What Is the Patient-reported Outcome and Complication Incidence After Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Minimally Displaced Tibial Plateau Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Much controversy remains about whether minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures should be treated operatively or nonoperatively. It is generally accepted that gaps and stepoffs up to 2 mm can be tolerated, but this assumption is based on older studies using plain radiographs instead of CT to assess the degree of initial fracture displacement. Knowledge regarding the relationship between the degree of fracture displacement and expected functional outcome is crucial for patient counseling and shared decision-making, specifically in terms of whether to perform surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is operative treatment associated with improved patient-reported outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures (fractures with up to 4 mm of displacement)? (2) What is the difference in the risk of complications after operative versus nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures? METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was performed in patients treated for tibial plateau fractures between 2003 and 2019 at six hospitals. Between January 2003 and December 2019, a total of 2241 patients were treated for tibial plateau fractures at six different trauma centers. During that time, the general indication for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was intra-articular displacement of > 2 mm. Patients treated with ORIF and those treated nonoperatively were potentially eligible; 0.2% (4) were excluded because they were treated with amputation because of severe soft tissue damage, whereas 4% (89) were excluded because of coexisting conditions that complicated outcome measurement including Parkinson disease, cerebrovascular accident, or paralysis (conditions causing an inability to walk). A further 2.7% (60) were excluded because their address was unknown, and 1.4% (31) were excluded because they spoke a language other than Dutch. Based on that, 1328 patients were potentially eligible for analysis in the operative group and 729 were potentially eligible in the nonoperative group. At least 1 year after injury, all patients were approached and asked to complete the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS) questionnaire. A total of 813 operatively treated patients (response percentage: 61%) and 345 nonoperatively treated patients (response percentage: 47%) responded to the questionnaire. Patient characteristics including age, gender, BMI, smoking, and diabetes were retrieved from electronic patient records, and imaging data were shared with the initiating center. Displacement (gap and stepoff) was measured for all participating patients, and all patients with minimally displaced fractures (gap or stepoff ≤ 4 mm) were included, leaving 195 and 300 in the operative and nonoperative groups, respectively, for analysis here. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the association of treatment choice (nonoperative or operative) with patient-reported outcomes in minimally displaced fractures. In the multivariate analysis, we accounted for nine potential confounders (age, gender, BMI, smoking, diabetes, gap, stepoff, AO/OTA classification, and number of involved segments). In addition, differences in complications after operative and nonoperative treatment were assessed. The minimum clinically important differences for the five subscales of the KOOS are 11 for symptoms, 17 for pain, 18 for activities of daily living, 13 for sports, and 16 for quality of life. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as age, gender, BMI, and AO/OTA classification, we found that operative treatment was not associated with an improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Operative treatment resulted in poorer KOOS in terms of pain (-4.7 points; p = 0.03), sports (-7.6 points; p = 0.04), and quality of life (-7.8 points; p = 0.01) compared with nonoperative treatment, but those differences were small enough that they were likely not clinically important. Patients treated operatively had more complications (4% [7 of 195] versus 0% [0 of 300]; p = 0.01) and reoperations (39% [76 of 195] versus 6% [18 of 300]; p < 0.001) than patients treated nonoperatively. After operative treatment, most reoperations (36% [70 of 195]) consisted of elective removal of osteosynthesis material. CONCLUSION: No differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed at midterm follow-up between patients treated surgically and those treated nonsurgically for tibial plateau fractures with displacement up to 4 mm. Therefore, nonoperative treatment should be the preferred treatment option in minimally displaced fractures. Patients who opt for nonoperative treatment should be told that complications are rare, and only 6% of patients might undergo surgery by midterm follow-up. Patients who opt for surgery of a minimally displaced tibial plateau fracture should be told that complications may occur in up to 4% of patients, and 39% of patients may undergo a secondary intervention (most of which are elective implant removal). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Tibial plateau fracture morphology based on injury force mechanism is predictive for patient-reported outcome and conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSES: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between injury mechanism-based fracture patterns and patient-reported outcome as well as conversion rate to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at follow-up. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed including 1039 patients treated for a tibial plateau fracture between 2003 and 2019. At a mean follow-up of 5.8 ± 3.7 years, patients completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire. For all patients, the injury force mechanism was defined based on CT images. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the relationship between different injury mechanisms and functional recovery. Cox regression was performed to assess the association with an increased risk on conversion to TKA. RESULTS: A total of 378 (36%) patients suffered valgus-flexion, 305 (29%) valgus-extension, 122 (12%) valgus-hyperextension, 110 (11%) varus-flexion, 58 (6%) varus-hyperextension, and 66 (6%) varus-extension injuries. ANOVA showed significant different KOOS values between injury fracture patterns in all subscales (P < 0.01). Varus-flexion injuries had the lowest average KOOS scores (symptoms 65; pain 67; ADL 72; sport 35; QoL 48). Varus-flexion mechanism was associated with an increased risk on a TKA (HR 1.8; P = 0.03) whereas valgus-extension mechanism was associated with a reduced risk on a TKA (HR 0.5; P = 0.012) as compared to all other mechanisms. CONCLUSION: Tibial plateau fracture patterns based on injury force mechanisms are associated with clinical outcome. Varus-flexion injuries have a worse prognosis in terms of patient-reported outcome and conversion rate to TKA at follow-up. Valgus-extension injuries have least risk on conversion to TKA.

Radiographic Predictors of Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty After Tibial Plateau Fracture Surgery: Results in a Large Multicenter Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of initial displacement of tibial plateau fractures and of postoperative reduction are used to determine treatment strategy and prognosis. We assessed the association between radiographic measurements and the risk of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at the time of follow-up. METHODS: A total of 862 patients surgically treated for tibial plateau fractures between 2003 and 2018 were eligible for this multicenter cross-sectional study. Patients were approached for follow-up, and 477 (55%) responded. The initial gap and step-off were measured on the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of the responders. Condylar widening, residual incongruity, and coronal and sagittal alignment were measured on postoperative radiographs. Critical cutoff values for gap and step-off were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Postoperative reduction measurements were categorized as adequate or inadequate on the basis of cutoff values in international guidelines. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess the association between each radiographic measurement and conversion to TKA. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (14%) of the patients had conversion to TKA after a mean follow-up of 6.5 ± 4.1 years. Assessment of the preoperative CT scans revealed that a gap of >8.5 mm (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.6, p < 0.001) and step-off of >6.0 mm (HR = 3.0, p < 0.001) were independently associated with conversion to TKA. Assessment of the postoperative radiographs demonstrated that residual incongruity of 2 to 4 mm was not associated with increased risk of TKA compared with adequate fracture reduction of <2 mm (HR = 0.6, p = 0.176). Articular incongruity of >4 mm resulted in increased risk of TKA. Coronal (HR = 1.6, p = 0.05) and sagittal malalignment (HR = 3.7 p < 0.001) of the tibia were strongly associated with conversion to TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial preoperative fracture displacement was a strong predictor of conversion to TKA. Postoperative gaps or step-offs of >4 mm as well as inadequate alignment of the tibia were strongly associated with an increased risk of TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Increased and unjustified CT usage in paediatric C-spine clearance in a level 2 trauma centre.

PURPOSE: Cervical spine injury after blunt trauma in children is rare but can have severe consequences. Clear protocols for diagnostic workup are, therefore, needed, but currently not available. As a step in developing such a protocol, we determined the incidence of cervical spine injury and the degree of protocol adherence at our level 2 trauma centre. METHODS: We analysed data from all patients aged < 16 years suspected of cervical spine injury after blunt trauma who had presented to our hospital during two periods: January 2010 to June 2012, and January 2017 to June 2019. In the intervening period, the imaging protocol for diagnostic workup was updated. Outcomes were the incidence of cervical spine injury and protocol adherence in terms of the indication for imaging and the type of imaging. RESULTS: We included 170 children in the first study period and 83 in the second. One patient was diagnosed with cervical spine injury. Protocol adherence regarding the indication for imaging was > 80% in both periods. Adherence regarding the imaging type decreased over time, with 45.8% of the patients receiving a primary CT scan in the second study period versus 2.9% in the first. CONCLUSION: Radiographic imaging is frequently performed when clearing the paediatric cervical spine, although cervical spine injury is rare. Particularly CT scan usage has wrongly been emerging over time. Stricter adherence to current protocols could limit overuse of radiographic imaging, but ultimately there is a need for an accurate rule predicting which children really are at risk of injury.

Small stitches with small suture distances increase laparotomy closure strength.

BACKGROUND: There is no conclusive evidence which size of suture stitches and suture distance should be used to prevent burst abdomen and incisional hernia. METHODS: Thirty-eight porcine abdominal walls were removed immediately after death and divided into 2 groups: A and B (N = 19 each). Two suturing methods using double-loop polydioxanone were tested in 14-cm midline incisions: group A consisted of large stitches (1 cm) with a large suture distance (1 cm), and group B consisted of small stitches (.5 cm) with a small suture distance (.5 cm). RESULTS: The geometric mean tensile force in group B was significantly higher than in group A (787 N vs 534 N; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Small stitches with small suture distances achieve higher tensile forces than large stitches with large suture distances. Therefore, small stitches may be useful to prevent the development of a burst abdomen or an incisional hernia after midline incisions.