Surgery as primary treatment improved overall survival in vulvar squamous cancer: A single center study with 108 women.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a single-center experience managing women with vulvar squamous cancer and analyze factors influencing their survival. STUDY DESIGN: It is an observational longitudinal retrospective study that reviewed medical records of patients admitted for treatment at the University of Campinas between 2010 and 2019, followed up until June 2022. The final sample was 108 cases. The main outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Other variables were age, stage, relapse, and race. Vital status was accessed by medical records, active search, or public online register. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank Test, and Regression Cox-Model assessed risks. RESULTS: The mean age in stages IA and IB were 65.0 years, and in stages II + III + IVA 71.1 years. Women 70 years or older were more related to diagnosis in stages II + III + IVA (p = 0.019). Progression was observed in 7 (16.7 %) patients in stage IB and 30 (65.2 %) in stage II + III + IVA. Both five-year (5y) DFS and OS were significantly different in stage IB and II + III + IVA (5y-DFS 70.5 % and 39.3 %, p = 0.024; 65.1 % and 24.3 %, p < 0.001). In stages II + III + IVA, most deaths happened before 24 months of follow-up. The primary treatment was surgery in 81.0 % of stage IB and 47.8 % of stage II + III + IVA. A higher OS was observed in patients treated primarily by surgery compared to radiotherapy in stage IB (p = 0.008), and in stages II + III + IVA (p = 0.013). Surgery followed or not by adjuvant radiotherapy was independently associated with a 60 % adjusted death protection compared to radiotherapy alone as primary treatment (0.40, 0.23;0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the patients have been diagnosed in stage I. The progression rate was high in the advanced stages of the disease. Overall survival by stage was improved when surgery was the primary treatment. Surgery was independently associated with death.

Association of Fibrinolytic Potential and Risk of Mortality in Cancer Patients.

Cancer is a leading cause of death, and the fibrinolytic system shows cooperative effects that facilitate the growth of tumors and the appearance of metastases. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the fibrinolytic potential in cancer patients and its association with mortality outcomes using the fluorometric method of simultaneous thrombin and plasmin generation. The study included 323 cancer patients and 148 healthy individuals. During the 12-month follow-up, 68 patients died. Compared to the control group, cancer patients showed alterations in thrombin production consistent with a hypercoagulability profile, and an increase in plasmin generation. Mortality risk was associated with two parameters of thrombin in both univariate and multivariable analysis: maximum amplitude (Wald 11.78, p < 0.001) and area under the curve (Wald 8.0, p < 0.005), while such associations were not observed for plasmin. In conclusion, this was the first study able to demonstrate the simultaneous evaluation of thrombin and plasmin generation in newly diagnosed untreated cancer patients. Patients with cancer have been observed to exhibit a hypercoagulable profile. During the study, two parameters linked to thrombin generation, MA and AUC, were identified and found to have a potential association with mortality risk. However, no associations were found with parameters related to plasmin generation.

Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: the Transradial and Transfemoral Approach by EXPERienced Operators in Daily rouTine (EXPERT) Trial.

BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to coronary angiography reduces vascular complications but is associated with greater radiation exposure than the transfemoral approach (TFA). It is unknown whether exposure remains higher when TRA is performed by experienced operators. METHODS: Patients were randomly, prospectively assigned to TRA or TFA. The primary end point was patient radiation dose; secondary end points were the physician radiation dose and 30-day major adverse cardiac event rate. Coronary angiography was performed by experienced operators using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: Clinical and procedural characteristics were similar between the TRA (n = 150) and TFA (n = 149) groups, and they had comparable mean (SD) radiation doses for patients (616.51 [252] vs 585.57 [225] mGy; P = .13) and physicians (0.49 [0.3] vs 0.46 [0.29] mSv; P = .32). The mean (SD) fluoroscopy time (3.52 [2.02] vs 3.13 [2.46] min; P = .14) and the mean (SD) dose area product (35,496.5 [15,670] vs 38,313.4 [17,764.9] mGy·cm2; P = .2) did not differ. None of the following factors predicted higher radiation doses: female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.38-1.3]; P = .34), body mass index >25 (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.43-1.6]; P = .76), age >65 years (HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.89-3.1]; P = .11), severe valve disease (HR, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.52-3.5]; P = .68), or previous coronary artery bypass graft (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.8; P = .38). CONCLUSION: TRA for elective coronary angiography is noninferior to TFA when performed by experienced operators.

