Addressing Burn Hypertrophic Scar Symptoms Earlier: Laser Scar Revision May Begin as Early as 3-6 Months After Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Fractional ablative CO2 laser (FLSR) is used to treat hypertrophic scars (HTSs) resulting from burn injuries, which are characterized by factors, such as erythema, contracture, thickness, and symptoms of pain and itch. Traditionally, waiting a year after injury for scar maturation before starting laser treatment has been recommended; however, the potential benefits of earlier intervention have gained popularity. Still, the optimal timing for beginning laser intervention in patients with HTSs remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the ideal timing for the initiation of FLSR for HTSs using several qualitative and quantitative assessment measures. It was hypothesized that early intervention would lead to similar improvement trends as later intervention, however, would be more ideal due to the shortened time without symptom relief for patients. METHODS: Patients who received three or more laser treatment sessions and completed both pre- and posttreatment evaluations were included in this analysis (n = 69). FLSR treatment was administered at 4-8-week intervals. Patients starting treatment before 6 months after injury were classified as the early-stage intervention group and those beginning treatment at 6-12 months after injury were classified as the late-stage intervention group. Demographic data, including the age of patients at the time of first treatment, age of scars at the time of first treatment, biological sex, ethnicity, Fitzpatrick skin type, and use of laser-assisted drug delivery, were collected by retrospective chart review. Patients were evaluated on six subjective scales and objectively for scar stiffness with durometry. For all scales, higher scores indicate worse scars. A two-way ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare scores from the pre- to posttreatment evaluations. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the demographic or scar-specific variables; thus, differences in outcome can be attributed to the timing of intervention. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in scars with treatment over time (p < 0.05). Both early- and middle-stage initiation showed scar symptom improvement in five out of six scales. In the late-stage intervention, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale-Patient average score did not show improvement. In the early-stage intervention, the Vancouver Scar Scale total did not show improvement. Quantitative evaluation of scar stiffness by durometry did not show symptom improvement in either group. The Scar Comparison Scale demonstrated the greatest improvement across groups. CONCLUSION: Laser treatment led to scar improvement in at least one scale at each stage of initiation. Both intervention timelines resulted in equivalent outcomes, and early intervention should be considered when initiating FLSR treatment in burn scars to alleviate symptoms earlier.

Comparison of Rapid-, Kaolin-, and Native-TEG Parameters in Burn Patient Cohorts With Acute Burn-induced Coagulopathy and Abnormal Fibrinolytic Function.

Although use of thromboelastography (TEG) to diagnose coagulopathy and guide clinical decision-making is increasing, relative performance of different TEG methods has not been well-defined. Rapid-TEG (rTEG), kaolin-TEG (kTEG), and native-TEG (nTEG) were performed on blood samples from burn patients presenting to a regional center from admission to 21 days. Patients were categorized by burn severity, mortality, and fibrinolytic phenotypes (Shutdown [SD], Physiologic [PHYS], and Hyperfibrinolytic [HF]). Manufacturer ranges and published TEG cutoffs were examined. Concordance correlations (Rc) of TEG parameters (R, α-angle, maximum amplitude [MA], LY30) measured agreement and Cohen's Kappa (κ) determined interclass reliability. Patients (n = 121) were mostly male (n = 84; 69.4%), with median age 40 years, median TBSA burn 13%, and mortality 17% (n = 21). Severe burns (≥40% TBSA) were associated with lower admission α-angle for rTEG (P = .03) and lower MA for rTEG (P = .02) and kTEG (P = .01). MA was lower in patients who died (nTEG, P = .04; kTEG, P = .02; rTEG, P = .003). Admission HF was associated with increased mortality (OR, 10.45; 95% CI, 2.54-43.31, P = .001) on rTEG only. Delayed SD was associated with mortality using rTEG and nTEG (OR 9.46; 95% CI, 1.96-45.73; P = .005 and OR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.35-35.48; P = .02). Admission TEGs showed poor agreement on R-time (Rc, 0.00-0.56) and α-angle (0.40 to 0.55), and moderate agreement on MA (0.67-0.81) and LY30 (0.72-0.93). Interclass reliability was lowest for R-time (κ, -0.07 to 0.01) and α-angle (-0.06 to 0.17) and highest for MA (0.22-0.51) and LY30 (0.29-0.49). Choice of TEG method may impact clinical decision-making. rTEG appeared most sensitive in parameter-specific associations with injury severity, abnormal fibrinolysis, and mortality.

