Outcome of EGFR inhibitors treatment in advanced NSCLC patients, not enrolled in clinical trials.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have become a treatment after first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. We assessed the predictive and prognostic role of EGFR and Kras mutations in NSCLC patients treated with TKIs after progression, not included in clinical trials. Gefitinib 250 mg or Erlotinib 150 mg per os were administered to 70 patients. Radiological assessment was performed every six weeks. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 21.4% and 24.3% of patients, respectively. At multivariate analysis, Kras mutation was positively associated with progression-free survival (PFS; HR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.96; p=0.027) and, less clearly, with response (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 0.98-3.45; p=0.057) and survival (HR=0.74, 95% CI:0.54-1.02; p=0.066). EGFR mutation influenced positively PFS (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.47-1.02; p=0.06), but not survival. In conclusion, in our unselected patients mutation of Kras correlated with a better outcome. The small number of patients may explain some discrepancies with data in literature.

Multicenter phase III randomized trial of polychemotherapy (CVD regimen) versus the same chemotherapy (CT) plus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha2b in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The addition of cytokines to chemotherapy (CT) has obtained encouraging but contradictory results in metastatic melanoma. In this phase III trial, we compared the effects of CT [cisplatin, vindesine and dacarbazine (CVD)] with those of concurrent biochemotherapy (bioCT) consisting of CVD plus interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 untreated metastatic melanoma patients were randomized, 75 on arm A (cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1-3, vindesine 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 1-3), and 76 on arm B (same CVD scheme plus interferon-alpha2b on days 1-5 and interleukin-2 on days 1-5 and 8-15, both administered subcutaneously), either recycled every 3 weeks. Response was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS: Ten percent of the patients were alive at a median of 52 months from start of therapy. We observed a response rate (RR) of 21% on arm A versus 33% on arm B; three patients (4%) given bioCT had complete responses (CRs). Median time to progression (TTP) was identical; median overall survival (OS) time was 12 months on arm A and 11 months on arm B. CONCLUSIONS: BioCT is not better than CT alone; the trend in favor of the bioCT in terms of RR did not translate into better TTP or OS. Therefore, bioCT cannot be recommended as standard first-line therapy for metastatic melanoma.

Phase II study of weekly oxaliplatin and high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) has proven efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although the optimal dosage and administration schedule are still unclear. This phase II trial investigated the tolerability and activity of weekly oxaliplatin, high-dose infusional 5-FU and LV in pretreated patients with metastatic CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received weekly courses of i.v. oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 (1-h infusion), LV 100 mg/m2 (1-h infusion) and 5-FU 2100 mg/m2 (24-h infusion) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NCI-CTC criteria were used for assessment of side-effects (at each cycle) and WHO criteria for assessment of tumour response (every 8 cycles). For descriptive purposes, time to progression, overall survival and duration of objective response were also calculated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled and received a total of 606 cycles (median 13/patient, range 4-33), and 70% of courses (421/606) were delivered at 100% of the planned dose. The most frequent side-effects were gastrointestinal and neurological and incidence rates were: diarrhoea 66% (grade III: 29%), nausea/vomiting 54%, neurotoxicity 34% (grade III: 2%), fatigue 27%, mucositis 22%, leucopenia 14%. No grade IV toxicity was observed. Objective response rates were: partial response 23% (10 patients), stable disease 59% (26) and progressive disease 11% (5). Median time to progression was 7 months, overall survival 13 months and the duration of partial response and stable disease were 9 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that this regimen has a favourable tolerability profile and is an active combination in the pretreated metastatic CRC patient, deserving further evaluation in phase III trials.