Cervical Cancer Screening with DNA-HPV Testing and Precancerous Lesions Detection: A Brazilian Population-based Demonstration Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rates of precancerous lesions, colposcopy referral, and positive predictive value (PPV) by age groups of a population-based screening with DNA-HPV testing. METHODS: The present demonstration study compared 16,384 HPV tests performed in the first 30 months of the program with 19,992 women tested in the cytology screening. The colposcopy referral rate and PPV for CIN2+ and CIN3+ by age group and screening program were compared. The statistical analysis used the chi-squared test and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). RESULTS: The HPV tests were 3.26% positive for HPV16-HPV18 and 9.92% positive for 12 other HPVs with a 3.7 times higher colposcopy referral rate than the cytology program, which had 1.68% abnormalities. Human Papillomavirus testing detected 103 CIN2, 89 CIN3, and one AIS, compared with 24 CIN2 and 54 CIN3 detected by cytology (p < 0.0001). The age group between 25 and 29 years old screened by HPV testing had 2.4 to 3.0 times more positivity, 13.0% colposcopy referral, twice more than women aged 30 to 39 years old (7.7%; p < 0.0001), and detected 20 CIN3 and 3 early-stage cancer versus 9 CIN3 and no cancer by cytology screening (CIN3 OR= 2.10; 95%CI: 0.91-5.25; p = 0.043). The PPV of colposcopy for CIN2+ ranged from 29.5 to 41.0% in the HPV testing program. CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in detections of cervix precancerous lesions in a short period of screening with HPV testing. In women < 30 years old, the HPV testing exhibited more positivity, high colposcopy referral rate, similar colposcopy PPV to older women, and more detection of HSIL and early-stage cervical cancer.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar as taxas de lesões pré-cancerosas, encaminhamento para colposcopia e valor preditivo positivo (VPP) por faixas etárias de rastreamento populacional com teste DNA-HPV. MéTODOS: O presente estudo de demonstração comparou 16.384 testes de HPV realizados nos primeiros 30 meses do programa com 19.992 mulheres testadas no rastreio citológico. Os programas foram comparados por taxa de encaminhamento de colposcopia e VPP para NIC2+ e NIC3+ por faixa etária. A análise estatística utilizou o teste de qui-quadrado e odds ratio (OR, na sigla em inglês) com intervalo de confiança (IC) de 95%. RESULTADOS: Os testes de HPV foram 3,26% positivos para HPV16-HPV18 e 9,92% positivos para 12 outros HPVs, com uma taxa de encaminhamento de colposcopia 3,7 vezes maior do que o programa de citologia, que teve 1,68% de anormalidades. O teste de HPV detectou 103 NIC2, 89 NIC3 e um AIS, em comparação com 24 NIC2 e 54 NIC3 detectados por citologia (p < 0,0001). O rastreio por teste de HPV no grupo etário 25 a 29 anos teve 2,4 a 3,0 vezes mais positividade, 13,0% de encaminhamento para colposcopia, 2 vezes mais que mulheres de 30 a 39 anos (7,7%; p < 0,0001), e detectou 20 NIC3 e 3 cânceres em estágio inicial versus nove NIC3 e nenhum câncer pelo rastreio citológico (NIC3 OR= 2,10; 96%CI: 0,91­5,25; p = 0,043). O VPP da colposcopia para NIC2+ variou de 29,5 a 41,0% no programa de teste de HPV. CONCLUSãO: Houve um aumento significativo na detecção de lesões pré-cancerosas do colo do útero em um curto período de rastreamento com teste de HPV. Em mulheres < 30 anos, o teste de HPV exibiu mais positividade, alta taxa de encaminhamento para colposcopia com VPP semelhante a mulheres mais velhas, e mais detecção de HSIL e de câncer cervical em estágio inicial.