Sepsis in surgical patients: Burn sepsis.

Patients with large burn injuries remain a challenge. The loss of skin barrier integrity and induced immunosuppression after injury increases their vulnerability to infection. Sepsis remains the primary cause of death for burn-injured patients who survive their acute injury and resuscitation. The objective of this work is to describe the current understanding and management of sepsis in the burn-injured patient and newer strategies to approach its management. Current understanding of the systemic inflammatory response to burn injury and sepsis, preventative strategies, and novel research will be discussed. Understanding the origin of burn sepsis from wounds themselves is key to understanding current paradigms. Infection control and management begins from the time of injury and continues throughout the patient's hospital course. The use of personal protective equipment, burn unit design considerations, and optimization of prevention protocols and catheter care all play a role in burn sepsis prevention and management. The emergence of drug-resistant pathogens poses a particular challenge for burn patients due to the chronicity with which their wounds are sometimes open. The difficulty of systemic antibiotics to reach wounds has underscored the need to anticipate resistant organisms moving forward. Antibiotic strategies and newer approaches, such as phage therapy, will be discussed. Multi-omics approaches to understanding burn sepsis have developed in hopes of identifying patients more susceptible or at risk of developing burn sepsis. As with many aspects of burn care, a multidisciplinary, proactive approach to the management of burn sepsis is key to minimizing the morbidity and mortality associated with this complication.

Examining Obesity and Its Association With Burn Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation Study.

INTRODUCTION: Literature examining the connection between obesity and burn injuries is limited. This study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter trial data set to investigate the association between burn outcomes and obesity following severe burn injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Body mass index (BMI) was used to stratify patients as normal weight (NW; BMI 18.5-25), all obese (AO; any BMI>30), obese I (OI; BMI 30-34.9), obese II (OII; BMI 35-39.9), or obese III (OIII; BMI>40). The primary outcome examined was mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), number of transfusions, injury scores, infection occurrences, number of operations, ventilator days, intensive care unit LOS, and days to wound healing. RESULTS: Of 335 patients included for study, 130 were obese. Median total body surface area (TBSA) was 31%, 77 patients (23%) had inhalation injury and 41 patients died. Inhalation injury was higher in OIII than NW (42.1% versus 20%, P = 0.03). Blood stream infections (BSI) were higher in OI versus NW (0.72 versus 0.33, P = 0.03). Total operations, ventilator days, days to wound healing, multiorgan dysfunction score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluationscore, hospital LOS, and intensive care unit LOS were not significantly affected by BMI classification. Mortality was not significantly different between obesity groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves did not significantly differ between the groups (χ2 = 0.025, P = 0.87). Multiple logistic regression identified age, TBSA, and full thickness burn as significant independent predictors (P < 0.05) of mortality; however, BMI classification itself was not predictive of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: No significant association between obesity and mortality was seen after burn injury. Age, TBSA, and percent full- thickness burn were independent predictors of mortality after burn injury, while BMI classification was not.

The First 24 Hours: Burn Shock Resuscitation and Early Complications.

Resuscitation is required for the management of patients with severe thermal injury. Some of the initial pathophysiologic events following burn injury include an exaggerated inflammatory state, injury to the endothelium, and increased capillary permeability, which all culminate in shock. Understanding these processes is critical to the effective management of patients with burn injuries. Formulas predicting fluid requirements during burn resuscitation have evolved over the past century in response to clinical experience and research efforts. Modern resuscitation features individualized fluid titration and monitoring along with colloid-based adjuncts. Despite these developments, complications from over-resuscitation still occur.

Representation Matters: An Assessment of Diversity in Current Major Textbooks on Burn Care.

Ethnic and gender disparities in healthcare have been well described. Increasing attention is paid to representative diversity in the images and educational resources used during medical training. Nearly 40% of the population of the United States identifies as a person of color, and patients of color reflect 41% of the total burn population seen in the United States. Additionally, national data on providers suggest about 5% of the Burn Team should be people of color. A better understanding of the diversity represented by burn-related medical literature could affect the management of patients with diverse backgrounds, as well as recruitment of black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) into this field. The goal of this study is to investigate the representation of diverse skin tones in several leading medical textbooks of burn care. All photographs that contained people were evaluated for the number of people present and the depicted role of the person present. Diversity count was assessed in a binary fashion-was the individual represented a BIPOC? About 2579 total individuals were identified. BIPOC was represented in 363 total images (14%). There were 6 providers of color identified out of a total of 161 (3.7%); 30 providers were women (19%), of whom only 1 was a female provider of color. BIPOC patients and providers are underrepresented in the leading textbooks of burn care. Proper representation must be included in modern educational materials to better prepare providers for a diverse population of burn-injured patients and ensure effective and thoughtful care.

