Effects of pentagastrin and the cold pressor test on the acoustic startle response and pupillary function in man.

Pentagastrin, a cholecystokinin2 (CCK2) receptor agonist, evokes autonomic and subjective features of anxiety in healthy volunteers. The present experiments examined the effects of pentagastrin on two responses with known sensitivity to another anxiogenic procedure (threat of electric shock): the acoustic startle response and the pupillary light reflex. The effects of pentagastrin were compared with those of the cold pressor test, a procedure known to elicit sympathetic activation. Twelve healthy males (18-35 years) participated in two experiments each consisting of two sessions in which they received (1) pentagastrin (0.3 microg/kg, i.v.) and a control infusion (saline), and (2) cold pressor test (90 s hand immersion at 4 degrees C) and a control immersion (37 degrees C), using a balanced single-blind protocol. Electromyographic responses of the orbicularis oculi to 40 ms, 1 kHz, 115 dB tones ('startle responses') [Experiment 1], and miotic responses to 200 ms, 0.43 mW/cm2 light pulses [Experiment 2] were recorded before, during and after the infusions and hand immersions. Heart rate, blood pressure and subjective feelings were also recorded. The amplitude of the startle response was not significantly affected by pentagastrin, but was reduced during the cold pressor test. Resting pupil diameter increased during both pentagastrin infusion and the cold pressor test, but neither procedure altered the amplitude of the light reflex. Tachycardia, increased blood pressure and subjective anxiety were induced by both pentagastrin and the cold pressor test. The cardiovascular and mydriatic effects of pentagastrin and the cold pressor test are consistent with the known ability of these treatments to induce sympathetic activation. The anxiety induced by these treatments, unlike anxiety induced by threat of electric shock, was not accompanied by potentiation of the startle response or reduction of the miotic response. The results indicate that different anxiogenic procedures do not have equivalent effects on these reflexes.

Comparison of the effects of moclobemide and selegiline on tyramine-evoked mydriasis in man.

AIMS: To examine the feasibility of using the human iris in vivo for the assessment of the interaction between tyramine and monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors. To examine the relative roles of the two forms of MAO in terminating the response to sympathomimetic amines in the iris, by comparing the effects of single oral doses of moclobemide, a selective MAO-A inhibitor, and selegiline, a selective MAO-B inhibitor, on mydriatic responses to tyramine. METHODS: Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in three monthly sessions, each associated with ingestion of one capsule (moclobemide 450 mg, selegiline 10 mg, or placebo), according to a double-blind, balanced, cross-over design. Tyramine hydrochloride eye-drops (75 mM, 2 x 10 microl) were instilled three times in the left conjuctival sac at 40 min intervals. Pupil diameter was monitored with a binocular infrared television pupillometer before and for 4.5 h after ingestion of the capsule. The pupillary response to tyramine was expressed as the area under the pupil diameter x time curve (arbitrary units). A blood sample was taken before and 2 h after ingestion of the capsule, for the assay of platelet MAO-B activity, and plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) concentration, an index of MAO-A activity. Platelet MAO activity was assayed radiochemically, using [14C]-phenylethylamine as substrate, and plasma DHPG by high performance liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.). The results were analysed using analysis of variance with repeated measures, followed by Bonferroni's corrected t-test, using a significance criterion of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Both moclobemide and selegiline, compared with placebo, caused significant miosis in the right (untreated) eye. The changes in pupil diameter (mm +/- s.e. mean) from the pretreatment measurement were: placebo -0.09 +/- 0.07, moclobemide -0.52 +/- 0.09, selegiline -0.26 +/- 0.1. The mydriatic response to tyramine was potentiated by moclobemide, compared with the response recorded in the presence of placebo. The responses to tyramine (arbitrary units +/- s.e. mean) were: placebo 77.08 +/- 11.65, moclobemide 140.25 +/- 18.9, selegiline 72.75 +/- 12.35. Both moclobemide and selegiline significantly reduced platelet MAO activity, compared with placebo. The changes in platelet MAO activity (nmol h(-1) mg(-1) protein +/- s.e. mean) from the pretreatment level were: placebo 0.5 +/- 0.62, moclobemide -6.7 +/- 0.66, selegiline -17.7 +/- 0.87. Moclobemide significantly reduced plasma DHPG concentration, compared with placebo. The changes in plasma DHPG concentration (nmol l(-1) +/- s.e. mean) from the pretreatment level were: placebo -0.01 +/- 0.24, moclobemide -4.98 +/- 0.32, selegiline -0.51 +/- 0.26. CONCLUSIONS: The potentiation of tyramine-evoked mydriasis by moclobemide is likely to reflect the inhibition of MAO-A activity in the iris, consistent with the activity of this enzyme in sympathetic nerve terminals. The lack of effect of selegiline on tyramine-evoked mydriasis argues against a role of MAO-B in terminating the effects of sympathomimetic amines in the iris. The effects of the two drugs on platelet MAO activity and plasma DHPG concentration are in agreement with previous reports and consistent with the relative selectivity of moclobemide for MAO-A and of selegiline for MAO-B. The miosis caused by the two MAO inhibitors is likely to be due to a central sympatholytic action of the drugs.

Electrocardiograph QT lengthening associated with epileptiform EEG discharges--a role in sudden unexplained death in epilepsy?

EEG with co-registered electrocardiography was recorded during at least two interictal epileptiform EEG discharges in each of 11 patients who later suffered from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), and from another 11 age and sex matched patients, also with uncontrolled tonic-clonic seizures, drawn from the same centre who were still alive at the time of investigation (non-SUDEPs). A corrected QT interval for rate (QTc) was obtained and a mean value calculated for the period immediately prior to discharge, during discharge and immediately post discharge. Mean QTc was also obtained interictally without discharge. There was a significant (P = 0.01) increase in the mean QTc during discharge compared to that measured interictally without discharge for the whole population of SUDEPs and non-SUDEPs, and this was maintained for the SUDEPs alone (P = 0.02) but did not hold for the non-SUDEP group alone. Although reaching statistical significance, increases in mean QTc in SUDEP patients only exceeded currently accepted upper limits in one case, and then only marginally. The clinical significance of these findings merits further investigation.

Rechallenge with lamotrigine after initial rash.

Eight patients rechallenged with lamotrigine after initial exposure which resulted in a skin rash are reported. On reintroduction of the lamotrigine, six of the patients had no recurrence of the rash. Of the other two patients, one had the occurrence of a mild fluctuating and qualitatively different skin rash on rechallenge. The other patient had developed a dose-related rash on initial challenge resulting in a dose reduction. The first attempt to re-increase the dose resulted in reappearance of the rash which again disappeared on dose reduction. However a further attempt to re-increase the dose did not result in reappearance of a rash. It is suggested that patients who experience a rash but good therapeutic response to lamotrigine might be considered for re-dosing.