Screen-and-treat approach in managing cervical cancer precursor lesions: An observational study with 524 women.

OBJECTIVE: To detect factors related to overtreatment with the "Screen-and-treat" approach (S&T) in women with suspicious cervical precancerous lesions. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of 524 women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or more severe (HSIL+) in cytology, treated by the Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ): 161 without a previous biopsy (S&T group) and 363 with a previous biopsy (biopsy group) from January 2017 to July 2020. The main outcome was a diagnosis of LLETZ: negative (negative or low-grade squamous intraepithlelial lesion LSIL) or HSIL+. A negative diagnosis was interpreted as "overtreatment." Results were analyzed as a function of the S&T approach (whether previous biopsy or not). Variables were obtained from medical records, and were compared with Chi-square or Fisher's exact test (p, p-value), to estimate the chances of a logistic regression analysis (Odds Ratio, OR, or admitting a Confidence Interval (CI) of 95 %). RESULTS: No differences were observed in groups regarding menopausal status, smoking, hormonal contraceptive use, colposcopy findings, LLETZ diagnosis, and recurrence. Comparing biopsy vs S&T groups, the frequency of women over 40 years was 28.4 % vs 39.7 % (p = 0.011), and transformation zone type 3 was 12.2 vs 26.8 % (p < 0.001), respectively. In women managed by S&T, when compared to a LLETZ diagnosis, an HSIL+ result was more frequent in women presenting with TZ 1 (93.1 % TZ1 vs 78.5 % TZ2 vs 73.8 % TZ3, p = 0.008) and in women with abnormal colposcopy (92.9 % abnormal vs 38.1 % negative, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis found that women with negative colposcopic findings presented a higher risk for negative LLETZ diagnosis (LSIL/Negative final histology) (18.6; 6.18-56.02). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in the LLETZ diagnosis in women who did or did not use the S&T approach: it was adequate for women referred by cytological HSIL along with high-grade colposcopic findings.

Experiência inicial com a extensão de cateter-guia ExpressmanTM em um centro terciário de cardiologia de alto volume / Initial experience with the ExpressmanTM guide catheter extension in a high-volume tertiary cardiology center

Introdução: As extensões de cateter-guia fornecem maior suporte em intervenções coronárias percutâneas complexas. O ExpressmanTM é uma nova extensão de cateter-guia, e nosso objetivo foi avaliar o impacto de seu uso no sucesso do procedimento e nas complicações ocorridas em um centro de referência de alto volume. Métodos: Analisamos os dados de todos os procedimentos consecutivos em que foi usada uma extensão de cateter-guia ExpressmanTM. A decisão de usar uma extensão de cateter-guia ficou a critério do operador. O sucesso do dispositivo foi definido como o posicionamento bem-sucedido da extensão de cateter-guia dentro do vaso coronário, e o sucesso do procedimento foi definido como <20% de estenose residual e fluxo TIMI 3, sem perda significativa de ramos laterais. Eventos adversos cardíacos e cerebrovasculares maiores foram definidos como a combinação morte por todas as causas, infarto do miocárdio, revascularização do vaso-alvo e acidente vascular cerebral. Resultados: Foram incluídos 34 procedimentos entre abril de 2022 e janeiro de 2023. A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo masculino (59%), e a média de idade foi 66,5 anos. O uso da extensão de cateter-guia não foi planejado antes do procedimento em 17 procedimentos (50%). Os motivos mais comuns para o uso da extensão de cateter-guia foram angulação ou tortuosidade do vaso-alvo e posição desfavorável do óstio coronário. O sucesso do dispositivo foi obtido em 88% e o da revascularização, em 91%. Houve três oclusões de ramo lateral. Durante o acompanhamento clínico intra-hospitalar, não ocorreram sangramento e nem eventos adversos cardíacos e cerebrovasculares maiores. Conclusão: O sucesso do dispositivo e do procedimento foi alto, e a taxa de complicações foi baixa. O uso da extensão de cateter-guia como técnica de resgate em anatomias complexas permitiu o sucesso do procedimento na maioria dos pacientes que, de outro modo, não poderiam ser tratados.

