Examining the Effectiveness of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in People With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are commonly used in oncology clinical practice and have shown benefits for patients and health resource use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the isolated effect of administering ePROs to patients with cancer versus a control condition. METHODS: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Randomized controlled trials evaluating ePRO interventions that aimed to improve health-related outcomes among patients with cancer were included. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and the secondary outcomes were symptoms, hospital admissions, unplanned visits, chemotherapy completion, survival, and satisfaction with care. The effect sizes of ePROs on health-related outcomes were analyzed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs using a random effects model. RESULTS: The search identified 10,965 papers, of which 19 (0.17%) from 15 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed an improvement in HRQOL at 3 months, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (SMD 0.28, 95% CI -1.22 to 1.78), and at 6 months, assessed using various HRQOL measures (SMD 0.07, 95% CI -1.24 to 1.39). The results should be interpreted with caution, given the wide 95% CIs. Of the 15 studies, 9 (60%) reported a positive signal on HRQOL, with two-thirds of the studies (n=6, 67%) including tailored patient advice and two-thirds (n=6, 67%) using clinician alert systems. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed a potential improvement in HRQOL at 6 months and in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores at 3 months for studies that included tailored advice and clinician alerts, suggesting that these elements may improve ePRO effectiveness. The findings will provide guidance for future use and help health care professionals choose the most suitable ePRO features for their patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020175007; https://tinyurl.com/5cwmy3j6.

Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients' Experiences of Surgical Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Recommended treatment for advanced ovarian cancer involves a combination of debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Surgery places a significant burden on a patient's physical, social, sexual, and emotional wellbeing. Existing research exploring the impact of surgery is often limited to questionnaire administration with large gaps between data collection time points, missing key aspects of the perioperative period. Little is known of the experience of ovarian cancer surgical treatment from a patient perspective. This research aims to qualitatively explore advanced ovarian cancer patients' experience of surgery and identify areas in which quality of life may be impacted. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone or face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients who had undergone combined surgical and chemotherapy treatment. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty ovarian cancer patients who had undergone debulking surgery participated in interviews lasting between 33 and 68 minutes. Qualitative analysis generated five key themes: (1) care services; (2) experiences of a stoma; (3) preoperative experience; (4) impact of surgery; and (5) coping mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the patient experience of surgical treatment for advanced ovarian cancer can help inform and improve future care. This research explored the ways in which a patient's quality of life is impacted by surgery and highlights areas in which further support may be needed. Knowledge of the patient experience may also aid decision-making for both clinicians and patients when considering different treatment pathways. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Results highlighted two crucial points in the surgical pathway where patients' need for emotional support was significant: during pre-op and recovering from surgery as an inpatient. Nursing staff are key to providing reassurance during this time. Specialized stoma nurses were also essential for supporting patients to adapt to their stomas both physically and psychologically.

Development and validation of a patient reported experience measure for experimental cancer medicines (PREM-ECM) and their carers (PREM-ECM-Carer).

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to develop a validated Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) to capture patient and carer experience during participation in experimental cancer medicine trials (ECM): called PREM-ECM. METHODS: Mixed method design, consisting of four stages. Questionnaire items were produced for both patients and carers using interviews, focus groups, and cognitive interviews with patients and carers separately. For both patient and carer PREMs, a cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted to identify final items for inclusion using hierarchical item reduction and Rasch analysis. Questionnaire validity and reliability were assessed, including administration feasibility. RESULTS: Initial interview participants suggested the need for three PREMs, two specific to patients: (i) a 'prior' questionnaire that captured experiences of trial introduction, screening, consenting, and early trial experience (< 6 weeks post consent); and (ii) 'on-trial' that captured experiences of ongoing consent and trial participation; and (iii) a PREM specific for carers. The draft 25-item 'prior' questionnaire was completed by 162 patients and 162 patients completed the draft 35-item 'on-trial' questionnaire. Hierarchical and Rasch analysis produced a 14-item 'prior' list and a 15-item list for 'on-trial'. Both patient PREM's demonstrated a good fit to the Rasch model following Bonferroni correction (X2p = 0.008). The carer 34-draft item questionnaire was completed by 102 participants. Hierarchical and Rasch analysis produced a 13-item list for PREM-ECM-Carer, with good fit to the Rasch model ( X2p = 0.62). The pilot testing demonstrated the feasibility of all the PREMs in capturing patient and caregiver experiences in routine clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS: The three PREM-ECM questionnaires will be the first validated experience measures for ECM trial patients and their carers. These questionnaires may be used to assess patients' and their carers' experiences of ECM and enable robust comparisons across cancer trial units highlighting areas for service improvement.

