Perceptions of healthcare workers in high-risk areas of a Singapore hospital during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.

Introduction: There is worldwide concern over the psycho-emotional impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers (HCWs). This study aimed to elicit HCWs' perceptions of the adequacy of protective measures in high-risk clinical areas and the factors associated with these perceptions. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in April 2020. An anonymous electronic survey was sent via email to operating theatre (OT) and intensive care unit (ICU) staff of Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore. Results: Of the 358 eligible participants, 292 (81.6%) responded to the survey. 93.2% of the participants felt that precautionary measures at work were sufficient and 94.9% acknowledged that adequate training was provided. More than 60% of the participants opined that their chances of contracting COVID-19 were moderate to high. Female gender, nursing occupation and duration of service <10 years were significantly associated with increased fear of contracting COVID-19, less control over occupational exposure and lower perceived need to care for COVID-19 patients. Having young children at home did not significantly affect these perceptions. The most important ICU precautions were availability of personal protective equipment outside the rooms of COVID-19 positive patients (95.3%) and having visitor restrictions (95.3%). The most important OT measures were having a dedicated OT for COVID-19 positive patients (91.2%) and having simulation as part of protocol familiarisation (91.7%). Conclusion: Overall, there was high confidence in the adequacy of COVID-19 protective measures to prevent healthcare transmission in Singapore. The pandemic had a lower degree of psycho-emotional impact on HCWs here as compared to other countries.

Association of Multimorbidity With Frailty in Older Adults for Elective Non-Cardiac Surgery.

Introduction Frailty is associated with adverse surgical outcomes. While existing studies describe the prevalence of multimorbidity and frailty in the community, the surgical population may have more severe disease and significant surgical stress. This study aims to describe the distribution of frailty and multimorbidity in the older surgical population and examine if specific comorbidities are more strongly associated with frailty. Methods This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study using an electronic database in the preoperative evaluation clinic, conducted in Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. All patients above 70 years old going for elective non-cardiac surgery were included. Demographics and comorbidities were analysed for their association with frailty according to the Edmonton Frail Scale. Results A total of 1396 out of 1398 patients were analyzed. The overall incidence of frailty was 27.8% and multimorbidity was 63.4%. Factors independently associated with frailty were age (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.07), female gender (aOR = 1.67), type 2 diabetes mellitus (aOR = 1.69), chronic kidney disease (aOR = 1.47), end-stage renal failure (aOR = 3.58), history of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack (aOR = 1.87), moderate anaemia (aOR = 2.11), dementia (aOR = 6.38), depression (aOR = 3.82), and peptic ulcer disease (aOR = 1.98). The presence of multi-morbidity was significantly associated with frailty, with overall increasing strength of association. Conclusion As the number of comorbidities increases, the odds of frailty increase. Only a small proportion of those with multimorbidity accumulate enough biological deficits to develop frailty, putting them at higher risk than with solely multimorbidity or frailty. Dementia and depression are comorbidities with strong associations that have yet to see coordinated interventional efforts in the preoperative setting.

Real-world results of the implementation of preoperative anaemia clinic with intravenous iron therapy for treating iron-deficiency anaemia: a propensity-matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anaemia is associated with blood transfusion and longer hospital length of stay. Preoperative iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) can be treated with oral or intravenous (IV) iron. IV iron can raise haemoglobin faster compared with oral iron. However, its ability to reduce blood transfusion and length of stay in clinical trials is inconclusive. This study aims to compare blood transfusion and hospital length of stay between anemic patients who received preoperative IV iron versus standard care, after implementation of a protocol in 2017 to screen patients for preoperative IDA, and its treatment with IV iron. METHODS: Retrospective before-after cohort study comparing 89 patients who received IV iron preoperatively in 2017, with historic patients who received oral iron therapy (selected by propensity score matching (PSM) from historic cohort of 7,542 patients who underwent surgery in 2016). Propensity score was calculated using ASA status, age, gender, surgical discipline, surgical risk and preoperative haemoglobin concentration. Both 1:1 and 1:2 matching were performed as sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in distribution of preoperative clinical variables. There was no significant difference in proportion of cases requiring transfusion nor a difference in average units transfused per patient. IV iron cohort stayed in hospital on average 8.0 days compared to non-IV iron cohort 14.1-15.1 days (P=0.006, P=0.013 respectively). Average time from IV iron therapy to surgery was 10.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IV iron therapy for patients with IDA undergoing elective surgery may not reduce perioperative blood transfusion, but this could be due to the short time between therapy and surgery. Implementation of IV iron therapy may reduce hospital length of stay compared to standard care for anemic patients, although this may be enhanced by concomitant improvement in perioperative care.