Background: Guide catheter extensions provide increased support in complex percutaneous coronary interventions. The ExpressmanTM is a novel guide catheter extension and the objective was to assess the impact of its use on procedural success and complications in a high-volume reference center. Methods: We analyzed data from all consecutive procedures in which the ExpressmanTM guide catheter extension was used. The decision to use a guide catheter extension was at operator's discretion. Device success was defined as the successful positioning of the guide catheter extension in the coronary vessel and procedural success was defined as <20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow, with no loss of significant side branches. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke. Results: From April 2022 to January 2023, 34 procedures were included. The majority of the patients were male (59%) and the mean age was 66.5 years. Guide catheter extension use was not planned pre-procedure in 17 procedures (50%). The most common reasons for guide catheter extension use were target vessel angulation or tortuosity and unfavorable coronary ostium position. Device success was obtained in 88% and revascularization success in 91%. There were three side branch occlusions. During in-hospital clinical follow-up, no major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events or major bleeding occurred. Conclusion: The device success and procedural success were high and the rate of complications was low. Guide catheter extension use as bailout technique in complex anatomies allowed procedural success in the vast majority of otherwise untreatable patients.

Cervical Cancer Screening with DNA-HPV Testing and Precancerous Lesions Detection: A Brazilian Population-based Demonstration Study / Rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero com teste de DNA-HPV e detecção de lesões precursoras: um estudo de demonstração de base populacional brasileiro

Abstract Objective To evaluate the rates of precancerous lesions, colposcopy referral, and positive predictive value (PPV) by age groups of a population-based screening with DNA-HPV testing. Methods The present demonstration study compared 16,384 HPV tests performed in the first 30 months of the program with 19,992 women tested in the cytology screening. The colposcopy referral rate and PPV for CIN2+ and CIN3+ by age group and screening program were compared. The statistical analysis used the chi-squared test and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Results The HPV tests were 3.26% positive for HPV16-HPV18 and 9.92% positive for 12 other HPVs with a 3.7 times higher colposcopy referral rate than the cytology program, which had 1.68% abnormalities. Human Papillomavirus testing detected 103 CIN2, 89 CIN3, and one AIS, compared with 24 CIN2 and 54 CIN3 detected by cytology (p < 0.0001). The age group between 25 and 29 years old screened by HPV testing had 2.4 to 3.0 times more positivity, 13.0% colposcopy referral, twice more than women aged 30 to 39 years old (7.7%; p < 0.0001), and detected 20 CIN3 and 3 early-stage cancer versus 9 CIN3 and no cancer by cytology screening (CIN3 OR= 2.10; 95%CI: 0.91 -5.25; p = 0.043). The PPV of colposcopy for CIN2+ ranged from 29.5 to 41.0% in the HPV testing program. Conclusion There was a significant increase in detections of cervix precancerous lesions in a short period of screening with HPV testing. In women < 30 years old, the HPV testing exhibited more positivity, high colposcopy referral rate, similar colposcopy PPV to older women, and more detection of HSIL and early-stage cervical cancer.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar as taxas de lesões pré-cancerosas, encaminhamento para colposco pia e valor preditivo positivo (VPP) por faixas etárias de rastreamento populacional com teste DNA-HPV. Métodos O presente estudo de demonstração comparou 16.384 testes de HPV realizados nos primeiros 30 meses do programa com 19.992 mulheres testadas no rastreio citológico. Os programas foram comparados por taxa de encaminhamento de colposcopia e VPP para NIC2+ e NIC3+ por faixa etária. A análise estatística utilizou o teste de qui-quadrado e odds ratio (OR, na sigla em inglês) com intervalo de confiança (IC) de 95%. Resultados Os testes de HPV foram 3,26% positivos para HPV16-HPV18 e 9,92% positivos para 12 outros HPVs, com uma taxa de encaminhamento de colposcopia 3,7 vezes maior do que o programa de citologia, que teve 1,68% de anormalidades. O teste de HPV detectou 103 NIC2, 89 NIC3 e um AIS, em comparação com 24 NIC2 e 54 NIC3 detectados por citologia (p < 0,0001 ). O rastreio por teste de HPV no grupo etário 25 a 29 anos teve 2,4 a 3,0 vezes mais positividade, 13,0% de encaminhamento para colposcopia, 2 vezes mais que mulheres de 30 a 39 anos (7,7%; p < 0,0001 ), e detectou 20 NIC3 e 3 cânceres em estágio inicial versus nove NIC3 e nenhum câncer pelo rastreio citológico (NIC3 OR= 2,10; 96%CI: 0,91 -5,25; p = 0,043). O VPP da colposcopia para NIC2+ variou de 29,5 a 41,0% no programa de teste de HPV. Conclusão Houve um aumento significativo na detecção de lesões pré-cancerosas do colo do útero em um curto período de rastreamento com teste de HPV. Em mulheres < 30 anos, o teste de HPV exibiu mais positividade, alta taxa de encaminhamento para colposcopia com VPP semelhante a mulheres mais velhas, e mais detecção de HSIL e de câncer cervical em estágio inicial.

