission, or symptom relief. The study was conducted from a systematic review perspective. It involved consulting literature from published original research articles, noting outcomes, and performing a meta-analysis to identify trends and draw conclusions. The selected articles were those that had been published in a 10-year period ranging between 2012 and 2022. The motivation was to ensure recency and also relevance to contemporary scientific research and clinical environment practices. Indeed, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework helped in answering the focal question of the investigation, which revolved around whether cannabinoids are beneficial to IBD treatment and to what extent. The aim of using this protocol was to ensure the satisfaction of the article exclusion and inclusion criteria, as well as ensure the utilization of articles directly contributing to the central subject under investigation. In the findings, it was established that on the one hand, cannabinoid usage in IBD treatment comes with promising results as reported in the majority of the selected studies which reported reduced clinical complications which were assessed using Mayo scores, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score, weight gain, enhanced patient health perception, Lichtiger Index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index or general wellbeing. On the other hand, cannabinoid use remains questionable because evidence of high quality is yet to surface vividly, especially in terms of the mode of administration and the appropriate dose. It is also notable that the findings were characterized by a state of high heterogeneity in terms of the study designs of the studies that were selected, disease activity indices, the duration of treatment by different scholarly researchers, the difference in the modes of administration of cannabinoid and cannabis by different researchers, variations in cannabis dosage, differences in the selected studies' inclusion criteria, and variations in their case definitions. The implication is that whereas the efficacy of cannabinoid use in IBD treatment was reported in most studies, outcome generalizability from the review was highly likely to be restricted. In the future, it is recommended that randomized controlled trials center, set universal parameters for IBD treatment using cannabis and cannabinoids to determine intervention safety and effectiveness as well as having homogenous outcomes that can be compared between different studies. In so doing, the appropriate dose and ideal mode of administration of cannabis and its derivatives might be discerned, ensuring relevance based on patient characteristics such as gender and age, as well as the appropriate administration mode and dose as per IBD symptom severity.

Endoscopic Gastric Sleeve: A Review of Literature.

For morbid obesity, one of the treatment options that have been deemed the most effective is bariatric surgery. Specifically, endoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (ESG) has emerged as one of the minimally invasive procedures for weight loss to be developed recently. In this procedure, there is the endoscopic placement of sutures in a quest to ensure reductions in the stomach volume. In this review, the main aim was to review the literature concerning ESG's efficacy and safety. Secondary sources of data were used and electronic databases were searched to identify articles focused on assessing the safety or efficacy of ESG. They included several databases such as Clinicaltrials.gov, Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), and MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, or MEDLARS Online) to select relevant articles. Both the titles and abstracts of the articles were used to determine their inclusion or exclusion from the current review. Additionally, some keywords were used to search and obtain relevant articles such as: ESG, obesity, bariatric surgery, and total body weight loss. This review relied on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework for the identification of articles, screening, determination of eligibility, and inclusion and exclusion as deemed appropriate. From the findings, the review established that ESG is effective when used as an alternative intervention for obesity. The beneficial effects are felt particularly in terms of the procedure's capacity to ensure that the total body weight loss mean percentage is significant. Apart from the benefit of ensuring weight loss, ESG was also found to impair gastric emptying, pose metabolic effects that are key to controlling obesity-associated metabolic dysregulation, and the ability to increase satiety. However, the procedure was documented to yield a few adverse events in some studies. Some of the notable adverse events include pulmonary embolism, potential pneumoperitoneum, and possible post-procedure leak in the posterior aspect of the gastric fundus as sutures exert tension and also cause thin walls. Emerging as a minimally-invasive procedure, ESG is a cost-effective alternative through which weight loss can be achieved significantly in obese populations. It leads to a slowdown of gastric emptying, causes an increase in satiety, and leads to an improvement in the metabolic profile. Therefore, for obese individuals not undergoing bariatric surgery, ESG can be an ideal treatment option, including individuals in need of a bridge to surgery and also those diagnosed with moderate obesity. Overall, when it comes to the management of obesity, this review established that ESG provides a paradigm shift targeting existing therapeutic gaps.