Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Mal Respir ; 40(7): 555-563, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635020

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients often perceive flexible bronchoscopy as an unpleasant procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of virtual reality (VR) hypnosis on tolerance to flexible bronchoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, monocentric study comparing flexible bronchoscopy with VR-induced hypnosis to the usual procedure. Patient tolerance was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) before and after the procedure and, finally, willingness to repeat the examination under the same conditions (WTR). RESULTS: Among the 70 patients included, 34 were randomized to the VR hypnosis group and 36 to the control group. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of modification of the pre-/post-bronchoscopy VAS for anxiety, pain, cough, choking, nausea and overall discomfort, or modification of the STAI score and WTR. Subgroup analysis among patients who were more anxious before the procedure revealed a trend toward reduced anxiety in the VR hypnosis group. CONCLUSION: This study did not observe any effect of VR hypnosis on the tolerance of patients during routine flexible bronchoscopy. However, VR hypnosis may be beneficial in patients with higher anxiety score before bronchoscopy, a hypothesis that needs to be confirmed by further studies with a larger number of subjects.


Asunto(s)
Hipnosis , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Broncoscopía/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/prevención & control
2.
Acta Gastroenterol Belg ; 79(2): 257-61, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27382949

RESUMEN

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare but life-threatening complement system-related disorder, characterized by renal failure, non-immune haemolytic anaemia and thrombo-cytopenia. We report on a young woman who developed a pancreatitis-induced aHUS following a routine procedure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The patient was successively treated by 2 plasma exchanges with fresh frozen plasma and eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody designed to block terminal complement activation. The last treatment resulted in the immediate improvement of haemolytic parameters and to the definitive suspension of plasma exchanges. This is likely the first description of the use of a complement inhibitor to treat post-pancreatitis aHUS. We discussed treatment options and concluded that eculizumab could be a beneficial alternative to plasma exchanges in the management of such complications.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/terapia , Inactivadores del Complemento/uso terapéutico , Intercambio Plasmático , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/etiología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/terapia , Adulto Joven
3.
Anaesthesia ; 68(9): 917-23, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23837860

RESUMEN

In this prospective study, cardiac output was measured in 38 intensive care unit patients before and after a fluid challenge, using both pulse contour analysis (Nexfin(®); BMEYE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and transthoracic echocardiography. The ability of the Nexfin device to detect significant changes in the velocity-time integral was evaluated. The pulse wave could not be detected by the Nexfin device in five patients (13%), leaving 33 patients for analysis. The Nexfin device adequately tracked changes in the velocity-time integral in 20 (61%) patients. Using a cut-off of a 10% increase in cardiac output estimated by the Nexfin or by echocardiography, the sensitivity of the Nexfin device to detect a response to fluid challenge was 47%, with specificity 81% and accuracy 64%. The percentage error between the Nexfin and echocardiography was 448%; lower limit of agreement -48% (95% CI -62 to -36%) and upper limit of agreement, 32% (95% CI 20-45%). We conclude that the Nexfin device does not adequately track changes in cardiac output in critically ill patients.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Coloides/administración & dosificación , Soluciones Cristaloides , Ecocardiografía/normas , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Soluciones Isotónicas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pletismografía/instrumentación , Pletismografía/normas , Pletismografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pulso Arterial , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA