Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in patients with STEMI. Association with percutaneous coronary intervention and antithrombotic treatments.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are formed by DNA, histones and proteolytic enzymes, and are produced by activated neutrophils through different mechanisms. In turn, NETs can activate platelets and coagulation cascade favoring thrombotic processes. The aims of this study were to analyze levels and kinetics of NETs in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and correlate them with antithrombotic therapy and cardiovascular outcomes at follow-up. METHODS: 150 consecutive STEMI patients referred to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were included. Citrate anticoagulated blood was extracted immediately before pPCI, 30 min and 24 h after the procedure. As markers of NETS cell free DNA (cfDNA), nucleosomes and citrullinated Histone 3 (citH3) were determined. 46 healthy subjects were included as controls. Patients were follow-up for 1.4 ± 0.56 years. RESULTS: Before pPCI, NETs markers were elevated in STEMI patients compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05); these increased significantly 30 min post pPCI (p ≤ 0.001) and decreased at 24 h but remained elevated compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Patients treated with bivalirudin presented a lower increase of NETs 30 min post pPCI compared to patients treated with heparin (p < 0.05). Cardiovascular risk factors or type of stent implanted did not modify NETs levels. Cit3H (HR = 3.74; 95%CI 1.05-13.4; p = 0.042) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% (HR = 6.84; 95%CI 2-23; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis and/or cardiovascular-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: NETs were elevated in STEMI patients, increased by pPCI and decreased thereafter. One of the most specific NETs markers was associated with cardiovascular outcomes.

Balloon-Expandable versus Self-Expandable Valves in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Complications and Outcomes from a Large International Patient Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Both balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are broadly used in clinical practice. However, adequately powered randomized controlled trials comparing these two valve designs are lacking. METHODS: The CENTER-study included 12,381 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. Patients undergoing TAVI with a BE-valve (n = 4096) were compared to patients undergoing TAVI with an SE-valve (n = 4096) after propensity score matching. Clinical outcomes including one-year mortality and stroke rates were assessed. RESULTS: In the matched population of n = 5410 patients, the mean age was 81 ± 3 years, 60% was female, and the STS-PROM predicted 30-day mortality was 6.2% (IQR 4.0-12.4). One-year mortality was not different between patients treated with BE- or SE-valves (BE: 16.4% vs. SE: 17.0%, Relative Risk 1.04, 95%CI 0.02-1.21, p = 0.57). One-year stroke rates were also comparable (BE: 4.9% vs. SE: 5.3%, RR 1.09, 95%CI 0.86-1.37, p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that one-year mortality and stroke rates were comparable in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing TAVI with either BE or SE-valves.

Puncture Versus Surgical Cutdown Complications of Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Spanish TAVI Registry).

Vascular complications in transcatheter aortic valve implantation using transfemoral approach are related to higher mortality. Complete percutaneous approach is currently the preferred technique for vascular access. However, some centers still perform surgical cutdown. Our purpose was to determine complications related to vascular access technique in the population of the Spanish TAVI National Registry. From January 2010 to July 2015, 3,046 patients were included in this Registry. Of them, 2,465 underwent transfemoral approach and were treated with either surgical cutdown and closure (cutdown group, n = 632) or percutaneous approach (puncture group, n = 1,833). Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions were used to assess vascular and bleeding complications. Propensity matching resulted in 615 matched pairs. Overall, 30-day vascular complications were significantly higher in the puncture group (109 [18%] vs 42 [6.9%]; relative risk [RR] 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85 to 3.64, p <0.001) due mostly by minor vascular events (89 [15%] vs 25 [4.1%], RR 3.56, 95% CI 2.32 to 5.47, p <0.001). Bleeding rates were lower in the puncture group (18 [3%] vs 40 [6.6%], RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.78, p = 0.003) mainly driven by major bleeding (9 [1.5%] vs 21 [3.4%], RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.93, p = 0.03). At a mean follow-up of 323 days, complication rates remained significantly different between groups (minor vascular complications 90 [15%] vs 31 [5.1%], hazard ratio 2.99, 95% CI 1.99 to 4.50, p <0.001 and major bleeding 10 [1.6%] vs 21 [3.4%], hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.0, p = 0.04, puncture versus cutdown group, respectively). In conclusion, percutaneous approach yielded higher rates of minor vascular complications but lower rates of major bleeding compared with the surgical cutdown, both at 30-day and at mid-term follow-up in our population.