Innovations in Infection Prevention and Treatment.

Background: Patients with large, acute burn injuries are a major challenge for clinicians. The loss of skin barrier protection against micro-organisms combined with the induced immunosuppression after burn injury makes this population especially vulnerable to infection. For burn-injured patients who survive immediate management considerations and burn resuscitation after acute injury, sepsis remains the primary cause of death. The purpose of this article is to describe current strategies and innovations in burn sepsis prevention and management. Methods: This work reviews the current understanding of the systemic inflammatory response to burn injury and burn sepsis as well as current strategies in insolation and infection prevention, newer burn unit design strategies in the context of infection prevention, and novel therapies being considered in topical antimicrobial wound care management. Results: A review of burn sepsis is key to understanding current paradigms and innovation in burn management and prevention. Key management principles begin from the time of injury and persist throughout the patient's hospital course. This includes use of personal protective equipment, burn unit design considerations, and knowledge of critical care principles such as central venous catheter management strategies. Innovations on wound dressing types, forms, and use have been key to better controlling burn wound sepsis and improving wound healing. Products incorporating nanotechnology, novel anions, oxygen, and even light have been key to introducing previously unconsidered methods to fight or prevent infection. Conclusion: Understanding the pathophysiology and source identification of sepsis from burn wounds has been a key contributor in developing innovative prevention and therapeutic strategies in burn management. The emergence of drug-resistant pathogens and the difficulty of systemic antibiotic agents to reach poorly vascularized wounds have further reinforced the need to anticipate management strategies moving forward. A proactive, multidisciplinary approach is necessary to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with infection control.

A Prospective Comparison of Frailty Scores and Fall Prediction in Acutely Injured Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Elderly (65 and older) fall-related injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although frailty predicts poor outcomes in geriatric trauma, literature comparing frailty scoring systems remains limited. Herein, we evaluated which frailty scoring system best predicts falls over time in the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acute surgical patients 65 y and older were enrolled and prospectively observed. Demographics and frailty, assessed using the FRAIL Scale, Trauma Specific Frailty Index (TSFI), and Canadian Frailty Scale (CSHA-CFS), were collected at enrollment and 3 mo intervals following discharge for 1 y. Surveys queried the total number and timing of falls. Changes in frailty over time were assessed by logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled. FRAIL Scale and CSHA-CFS scores did not change over time, but TSFI scores did (P ≤ 0.01). Worsening frailty was observed using TSFI at 6 (P ≤ 0.01) and 12 mo (P ≤ 0.01) relative to baseline. Mortality did not differ based on frailty using any frailty score. Increasing frailty scores and time postdischarge was associated with increased odds of a fall. AUC estimates with 95% CI were 0.72 [0.64, 0.80], 0.81 [0.74, 0.88], and 0.76 [0.68, 0.84] for the FRAIL Scale, TSFI, and CSHA-CFS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of falls postdischarge were associated with increased age, time postdischarge, and frailty in our population. No scale appeared to significantly outperform the other by AUC estimation. Further study on the longitudinal effects of frailty is warranted.

Examining 1:1 vs. 4:1 Packed Red Blood Cell to Fresh Frozen Plasma Ratio Transfusion During Pediatric Burn Excision.

Blood transfusions following major burn injury are common due to operative losses, blood sampling, and burn physiology. While massive transfusion improves outcomes in adult trauma patients, literature examining its effect in critically ill children is limited. The study purpose was to prospectively compare outcomes of major pediatric burns receiving a 1:1 vs. 4:1 packed red blood cell to fresh frozen plasma transfusion strategy during massive burn excision. Children with >20% total body surface area burns were randomized to a 1:1 or 4:1 packed red blood cell/fresh frozen plasma transfusion ratio during burn excision. Parameters examined include patient demographics, burn size, pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) scores, pediatric logistic organ dysfunction scores, laboratory values, total blood products transfused, and the presence of blood stream infections or pneumonia. A total of 68 children who met inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups (n = 34). Mean age, PRISM scores, estimated blood loss (600 ml (400-1175 ml) vs. 600 ml (300-1150 ml), P = 0.68), ventilator days (5 vs. 9, P = 0.47), and length of stay (57 vs. 60 days, P = 0.24) had no difference. No differences in frequency of blood stream infection (20 vs. 18, P = 0.46) or pneumonia events (68 vs. 116, P = 0.08) were noted. On multivariate analysis, only total body surface area burn size, inhalation injury, and PRISM scores (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with infections.

Initial management of severe burn injury.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with severe burn injuries pose significant challenges for the intensivist. Though average burn sizes have decreased over time, severe burn injuries involving greater than 20% of the total body surface area still occur. Verified burn centers are limited, making the management of severely burn injured patients at nonspecialized ICUs likely. Current practices in burn care have increased survivability even from massive burns. It is important for intensivists to be aware of the unique complications and therapeutic options in burn critical care management. This review critically discusses current practices and recently published data regarding the evaluation and management of severe burn injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Burn patients have long, complex ICU stays with accompanying multiorgan dysfunction. Recent advances in burn intensive care have focused on acute respiratory distress syndrome from inhalation injury, acute kidney injury (AKI), and transfusion, resulting in new strategies for organ failure, including renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal life support. SUMMARY: Initial evaluation and treatment of acute severe burn injury remains an ongoing area of study. This manuscript reviews current practices and considerations in the acute management of the severely burn injured patient.

Utilizing Plasma Composition Data to Help Determine Procoagulant Dynamics in Patients with Thermal Injury: A Computational Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: The development of methods that generate individualized assessments of the procoagulant potential of burn patients could improve their treatment. Beyond its role as an essential intermediate in the formation of thrombin, factor (F)Xa has systemic effects as an agonist to inflammatory processes. In this study, we use a computational model to study the FXa dynamics underlying tissue factor-initiated thrombin generation in a small cohort of burn patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma samples were collected upon admission (Hour 0) from nine subjects (five non-survivors) with major burn injuries and then at 48 hours. Coagulation factor concentrations (II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, TFPI, antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC)) were measured and used in a computational model to generate time course profiles for thrombin (IIa), FXa, extrinsic tenase, intrinsic tenase and prothrombinase complexes upon a 5 pM tissue factor stimulus in the presence of 1 nM thrombomodulin. Parameters were extracted from the thrombin and FXa profiles (including max rate (MaxRIIa and MaxRFXa) and peak level (MaxLIIa and MaxLFXa)). Procoagulant potential was also evaluated by determining the concentration of the complexes at select times. Parameter values were compared between survivors and non-survivors in the burn cohort and between the burn cohort and a simulation based on the mean physiological (100%) concentration for all factor levels. RESULTS: Burn patients differed at Hour 0 (p < 0.05) from 100% mean physiological levels for all coagulation factor levels except FV and FVII. The concentration of FX, FII, TFPI, AT and PC was lower; FIX and FVIII were increased. The composition differences resulted in all nine burn patients at Hour 0 displaying a procoagulant phenotype relative to 100% mean physiological simulation (MaxLIIa (306 ± 90 nM vs. 52 nM), MaxRIIa (2.9 ± 1.1 nM/s vs. 0.3 nM/s), respectively p < 0.001); MaxRFXa and MaxLFXa were also an order of magnitude greater than 100% mean physiological simulation (p < 0.001). When grouped by survival status and compared at the time of admission, non-survivors had lower PC levels (56 ± 18% vs. 82 ± 9%, p < 0.05), and faster MaxRFXa (29 ± 6 pM/s vs. 18 ± 6 pM/s, p < 0.05) than those that survived; similar trends were observed for all other procoagulant parameters. At 48 hours when comparing non-survivors to survivors, TFPI levels were higher (108 ± 18% vs. 59 ± 18%, p < 0.05), and MaxRIIa (1.5 ± 1.4 nM/s vs. 3.6 ± 0.7 nM/s, p < 0.05) and MaxRFXa (13 ± 12 pM/s vs. 35 ± 4 pM/s, p < 0.05) were lower; similar trends were observed with all other procoagulant parameters. Overall, between admission and 48 hours, procoagulant potential, as represented by MaxR and MaxL parameters for thrombin and FXa, in non-survivors decreased while in survivors they increased (p < 0.05). In patients that survived, there was a positive correlation between FX levels and MaxLFXa (r = 0.96) and reversed in mortality (r= -0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombin and FXa generation are increased in burn patients at admission compared to mean physiological simulations. Over the first 48 hours, burn survivors became more procoagulant while non-survivors became less procoagulant. Differences between survivors and non-survivors appear to be present in the underlying dynamics that contribute to FXa dynamics. Understanding how the individual specific balance of procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins contributes to thrombin and FXa generation could ultimately guide therapy and potentially reduce burn injury-related morbidity and mortality.