End-of-Life Antibiotherapy: Factors Associated With Prescription.

Introduction Most cancer patients spend their last days of life in the hospital, often receiving invasive and non-palliative interventions. These patients are particularly susceptible to infections, which are a major cause of death. The decision to use antimicrobials in a palliative context is difficult, given the lack of guidelines. Objectives To characterize patients who received antimicrobials at the end of life and analyze factors associated with their prescription decisions. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who died in the Medical Oncology Service from January to December 2017 was done. In addition, the use of antibiotics in the last 15 days of life was considered. Clinical, therapeutic, and Eastern Corporative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale (ECOG PS) variables were analyzed using SPSS v23. Results There were a total of 116 deaths, of which 48.3% (n = 56) received antimicrobials in their last 15 days of life. The median age of the patients was 64.5 years. Most patients (55.4%) had an ECOG PS 4, of which 82.1% were stage IV tumors. The most frequent tumors were colorectal adenocarcinomas (21.3%), digestive non-colorectal (predominantly gastric or esophageal adenocarcinomas) (20.5%), and invasive breast carcinomas (16.4%). Asthenia (33.6%) and dyspnea (19.8%) were the main complaints, and most patients (55.4%) had respiratory infections. Fever was present in 51.8% of patients on antibiotics and was related to their use (p < 0.001). The use of antimicrobials is also related to higher C-reactive protein (CRP) values (p = 0.015). Conclusions The decision to institute antimicrobials at the end of life is related to clinical and analytical aspects suggestive of infection without considering the patient's general condition and the oncological disease's prognosis. Deprescription of antibiotic therapy is not yet a current clinical practice.

Endocervical Margins Status in Excision for Preventing Cervical Cancer According to the Transformation Zone Type.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of 610 excision types I and II in a referral facility as a function of transformation zone (TZ) types. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with cervical precursor lesions who underwent loop electrocautery excision procedure from 2017 to 2019 at the University of Campinas. The primary outcome was endocervical margin status, negative or positive. Other variables were excision type (I/II), TZ (1/2/3), age, menopausal status, hormonal contraceptives, smoking, and sexual debut. Tests used were chi-square or Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney, and simple and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The most frequent was TZ 1 (62.5%). Excision II was the most frequent: 54.1% in TZ 1, 67.2% in TZ 2, and 82.1% in TZ 3. A negative margin was observed in TZ 1, 76.0% when excision I and 86.4% when excision II ( p = .009); TZ 2, 86.4% when excision I and 88.9% when excision II ( p = .672); and TZ 3, 76.5% when excision I and 78.9% when excision II ( p = .672). Multivariate analysis revealed in TZ 1 a 2.12 (1.23-3.65) higher risk of obtaining a negative margin in excision type II. In TZ 2 and 3, none of the variables predicted the chance of a negative margin. CONCLUSIONS: The endocervical margin was negative in 3 in every 4 women who underwent loop electrocautery excision procedure, regardless of excision type. Age, menopausal status, smoking, and hormonal contraception did not predict margin status.