A pragmatic qualitative study to explore women's and clinicians' experience of access to systemic anti-cancer therapies for the treatment of secondary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: An estimated 57,000 women are currently living with secondary (metastatic) breast cancer across the UK. Equitable access to treatment has been associated with improved clinical outcomes, however geographical disparities have been reported which remain poorly understood. The purpose of our study was to explore women and clinicians' experience of geographic access to systemic anti-cancer therapies for the treatment of secondary breast cancer. METHOD: The study setting was the integrated cancer system across the northwest region of Greater Manchester UK. A pragmatic qualitative study design was used. Women aged >18 years with a confirmed SBC diagnosis and clinicians responsible for the care and treatment of women with a secondary breast cancer diagnosis were interviewed using semi structured interviews to elicit their experience and perspectives on geographic access to treatment. Data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Eighteen interviews with women and 12 interviews with clinicians were completed. Four meta-themes were identified for geographic access, the influence of the health care system, person centred factors and the impact of Covid-19 on treatment access and receipt. CONCLUSION: Our study was the first of its kind to explore women and clinicians experience of geographic access to systemic anti-cancer therapies for the treatment of secondary breast cancer. Findings provided a greater understanding of distance decay and the influence of the health care system on treatment access. This included the importance and availability of clinical trials as a potential treatment option. This provided important insights and contributed to ongoing debate.

A novel insecticide, isocycloseram, shows promise as an alternative to chlorpyrifos against a direct pest of peanut, Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

Larvae of the southern corn rootworm (SCR) Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Barber (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) are primary pests of peanut in the Virginia-Carolina region of the United States, and are relatively sporadic pests in southern states such as Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. Peanuts have strict quality standards which, when they are not met, can diminish crop value by more than 65%. Management of direct pests like SCR is therefore crucial to maintaining the economic viability of the crop. The soil-dwelling nature of SCR larvae complicates management due to difficulties associated with monitoring and predicting infestations. Nonchemical management options are limited in this system; preventative insecticide applications are the most reliable management strategy for at-risk fields. Chlorpyrifos was the standard product for larval SCR management in peanut until its registration was revoked in 2022, leaving no effective chemical management option for larvae. We tested a novel insecticide, isocycloseram, for its ability to reduce pod scarring, pod penetration, and non-SCR pod damage in field studies conducted in Suffolk, Virginia in 2020-2022. Overall injury was low in 2020 and 2022, and in 2022 there was not a significant effect of treatment. In 2021, 2 simulated chemigation applications of isocycloseram in July significantly reduced pod scarring and overall pod injury relative to chlorpyrifos and the untreated control. Our results suggest that isocycloseram may become an effective option for managing SCR in peanut, although more work is needed to understand the mechanisms by which it is effective as a soil-applied insecticide.

Geographic and sociodemographic access to systemic anticancer therapies for secondary breast cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The review aimed to investigate geographic and sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of systemic anticancer therapies (SACT) for women with secondary (metastatic) breast cancer (SBC). METHODS: Included studies reported geographic and sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of treatment with SACT for women > 18 years with an SBC diagnosis. Information sources searched were Ovid CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and Ovid PsychINFO. Assessment of methodological quality was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Findings were synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: Nineteen studies published between 2009 and 2023 were included in the review. Overall methodological quality was assessed as low to moderate. Outcomes were reported for treatment receipt and time to treatment. Overall treatment receipt ranged from 4% for immunotherapy treatment in one study to 83% for systemic anticancer therapies (unspecified). Time to treatment ranged from median 54 days to 95 days with 81% of patients who received treatment < 60 days. Younger women, women of White origin, and those women with a higher socioeconomic status had an increased likelihood of timely treatment receipt. Treatment receipt varied by geographical region, and place of care was associated with variation in timely receipt of treatment with women treated at teaching, research and private institutions being more likely to receive treatment in a timely manner. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment receipt varied depending upon type of SACT. A number of factors were associated with treatment receipt. Barriers included older age, non-White race, lower socioeconomic status, significant comorbidities, hospital setting and geographical location. Findings should however be interpreted with caution given the limitations in overall methodological quality of included studies and significant heterogeneity in measures of exposure and outcome. Generalisability was limited due to included study populations. Findings have practical implications for the development and piloting of targeted interventions to address specific barriers in a socioculturally sensitive manner. Addressing geographical variation and place of care may require intervention at a commissioning policy level. Further qualitative research is required to understand the experience and of women and clinicians. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020196490.