Graft loss: Review of a single burn center's experience and proposal of a graft loss grading scale.

BACKGROUND: There exists neither a consensus definition of burn "graft loss" nor a scale with which to grade severity. We introduced an institutional scale in 2014 for quality improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all burned patients with graft loss on departmental Morbidity and Mortality reports between July 2014 and July 2016. Graft loss grades were assigned during the course of clinical care per institutional scale. Chronic nonhealing wounds and nonburn wounds were excluded. Data abstracted included demographics, medical history, injury details, surgical procedures, graft loss, and lengths of stay (LOS). Photos of affected areas were graded by two blinded surgeons, and a linear weighted κ was calculated to assess interrater agreement. RESULTS: Graft loss was noted in 50 patients, with 43 remaining after exclusions. Mean age was 50.1 y. The majority were male (58.1%) and African American (41.9%). Smoking (30.2%) and diabetes (27.9%) were prevalent. Total body surface area involvement ranged from 0.5% to 51.0% (11.8 ± 12.3%). Grade I graft loss was documented on one patient (2.3%), Grade II in 15 (34.9%), Grade III in 12 (27.9%), and Grade IV in 15 (34.9%). Reoperation was performed in 20 (46.5%). Hospital LOS was longer than predicted in 38 patients (88.4%). Seven had significant morbidity, including two amputations. Moderate agreement was reached between blinded surgeons (κ = 0.44, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Graft loss is a major source of morbidity in burn patients. In this cohort, reoperation was common and hospital LOS was extended. Use of a grading scale improves dialog among providers and enables improved understanding of risk factors.

Screening nasal swabs for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A regional burn center's experience.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a pathogen that can result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Early detection of MRSA colonization by screening nasal swabs may be important in the management of burn-injured patients. However, studies examining its use in this population are limited. The aim of this study was to study the utility of admission MRSA screening nasal swabs and determine if being positive for MRSA on admission impacted outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of burn patients who presented to a single regional burn center between June 2012 and December 2014. Electronic medical records and charts were reviewed for patient demographics and management. MRSA screening swabs were obtained from the anterior nares of burn patients upon admission. Patients without a MRSA nasal swab within 48h of admission were excluded. Outcomes analyzed included overall length of stay, ICU admission and length of stay, mechanical ventilation, procedure count, time to excision, and wound complications after normalizing to total body surface area burn size (%TBSA). RESULTS: During the study period, 601 patients received a MRSA screening nasal swab upon admission. Of these, 24 patients screened positive for MRSA (4%). Patients who screened positive for MRSA had a significantly increased mean length of stay (3.95v 2.36 days; p<0.05) and number of surgical procedures (1.92v 1.06; p<0.05). Positively screened patients also had a higher proportion of wound infections (50% v 18.2%; p<0.05), half of which were caused by MRSA. Subsequent graft complications were seen in 50% of patients with a wound complication. Only 2 positively screened patients were started on empiric antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Burn patients who screened positive for MRSA had greater lengths of stay, more surgical procedures, and higher wound complications. Early identification of MRSA colonized patients in this patient population might allow for treatment modifications that improve outcomes. Further study is warranted in a prospective clinical trial.

In-depth analysis of clotting dynamics in burn patients.

BACKGROUND: Studies associating coagulopathic changes with burn injury have relied on limited tests such as partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and international normalized ratio (INR). Understanding the clotting dynamics and associated risk factors after burn injury could influence management. This work aimed to identify real-time changes in coagulation after burn injury not indicated by PTT or INR alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine burn-injured patients at a regional burn center were enrolled for blood collection at admission and set intervals over 96 h. Patient demographics, management, and laboratory data (PTT and INR) were collected. Plasma assays determined factors II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, antithrombin, and protein C functional activity as well as PAP, D-Dimer, fibrin monomer, TFPI, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p.70, and TNF-α concentrations. RESULTS: Overall, five patients died. These patients had higher mortality scores and were more acidotic. All patients had normal coagulation studies (INR < 1.5, PTT < 45 s) within 24 h of admission, and only two were abnormal after. Increased factor VIII and IX activity were identified in seven patients at admission. Decreased antithrombin and protein C activity were seen in all patients. Patients had increased PAP, D-Dimer, and fibrin monomer concentrations throughout their hospital course. At admission, increased fold changes were seen in IL-6 (2.5-117) and IL-10 (2.4-32), whereas IL-1b and TNF-α levels were depressed in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive changes not identified by PTT or INR were seen after burn injury that may explain perturbed coagulation in these patients. This approach further characterizes the impact thermal injury has on coagulation.

