Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nature ; 633(8029): 417-425, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39198650

RESUMEN

Severe defects in human IFNγ immunity predispose individuals to both Bacillus Calmette-Guérin disease and tuberculosis, whereas milder defects predispose only to tuberculosis1. Here we report two adults with recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis who are homozygous for a private loss-of-function TNF variant. Neither has any other clinical phenotype and both mount normal clinical and biological inflammatory responses. Their leukocytes, including monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) do not produce TNF, even after stimulation with IFNγ. Blood leukocyte subset development is normal in these patients. However, an impairment in the respiratory burst was observed in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-matured MDMs and alveolar macrophage-like (AML) cells2 from both patients with TNF deficiency, TNF- or TNFR1-deficient induced pluripotent stem (iPS)-cell-derived GM-CSF-matured macrophages, and healthy control MDMs and AML cells differentiated with TNF blockers in vitro, and in lung macrophages treated with TNF blockers ex vivo. The stimulation of TNF-deficient iPS-cell-derived macrophages with TNF rescued the respiratory burst. These findings contrast with those for patients with inherited complete deficiency of the respiratory burst across all phagocytes, who are prone to multiple infections, including both Bacillus Calmette-Guérin disease and tuberculosis3. Human TNF is required for respiratory-burst-dependent immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages but is surprisingly redundant otherwise, including for inflammation and immunity to weakly virulent mycobacteria and many other infectious agents.


Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Humanos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Masculino , Adulto , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/metabolismo , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/inmunología , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/citología , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/deficiencia , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/metabolismo , Femenino , Estallido Respiratorio , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/inmunología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/microbiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/genética , Macrófagos/inmunología , Macrófagos/microbiología , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Macrófagos Alveolares/inmunología , Macrófagos Alveolares/microbiología , Interferón gamma/inmunología , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/farmacología , Homocigoto , Receptores Tipo I de Factores de Necrosis Tumoral/deficiencia , Receptores Tipo I de Factores de Necrosis Tumoral/genética , Receptores Tipo I de Factores de Necrosis Tumoral/metabolismo , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/inmunología
2.
Pulm Med ; 2020: 6365314, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32047667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: IgE sensitization (atopy) to pets is commonly evaluated using pet dander extracts. However, the diagnosis by components seems to be more adequate to evaluate the clinical relevance (allergy) of sIgE sensitization. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between IgE sensitization to pet allergen components and clinical symptoms. Methodology. Dander extracts and sIgE levels to pet components (Can f 1, Can f 2, Can f 3, Can f 5, Fel d 1, Fel 2, and Fel 4) were measured in a rhinitis group (n = 101) and a control group (n = 101) and a control group (. RESULTS: Dog (34.6% vs. 23.5%) and cat dander (26.7% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.05) IgE sensitization was frequent among rhinitis and no-rhinitis subjects, and it was similar to dog (29.7% vs. 20.5%) and cat (18.8% vs. 8.8%) components. Polysensitization for dog (3.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.1, p = 0.05) IgE sensitization was frequent among rhinitis and no-rhinitis subjects, and it was similar to dog (29.7% vs. 20.5%) and cat (18.8% vs. 8.8%) components. Polysensitization for dog (3.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.1, p = 0.05) IgE sensitization was frequent among rhinitis and no-rhinitis subjects, and it was similar to dog (29.7% vs. 20.5%) and cat (18.8% vs. 8.8%) components. Polysensitization for dog (3.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.1. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization to pet dander extract identifies atopic patients, but its utility to predict clinical relevance is poor. Allergenic components could help to define the clinical relevance of sensitization to furry animals and could reduce the need for provocation test.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Alérgenos Animales/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal/métodos , Rinitis/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Animales , Gatos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Alérgenos Animales/efectos adversos , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal/estadística & datos numéricos , Rinitis/etiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA