Local control correlates with overall survival in radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Local control (LC) is an important outcome of local cancer therapy, besides overall survival (OS). We conducted a comprehensive literature search to investigate whether a high LC rate contributes to good OS in radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies in patients receiving radiotherapy for peripheral ES-NSCLC, mainly staged as T1-2N0M0 were included for a systematic review. Relevant information was collected including, dose fractionation, T stage, median age, 3-year LC, cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and OS. Correlations between outcomes and clinical variables were evaluated. RESULTS: After screening, 101 data points from 87 studies including 13,435 patients were selected for the quantitative synthesis. Univariate meta-regression analysis revealed that the coefficients between the 3-year LC and 3-year DFS, DMFS, CSS, and OS were 0.753 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.307-1.199; p < 0.001), 0.360 (95% CI: 0.128-0.593; p = 0.002), 0.766 (95% CI: 0.489-1.044; p < 0.001), and 0.574 (95% CI: 0.275-0.822; p < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the 3-year LC (coefficient, 0.561; 95% CI: 0.254-0.830; p < 0.001) and T1 proportion (coefficient, 0.207; 95% CI: 0.030-0.385; p = 0.012) were significantly associated with the 3-year OS and CSS (coefficient for 3-year LC, 0.720; 95% CI: 0.468-0.972; p < 0.001 and T1 proportion, 0.002; 95% CI: 0.000-0.003; p = 0.012). Toxicities ≥ grade 3 were low (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Three-year LC was correlated with three-year OS in patients receiving radiotherapy for ES-NSCLC. A 5% increase in 3-year LC is expected to improve the 3-year CSS and OS rates by 3.8% and 2.8%, respectively.

A case of a pregnant woman with locally advanced cervical esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

The information of definitive radiotherapy for a pregnant woman with malignancy was limited; however, it was reported to be potentially feasible with minimal risks. We performed definitive chemoradiotherapy for a pregnant woman with locally advanced cervical esophageal cancer. Feasibility of radiotherapy and safety of fetus were confirmed by the phantom study estimating fetal dose, and monitoring it in each radiotherapy session. The planned chemoradiotherapy completely eradicated esophageal cancer while preserving her laryngopharyngeal function. A female infant was delivered by cesarian section after planned chemoradiotherapy, and she grew without any apparent disorders 2 years after chemoradiotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy might be one of the treatment options for a pregnant woman with cervical esophageal cancer especially wishing the preservation of laryngopharyngeal function.

Relationship between Dose Prescription Methods and Local Control Rate in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Variations in dose prescription methods in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) make it difficult to properly compare the outcomes of published studies. We conducted a comprehensive search of the published literature to summarize the outcomes by discerning the relationship between local control (LC) and dose prescription sites. We systematically searched PubMed to identify observational studies reporting LC after SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC. The correlations between LC and four types of biologically effective doses (BED) were evaluated, which were calculated from nominal, central, and peripheral prescription points and, from those, the average BED. To evaluate information on SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC, 188 studies were analyzed. The number of relevant articles increased over time. The use of an inhomogeneity correction was mentioned in less than half of the articles, even among the most recent. To evaluate the relationship between the four BEDs and LC, 33 studies were analyzed. Univariate meta-regression revealed that only the central BED significantly correlated with the 3-year LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC (p = 0.03). As a limitation, tumor volume, which might affect the results of this study, could not be considered due to a lack of data. In conclusion, the central dose prescription is appropriate for evaluating the correlation between the dose and LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC. The standardization of SBRT dose prescriptions is desirable.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score studies.

AIM: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has shown excellent local control (LC), as has radiofrequency ablation (RFA). As no randomized controlled trial has compared SBRT and RFA for HCC, data from a propensity score matched study (PSMS) are valuable. However, the results varied greatly and depended on composing factors of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging (BCLC-factors) adjusted. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analyses of the studies focusing on BCLC-factors matching. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane database, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing RFA and SBRT using propensity scores. The hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and LC from BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched PSMS were pooled. Heterogeneity between the data from these studies was assessed. RESULTS: Three BCLC-factor-matched studies were identified. Stereotactic body radiotherapy led to comparable OS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; p = 0.24; I2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.56) and significantly better LC (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51; p < 0.001; I2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.67). We also identified three additional BCLC-factor-unmatched studies (HR of OS, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.65; p < 0.0001; I2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.63). However, considerable heterogeneity was observed for HR of OS between BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched studies (I2  = 92.6%; p for heterogeneity, 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: When BCLC-factors were properly adjusted, the results of the meta-analysis revealed equivalent OS and better LC for SBRT compared with RFA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy could be an alternative treatment option for HCC.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With a High Maximum Dose Improves Local Control, Cancer-Specific Death, and Overall Survival in Peripheral Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether delivery of a high biologically effective dose (BED) to primary tumors affects systemic outcomes of cancer-specific death (CSD) and overall survival (OS) rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among consecutive ES-NSCLC patients treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2019, we retrospectively identified patients who received a prescription of 50 to 60 Gy in 5 fractions with maximum doses of 62.5 to 100 Gy. Patients were categorized by maximum BED within the planning target volume with a threshold dose of 200 Gy. Outcomes were analyzed in all and matched patients. RESULTS: Overall, 433 patients were eligible, and 262 and 171 patients were categorized into HighBED and LowBED groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, pairs of 154 patients were selected. Median follow-up times for the HighBED and LowBED groups were 52.3 months (range, 0.8-107.2 months) and 121.6 months (range, 3.0-162.8 months), respectively. The local recurrence rate in the HighBED group was significantly lower than that in the LowBED group (5-year rate, 1.3% and 7.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.65; P = .011). Rates of any recurrence and CSD in the HighBED group were significantly lower (5-year any recurrence: 18.1% and 32.1%; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83; P = .0058; 5-year CSD: 9.5% and 21.8%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.70; P = .002), and OS in the HighBED group was significantly better compared with the LowBED group (5-year rate: 61.7% and 51.8%; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.00; P = .047). CONCLUSION: In patients with peripheral ES-NSCLC, SBRT with a high maximum dose may improve not only local control, but also any recurrence, CSD, and OS rates without increased toxicity. Further trials designed to evaluate whether higher intensity SBRT increases local control rates and contributes to improved CSD and OS outcomes are anticipated.

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Completely Resected Masaoka/Masaoka-Koga Stage II/III Thymoma Improves Overall Survival: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 4746 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on completely resected Masaoka/Masaoka-Koga (M/MK) stage II/III thymomas. METHODS: We systematically searched four online databases and included studies that compared surgery alone versus surgery plus a PORT for completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were evaluated as the primary and secondary end points, respectively. We performed a subgroup analysis for OS with respect to M/MK stage II, III, and inseparable II/III cases. A generic inverse variance meta-analysis using a random model was conducted. RESULTS: Five studies including 4746 patients (among them, 2408 patients received PORT) met our selection criteria. A meta-analysis of these five studies revealed that PORT was associated with a significantly better OS (HR = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.97). Subgroup analyses for M/MK stage II disease (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.91, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.80) and M/MK stage III disease (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.84) revealed similar results. PORT was not associated with an improved disease-free survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.33, p = 0.83, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence from observational studies suggests PORT for patients with completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. A randomized trial is warranted.