Compression therapy affects collagen type balance in hypertrophic scar.

BACKGROUND: The effects of pressure on hypertrophic scar are poorly understood. Decreased extracellular matrix deposition is hypothesized to contribute to changes observed after pressure therapy. To examine this further, collagen composition was analyzed in a model of pressure therapy in hypertrophic scar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hypertrophic scars created on red Duroc swine (n = 8) received pressure treatment (pressure device mounting and delivery at 30 mm Hg), sham treatment (device mounting and no delivery), or no treatment for 2 wk. Scars were assessed weekly and biopsied for histology, hydroxyproline quantification, and gene expression analysis. Transcription levels of collagen precursors COL1A2 and COL3A1 were quantified using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Masson trichrome was used for general collagen quantification, whereas immunofluorescence was used for collagen types I and III specific quantification. RESULTS: Total collagen quantification using hydroxyproline assay showed a 51.9% decrease after pressure initiation. Masson trichrome staining showed less collagen after 1 (P < 0.03) and 2 wk (P < 0.002) of pressure application compared with sham and untreated scars. Collagen 1A2 and 3A1 transcript decreased by 41.9- and 42.3-fold, respectively, compared with uninjured skin after pressure treatment, whereas a 2.3- and 1.3-fold increase was seen in untreated scars. This decrease was seen in immunofluorescence staining for collagen types I (P < 0.001) and III (P < 0.04) compared with pretreated levels. Pressure-treated scars also had lower levels of collagen I and III after pressure treatment (P < 0.05) compared with sham and untreated scars. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the modulation of collagen after pressure therapy and further characterize its role in scar formation and therapy.

Sensory neuropathy associated with aggressive cauterization using a bipolar radiofrequency device in primary TKA.

Because significant postoperative blood loss can result in many complications, hemostasis remains a critical part of successful joint replacement outcomes. Advanced techniques, such as electrocautery use after optimally timed tourniquet release, focus on desired patient blood loss outcomes. The purposes of this study were to report the incidence of nerve injury, identify associated risk factors following the use of bipolar electrocautery for hemostasis in the posterior knee during primary total knee arthroplasty, and compare that rate with the rate seen using a standard electrocautery device. Clinical and operative data were retrospectively reviewed for an association with postoperative nerve injury in 241 consecutive patients when using bipolar electrocautery between July 2007 and October 2008. A comparison group of 192 demographically similar consecutive patients between November 2008 and October 2009 was also evaluated to establish a surgeon-specific benchmark when using standard electrocautery. Seven (2.9%) of 241 patients in the bipolar electrocautery group reported documented neuropathies compared with 1 (0.52%) of 192 patients using standard electrocautery. In addition, female sex and rheumatoid arthritis were associated with postoperative nerve injury following bipolar electrocautery. Although the bipolar radiofrequency device is effective in achieving hemostasis, the authors recommend judicious use of this procedure in women or patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cautious, nonaggressive use of posterior compartment bipolar radiofrequency ablation in the remaining patient populations.

Adult soft tissue sarcoma local recurrence after adjuvant treatment without resection of core needle biopsy tract.

BACKGROUND: Core needle biopsies of sarcomas allow a diagnosis in a high percentage of patients with few complications. However, it is unclear whether the tract needs to be excised to prevent recurrences. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined the rates of recurrence and metastases in patients with Stage III extremity sarcomas, who underwent wide local resection without excision of the needle tract and also received adjuvant treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 59 adult patients with deep, larger than 5 cm, high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the upper or lower extremity treated between January 1999 and April 2009. All the patients underwent a core needle biopsy. Resection was performed with wide margins. The biopsy tract was not resected during the definitive surgery. Fifty-seven patients (97%) received preoperative and/or postoperative radiation, whereas 49 patients (83%) received chemotherapy. Local recurrence and distant recurrence rates were determined. The minimum followup was 24 months (median, 56 months; range, 24-122 months). RESULTS: The local recurrence rate was 9%. Fifteen patients (25%) developed metastasis after diagnosis. Seven of the 59 patients (12%) had microscopic positive margins at resection. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate no increase in local recurrence rates or rates of metastatic disease compared with previously published studies when resection of the core biopsy tract was not performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.