Primate cognition in zoos: Reviewing the impact of zoo-based research over 15 years.

Primate cognition research is reliant on access to members of the study sp ecies and logistical infrastructures to conduct observations and experiments. Historically founded in research centers and private collections, and spreading to modern zoos, sanctuaries, and the field, primate cognition has been investigated in diverse settings, each with benefits and challenges. In our systematic review of 12 primatology, animal behavior, and animal cognition journals over the last 15 years, we turn a spotlight on zoos to quantify their current impact on the field and to highlight their potential as robust contributors to future work. To put zoo-based research in context, we compare zoos to three other site types: university-owned or independent research centers, sanctuaries, and field sites. We assess the contributions of zoos across several critical considerations in primate cognition research, including number of investigations, species diversity, sample size, research topic diversity, and methodology. We identified 1119 publications reporting studies of primate cognition, almost 25% of which report research conducted in zoos. Across publications, zoo-based research has greater species diversity than research centers and covers a diverse range of research topics. Although our review is merely a snapshot of primate cognition research, our findings suggest that zoos may present advantages to researchers regarding species diversity, and lack some of the methodological constraints of field sites, allowing greater ease of access to a diverse range of subjects for cognition investigations. We suggest that zoos have great potential as key contributors for future investigations in primate cognition. Finally, we shed light on the symbiotic relationship that can emerge between researchers and zoos, forming partnerships that bring unique advantages to both parties.

Methylphenidate and alcohol effects on flash-evoked potentials, body temperature, and behavior in Long-Evans rats.

Methylphenidate (MPD) is a psychostimulant used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Most adult ADHD patients use ethanol in combination with MPD. This research examined the effects of MPD and ethanol on flash-evoked potentials (FEPs; cortical responses frequently used to assess neural activity and sensory processing) recorded from the visual cortex (VC) and superior colliculus (SC; a structure involved in attention and orientation) of chronically implanted male Long-Evans rats, and on body temperature and open field behavior. For one group of rats, either saline or ethanol (2.0 g/kg) was given 5 min prior to either saline or MPD (2.9 mg/kg). FEPs were recorded 10 and 20 min later. In the VC, ethanol decreased amplitudes of several components, but increased P2. MPD increased N3, but decreased P3 and P4. Ethanol increased the latency of several components. In the SC, ethanol decreased all three components, while MPD increased P3. Ethanol increased latency of all components. During FEP testing, ethanol decreased body movement while MPD increased movement. In the open field, line crossings were increased but rearings were decreased by ethanol. Both ethanol and MPD produced hypothermia. A second group of rats was given MPD at 11.6 mg/kg. Ethanol decreased several VC amplitudes, but increased P2. MPD increased N3 amplitude but decreased amplitude for other components. MPD also counteracted the effect of ethanol on the amplitude of P2 and N3. Both ethanol and MPD increased the latency of several components. In the SC, ethanol decreased all component amplitudes, while MPD increased P3 but decreased N4. Ethanol increased all component latencies, while MPD increased latency for two components. During FEP testing, ethanol decreased body movement while MPD increased movement. In the open field, line crossings were increased by ethanol and MPD. Rearings were eliminated by ethanol in the open field but increased by MPD, and MPD counteracted the effect of ethanol on rearings. Both ethanol and MPD produced hypothermia. Some of these results might help explain why users take MPD and ethanol in combination in order to enable consuming larger amounts of alcohol.