A stratified randomized double-blind phase II trial of celecoxib for treating patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: The potential predictive value of VEGF serum levels: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of celecoxib on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN 3). This is a NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study with translational biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CIN 3 were randomized to celecoxib 400mg once daily (67 patients) or placebo (63 patients) for 14-18weeks. The primary outcome measure was histologic regression. A test of equal probabilities of success between two therapies was conducted, using Fisher's Exact Test at alpha=10% and 90% power when the treatment arm boosted the probability of success by 30%. Translational analysis included cervical tissue HPV genotyping, COX-2 expression in biopsies, and serum celecoxib and VEGF levels. RESULTS: In primary analysis, histologic regression was not significantly higher in the celecoxib group (40%) than in the placebo group (34.1%). However, exploratory analyses suggest patients with high serum VEGF levels exhibited greater regression in the celecoxib arm (47.3%) than in the placebo arm (14.3%). Regression rates were similar by treatment group in patients with low VEGF. VEGF levels increased over time in the placebo group, but remained the same in the treatment group. COX-2 expression in cervical biopsies declined from pre-treatment to the end of treatment with celecoxib; it did not change with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib at 400mg once daily for 14-18weeks did not significantly decrease the severity of CIN 3 compared with placebo except, possibly, in subjects with high baseline VEGF. Therefore, serum VEGF levels might identify patients who may benefit from celecoxib or other therapies, personalizing future chemoprevention trials for CIN 3.

A phase II study of paclitaxel for the treatment of ovarian stromal tumors: An NRG Oncology/ Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the probability of complete clinical response and toxicity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in measurable disease patients with malignant tumors of the ovarian stroma, and to evaluate the value of inhibin for predicting response. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with histologically confirmed ovarian stromal tumor were enrolled from 2000 to 2013. Patients were required to have measurable recurrent disease, and to have received only one prior chemotherapy regimen. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 was administered over a 3 hour infusion, cycling every 21 days. Inhibin levels were drawn within two weeks of initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Of 31 women enrolled, there was only one complete response (3.2%), and partial response in eight of 31 cases (25.8%). The pretreatment inhibin level for the single patient who had complete response was 88 pg/mL. Median progression-free survival was 10.0 months and overall survival was 73.6 months. Myelosuppression was common with 12 of 31 patients (38.7%) suffering grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, leukopenia, or anemia. CONCLUSION: There were too few complete responses to warrant continued evaluation of paclitaxel as a single agent treatment for women with recurrent malignant ovarian stromal tumors with measurable disease according to the primary objective of the study. Toxicity of the regimen was acceptable. Pretreatment inhibin is not a reliable tumor marker as it was not elevated in the majority of patients.

Contemporary phase III clinical trial endpoints in advanced ovarian cancer: assessing the pros and cons of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Among gynecologic cancers, ovarian cancer provides the greatest challenge because 75% to 80% of patients present with stage III/IV disease. Over the last 40 years, a series of large trials conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group and other cooperative groups has produced striking improvements in patient outcome; but the majority still dies of their disease. Further research in both the laboratory and the clinic is essential to continued improvement in patient management. Clinical trials, however, have become a major challenge because of issues with trial endpoints. Historically, overall survival (OS) has been regarded as the "gold standard" of endpoints. Lack of effective treatment for patients who progressed on or recurred after front-line therapy allowed trials to avoid obfuscation of OS by post-progression therapy. More recently, studies have identified over 20 agents active against ovarian cancer. Reasonable evidence shows that effective post-progression therapy with multiple lines of active agents can render the survival endpoint uninterpretable. Two other endpoints avoid this problem. The objective response rate, assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), is an accepted endpoint for accelerated approval in ovarian cancer. More importantly, progression-free survival (PFS), measured from study entry to progression of disease, avoids post-progression therapy completely. Without effective post-progression therapy (prior to 1990), data show that PFS is a surrogate for OS. Recent experience with 4 large trials of bevacizumab shows that PFS can be accurately assessed if progression is clearly defined and if timing of assessments is consistent in all study arms. Acceptance of PFS as the optimal endpoint for ovarian cancer trials by investigators and regulatory agencies is crucial to further advances in management because effective post-progression therapy has rendered differences in OS virtually impossible to assess reliably.

Evaluation of tamoxifen in persistent or recurrent nonsquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

This study was undertaken to estimate the antitumor activity of tamoxifen in patients with persistent or recurrent nonsquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Furthermore, the nature and degree of adverse effects from tamoxifen in this cohort of individuals was examined. Tamoxifen citrate was to be administered at a dose of 10 mg per orally twice a day until disease progression or unacceptable side effects prevented further therapy. A total of 34 patients (median age: 49 years) were registered to this trial; two were declared ineligible. Thirty-two patients were evaluable for adverse effects and 27 were evaluable for response. There were only six grades 3 and 4 adverse effects reported: leukopenia (in one patient), anemia (in two), emesis (in one), gastrointestinal distress (in one), and neuropathy (in one). The objective response rate was 11.1%, with one complete and two partial responses. In conclusion, tamoxifen appears to have minimal activity in nonsquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Cisplatin as initial chemotherapy in ovarian carcinosarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: Carcinosarcomas of the ovary are rare; hence, although most patients recur after surgical resection or have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, only anecdotal information is available concerning the activity of cytotoxic drugs against these lesions. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) initiated a concerted effort to study cytotoxic therapy for these cancers in 1976. This report presents data on cisplatin, the first of the agents to be studied in this disease. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six eligible patients with ovarian carcinosarcoma received cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Among 44 patients evaluable for response, one complete (2%) and eight partial (18%) responses resulted. An additional 10 (23%) patients exhibited stable disease, while 25 (57%) had increasing disease. Median progression-free survival in 130 patients evaluable for this endpoint was 5.2 months. Median survival in the same 130 patients was 11.7 months. Adverse effects >/=grade 2 among the 132 patients evaluable for toxicity included leukopenia (14%), neutropenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (2%), anemia (10%), nausea and vomiting (40%), azotemia (3%), neurotoxicity (4%), fever (2%), and tinnitus (1%). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the first objective evidence that cisplatin is active as an initial therapy for patients who have carcinosarcoma of the ovary. The overall response rate (20%) is similar to that seen in carcinosarcomas of the uterus.