Safety of Conservative Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Women Under 30 Years Old.

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of conservative management in young women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Methods: A retrospective cohort study included women younger than 30 years referred with HSIL (cytology or biopsy) managed conservatively from 2012 to 2019, in Campinas/Brazil. Regression was the outcome when no evidence of HSIL was observed in at least two consecutive follow-ups. Kaplan-Meyer method was used to determine regression probabilities. Other tests were chi-square or Fisher, Mann-Whitney and COX regression. Results: During the study period, 89 patients were included. No progression to microinvasive or invasive cancer was observed. Sixty-one (69%) patients were younger than 25 years, and 28 (31%) were aged 25-30 years. Spontaneous regression was seen in 64 (72%) and persistence in 25 (28%) of the overall sample. The average time to regression was 15.4 months (standard deviation [SD] = 7.7), and the follow-up time was 31.6 months (SD 19.0). Age, parity, first sexual intercourse, smoking, hormonal contraception, and colposcopy impression were not different among women with regression or persistence. Regression probabilities were, respectively, 28.9%, 60.2%, and 78.1% after 12, 18, and 24 months. Most of the events happened between 12 and 18 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Conservative management in women younger than 30 years was safe: spontaneous regression was observed in 72% of all women younger than 30 with HSIL managed conservatively. No clinical variable was relevant, influencing regression. In 2 years the regression probability was 78%.

Maternal Deaths from COVID-19 in Brazil: Increase during the Second Wave of the Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To compare death rates by COVID-19 between pregnant or postpartum and nonpregnant women during the first and second waves of the Brazilian pandemic. METHODS: In the present population-based evaluation data from the Sistema de Informação da Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe (SIVEP-Gripe, in the Portuguese acronym), we included women with c (ARDS) by COVID-19: 47,768 in 2020 (4,853 obstetric versus 42,915 nonobstetric) and 66,689 in 2021 (5,208 obstetric versus 61,481 nonobstetric) and estimated the frequency of in-hospital death. RESULTS: We identified 377 maternal deaths in 2020 (first wave) and 804 in 2021 (second wave). The death rate increased 2.0-fold for the obstetric (7.7 to 15.4%) and 1.6-fold for the nonobstetric groups (13.9 to 22.9%) from 2020 to 2021 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.58 in 2020 and OR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.56-0.66 in 2021; p < 0.05). In women with comorbidities, the death rate increased 1.7-fold (13.3 to 23.3%) and 1.4-fold (22.8 to 31.4%) in the obstetric and nonobstetric groups, respectively (OR: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.44-0.61 in 2020 to OR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.59-0.73 in 2021; p < 0.05). In women without comorbidities, the mortality rate was higher for nonobstetric (2.4 times; 6.6 to 15.7%) than for obstetric women (1.8 times; 5.5 to 10.1%; OR: 0.81; 95%CI: 0.69-0.95 in 2020 and OR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.58-0.68 in 2021; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was an increase in maternal deaths from COVID-19 in 2021 compared with 2020, especially in patients with comorbidities. Death rates were even higher in nonpregnant women, with or without comorbidities.

OBJETIVO: Comparar as taxas de mortalidade por COVID-19 entre gestantes ou puérperas e não gestantes durante a primeira e segunda ondas da pandemia brasileira. MéTODOS: Na presente avaliação dos dados do Sistema de Informação da Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe (SIVEP-Gripe), incluímos mulheres com síndrome respiratória aguda grave por COVID-19: 47.768 em 2020 (4.853 obstétricas versus 42.915 não obstétricas) e 66.689 em 2021 (5.208 obstétricas versus 61.481 não obstétricas) e estimamos a frequência de óbito intra-hospitalar. RESULTADOS: Identificamos 377 óbitos maternos em 2020 e 804 em 2021. A taxa de mortalidade por COVID-19 aumentou 2,0 vezes no grupo obstétrico (de 7,7 para 15,4%) e 1,6 vezes no grupo não obstétrico (de 13,9 para 22,9%) de 2020 a 2021 (odds ratio [OR]: 0,52; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%: 0,47­0,58 em 2020 e OR: 0,61; IC95%: 0,56­0,66 em 2021; p < 0,05). Em mulheres com comorbidades, a taxa de óbitos aumentou 1,7 vezes (de 13,3 para 23,3%) e 1,4 vezes (de 22,8 para 31,4%) para os grupos obstétricos e não obstétricos, respectivamente (OR: 0,52; IC95%: 0,44­0,61 em 2020 para OR: 0,66; IC95%: 0,59­0,73 em 2021; p < 0,05). Em mulheres sem comorbidades, a taxa de mortalidade foi maior para as não obstétricas (2,4 vezes; de 6,6% para 15,7%) do que para mulheres obstétricas (1,8 vezes; de 5,5 para 10,1%; OR: 0,81; IC95%: 0,69­0,95 em 2020 e OR: 0,60; IC95%: 0,58­0,68 em 2021; p < 0,05). CONCLUSãO: Houve aumento das mortes maternas por COVID-19 em 2021 em relação a 2020, principalmente naquelas com comorbidades. As taxas de mortalidade foram ainda maiores em mulheres não grávidas, com ou sem comorbidades.

Maternal Deaths from COVID-19 in Brazil: Increase during the Second Wave of the Pandemic / Mortes maternas por COVID-19 no Brasil: Aumento durante a segunda onda da pandemia

Abstract Objective To compare death rates by COVID-19 between pregnant or postpartum and nonpregnant women during the first and second waves of the Brazilian pandemic. Methods In the present population-based evaluation data from the Sistema de Informação da Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe (SIVEP-Gripe, in the Portuguese acronym), we included women with c (ARDS) by COVID-19: 47,768 in 2020 (4,853 obstetric versus 42,915 nonobstetric) and 66,689 in 2021 (5,208 obstetric versus 61,481 nonobstetric) and estimated the frequency of in-hospital death. Results We identified 377 maternal deaths in 2020 (first wave) and 804 in 2021 (second wave). The death rate increased 2.0-fold for the obstetric (7.7 to 15.4%) and 1.6-fold for the nonobstetric groups (13.9 to 22.9%) from 2020 to 2021 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.58 in 2020 and OR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.56- 0.66 in 2021; p < 0.05). In women with comorbidities, the death rate increased 1.7-fold (13.3 to 23.3%) and 1.4-fold (22.8 to 31.4%) in the obstetric and nonobstetric groups, respectively (OR: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.44-0.61 in 2020 to OR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.59-0.73 in 2021; p <0.05). In women without comorbidities, the mortality rate was higher for nonobstetric (2.4 times; 6.6 to 15.7%) than for obstetric women (1.8 times; 5.5 to 10.1%; OR: 0.81; 95%CI: 0.69-0.95 in 2020 and OR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.58-0.68 in 2021; p <0.05). Conclusion There was an increase in maternal deaths from COVID-19 in 2021 compared with 2020, especially in patients with comorbidities. Death rates were even higher in nonpregnant women, with or without comorbidities.

Resumo Objetivo Comparar as taxas de mortalidade por COVID-19 entre gestantes ou puérperas e não gestantes durante a primeira e segunda ondas da pandemia brasileira. Métodos Na presente avaliação dos dados do Sistema de Informação da Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe (SIVEP-Gripe), incluímos mulheres com síndrome respiratória aguda grave por COVID-19: 47.768 em 2020 (4.853 obstétricas versus 42.915 não obstétricas) e 66.689 em 2021 (5.208 obstétricas versus 61.481 não obstétricas) e estimamos a frequência de óbito intra-hospitalar. Resultados Identificamos 377 óbitos maternos em 2020 e 804 em 2021. A taxa de mortalidade por COVID-19 aumentou 2,0 vezes no grupo obstétrico (de 7,7 para 15,4%) e 1,6 vezes no grupo não obstétrico (de 13,9 para 22,9%) de 2020 a 2021 (odds ratio [OR]: 0,52; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%: 0,47-0,58 em 2020 e OR: 0,61; IC95%: 0,56-0,66 em 2021; p <0,05). Em mulheres com comorbidades, a taxa de óbitos aumentou 1,7 vezes (de 13,3 para 23,3%) e 1,4 vezes (de 22,8 para 31,4%) para os grupos obstétricos e não obstétricos, respectivamente (OR: 0,52; IC95%: 0,44-0,61 em 2020 para OR: 0,66; IC95%: 0,59-0,73 em 2021; p <0,05). Em mulheres sem comorbidades, a taxa de mortalidade foi maior para as não obstétricas (2,4 vezes; de 6,6% para 15,7%) do que para mulheres obstétricas (1,8 vezes; de 5,5 para 10,1%; OR: 0,81; IC95%: 0,69-0,95 em 2020 e OR: 0,60; IC95%: 0,58-0,68 em 2021; p < 0,05). Conclusão Houve aumento das mortes maternas por COVID-19 em 2021 em relação a 2020, principalmente naquelas com comorbidades. As taxas de mortalidade foram ainda maiores em mulheres não grávidas, com ou sem comorbidades.

Cervical Cancer Screening with HPV Testing: Updates on the Recommendation / Rastreamento do câncer do colo de útero com teste de HPV: Atualizações na recomendação

Abstract The present update is a reassessment of the 2018 'Guidelines for HPV-DNA Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Brazil' (Zeferino et al.)9, according to the changes observed in new international guidelines and knowledge updates. The most relevant and recent guidelines were assessed. Questions regarding the clinical practice were formulated, and the answers considered the perspective of the public and private sectors of the Brazilian health system. The review addressed risk-based strategies regarding age to start and stop screening, the use of cytology and colposcopy to support management decisions, treatment, follow-up strategies, and screening in specific groups, including vaccinated women. The update aims to improve the prevention of cervical cancer and to reduce overtreatment and the misuse of HPV testing.

Resumo Esta atualização é uma reavaliação das "Recomendações para o uso de testes de DNAHPV no rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero no Brasil" (Zeferino et al., 2018),9 de acordo com as mudanças observadas nas novas recomendações internacionais, além das atualizações no conhecimento. As recomendações mais relevantes e recentes foram avaliadas. Questões referentes à prática clínica foram formuladas, e as respostas consideraram a perspectiva do sistema de saúde brasileiro, tanto público quanto privado. Esta revisão abrange estratégias baseadas em risco sobre idade para início e término de rastreamento, o uso da citologia e colposcopia para apoiar as condutas, tratamento, estratégias de seguimento, e rastreamento em grupos específicos, incluindo mulheres vacinadas. Esta atualização tem o objetivo de melhorar as estratégias de prevenção do câncer do colo de útero e reduzir o supertratamento e o uso incorreto dos testes de HPV.

The value of the endocervical margin status in LEEP: analysis of 610 cases.

PURPOSE: To describe the results of 610 patients who underwent LEEP and evaluate factors related to a negative margin. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients treated by LEEP at a colposcopy referral service in Campinas, Brazil, 2017-2019. Patients were referred to treat high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or adenocarcinoma in situ suspected by cytology and colposcopy (screen-and-treat) or by biopsy. Descriptive analysis was performed by frequencies as a function of the status of the margins (negative or positive). Factors associated with margin status were assessed by regression. RESULTS: The endocervical, ectocervical or both margins were negative in 82.4%, 75.7% and 65.9%, respectively. Age, sexual debut, parity, menopause status, smoking and hormonal contraception showed no difference in the proportion of negative margins. Both margins were negative in 66.1% of patients with transformation zone type(TZ) 1, 73.1% of TZ 2, and 54.7% of TZ 3 (p = 0.015). The endocervical negative margin was obtained in 78.0% of patients submitted to excision I (loop 10 mm) and 82.5% to excision II (loop 15 mm) (p = 0.016). Having the sexual debut at 18 years or older or being submitted to an excision type II doubled the chance of negative endocervical margin (1.98;1.04-3.77 and 1.95; 1.18-3.21, respectively). CONCLUSION: The proportion of negative endocervical margin was 78% in excision I and 86% in excision II. Sexual onset and excision type II increased the chance of obtaining a negative endocervical margin.